Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
FortiSASE Logo

Top 10 FortiSASE Alternatives

Vendor: Fortinet
3.9 out of 5
Start review

Top FortiSASE Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to FortiSASE based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cisco Umbrella, Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. FortiSASE surpasses its competitors by offering seamless integration with Fortinet's security fabric, providing comprehensive threat protection, and ensuring high-performance connectivity, while delivering unmatched scalability and centralized management for modern cloud-based environments.

Fortinet Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Fortinet, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
FortiSASE Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
Cisco Umbrella
4.4 out of 5
Cisco Umbrella offers customizable filtering, DNS-level security, and seamless integration, providing robust malware and phishing protection. In comparison, FortiSASE includes firewall services, competitive pricing, and AI-based detection, appealing to businesses prioritizing endpoint protection and tenant management in cloud environments.
Download Cisco Umbrella vs. FortiSASE Report
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE, highlighting its affordability. FortiSASE's higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature offerings.
View comparison
Pricing
Cisco Umbrella has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE, highlighting its affordability. FortiSASE's higher setup cost reflects its extensive feature offerings.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks
4.2 out of 5
Prisma Access excels in threat detection and policy management, ideal for customization-focused tech buyers. In comparison, FortiSASE offers seamless integration and diverse security features, appealing to businesses prioritizing easy integration and comprehensive protection.
Download FortiSASE vs. Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Report
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost, focusing on robust cybersecurity features, while FortiSASE offers a more budget-friendly installation with flexible scalability, highlighting cost differences in initial deployment expenditures.
View comparison
Pricing
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks involves a higher setup cost, focusing on robust cybersecurity features, while FortiSASE offers a more budget-friendly installation with flexible scalability, highlighting cost differences in initial deployment expenditures.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform
4.2 out of 5
Zscaler excels with integrated security features and cloud capability suited for hybrid deployment. In comparison, FortiSASE offers simplicity through its unified management interface and competitive pricing, particularly benefiting existing Fortinet users seeking an efficient and cost-effective networking solution.
Download FortiSASE vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive security features, while FortiSASE offers more budget-friendly options with essential functionalities, making it more accessible for smaller organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform setup costs are generally higher due to its comprehensive security features, while FortiSASE offers more budget-friendly options with essential functionalities, making it more accessible for smaller organizations.
FortiSASE Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
iboss
4.2 out of 5
iboss attracts budget-conscious buyers with affordability and quick ROI, emphasizing web filtering and threat detection. In comparison, FortiSASE offers advanced security features and seamless integration, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive security despite higher costs. Buyers choose based on financial constraints and feature requirements.
Download FortiSASE vs. iboss Report
Iboss has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while FortiSASE offers a more comprehensive configuration with higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Iboss has a straightforward and affordable setup cost, while FortiSASE offers a more comprehensive configuration with higher initial expenses.
FortiSASE Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
Cloudflare One
4.4 out of 5
Cloudflare One appeals with competitive pricing and seamless integration with existing IT infrastructure. In comparison, FortiSASE stands out for its advanced security options, providing significant value for enterprises needing robust infrastructure despite its higher cost. Cloudflare impresses with deployment ease, while FortiSASE offers comprehensive customer support.
Download Cloudflare One vs. FortiSASE Report
Cloudflare One offers a more flexible setup cost structure, while FortiSASE has a more straightforward pricing model with clear initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cloudflare One offers a more flexible setup cost structure, while FortiSASE has a more straightforward pricing model with clear initial expenses.
FortiSASE Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
Netskope
4.2 out of 5
Netskope offers deployment flexibility and seamless customer service, making it appealing for those valuing integration with cloud applications. In comparison, FortiSASE provides cost-efficiency and a robust feature set, attracting tech buyers focused on comprehensive coverage and investment value.
Download FortiSASE vs. Netskope Report
Netskope has a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while FortiSASE presents a more complex initial setup that might lead to higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Netskope has a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while FortiSASE presents a more complex initial setup that might lead to higher expenses.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Cato SASE Cloud Platform
