Cambium Networks Wireless LAN Reviews

We have a restaurant, we have a hotel, we have conference centers, and we have our offices as well.

All the features are the same for all of them. The main difference we realized is that Cisco works better than Cambium Networks Wireless LAN, and it is obviously easier to manage as well. Meraki products are better than Cambium Networks Wireless LAN because the quality of the Wi-Fi is better, and it is easier to manage.

I have only been here for half a year, but they probably have had it for the last three or four years.

There were one or two access points that needed some reboots from time to time, but otherwise no issues. In the last six months, we have never had any issues.

There may have been scalability issues, but we are not a complex site, so from our point of view, the scalability is a bit irrelevant.

We never contacted Cambium Networks Wireless LAN support because we used to have another company providing support in case we had an issue. In the last six months, we have never had any issues.

We work with both Cambium Networks Wireless LAN and Cisco because we currently have Cambium Networks Wireless LAN and used to have it for a period of time. We have now decided to move to Meraki, and we currently have both of them. Once Cambium Networks Wireless LAN has run out and gone to end of life, we will replace them with Meraki.

I think we did not have difficulty with initial setup. I don't know exactly because I have only started here for the last six months and everything was set up years ago, but we are just moving away from it.

The cost is a bit relative because it depends where you buy it from and how good you are to negotiate prices. It cost less for us to move to Meraki than Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. Even though people said Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is cheaper, I assumed it was cheaper at one point, but they changed the way how subscription works, and there is no difference compared with Meraki at the moment.

I would say no other products are better. I would go for Meraki instead.

I did not buy any Cambium Networks Wireless LAN because they were all there, and whatever I bought now is Meraki. I do not see any benefits compared with other products. I do not see things which Cambium Networks Wireless LAN has and the others do not. I am not a specialist in Wi-Fi, but this is what I can see. As I do not recommend it, I do not have other advice to give. My overall rating for this product is 8 out of 10.

The main use case is WiFi catering for the students.

For the connectivity needs of my customers, the most beneficial feature of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is the hardware quality of the radio, as well as the provisioning feature, which I can say is better in Cambium Networks.

I would want more WiFi products, specifically WiFi indoor access point products.

They should also look into getting a more extensive switching portfolio, as they don't have much of one currently.

I believe the hardware used in Cambium Networks is pretty robust, and the radios are strong in terms of signal and performance, so I see that Cambium delivers what is committed.

I would rate the technical support from Cambium Networks as nine out of ten.

Positive

It's not easy to do some of the access point configurations sometimes, as the policy cannot be mapped easily, which is the reason for my rating.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is 100% reliable, as I have never faced any issues in our deployment after deployment, and the support is also very good.

It takes a maximum of 15-20 minutes to configure one particular site of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN.

The usual deployment process involves inspecting the hardware at our warehouse, dispatching it to the customer location, where the vendor installs the access point, and once it has internet, the configuration will be directly pushed from the cloud to the access point, making it up and running.

Currently, around 100 plus of my customers are using this solution.

My customers are a mix of medium and enterprise businesses.

The least amount my customers usually pay is around $1,000, and the largest amount is approximately $10,000 per year.

On a scale of 1-10, I rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN a 9 overall.

Positive

We used Cambium Networks Wireless LAN in a school district, in classrooms and administrative spaces, providing what we sometimes refer to as wall-to-wall wireless.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced and offered a controllerless setup, which was more unusual at the time we first used them. This meant they could operate independently without a controller, unlike many other products that required a controller. 

Also, they had a software-based controller or management system that we initially used. The product was scalable, allowing for fewer access points to cover more area, and supported a high number of clients. We were able to deploy them across multiple sites within a limited timeframe, thanks to their efficient setup process.

Channel management required manual intervention, especially in environments with multiple floors, leading to potential signal interference issues. Although improvements were being made, automation would have been beneficial.

