Arcserve Cloud Direct vs HPE Zerto Software comparison

Arcserve and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. Arcserve is ranked #55, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.8. Arcserve holds a 0.3% mindshare in CB, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 4.1% mindshare. Additionally, 98% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution.

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Read 1 Arcserve Cloud Direct review

433 Views
351 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

HPE Zerto Software

Read 341 HPE Zerto Software reviews

13,360 Views
6,146 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Arcserve Cloud Direct

HPE Zerto Software

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 11, 2025

HPE Zerto Software and Arcserve Cloud Direct are competing products in the disaster recovery and data protection market. HPE Zerto Software is favored for its robust features and ease of use, while Arcserve Cloud Direct offers a comprehensive solution focusing on backup and recovery capabilities.

Features: HPE Zerto Software provides continuous data protection with real-time replication, seamless disaster recovery solutions, and deployment flexibility. Arcserve Cloud Direct features advanced backup and recovery with multi-platform support and cloud-first architecture, offering a comprehensive backup solution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software supports various environments with minimal setup effort and reliable customer service. Arcserve Cloud Direct offers quick deployment with pre-configured setups and excellent support. The key distinction lies in HPE Zerto's versatile deployment options against Arcserve's streamlined approach.

Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software presents a higher initial setup cost but offers a robust ROI with advanced features and disaster recovery capabilities. Arcserve Cloud Direct is recognized for cost-effective pricing, providing solid ROI through competitive pricing and reliable backup features. The decision hinges on budget considerations versus feature requirements.

To learn more, read our detailed Cloud Backup Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Arcserve Cloud Direct

Ranking in Cloud Backup

55th

Average Rating

5.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Disaster Recovery as a Service (16th)

HPE Zerto Software

Ranking in Cloud Backup

3rd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

341

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (2nd), Cloud Migration (2nd), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of Arcserve Cloud Direct is 0.3%, down from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE Zerto Software is 4.1%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

reviewer1321896

Junior Service Desk Operator at a cloud solution provider with 11-50 employees

Good backup retention but it is not a reliable platform and it doesn't giving any sort of alerts that things are not working

StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around 1 to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working. The majority of stuff wasn't backed up, so we really weren't happy with them. That's when we went on the look for a new solution.

Read full review

Sachin Vinay

Assistant Manager-Networks at Amrita

Leverage disaster recovery with reliable support and cost-effective future-proof features

Zerto is straightforward to implement because it only requires the installation of an agent on the VMs designated for migration. A service, typically a VM, must also be deployed at the disaster recovery location. This entire process is simple and can be completed within three days. Zerto's near-synchronous replication occurs every minute, allowing for highly granular recovery points. This means that even if interruptions or malware disruptions occur within that minute, Zerto can restore to the last known good state, effectively recovering the entire setup to the latest backup. This capability ensures high data security and minimizes potential data loss. One of the main benefits of implementing Zerto is its data compression, which significantly reduces the load on our IPsec VPN. Zerto compresses data by 80 percent before transmitting it across the VPN, minimizing the data transferred between geographically dispersed locations. This compression and subsequent decompression at the destination alleviate the strain on the VPN, preventing overload and ensuring efficient data synchronization. Zerto simplifies malware protection by integrating it into its disaster recovery and synchronization features. This comprehensive approach eliminates the need for separate antivirus setups in virtual machines and applications. It streamlines our security measures and removes the need for additional software or solutions, resulting in an excellent return on investment. Zerto's single-click recovery solution offers exceptional recovery speed. Through the user interface, a single click allows for a complete restoration from the most recent backup within two to three minutes, enabling rapid recovery and minimal downtime. Zerto's Recovery Time Objective is excellent. In the past, if a virtual machine crashed, we would recover it from a snapshot, which could take one to two hours. With Zerto, the recovery process takes only five minutes, and users are typically unaware of any disruption. This allows us to restore everything quickly and efficiently. Zerto has significantly reduced our downtime. When malware affects our data, Zerto immediately notifies us and helps us protect other applications, even those not yet implemented with Zerto. By monitoring these applications, we can quickly identify and address any potential malware spread, minimizing downtime across our systems. Zerto significantly reduces downtime and associated costs during disruptions. Our services are unified, so in the event of a disruption without Zerto, even a half-day disruption would necessitate offline procedures. This would lead to increased manpower, service delays, and substantial financial losses due to interrupted admissions and other critical processes. By unifying service processes, Zerto minimizes the impact of outages. Zerto streamlines our disaster recovery testing across multiple locations by enabling efficient failover testing without disrupting live services. Traditionally, DR testing required downtime of critical systems, but Zerto's replication and failover capabilities allow us to test in parallel with live operations. This non-disruptive approach ensures continuous service availability while validating our DR plan, even in scenarios like malware attacks, by creating a separate testing environment that mirrors the live setup. This comprehensive testing provides confidence in our ability to handle real-world incidents effectively. This saves us over 60 percent of the time. Zerto streamlines system administration tasks by automating many processes, thereby reducing the workload for multiple administrators. This allows them to focus on other university services that require attention and effectively reallocate support resources from automated tasks to those requiring more dedicated management. Zerto is used exclusively for our critical services, providing up to a 70 percent improvement in our IT resilience.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The backup retention was pretty good. Being able to archive users who had been backed up, is a good functionality. Even if they've been deactivated it'll keep the backups and keep them protected."

"The most valuable features are the continuous streaming, that it takes very little CPU usage — it doesn't affect production — and the recovery time is very short."

"In terms of continuous data protection, it's the best product that we've found that does this. It's not snapshot-based. It's continuous, so there are no specific points in time we have to worry about recovering to or from. It's pretty much any time, as long as it's within our replication window."

"The features I have found most valuable in HPE Zerto Software are the replication using the virtual VPGs."

"The recovery was pretty seamless. It took about a minute for it to kick over when we did our testing. So, it wasn't a long downtime."

"The most valuable tool is the dashboard, which allows us to immediately check the DLP status, replication data, and all other data needed to have cleaner and immediate control of the situation."

"Zerto offered us massive time saving and consistency. We have a consistent outcome every time we complete conversions."

"The most valuable feature is the point in time recovery. This allows us to recover at any point in time, up to a minute or so."

"The most valuable feature is the disaster recovery capabilities. The fact that we can have a clinic across the country backup in as little as 45 minutes is incredible."

More HPE Zerto Software pros

Cons

"StorageCraft wasn't getting full backup coverage. It was backing up around one to 2% of the points. It was not a reliable platform and it wasn't giving any sort of alerts that things were not working."

"The backup end of this solution could be improved. We tried using it as a full backup solution and it took way too long to complete at least one backup."

"When setting up Zerto, you have to set up VRAs. I would like to see those not be needed as much. They're a little cumbersome and take up a lot of VM counts."

"There are a lot of features that it has that we don't use since we are on prem."

"There are certain things about the user interface that could be a little bit more user-friendly."

"This solution could be improved if it met all the requirements that we look for including supporting multiple operating systems. We would prefer to use one solution for DR and backup."

"We did look at the long-term retention backup feature of Zerto a few years ago, and at that time, it was limited. I can't say what it is right now, but at the time, its functionality was limited in terms of basically where we could save it and how we could save it. Offsite air gapping our backups is important to us to help protect against ransomware, and at the time, it couldn't do that. That would be one area that would be important before we consider using the long-term retention again. I haven't looked at it recently, and they may have addressed this in the meantime, but if not, this would be an area of improvement."

"The alerting could be fine tuned and improved. It does a lot of alerts, but it's a little bit cumbersome to modify them."

"Whenever we do a failover, there's a confirmation box that shows up later. It's a little hard to see sometimes... A popup to continue would be a little bit better because then you're not sitting and waiting for something and it's already there."

More HPE Zerto Software cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It was pretty appropriate. It was not too cheap, not too expensive. It was just about right."

"Its pricing is way better than Veeam."

"It is not cheap, but it is reasonable for what it is offering. It gives me the peace of mind that my data is protected. It is worth the cost."

"This solution is far less expensive than SRM and NetBackup."

"The pricing is based on virtual machines. They need to do better in regards to their tiering pricing rather than one price per VM. A lot of times we have VMs that are lower tier, such as Tier 2 or Tier 3, but we pay the same price as for Tier 1. I know they are developing this out, but it would be nice if they could provide a little better pricing in regards to their tiering protection."

