ADONIS vs Camunda comparison

Read 78 Camunda reviews

20,291 Views
13,392 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ADONIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Camunda and ADONIS are both competitive solutions in the process management and automation space. Data comparisons suggest that Camunda’s open-source nature and community support give it an advantage in terms of adaptability, but ADONIS provides a broader range of features and toolsets.

Features: Camunda includes an embeddable process engine compliant with BPMN 2.0 standards. It also offers developer-friendly tools conducive to integration and process automation. ADONIS provides extensive modeling capabilities, business architecture frameworks, and integrated analysis tools, effectively supporting a business-wide approach.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its graphical user interface and offer more robust built-in analytics capabilities. It might also expand its integration options. ADONIS could benefit from offering a more developer-friendly environment, reducing complexity in deployment, and providing better customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers a more streamlined deployment process, appealing to developers and organizations with technical expertise, primarily due to its open-source model and extensive documentation. In contrast, ADONIS excels in providing comprehensive onboarding services and customer support, crucial for organizations in need of direct guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda typically presents a lower initial setup cost because of its open-source offering and community-driven resources. It delivers significant ROI for organizations with technical capabilities. Although ADONIS may have a higher setup cost, its extensive feature range and supportive services aim to justify its pricing, aligning with enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Camunda Report (Updated: December 2025).

Download the complete report

ADONIS vs. Camunda

December 2025

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

17th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (1st), Process Automation (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (3rd), AI Software Development (2nd), AI Customer Support (8th), AI IT Support (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.2%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 9.9%, down from 21.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Camunda	9.9%
ADONIS	2.2%
Other	87.9%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ostap Kharysh

Product Manager & Student at University of Vienna

The tool supports university projects with effective modeling and a comprehensive toolset

The pure modeling capabilities with drag-and-drop elements for business process diagrams are excellent. The ability to move smoothly from the process landscape to the business process model diagram is appreciated. The simulation model is user-friendly, and the analysis features offer correct insights quickly. It helps me explore and identify the best candidates for automation. ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making.

Read full review

CristianoGomes

Owner at a tech services company with 1-10 employees

Supports long-running asynchronous processes effectively but has not evolved much in recent years

I think Camunda is focusing too much on the SaaS offering right now and not much on improving and developing the product itself. I did not see any innovations on that aspect, especially for the open-source version. I was making some tests recently and the tool seemed pretty much the same as it was three or four years ago. Since they made the move to cloud deployment in a more SaaS-oriented way, they do not invest too much in the community version. To be honest, it did not change much from the Activiti initial version. Activiti was pretty much what Camunda is today. They invested a lot on Zeebe and made it the engine for their SaaS cloud version. Camunda itself, the embedded engine, did not evolve too much. They could invest more on that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"The process modeling interface of ADONIS is very comprehensive, being more complete than Camunda in terms of process documentation and process components such as risks, KPI, and other process components, making it excellent for process documentation, compliance, and repository."

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"It's a very complete solution."

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"The headless nature of the Camunda Platform is something that has helped us to build our own logic and platforms on it."

"The architecture is good because it's a headless workflow. I can create my own frontend, and it's fully API-based."

"There's this graphic that tells you how many lines or how many tickets are in each step. In that way, you know where you stand. I find this feature very valuable."

"The visibility – the diagrams you create – and then being able to automate based on them are valuable features. It's easy to explain and comprehend, and the integration aspects are valuable."

"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."

"One reason we selected Camunda or Cloud/DB is that it comes with the support of the BPMN notation, which helps to define processes in a standard manner. Another reason was that Camunda Cloud, as the name says, is designed for a new cloud era."

"The solution is useful for small projects."

"The product has a good task management engine."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"It's costly and not accessible for small enterprises or startups. It would be great if Camunda offered a tier plan for smaller companies."

"The product's initial setup phase is difficult for beginners."

"Without a proper frontend, the business cannot effectively use the platform."

"I would like to see better pricing."

"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."

"I think that Camunda can try to do better when it comes to solving the complexities of all the products in its software stack."

"Would be helpful if there were additional out-of-the-box activities."

"The deployment model could be improved for easier implementation."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"When compared with the proprietary products, the pricing costs are much less, even though it is an enterprise edition."

"In Africa, the cost of deployment is an important factor to consider since it adds to the overall cost. This might be the only drawback to using it."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"We are using the open-source version of this solution."

"I think Camunda BPM can improve their licensing costs. It isn't easy to find clients with Camunda BPM licenses mainly because it's quite expensive."

"We pay for the license of this solution annually."

"The open-source version of the product is free to use."

"We use a community version."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

University

Computer Software Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

12%

Insurance Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	43
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business process...

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

What advice do you have for others considering ADONIS?

I have not integrated it with other products in my system because we are just using the free version. I am planning to purchase the Team version or Business plan for the initial proof of concept pr...

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Comparisons

Compared 24% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 16% of the time

ARIS Process Governance vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 8% of the time

BIC Platform vs ADONIS

Compared 6% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

IBM BPM vs Camunda

Compared 10% of the time

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 7% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

January 2026

Download ADONIS product report

Download Camunda product report

January 2026

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BOC Group

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

Camunda revolutionizes process orchestration by enabling seamless automation and integration with AI, human tasks, and existing systems while ensuring security and governance.

Built for collaboration between business and IT, Camunda empowers organizations to manage complexity, boost efficiency, and maintain competitive advantage. With a clientele of over 700 top organizations like Atlassian, ING, and Vodafone, Camunda is a trusted partner in designing, orchestrating, automating, and refining critical business processes to accelerate digital transformation. Its open-source nature, ease of use, and REST API integration make it a versatile choice for various needs.

What are Camunda's key features?

Lightweight Architecture: Offers streamlined and efficient process management.
Scalability: Supports growth and complexity in operations.
Flexibility with BPMN, CMMN, and DMN Standards: Ensures adaptability to different process modeling needs.
Open-Source: Encourages customization and user-specific enhancements.
Graphical Process Modeling: Intuitive interface for designing and automating processes.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Efficiency: Streamlines processes for optimized performance.
Seamless Integration: Ensures smooth workflow across different systems.
Improved Collaboration: Facilitates effective cooperation between business and IT.
Customizability: Adapts to specific user requirements and system environments.

In banking, Camunda automates processes and manages transactions, while in telecommunications, it optimizes service orders. Governmental and public sectors benefit from workflow automation. Organizations often use either the enterprise edition or the open-source version to create APIs and manage business rules effectively.

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando