ADONIS vs Camunda comparison

Read 77 Camunda reviews

23,608 Views
16,762 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

ADONIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 15, 2025

Camunda and ADONIS are both competitive solutions in the process management and automation space. Data comparisons suggest that Camunda’s open-source nature and community support give it an advantage in terms of adaptability, but ADONIS provides a broader range of features and toolsets.

Features: Camunda includes an embeddable process engine compliant with BPMN 2.0 standards. It also offers developer-friendly tools conducive to integration and process automation. ADONIS provides extensive modeling capabilities, business architecture frameworks, and integrated analysis tools, effectively supporting a business-wide approach.

Room for Improvement: Camunda could enhance its graphical user interface and offer more robust built-in analytics capabilities. It might also expand its integration options. ADONIS could benefit from offering a more developer-friendly environment, reducing complexity in deployment, and providing better customization capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Camunda offers a more streamlined deployment process, appealing to developers and organizations with technical expertise, primarily due to its open-source model and extensive documentation. In contrast, ADONIS excels in providing comprehensive onboarding services and customer support, crucial for organizations in need of direct guidance.

Pricing and ROI: Camunda typically presents a lower initial setup cost because of its open-source offering and community-driven resources. It delivers significant ROI for organizations with technical capabilities. Although ADONIS may have a higher setup cost, its extensive feature range and supportive services aim to justify its pricing, aligning with enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed ADONIS vs. Camunda Report (Updated: July 2025).

Download the complete report

ADONIS vs. Camunda

July 2025

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ADONIS

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

21st

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Camunda

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (2nd), Process Automation (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of ADONIS is 2.9%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Camunda is 19.1%, down from 21.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Teguh Surya

AVP B2B Business Process Excellence at PT. Indosat Tbk

Process capabilities impress while user setup requires streamlining

I stopped using ADONIS because it is not capable of integrating and automating business processes for the POC. I see that Camunda is more capable for our POC project to orchestrate business processes. We also plan to integrate with UiPath because currently, we are focusing on task automations, not process orchestrations. In the future, we plan to implement process orchestrations. I see that Camunda can integrate UiPath into the process, process model, and process integrations. ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users.

Read full review

FABIO NAGAO

Chief Technology Officer at Looplex SA

Reduces costs with hardware abstraction and simplifies scaling

There is an issue where, in some situations, I need to scale up by observing both CPU and memory usage of containers, yet under the current options available at Amazon, this is not possible. I have to choose between monitoring CPU or memory to scale my solution. Not every software is built for deployment as a container service, although the current architecture trend is changing this.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The best features of the system include good analytics for business processes including the calculation of time and cost."

"We haven't ever needed to take service breaks and we can scale it throughout our company without any problem."

"It's a very complete solution."

"It seems that the process mapping and modeling features are well and thoroughly covered."

"ADONIS supports the project hierarchy and allows collaboration through methodological reviews and comments, enhancing decision-making."

"It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop"

"The product is useful for designing business processes and for repositories."

"Overall, the solution has been very solid."

"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."

"The use of Java is a big plus for our intern developers, and Camunda scales well, as many of our departments are already using it in production with dedicated teams."

"We are using the BPMN engine of Camunda; we are not using the user interface. We are using just the engine, the back end of this. For us, it is working quite well."

"When I compare it with other BPM tools, like IBM, it is great, open source, and free when you use the community version."

"I love that Camunda is a very developer-friendly platform, and my customers have evaluated the pricing as reasonable."

"Camunda's most valuable feature is its ability to integrate with different products."

", Camunda can be a powerful tool to work with when used in an optimized and well-implemented manner."

More Camunda pros

Cons

"ADONIS needs improvement in its user interface functionality."

"There is a function to check if the model BPMN is being used correctly, but the report from the check is not always very clear."

"The solution is in English and we have added certain parts in Russian as this is easier for our students. It would be useful to have the system in Russian."

"We have to use a different solution to automate our business processes."

"This solution would be improved if 24/7 support were available."

"If there's no WiFi connection, you can't access ADONIS."

"ADONIS needs improvement mainly in user-friendliness, setup, and installations. As an administrator at that time, I found it quite difficult to manage users because I needed to open specific software, possibly Java-based, which is not web-based and should be installed first to manage the users."

"Rearranging things to get information from the objects and the model together to get a report out of them could be done better."

"Camunda could be improved by making it easier to modify a process. You can program it to follow a process, but it is difficult to modify the process when the application is in use. It could also be improved by making it easier to use the visual platform without needing to be informed on that. Sometimes, we programmers haven't used it in the past, and it's a bit difficult to learn it."

"I would like to see the forms engine available in the open-source version of this solution."

"The user interface needs some polishing because it is too technical for end-users to use it."

"If there were some industry templates it would have helped significantly, because it is similar to a process map for a domain. That is what we are currently creating, a domain-relevant process map."

"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."

"The documentation could use improvement."

"Like all BPM tools, they're very bad with proprietary UIs. In general, anyone who uses BPM tools should not expect to use their proprietary UI."

"There should be a multi-tenant solution for the platform where it supports multiple organizations on one platform instead of having to spin up multiple clusters for each organization. There should be an easy way to integrate different departments into one platform without having to operate multiple platforms. The operations should be easier with the enterprise solution. It should not create more overhead for the operations people."

