Appgate SDP vs Prisma SD-WAN comparison

Appgate and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) category. Appgate is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.0, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. Appgate holds a 2.2% mindshare in SASE, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Appgate users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Appgate SDP and Prisma SD-WAN compete in the network security domain. Appgate SDP has the edge in ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness, while Prisma SD-WAN leads with its feature set and network performance.

Features: Appgate SDP provides policy-driven security, flexibility, and scalability, offering robust zero trust network access. Prisma SD-WAN is known for comprehensive integration capabilities, extensive visibility, and optimization features, providing a more complete package for network performance and control.

Room for Improvement: Appgate SDP could enhance reporting and analytics, and improve multi-cloud integrations. Prisma SD-WAN needs simplification in the initial configuration and better support for legacy systems.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Appgate SDP offers straightforward deployment with effective customer service, leading to rapid setup times. Prisma SD-WAN requires more setup time and technical knowledge, but benefits from thorough documentation and professional assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Appgate SDP is cost-effective with a favorable return on investment, especially in flexible deployment scenarios. Prisma SD-WAN, though more costly, provides strong long-term performance benefits due to its feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iboss

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) category, the mindshare of iboss is 3.3%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Appgate SDP is 2.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma SD-WAN is 2.7%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
iboss	3.3%
Prisma SD-WAN	2.7%
Appgate SDP	2.2%
Other	91.8%

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)

Featured Reviews

Ashok Ananthula

Senior Consultant Proxy Engineering at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Cloud gateway has strengthened remote web security and now needs better Mac and ISP support

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent for the Mac agents. That is where in 2025, we had to migrate to the Palo Alto-based platform. If your use case is for just Windows laptops,you can consider this platform as an option One issue is the data center resiliency part. In India especially, they are not tied up with the Tier 1 ISPs like Tata or Airtel; they were having Tier 2 ISPs and encountered many issues reaching few major sites that my organization depends on, and they were having problems that they could not fix quickly. They also lack a mechanism to route that traffic within their data center; rather, they ask customers to make a pac file change to route it to Singapore explicitly. It would be better if they route from their backend , i mean even if I send it to India DC, they should be able to route it internally to make that work; however, they fail to do that and ask the customer to route it in the pac file. Another suggestion is that in China, they do not have the proper setup; they used to have numerous problems with slowness and lack of premium circuits in China as well. That leads to multiple sites working slowly with latency-related issues. So the main issue is the ISP-related problems that need to be solved.

Read full review

Sachin Mohanty

Cloud Operations Engineer at PowerSchool India Pvt.Ltd

Zero trust access has strengthened security and now streamlines remote work across all sites

The reporting can be improved, as Appgate SDP is strong but could benefit from enhanced reporting features. This would improve visibility and simplify operational monitoring, along with simpler initial deployment. The initial setup and configuration require a good understanding of Zero Trust principles. The user interface can also be improved, as the administrative interface and policy workflows would make day-to-day operations easier for security teams. Additionally, more AI-driven insights such as anomaly detection and automated policy recommendations would further enhance security operations, along with richer reporting and dashboard capabilities. Regarding scalability, we can improve it for larger-scale deployments, making the platform more effective for growing enterprises and benefiting organizations with large and distributed user populations. Many users starting with Appgate SDP would see improvements from better centralized policy management for large environments and more efficient handling for large-scale deployments while improving monitoring and reporting across multiple regions. Additional automation capabilities would also support expanding infrastructures.

Read full review

Srinivas-S

Senior IT Consultant at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Centralized management has simplified branch connectivity while cost and pricing could be optimized

When speaking about features, I think the most effective features of Prisma SD-WAN are the centralized management; I don't see any complications here. Centralized management improves network visibility because if I want to configure multiple branches and firewalls, it could be quite complicated. When I have the centralized system, it's easier for users to access branches and manage all the firewalls in the branches. We have the opportunity to use SD-WAN application-aware traffic management. With multiple branches and ISP connections, we track applications and divert traffic depending on ISP connections and speed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Granular setup, which was able to set different levels of filters using the OUs in the AD."

"Content filtering is the most useful feature of iboss."

"Because of iboss, I did not have to assign web filtering tasks to my techs on a daily basis."

