


Prisma SD-WAN and FortiSASE are both top contenders in cloud networking solutions. Users tend to prefer FortiSASE for its superior features and performance despite its higher cost, compared to the competitive pricing and support of Prisma SD-WAN.
Features: Prisma SD-WAN offers robust network management, seamless connectivity, and competitive setup costs. FortiSASE provides comprehensive security tools, advanced security features, and a seamless integration flow for complex IT environments.
Room for Improvement: Prisma SD-WAN needs to enhance scalability options, improve security protocols, and update its user interface. FortiSASE should focus on better integration with third-party applications, optimize software updates frequency, and streamline user management capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prisma SD-WAN deployment is straightforward, with users praising its customer service for responsiveness and helpfulness. FortiSASE also offers easy deployment, but its customer service is perceived as less responsive in handling complex issues.
Pricing and ROI: Prisma SD-WAN is noted for competitive pricing with significant ROI potential. FortiSASE involves higher initial costs but offers value through its advanced long-term features and performance, appealing to users prioritizing feature returns over immediate costs.
With iboss, whenever you turn on your laptop, the iboss agent automatically connects to the iboss cloud, enforcing all security policies. So with respect to the security side, it strengthens measures.
I have seen some cost effectiveness from iboss; it has reduced certain support requirements, making it a more hands-off solution.
With FortiCASB, we manage to save around 50% on our budget compared to other products.
Prisma SD-WAN helps reduce network costs.
They are very fast, responsive, and knowledgeable.
The quality of the support is fantastic.
We had promising discussions about resolving these issues, but no real action followed.
I am totally satisfied with their response time and support quality.
If there is a solution in the market, the people supporting it should be technical enough to resolve issues at their first level or second level, or at least at the third level.
At a high level, they deliver the intended information, but I still need their representatives, particularly sales engineers, to provide detailed explanations, as the documentation may not cover every area that all audiences might be looking for.
They respond promptly and are good at finding issues.
I would rate the support at minimum eight plus.
Since we are at a premium level, customer service is rated at eight or 8.9 out of ten.
They are also able to meet on-demand requirements based on your contract with them, and can easily provide adequate resources and scalability.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
If I start seeing sluggishness or anything like that, I just reach out to my rep, and they connect with their dev team, typically resolving it the same day.
FortiSASE is a very scalable solution because it licenses every user individually.
If the customer is within the Fortinet ecosystem, they are generally good for scalability.
Everything is managed by the service provider, Palo Alto Networks, allowing me to manage my infrastructure without overheads or extra costs to adapt the management infrastructure to the actual needs of the field.
I rate it a ten out of ten since we can easily scale by just paying for additional licenses as needed.
Scalability is a significant concern for us due to the poor documentation that limits our ability to understand and utilize their system effectively.
It's been pretty solid; I've never had an outage with them, and if I ever had, it's only been once out of the seven years.
We've experienced zero downtime.
Our biggest problem with their service was it did not recognize the device despite our ClearPass sending information to the iboss box.
They maintain high availability using numerous data centers globally.
FortiSASE is not stable yet and is in the learning stage.
Stability is high, I rate it 9.8 out of ten.
Prisma SD-WAN is an absolutely stable solution.
Our engineers make the system appear stable through effective management.
It is not as intuitive as the rest of the platform.
We also had a problem with a transition when we upgraded from one appliance of theirs to another, but their engineer lost a good deal of our data.
Our iboss subscription access should be more secure with an OTP or VPN etc.
FortiSASE implementation is too complex where other products take two to three months or maximum four months to implement, FortiSASE took more than double that time.
If third-party vendors could be integrated and supported, enabling two-way communication, it would greatly enhance the solution compared to competitors such as Netskope and Zscaler.
While connectivity from outside to inside is okay, inside to outside is not.
Scalability is a significant concern for us due to the poor documentation that limits our ability to understand and utilize their system effectively.
If there were an option to extend management to other firewalls, users could perform staggered migrations.
It would be beneficial if the solution integrated the SD-WAN features of Prisma SD-WAN with the security features of Palo Alto's next-generation firewalls.
It offers the same features you would get from a vendor that charges 250,000 British pounds for a fraction of the price.
The following year, the cost of just licensing was similar to what was paid the previous year for a new appliance along with the implementation and licensing costs.
Regarding pricing, setup costs, and licensing, iboss is not cheap, and that's my only concern.
FortiSASE is an expensive product and the cost is indeed high.
The pricing for FortiCASB is competitive and not expensive.
When combining everything for a full SASE solution, I notice the pricing becomes quite high.
The solution is not cost-effective for smaller environments and is more suitable for medium to large companies.
The price for Prisma is a bit high.
The product could be a bit cheaper for the services it provides.
The solution's mental health function can detect if someone needs help.
It's given us a lot more visibility into our computer assets that may be infected with viruses and also shows us people who have unusually large uploads or might be engaging in high-risk activities, such as searches or going to sites not categorized by their web crawler.
iboss was the best solution for us because, no matter what domain you were in, everything is under a single pane of glass, which is exactly what we wanted.
The important aspects are twofold. One is authorization, and the second is access control.
FortiCASB is user-friendly and integrates well with other Forti-products, providing enhanced management capabilities.
In FortiSASE, these features are bundled, and since they are tightly integrated with the firewall, SD-WAN works without additional payment.
By reducing the need for expensive internet connections, Prisma SD-WAN allows customers to achieve cost savings.
Prisma is a mature platform in terms of security.
The most valuable feature is the single pane of glass, especially since we have Palo Alto firewalls.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| FortiSASE | 6.4% |
| iboss | 3.0% |
| Prisma SD-WAN | 2.7% |
| Other | 87.9% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 11 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 6 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 5 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 13 |
Iboss offers a comprehensive cloud-based security platform valued for its scalability and autonomous features, ensuring robust security with easy deployment and management capabilities.
Renowned for its robust security architecture, Iboss integrates seamlessly within diverse networks, delivering efficient granular filtering and advanced content categorization. Its single pane of glass console provides ease of management, allowing rapid scalability suitable for rapidly deploying environments. Operates in BYOD setups due to inline filtering without device installation. Integration with cloud-based applications enhances user control, and features like SASE, SSL inspection, and ChatGPT risk protection stand as highlights. Despite its strengths, users have pointed out areas for enhancement like direct navigation in reports, SSL decryption, and better cloud integration while having room to improve data loss prevention.
What are the most important features of Iboss?The usage of Iboss spans educational institutions, specifically K-12, to enforce internet policies, protect data, and support remote work environments. It provides web filtering and security frameworks to ensure safe browsing. Its platform-as-a-service model offers flexibility for both cloud-based and on-premises requirements, integrating seamlessly to deliver enhanced security features suitable for various deployment needs including zero trust, CASB, and network security for work-from-home setups.
FortiSASE offers AI-based threat detection and centralized management, ensuring robust security through features like Secure Web Gateway and SD-WAN. It's appreciated for ease of deployment, scalability, and support for global workforces, with potential for cost-saving cloud management.
FortiSASE integrates tightly with the Fortinet ecosystem, providing comprehensive cybersecurity features such as a firewall-as-a-service and deep packet inspection. It facilitates Zero Trust Network Architecture, replacing traditional VPNs for secure remote access. The platform enhances IT management capabilities by supporting micro-segmentation and protecting endpoint devices. Despite excellence in these areas, FortiSASE faces challenges in application segmentation security, agent reliability, and data classification. Criticisms include underwhelming GUI design, licensing complexity, and mobile device support. Improvements in agent installation, cloud management, and automation are priorities for expanding efficacy.
What are FortiSASE's key features?Enterprises deploying FortiSASE in specific industries benefit from its ability to integrate cloud security, safeguard branch operations, and reduce latency to corporate data centers. Its robust features support industries needing secure connectivity for remote users and micro-segmentation to protect sensitive data and resources. Users find it helpful in managing access to corporate applications and reducing reliance on traditional VPNs, streamlining operational efficiencies and enhancing security postures.
Prisma SD-WAN offers centralized management, dynamic routing, and security integration with Palo Alto. It's intuitive for troubleshooting and cost-effective compared to Cisco Viptela, making it suitable for complex organizations needing comprehensive network management.
Prisma SD-WAN stands out with its seamless integration capabilities, enabling efficient application-aware traffic management. Centralized management simplifies operations, while intuitive interfaces enhance deployment and troubleshooting. With features like Zero Touch Provisioning and failover support, it ensures network continuity and remote access resilience. Despite its strengths, users call for improvement in bypass ports, initial setup, and documentation. Pricing strategies and integration with Prisma Access require attention, alongside enhancing transition flexibility and scalability, to maintain competitive edge.
What are Prisma SD-WAN's key features?In industries with extensive site connectivity needs, Prisma SD-WAN is used for connecting multiple sites, improving remote office connectivity, and replacing MPLS lines with cost-effective internet links. Organizations benefit from secure cloud integration and centralized management, facilitating communication between branches and data centers.
We monitor all Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.