4.4 out of 5
Cato SASE Cloud Platform appeals for its ease of integration and scalability, ideal for seamless expansion. In comparison, FortiSASE offers advanced security features and robust policy enforcement, making it suitable for organizations prioritizing security.
Download Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs. FortiSASE Report
Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers lower setup costs, emphasizing cost-efficiency compared to FortiSASE, which may have higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Cato SASE Cloud Platform offers lower setup costs, emphasizing cost-efficiency compared to FortiSASE, which may have higher initial expenses.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81)
4.4 out of 5
Check Point Harmony SASE excels with its extensive security features and user management, appealing to those needing secure connectivity without a full VPN. In comparison, FortiSASE offers efficient deep packet inspection and seamless Fortinet integration, making it attractive for environments already using Fortinet solutions.
Download Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs. FortiSASE Report
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE. FortiSASE's initial financial commitment is significant, highlighting the difference in upfront expenses between the two.
View comparison
Pricing
Check Point Harmony SASE has a lower setup cost compared to FortiSASE. FortiSASE's initial financial commitment is significant, highlighting the difference in upfront expenses between the two.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN
4.1 out of 5
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN offers efficient cloud-centric management and flexible connectivity at a competitive price. In comparison, FortiSASE integrates superior security features and threat protection, appealing to buyers prioritizing advanced security despite its higher cost and configuration complexity.
Download FortiSASE vs. VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN Report
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN features a higher setup cost compared to FortiSASE, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a key difference in budget requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
VMware VeloCloud SD-WAN features a higher setup cost compared to FortiSASE, which offers a more cost-effective initial setup, highlighting a key difference in budget requirements.
FortiSASE Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
Skyhigh Security
4.2 out of 5
Skyhigh Security offers seamless integration and strong customer service, appealing to enterprises seeking easy deployment. In comparison, FortiSASE's higher price is justified by its comprehensive features, including detailed reporting and cloud-native capabilities, valuable for organizations with modern security needs. Both offer scalability and strong technical support.
Download FortiSASE vs. Skyhigh Security Report
Skyhigh Security has a straightforward setup cost, whereas FortiSASE involves more intricate pricing aspects.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
Skyhigh Security has a straightforward setup cost, whereas FortiSASE involves more intricate pricing aspects.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform
4.0 out of 5
Versa SASE Platform offers scalable security and excellent network performance with solid connectivity controls. In comparison, FortiSASE excels with advanced threat detection and robust cloud security, appealing to those prioritizing cutting-edge innovations over affordability.
Download FortiSASE vs. Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform Report
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform setup costs are generally lower than FortiSASE, which may have higher initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Versa Unified Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) Platform setup costs are generally lower than FortiSASE, which may have higher initial setup expenses.
FortiSASE Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
FortiSASE Logo
Axis Security
4.8 out of 5
Axis Security is chosen for its competitive pricing and seamless integration capabilities. In comparison, FortiSASE attracts tech buyers with its comprehensive security services and advanced threat protection, making it suitable for those prioritizing extensive functionality despite higher costs.
Download Axis Security vs. FortiSASE Report
Axis Security features lower setup costs, simplifying early adoption, whereas FortiSASE offers comprehensive integration options with slightly higher initial expenses, catering to users seeking extensive features from the start.
View comparison
Pricing
Axis Security features lower setup costs, simplifying early adoption, whereas FortiSASE offers comprehensive integration options with slightly higher initial expenses, catering to users seeking extensive features from the start.
FortiSASE Logo
FortiSASE Logo
Cisco Secure Access
4.3 out of 5

FortiSASE impresses with integration efficiency and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Cisco Secure Access offers comprehensive protection and scalability. FortiSASE is ideal for cost-conscious buyers, while Cisco Secure Access suits those requiring a broad feature set despite higher initial costs.

Download Cisco Secure Access vs. FortiSASE Report
FortiSASE has a high setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more competitive and lower initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
FortiSASE has a high setup cost compared to Cisco Secure Access, which offers a more competitive and lower initial investment.

Related categories

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE)
Secure Web Gateways (SWG)
Internet Security