"iboss has significantly lowered the number of security incidents. It is crazy how much it blocks and how much it is aware of the outside danger."

"Valuable features: Within the filter: Controls (Web categories, applications, and Allow/Block list) and Network (local Subnets). Within the reporter: Logs (Event Log) and Reports."

"I would definitely recommend iboss for web filtering purposes to other organizations or individuals."

"Iboss is a solution that prevents advanced persistent threats, and has a zero tolerance for attacks."

"iboss is among the few products providing inline filtering where no application is needed on the device. It operates on the network side and is not device-based. This feature was one of the main reasons why we stayed with them for so long."

More iboss pros

"The flexibility of the tool is valuable; it is very robust, has a very robust configuration capability, is pretty well documented, and is also good interface-wise."

"The simplicity of the SDP platform is a standout feature; instead of navigating through intricate details, users can seamlessly connect to the company's network or switch to the internet with minimal effort."

"One of the most important features is stopping lateral movement across our network."

"Appgate SDP has positively impacted my organization, as we are using it to securely access the internet after the cyber attack."

"It is pretty stable."

"Appgate SDP has positively impacted my organization by strengthening our security posture and providing more granular control over access to internal resources we handle daily."

"It is a scalable solution...The support answers your questions very fast."

"The interface is really friendly. It's simple to understand."

More Appgate SDP pros

"Overall, it makes things easy and it is cost-effective."

"The solution has saved us about 50% of our costs, and moving from a legacy Layer 3 WAN to Prisma SD-WAN has resulted in a reduction in outages."

"Some of the best features with the Prisma SD-WAN are intelligent routing, dynamic path selection, best path selection, and forward error correction."

"The solution's most valuable feature is the visibility of the logs."

"The dynamic routing in Prisma SD-WAN is high-speed and valuable because it quickly adjusts, so users do not realize the link is down."

"If the MPLS goes down, there is a really smooth transition for a branch site to take traffic over the Internet. It will advertise the routes of that site in a jiffy."

"The AI ops feature streamlines revisions and automates compliance."

"From the main controller, we can administer the customer's devices, QoS, network, and traffic. We can monitor it and we can change and create policies as well as upgrade the software. We can totally control a customer's network from one site, the Prisma SD-WAN portal."

More Prisma SD-WAN pros

Cons

"For zero trust implementation, we encountered complexity issues, especially with a large infrastructure company ExxonMobil."

"Their on-premise hardware's network interface is capped at one gigabit, which is sort of a problem. If you stand a filter up where all traffic flows through that, according to them, in order to go above a gigabit, you have to have multiple devices, which in today's IT seems a little bit silly. They could easily put in an SFP port into their device that could accommodate 10 gigs or at least offer a box."

"SSL decryption: We had issues with learners using apps instead of using web browsers. This type of encryption is tough for any appliance in a BYOD environment."

"The solution could be stronger on the integration side and offer more cloud applications like G Suite or Oracle."

"iboss can be improved because the integration could be better; you need to import all the sites that you access today, and there are a few problems whenever you import thousands of websites, making the integration process messy for the users."

"I have heard they are doing DDoS filtering, but I am not certain if they are implementing it correctly."

"File integrity monitoring would be very advantageous as an additional feature."

"One thing I would like to see differently with their Zero Trust platform is that some of the AI aspects related to high-risk activities have more false positives."

More iboss cons

"One thing that kind of sticks out to me is the ability to do a proper non-split tunnel."

"The reporting can be improved, as Appgate SDP is strong but could benefit from enhanced reporting features."

"On the cloud, when you make some changes, it may be difficult."

"It would be better to connect to an application portal from any device. Documentation and support could be better."

"They could provide a single-box solution to manage tools for 4000 users. Additionally, they could add extra features to enhance remote micro connection."

"The user interface should be improved as it is not very easy to work with the updates."

"If I could change or improve anything about Appgate SDP, it would be to enhance the user experience by improving the UI so that it is more explanatory."

"One limitation is that it's harder to provide access to multiple applications in the company with Appgate, but that's probably because of poor management."

More Appgate SDP cons

"The only con is the pricing because it's more premium."