More Camunda cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product’s price is quite competitive."

"The product's pricing is medium, so I rate it a five out of ten."

"We're using the free version. We used the Enterprise version for some time. If I compare free versus what we paid at that time, the Enterprise version costs a lot. For the additional functionality that we got with the Enterprise version, it was too costly."

"I use the open-source free version."

"There is a bit of scope for improvement in how the licensing and pricing are done. They are based on the number of processing instances you execute on the cluster... but on the self-hosted mode, the pricing model should be customized."

"We are using the community version. There is no licensing cost."

"We are using the open-source version, free of charge. We didn't bother with the enterprise features."

"The evaluation of my customers on pricing is that it is reasonable."

"We use the free version."

"I tried to get some information about buying the license for the solution, but I found it kind of hard to understand the business model."

More Camunda pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

University

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

13%

Government

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ADONIS?

It's easy to handle the solution thanks to being drag and drop

What needs improvement with ADONIS?

What is your primary use case for ADONIS?

We are using Camunda for process modeling, some collaborations for process development, and for the process documentation repository, we use SharePoint. We have used ADONIS process modeler, not jus...

How does Bonita compare with Camunda Platform?

One of the things we like best about Bonita is that you can create without coding - it is a low-code platform. With Bonita, you can build the entire mechanism using the GUI, it’s that simple. You c...

Which do you prefer - Appian or Camunda Platform?

Appian is fast when building simple to medium solutions. This solution offers simple drag-and-drop functionality with easy plug-and-play options. The initial setup was seamless and very easy to imp...

Which would you choose - Camunda Platform or Apache Airflow?

Camunda Platform allows for visual demonstration and presentation of business process flows. The flexible Java-based option was a big win for us and allows for the integration of microservices very...

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs ADONIS

Comparisons

Compared 25% of the time

ARIS BPA vs ADONIS

Compared 21% of the time

Bizagi vs ADONIS

Compared 10% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ADONIS

Compared 5% of the time

BIC Platform vs ADONIS

Compared 5% of the time

More ADONIS Competitors

Flowable vs Camunda

Compared 11% of the time

Apache Airflow vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Temporal vs Camunda

Compared 9% of the time

Bizagi vs Camunda

Compared 8% of the time

ARIS BPA vs Camunda

Compared 2% of the time

More Camunda Competitors

Product Reports

Business Process Management (BPM)

July 2025

Download ADONIS product report

Download Camunda product report

August 2025

Also Known As

No data available

Camunda BPM

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

BOC Group

Overview

ADONIS BPM suite is users' best-rated tool for process management, analysis and optimization, trusted by SMEs and large corporations worldwide. It helps you transform your business and create competitive advantage by streamlining processes, enhancing operational efficiency, boosting transparency and creating a customer-centric organization. You can start creating your digital twin with ADONIS already today, as the cloud-based ADONIS:Community Edition is available for free. For more information please visit www.boc-group.com/en/adonis/.

BOC Group

Camunda drives business process automation and AI orchestration, enhancing efficiency and innovation without compromising security and governance. Trusted by major brands like Atlassian, it seamlessly integrates systems and human tasks for impactful digital transformation.

Camunda is renowned for fostering collaboration between business and IT, empowering over 700 organizations across diverse sectors to manage and improve business-critical processes. With its flexible architecture, Camunda supports BPMN, CMMN, and DMN standards, allowing for efficient modeling and smooth integration with environments via REST APIs. This open-source platform offers extensive customization and combines enterprise features such as process history tracking and decision table editing, supporting both technical and non-technical users in achieving efficient automation strategies. While performance and scalability issues exist, especially in the cloud, Camunda remains a top choice for companies like ING and Vodafone.

What are Camunda's standout features?

Lightweight, scalable architecture: Facilitates smooth business process automation.
BPMN, CMMN, DMN support: Ensures comprehensive process modeling capabilities.
REST API integration: Enables seamless connectivity with different environments.
Open-source customization: Offers flexibility for adapting to specific needs.
Enterprise features: Includes process history, graphical modifications, and decision table editing.

What benefits can users expect from Camunda?

Increased efficiency: Streamlined automation processes boost productivity.
Collaboration: Facilitates synergy between IT and business teams.
Competitive advantage: Enables organizations to stay ahead through innovation.
Customization: Adapts to precise business process requirements.
Scalability: Expands with organizational growth demands.

In sectors like banking and government, Camunda's fast prototyping and workflow automation capabilities optimize processes such as client onboarding and investment banking workflows. It enhances social governance tasks, credit flows, and enterprise integration, while also being used in insurance and telecom for automating repetitive tasks and improving efficiency. Organizations utilize Camunda for training and service management, showcasing its versatility across industries.

Sample Customers

Trusted by small to large enterprises worldwide: ABB, Allianz, Comcast, ERGO, Emerson, Glencore, Lincoln Financial Group, Marel, Raiffeisen bank, Schroders, Southern Water, Stadt Wien, UNIQA, VAUDE, Voestalpine, Volksbank, Vorwerk

24 Hour Fitness, Accruent, AT&T Inc., Atlassian, CSS Insurance, Deutsche Telekom, Generali, Provinzial NordWest Insurance Services, Swisscom AG, U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, VHV Group, Zalando