Adobe Workfront vs SAP Portfolio and Project Management comparison

"Various departments that we have to collaborate with, have indicated that they are much more efficient with their work because they are able to see exactly where everything is and what's coming."

"We are finding that AtTask is continuously breaking down the silos and facilitating cross-collaboration between groups and teams."

"AtTask is a great project management and workflow management tool."

"Workfront is innovative and these were plenty of features that I found valuable while working at Logitech. Workfront had this feature of Project Schedule Templatization. This saves time and effort and even leads to the standardization of processes that are well-assorted. The Intelligent Graphical Interfaces of Workfront allow one to look at a specific type of resource and a specific phase for a specific family of products. You can get quite granular with the data and even zoom in or out of the timeline. It also categorizes projects according to classes and portfolios so that over time, you can more easily understand what are the various metrics involved in producing a specific portfolio Another important feature is Workfront allowing you to validate milestones and investigate the project. This also helped me to understand which projects are performing well and whether it was beneficial to invest in the same. The IT and the app configuration is quite secure and it is one of the benefits. One more valuable feature is the integration of communication systems inside Workfront. This helps you differentiate between normal business emails and project-specific conversations. This is also known as ‘queues’ and I absolutely find this feature extremely powerful."

"It is a great tool and functions well across an organization."

"I also like Workfront's integration. The solution integrates natively with other systems. It's easy to connect Workfront to any product that has a customer service database, such as a CRM or service ticket management solution."

"The best features in Adobe Workfront from my perspective are the project management and automation from the back end, the tool called Workfront Fusion where we can automate processes."

"When compared with other project management tools or workflow tools, Adobe Workfront is far better than other tools in the market now."

"The integration portion with SAP models is valuable."

"The SAP PPM software is a very complete solution."

"SAP is gradually introducing more flexibility and customization options to the system, allowing users to adapt it to their specific needs."

"With SAP Portfolio and Project Management we were able to have a full track of project progress and get useful insights about our projects."

"It improves productivity, cash flow management, and inventory control for clients."

"Sometimes response times are longer than I would like."

"My experience with reporting in Adobe Workfront so far is that the reporting could be better."

"With the new security levels the administrative overhead increased."

"The downtime, while not too long or frequent, is an area for improvement."

"More customization of the user interface would be nice."

"Workfront's reporting capabilities must be improved."

"Some of the specific functions in the system can get a little quirky and could use some help, but those are really for unique cases and not general system functionality."

"Lots of bugs with AtTask. I had to call Help line A LOT for help."

"The product itself could have an advanced analytics layer with an improved user interface that is adapted to the new digital era."

"The initial support package of version 5.0 has some setup difficulties."

"The system is old, so there are several issues that arise when we fetch data from integrated systems. Sometimes the data gets stuck, and there are instances where we need to access multiple pieces of information simultaneously."

"The platform's support structure needs improvement."

"It would be valuable if SAP integrated seamlessly with some products like Jira and Bitbucket."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"The product pricing varies based on whether the client is new or existing and the complexity of their business processes."