"Sometimes, during the product's initial setup phase, bypass pair or couple ports don't come up normally, and it requires an hour and a half to troubleshoot to reset the box from Prisma SD-WAN to factory default."

"I would also like to see improvement in the product training for customers. Palo Alto has not initiated very much training but they have to do so because this is a new product. If you have experience in a legacy environment, and you are moving to Prisma SD-WAN, you don't have a training framework. That is one of the disadvantages."

"The solution is expensive. Its competitor, Zscaler, is far less expensive."

"We initially had challenges with AIOps, which was overwhelming, and could benefit from simplification or improved training."

"The pricing model could be improved to make it more affordable for smaller companies."

"Accessibility could be improved. Any new person attempting to access Prisma will have difficulty. It doesn't have CLI available."

"The solution’s technical support is good. The technical support team's response time should be improved."

More Prisma SD-WAN cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive compared to one of its competitors."

"We have not priced the solution recently, but they were competitive with other vendors in the past."

"It is not expensive, and it is also not cheap. iboss is priced right in the sweet spot for the number of features it offers."

"The overall pricing for iboss is very competitive and transparent."

"It is probably in line with other solutions, but I do not deal with the financial side."

"We had the cost of purchasing a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs. However, the following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs."

"We pay $100 per user per month. One license for the site is around $17."

"It is a pretty expensive tool. It is maybe about $20,000 per year for a hundred users or so."

"The pricing is according to the market price. It is not a very cheap solution. They have some very aggressive promotions to sell the product in the market."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"If you're already invested in a Palo Alto product, it would be logical to use this solution. If not, there might be some other solutions that are more viable in terms of pricing."

"Prisma SD-WAN is a pretty expensive solution."

"This solution stood out because it cost considerably less than the other SD-WAN solutions out there from Cisco."

"It is more expensive than Fortinet."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

Legal Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	8

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with iboss?

The problem our organization had is that iboss failed for the Mac devices. It is not able to give a successful agent ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iboss?

We used iBoss mainly for Internet Access by having an Agent on Windows laptops Primarily because when we try to use i...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iboss?

I am not involved in pricing, but as per the information I have, during that time, the Blue Coat proxies we were usin...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Appgate SDP?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that this whole thing is managed by the security team, and t...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Appgate SDP?

If I could change or improve anything about Appgate SDP, it would be to enhance the user experience by improving the ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Appgate SDP?

My main use case for Appgate SDP is for security purposes. We are trying to use it to connect with our VPNs and the n...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma SD-WAN?

Regarding whether Prisma SD-WAN is an expensive solution, I would say the price is competitively high. Everything dep...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Prisma SD-WAN?

I am still working on what should be improved in Prisma SD-WAN to make this product better, and I cannot give any upd...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Prisma SD-WAN?

Our customers' main use cases for Prisma SD-WAN are to connect multiple branches since they have numerous locations t...

See all answers

Comparisons

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs iboss

Compared 10% of the time

Netskope vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs iboss

Compared 9% of the time

FortiSASE vs iboss

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco Umbrella vs iboss

Compared 6% of the time

More iboss Competitors

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Appgate SDP

Compared 9% of the time

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform vs Appgate SDP

Compared 7% of the time

Twingate vs Appgate SDP

Compared 5% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Appgate SDP

Compared 4% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Appgate SDP

Compared 4% of the time

More Appgate SDP Competitors

Cisco Catalyst SD-WAN vs Prisma SD-WAN

Compared 24% of the time

VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN vs Prisma SD-WAN

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Prisma SD-WAN

Compared 7% of the time

BigLeaf vs Prisma SD-WAN

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Cloud Firewall (formerly CloudGuard Network Security) vs Prisma SD-WAN

Compared 4% of the time

More Prisma SD-WAN Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iboss

June 2026

Download iboss product report

Buyer's Guide

ZTNA

June 2026

Download Appgate SDP product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma SD-WAN

June 2026

Download Prisma SD-WAN product report

Also Known As

iBoss Cloud Platform

No data available

CloudGenix

Overview

Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.

Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.

What are the most important features of Iboss?