Our experience with Cambium Networks Wireless LAN began when Cambium bought Xerus, which was about three to four years prior to this conversation.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was highly scalable, allowing deployment of fewer access points while covering more area, adapting well with the evolution of wireless standards.

Cambium's customer support was very good. They were always available when needed, which we appreciated.

Positive

We initially used Xerus products before they were acquired by Cambium Networks Wireless LAN.

The initial setup was smooth. We had experts from Xerus conduct wireless surveys and assist us during the deployment across all sites, making it efficient despite our limited timeframe.

Xerus flew in a specialist who worked with me and two other technicians to implement the solution. The specialist conducted wireless surveys and assisted during deployment.

The integration with E-Rate funding allowed us to competitively bid on our wireless infrastructure, which showed a strong ROI in terms of cost-effectiveness.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN was well-priced, comparable and not the most expensive nor the cheapest option available. It was cost-effective while meeting our needs.

We evaluated products from multiple manufacturers during a competitive bidding process funded by E-Rate.

While Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is worth considering, I hesitate to recommend them to anyone right now because I am not up-to-date with their current products. 

Overall, I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN an eight out of ten.

I use the solution in my company because it is a tool with which users can manage all Cambium products in one single pane of glass. In a word, it serves as a zero-touch provisioning product with no hassle and is very user-friendly. Anyone can manage the product without any prior or advanced networking knowledge.

The solution's most valuable feature stems from the fact that Cambium's network and architecture are distributed technology, and they are autonomous. There is no dependency and no need for any controller or license. It can operate with and without a license.

I have used the product, and I haven't found any problem with the tool. The problem with the tool is that its prices are on the higher end. The tool should be made more cost-effective so that anyone can buy and use the product. The product's price is higher than that of other similar brands like Ubiquiti. Cambium should look at the pricing model it offers. Recently, Cambium released Cambium Networks Wi-Fi 7 with just one technology. It is a very outdated technology, and I don't know why it has introduced such a type of technology in 2024. With the new product, I don't know why Cambium has brought in an old technology associated with MIMO.

Cambium should design its products more to be like 2x2 MU-Mimo. Cambium also has a product, 2x2 MU-MIMO, that is in the high-price category. In Grandstream and Ubiquiti, products are offered in categories like 2x2, 3x3, or 4x4. In Cambium, the tools have been designed in such a way that the basic model offers 2x2 MU-MIMO. If you need 4x4 MU-MIMO, you need to go with a higher category product, which is very expensive and costlier than the other OEMs in the market. In Grandstream and Ubiquiti, the tools have been designed in such a way that the product lineup is such that the transfer from one model to another model, the pricing gap is about 20 to 30 USD, but in Cambium, it is around 300 to 400 USD to move to the next product, making it an area that should improve. Cambium should design its products within a certain budget. With Cambium, it would be very expensive if I changed from the 2x2 to the 4x4 category. I need to add an additional 400 to 500 USD for the next model of the product.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN for four years. I am a user of the solution. My company has a partnership with Cambium Networks.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable solution. In terms of scalability, I feel Cambium supports a wide number of users, starting with a minimum of 50 users for basic models, and it offers coverage that is higher than that of other brands or products.

I recommend the tool for SMBs to enterprise-sized companies. As the product lineup of Cambium is less than that of other OEMs, it's mostly recommended not to be used for big enterprise infrastructures but rather good for medium enterprise infrastructure.

The technical team is very horrible. If our company raises a ticket, the support team just keeps giving feedback, irrespective of whatever the problem is, so I feel they should be more technical and more responsive. I have personally faced a lot of issues with the tool's support team. I had once asked the tool's support team to solve a problem, but they gave me some general basic guidelines, which is not something I can figure out. I did the analysis myself and found a solution to my issue. The technical team should not reply to all the problems from a general point of view. The support team should reply to a specific problem, and they should be more flexible.

The product's initial setup phase is very simple and involves just a PnP process. Deploying a big infrastructure will not take more than four or five minutes because the configuration is built on the template. At a time, you need to create the template, and when you do the deployment using the same template, you need to onboard the devices, and it will automatically sync the configuration and start the operation.