"I wish it were cheaper, but I would purchase it again at the same price."

"Its pricing is very competitive. As compared to VMware SRM, Zerto has reduced our OPEX cost by at least 30%."

"It's not the cheapest tool, it's expensive. But it's doing a good job."

More HPE Zerto Software pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user159711

Architect at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Nov 9, 2014

VMware SRM vs. Veeam vs. Zerto

Disaster recovery planning is something that seems challenging for all businesses. Virtualization in addition to its operational flexibility, and cost reduction benefits, has helped companies improve their DR posture. Virtualization has made it easier to move machines from production to…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Computer Software Company

23%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Data Guard?

Ik fluister:VM Host Oracle en DataGuard hebben we per toeval vervangen door Zerto :-) tijdens de Zerto implementatie en VPG werden de Host Data in write-ack Block-Level gerepliceerd. Qua licentie 1...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zerto?

Its ability to roll back if the VM or the server that you are recovering does not come up right is also valuable. You have the ability to roll back a few seconds or a few minutes. The rollback feat...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zerto?

Regarding my experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing, I think on the pricing side, I don't generally deal with it, but from what I hear from my finance team, it's somewhat on the higher...

See all answers

Comparisons

Azure Site Recovery vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 38% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 21% of the time

AvePoint Cloud Backup vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 21% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Arcserve Cloud Direct

Compared 21% of the time

More Arcserve Cloud Direct Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 12% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 9% of the time

VMware Live Recovery vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 8% of the time

Rubrik vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines vs HPE Zerto Software

Compared 6% of the time

More HPE Zerto Software Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

August 2025

Download Arcserve Cloud Direct product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE Zerto Software

August 2025

Download HPE Zerto Software product report

Also Known As

StorageCraft Cloud Services, StorageCraft Disaster Recovery Services, StorageCraft Cloud Backup, Arcserve Cloud Services, Zetta Cloud Backup

Zerto Virtual Replication

Overview

Arcserve Cloud Direct is used for safeguarding data through backup and disaster recovery, swiftly restoring critical data and systems to ensure minimal downtime. It integrates cloud-based management and automated data protection with reliable efficiency.

Arcserve Cloud Direct offers a powerful solution for data protection with automated backup and disaster recovery features. Users appreciate its seamless integration with platforms, emphasizing its reliability and efficiency in preventing data loss. The straightforward setup and intuitive dashboard enhance its usability, while robust security measures safeguard data integrity. Despite its high performance and swift recovery times, users suggest improvements in customer support and reliability of technical assistance. Some face challenges with initial setup complexity, pointing out the need for clearer documentation and more robust features.

What are the most important features of Arcserve Cloud Direct?

Reliable data backup: Ensures consistent data protection and secure storage.
Seamless disaster recovery: Facilitates quick recovery of critical systems and data.
Easy scalability: Allows for flexible and straightforward scaling to meet growing data demands.
Intuitive dashboard: Simplifies management and monitoring of backup and recovery processes.
Robust security: Protects sensitive data against cyber threats and unauthorized access.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficient performance: Fast recovery times minimize downtime and maintain business continuity.
Comprehensive support: Assistance in resolving issues and optimizing usage.
Reliability in protecting data: Consistently prevents data loss and ensures accessibility.
Ease of setup: Quick and straightforward implementation without significant technical hurdles.
Scalability: Ability to adjust storage needs as data requirements grow.

Arcserve Cloud Direct's integration capabilities make it suitable for industries with extensive data protection needs, including finance, healthcare, and education. These sectors benefit from its efficient disaster recovery solutions and robust security features, ensuring compliance and safeguarding sensitive information. By offering scalable data protection services, Arcserve Cloud Direct supports businesses in maintaining operational continuity and achieving their data management goals.

Arcserve

Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Sample Customers

Lion

United Airlines, HCA, XPO Logistics, TaxSlayer, McKesson, Insight Global, American Airlines, Tencate, Aaron’s, Grey’s County, Kingston Technologies

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Commvault, Hewlett Packard Enterprise and others in Cloud Backup. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors and best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.