Scalability: Supports rapid deployment across diverse networks.
SASE: A consolidated approach to secure access.
SSL Inspection: Ensures safe data transmission.
Granular Filtering: Detailed control over accessible content.
Single Pane Management: Unifies control through a centralized console.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost-effectiveness: Offers competitive pricing with robust features.
Autonomous Operation: Reduces management overhead.
Responsive Support: Provides assistance when needed.
Flexible Deployment: Available for both cloud and on-premises environments.

The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.

iboss

Appgate SDP provides a comprehensive approach to network access control, optimizing security with robust configurations and a user-friendly interface, featuring flexible deployment and server concealment to mitigate risks.

Appgate SDP has been designed to enhance security operations through reliable access management. It prides itself on offering strong documentation, substantial scalability, and an interface that supports easy deployment, creating a seamless experience for local and remote connections. It enables organizations to implement micro-segmentation and integrate multifactor authentication, thus elevating their security posture. Recent updates reflect improvements, yet aspects like cost, cloud modification difficulties, VPN customization needs, and an upgraded interface remain areas for future enhancement. Ideal for hybrid environments, Appgate SDP aids transitions from traditional VPNs, protecting digital assets and preventing lateral network threats.

What are the key features of Appgate SDP?

Robust Configuration: Allows flexible setups to meet specific requirements.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies deployment, enhancing user experience.
Server Concealment: Minimizes exposure to threats by hiding servers.
Scalability: Accommodates growing organizational needs with stable performance.
Access Rule Granularity: Provides detailed options for managing network access.

What benefits should be considered in user reviews?

Security Enhancement: Improved protection against lateral movement and ransomware.
Deployment Ease: Streamlined processes for faster implementation.
Strong Support: Reliable assistance from the vendor ensures sustained use.
Remote Work Optimization: Facilitates safe remote access, vital for modern work environments.

Appgate SDP is prevalent in industries shifting from traditional VPNs to more secure architectures. It supports enterprises embracing cloud technologies by providing reliable network access solutions, especially in hybrid work settings, ensuring the security of digital assets while accommodating multifactor authentication and micro-segmentation strategies.

Appgate

Prisma SD-WAN offers centralized management, dynamic routing, and security integration with Palo Alto. It's intuitive for troubleshooting and cost-effective compared to Cisco Viptela, making it suitable for complex organizations needing comprehensive network management.

Prisma SD-WAN stands out with its seamless integration capabilities, enabling efficient application-aware traffic management. Centralized management simplifies operations, while intuitive interfaces enhance deployment and troubleshooting. With features like Zero Touch Provisioning and failover support, it ensures network continuity and remote access resilience. Despite its strengths, users call for improvement in bypass ports, initial setup, and documentation. Pricing strategies and integration with Prisma Access require attention, alongside enhancing transition flexibility and scalability, to maintain competitive edge.

What are Prisma SD-WAN's key features?

Easy Onboarding: Simplifies deployment processes.
Centralized Management: Streamlines network operations across sites.
Dynamic Routing: Enhances data flow efficiency and reliability.
Zero Touch Provisioning: Automates network setup for faster implementation.
Failover Capabilities: Maintains network continuity during disruptions.

What benefits can users expect from Prisma SD-WAN?

Cost Efficiency: Offers a competitive alternative to traditional solutions like Cisco Viptela.
Enhanced Connectivity: Simplifies integration with cloud services like AWS and Azure.
Improved Security: Facilitates secure connections for VPN and remote access.
Effective Traffic Management: Controls application data for optimal performance.

In industries with extensive site connectivity needs, Prisma SD-WAN is used for connecting multiple sites, improving remote office connectivity, and replacing MPLS lines with cost-effective internet links. Organizations benefit from secure cloud integration and centralized management, facilitating communication between branches and data centers.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

More than 4,000 global enterprises trust the iboss Cloud Platform to support their modern workforces, including a large number of Fortune 50 companies.

United States Air Force FINRA Weight Watchers Rackspace DataDog SageNet Verdant Norwegian Cruise Line VoiceBase The Third Floor

Open Networking User Group, Columbia Sportswear Company, Coca Cola

Buyer's Guide

Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN

June 2026

Free Report: Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN

Find out what your peers are saying about Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Appgate SDP vs. Prisma SD-WAN report.

See our list of best Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) vendors and best ZTNA as a Service vendors.

We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.