The solution is deployed on-premises and in the cloud.

If one is a high price and ten is a low price, I rate the product price as one.

Three to four years back, Ruckus and Cambium were preferred in the market. Nowadays, Cambium's main competitors include Grandstream, Ubiquiti and Wizzie.

Cambium is better than other products because the management portal's interface is more resourceful and user friendly than Ubiquiti or Grandstream.

Though I have not integrated the product with AI tools, I know that it provides an option to do it if required.

I recommend the product to others who plan to use it since it is a solution filled with features. If you invest now in the product, in the coming seven to ten years, you don't need to look at your infrastructure.

I rate the tool a ten out of ten.

We install a public Wi-Fi system. The transport network is one hundred percent optical fiber from our collection switch to the street, the university, or any enterprise. After the optical fiber, we have the site, and we make the connection between the optical fiber and the electricity for the access point with specific sectors, equipped with three outdoor access points. 

In some cases, we are obligated to install more equipment for indoor usage. This is done for projects, including ones in Mauritania and related to university infrastructure.

The main benefit of using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is the power it provides. This allows outdoor areas to be covered effectively with a good signal level and quality, which is crucial for providing reliable public Wi-Fi.

The most beneficial feature of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is its stability within about sixty meters around the tile. It provides strong coverage for outdoor areas.

The direct technical support from Cambium teams needs to be improved. In Africa, particularly in projects like in Mauritania, there is a lack of support from Cambium's direct teams, making it difficult to set the right parameters.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN for about one year and a half.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is stable within a range of 60 meters in dense zones. Beyond that distance, there are problems with the signal level and quality.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN can be configured to support about five hundred twelve users per access point. The scalability is rated eight out of ten. This indicates that it can handle an increased number of users effectively.

Customer service and support are rated seven out of ten. The support requires significant improvement to help set the right parameters and ensure stability.

Neutral

We use Cambium and Ruckus in parallel for the same project. Among other solutions, Cisco and Huawei were considered, but Cambium and Ruckus were chosen mainly because of their pricing and acceptable quality.

The initial setup for a project in Mauritania involved installing three sites over three days. The network configuration required detailed planning and coordination.

Our implementation team includes subcontractors and civil work teams, as well as technicians who install the LAN. We have a cross-skilled team of five engineers for maintenance.

I do not directly measure the benefits of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN. The program manager estimates and evaluates the financial benefits.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is not expensive compared to Cisco or Huawei. It is considered in the same price range as Ruckus.

The other solutions evaluated were Cisco and Huawei.

I recommend Cambium Networks Wireless LAN to new customers, but I advise requesting direct technical support from Cambium's teams. Without proper support, they may not experience the full benefits of Cambium.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

We primarily deal with hybrid setups where we need to connect outbuildings to a local area network (LAN) while also providing Wi-Fi access. For instance, we recently worked on a project involving six base sites and around one hundred points for monitoring a freeway with cameras in a remote desert area. Our main focus is on providing Wi-Fi and LAN connectivity, often in combination with each other, to meet various client needs.

We recently worked with a large tomato sauce production plant where we utilized point-to-multipoint connections to link up containers used as workspaces. This allowed us to extend the LAN to areas where running physical cables, like fiber, was impractical. Similarly, in the hospitality industry, we've deployed hybrid setups involving multiple buildings, such as hotels and surrounding facilities, using point-to-point connections to ensure seamless connectivity without extensive cabling. Additionally, in industrial settings like a sulfuric acid factory, where regular Wi-Fi access points are unsuitable due to environmental factors, we've implemented mesh Wi-Fi configurations with IP67-sealed equipment to maintain reliable connectivity. The cloud-based management provided by Cambium Networks is particularly valuable to us, as it allows us to efficiently manage Wi-Fi, point-to-point connections, firewalls, and switches across various locations from a centralized platform. This enables us to be proactive in providing support and ensures smooth operations for our clients.

I believe there's room for improvement in the configuration options for point-to-point setups directly from the cloud management interface. Currently, the process feels a bit clunky—you monitor the unit in the cloud but need to make configuration changes by editing a text file, then downloading it back to the unit. This method can be error-prone, as even a small mistake in the text file could disrupt the unit's configuration. However, this approach might suit larger ISPs with numerous point-to-point connections, whereas for us, managing a smaller number of setups, it's less ideal. Overall, the cloud management system provided by Cambium Networks is robust and offers a good range of features, with the free version being sufficient for most of our client needs.

We have been using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN for years.

It is super stable and I would rate it 9 out of 10. 

The scalability is 9 out of 10. For an example, we worked with a food packing company that started with four APs to try out the system. Now, they have expanded to over a hundred APs across seven sites in Chile. They also use Meraki Firewall, creating a mix of technologies that is effectively serving their needs.

The support for Cambium Networks Wireless LAN can be inconsistent at times, as it is based in India and you may encounter varying levels of expertise among support personnel. They are usually responsive and eventually connect you with the right person. I've encountered a few bugs over the years, but they have been quick to address them and even implemented some features I suggested, showing their proactive approach to improvement.

Positive

While it's not as straightforward as some other solutions like Meraki, once you understand how it works, it becomes easy to manage and configure. Occasionally, clients may reach out for assistance with specific tasks, but overall, they can handle most operations themselves with support available directly from Cambium.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is our top choice for various environments, including warehousing and mining, where durability is crucial. We recommend it in about eighty to ninety percent of cases, as we prioritize selecting the right product for each client's needs. While we remain brand-agnostic, Cambium has consistently proven to be a reliable and effective solution for our clients. We would rate it 9 out of 10. 

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is an internet service provider helping us with backhaul infrastructure.

The product has valuable throughput capabilities. It also has an inbuilt spectrum analyzer for stable connectivity.

The platform's cost needs improvement.

I have been using Cambium Networks Wireless LAN since its inception in 2005. I also have a few certifications, including ePMP.

It has good RSI strength and efficient link performance. I rate this platform's stability a nine out of ten.

It is a scalable platform. We have around 200 connections in a single base station.

The technical support team is customer-friendly.

The configuration process is easy as we can get web-based support services. We require two technical resources to execute it. The setup involves a series of steps after assembly for point-to-point installations within ten kilometers, including mounting and alignment. It takes around five to ten minutes to link. If the equipment incorporates GPS functionality, the setup time can be reduced to as little as five minutes by automatically detecting longitude and latitude.

The setup involves determining the appropriate mounting height at both ends and calculating the elevation. It includes adjusting the height and direction based on compass readings for optimal signal transmission.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is inexpensive compared to other products. The pricing and licensing might vary based on each country's specific needs and telecommunication regulations.

It is a good platform for long-range communication. It has an efficient latency as well. One must select the model based on internet traffic and throughput requirements.

I rate it a nine out of ten.

In the context of wireless LAN (Wi-Fi) deployments for enterprise use, the process typically begins with identifying specific areas within a building where wireless access points, often referred to as hotspots, are needed. The client provides information regarding the locations of these hotspots. As a network designer and implementer, my role involves creating a design plan for the wireless network. I use a combination of RF tools and physical networking tools to develop a comprehensive plan. This plan includes determining the required quantity of access points (APs), switches, cable lengths, and router specifications, and identifying entrance points for cabling. Once the design is complete and all the necessary equipment details are specified, we communicate with the client to discuss the plan.

It offers features that are essential for an efficient and high-performance wireless LAN deployment, where capacity, coverage, and quality are optimized, and frequency bands are selected based on the specific needs of the network.

The goal is to use fewer antennas while maintaining coverage and capacity. This approach is not only practical but also cost-effective as installing numerous access points in a room or facility can be expensive. We would appreciate it if it allowed us to optimize the number of access points while still providing customers with the same level of coverage, capacity, and quality. The solution should be scalable, offering better pricing options as we optimize the network for coverage, capacity, and quality.

I have been working with it for nine years.

It provides good stability features. I would rate it eight out of ten.

It is highly scalable. I would rate it eight out of ten.

Based on the feedback I've received, there's always someone ready to respond globally, regardless of the time zone, to address any issues or take your calls when needed.

Initially, I worked with Aruba, then moved on to Ruckus, and now I'm employing Cambium Networks for my current project. The choice between these manufacturers ultimately hinges on our ability to maintain high-quality service at a reasonable price.

The setup can be quite variable, typically tailored to each unique situation. We have straightforward installations in simple buildings where automation streamlines the process. However, when customers require more extensive coverage, spanning multiple floors, it becomes a bit more complex, hovering in the midrange of complexity. The real challenge isn't necessarily placing the access points (APs) but rather wiring them properly.

Implementing around four to five antennas typically takes a full day or night, not just an eight-hour workday. This is because the process involves thorough planning, ensuring proper cable bending, avoiding damage, and drilling, among other tasks. It's a meticulous job that requires a team of at least three people and can involve up to seven, depending on the speed and the size of the area being covered.

I would place it in the mid-range market segment, balancing affordability and profitability. While we prioritize offering competitive prices, it's essential to emphasize that maintaining top-notch quality remains our utmost priority, with no compromises.

It provides a comprehensive set of solutions, including point-to-point and point-to-multipoint setups. I rate it eight out of ten.

They all have controllers built in, and we manage them all with a web-based management tool.

Obviously, one of the reasons we're getting ready to upgrade the equipment is that it's five years old. 

Our areas for improvement would be a refresh with the most recent technology available. 

When we look at this, we will look at all vendors, not just Cambium, but I am not sure if we will stay with them, but in general, they work pretty well, and it is simple to manage.

It would be nice if it were a little less expensive, but their prices are comparable to others.

We are currently primarily using Xirrus. Cambium has recently acquired Xirrus.

It is still known as Xirrus, but Cambium Networks now owns it.

We are preparing to issue an RFP for an upgrade.

The stability of Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is good.

We have been using them with the current generation for over five years. 

We had Xirrus in here before that as well; we have been using Xirrus since, 2010, I believe. That is equivalent to 12 years.

Cambium Networks Wireless LAN is a scalable solution.

They enable a high level of connectivity. 

Sometimes we have to make adjustments because a room's purpose changes over time. 

We have had to rearrange things a little bit, but obviously, we are looking into the future and hoping to leverage things like Wi-Fi 6E.

The technical support is great.

Tech support has been excellent, despite the fact that they have been sold a few times. Since we have been with Xirrus, their product has been sold a few times. 

Cambium was not the first.

Technical support has changed. 

The Xirrus team has remained committed to their product's support team. 

They are very knowledgeable and communicate effectively. They are on time. 

We have had to army a few units, but replacements arrived within a few days. 

They have excellent support.

Pricing is reasonable. None of this wireless equipment is cheap, at least not on an enterprise level. 

In general, the way we purchased it was we purchased it at the beginning, was with five years of support, once our initial cost was met, we didn't have to pay for anything else.

I would consider them.

Previously, we were more of a Cisco shop, using controllers and, I don't know, just the ability to have all of these units stand alone on their own and have their own controllers built in, and they have really good coverage and are easy to manage.

I know there are two schools of thought. The first option is to get a cheap access point and then spend a lot of money on a controller. They are kind of dumb access points that are controlled, and in this case, it is the opposite, where you have a smart access point and a very low-cost control.

Now that it's web-based, there is a management subscription, which we bought for about five years. Once the five years are up, I guess we will have to start paying for it. I honestly don't know what that is, but based on what we saw, it seems reasonable. Let's see what happens.

I would recommend that people look into smart access points because they are great.

I would rate Cambium Networks Wireless LAN an eight out of ten. I am pretty happy with it.