Atera vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Atera and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. Atera is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.7, while TeamViewer is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.0. Atera holds a 7.3% mindshare in RMM, compared to TeamViewer’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of Atera users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Atera

Read 16 Atera reviews

7,069 Views
2,121 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

TeamViewer ONE

Read 34 TeamViewer ONE reviews

2,676 Views
1,820 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Atera

TeamViewer ONE

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 24, 2026

Atera and TeamViewer ONE compete in the remote management category. Atera seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and cost-effective pricing model, which provides greater value for startups.

Features: Atera includes an integration with Splashtop for reliable remote access, automation capabilities such as a Shared Script Library, and efficient patch management. TeamViewer ONE offers dependable chat and file transfer capabilities, as well as straightforward remote management functionality.

Room for Improvement: Users of Atera suggest enhancing mobile management features, better third-party integration, and improving billing and reporting functionalities. For TeamViewer ONE, users point out the need for better user-friendliness in licensing, improved security protocols, and greater compatibility across different versions and platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both Atera and TeamViewer ONE enable deployment via Public Cloud and On-premises. Atera is noted for its ease of use and quick setup, making it ideal for startups. Customer service is a strong suit for both products, though Atera's support is frequently commended for quick response times and an extensive knowledge base.

Pricing and ROI: Atera offers a cost-effective pricing model, charging per technician, allowing unlimited device management which is advantageous for startups. TeamViewer ONE provides a free version but is generally more expensive, especially for larger licenses, with costs based on usage, making its competitors sometimes perceived as offering better value.

To learn more, read our detailed Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Atera

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

5th

Ranking in Patch Management

12th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Help Desk Software (11th), Network Monitoring Software (39th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (42nd), IT Service Management (ITSM) (10th), AIOps (22nd), Agentic Automation (10th), Autonomous Endpoint Management (7th)

TeamViewer ONE

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

9th

Ranking in Patch Management

19th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Access (22nd), Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (12th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of Atera is 7.3%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 4.4%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Atera	7.3%
TeamViewer ONE	4.4%
Other	88.3%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Ning Chane

IT Manager at Telstra

Remote monitoring has streamlined endpoint management and consistently reduced ticket resolution time

The best features Atera offers include the per-technician pricing, which is honestly one of the biggest things. Unlimited endpoints for a flat monthly fee per tech is a model that makes sense for us, since we are not paying more every time we add a new endpoint. The AI Copilot feature has been a nice addition that helps our techs summarize tickets and suggest fixes faster, which has cut our resolution times noticeably. The AI Copilot feature has specifically helped my team because the automation handles a lot of the routine work, such as patch deployments, maintenance tasks, and monitoring alerts. Atera has positively impacted my organization by transforming how our team operates day-to-day, and the pricing model is hard to beat. The outcomes or metrics showing how Atera has made a positive impact include the 30% reduction in ticket resolution time I mentioned earlier.

Read full review

Nitesh Ranjan

Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably

One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Atera saves money. A trip to the customer costs between $20 to $30. Then, you need to charge the customer $20 to $30 for the travel. However, if you are doing this work remotely, then you are not driving. This makes the process easier and saves money for you and the customer. For example, if it is just one machine, then the savings comes out to $50 to $60. If we are talking about a huge client, who has hundreds of machines and is changing their infrastructure, that is a lot of money."

"I really like the Shared Script Library and automation tasks which they have implemented... because all the Atera users in the community can share their scripts and their automation tasks knowledge. The same goes for the Shared SNMP Template Library."

"Atera saves me money on a monthly basis because my cost is a fixed price per month per technician, and it doesn't matter how many computers I manage."

"Just because it is low cost doesn't mean it is low quality."

"It's very easy to use, not just for me, but even for people who have claimed, "I'm not very good at IT." Once you have it installed and you have it set up, it pretty much works by itself. It really helps you do what you need to do. It's easy to use for a beginner, compared to some of the other larger RMMs that are a little bit more complicated."

"I would say it's the number one tool for all ITMS."

"All corporations that have an IT department should look into and utilize this solution."

"Atera's automation capabilities are excellent because we can create new users and customers, and when a company wants to integrate us as IT consultants to their network, it can be very simple, such as installing to Active Directory or Azure."

More Atera pros

"I like that we can get a remote desktop view and even full control over remote machines for communication and troubleshooting, and we can make calls or chat over the applications, which are all quite helpful."

"All the features of TeamViewer Remote Management are very good from my perspective."

"If you want to do remote troubleshooting, it's a good idea to utilize TeamViewer."

"The pricing of the solution is very reasonable."

"It is user-friendly for opening my server or PC."

"We use the product to communicate."

"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."

"If I want to access software or a PC in my office when I am in another location using my notebook, then I use TeamViewer Remote Management to do it remotely."

More TeamViewer ONE pros

Cons

"While scalability meets growing needs, there haven't been many additions in the last two years."

"The chat solutions need improvement because we first need to connect to the customer. This needs to improve so that there is a particular feature that can provide support to customers even if they are not connected to a computer."

"Atera could be improved by adding more granular control over technician roles. We need more specific controls on what technicians can access, like limiting their ability to view certain sections or access devices and share files. This feature request has already been made. The IP asset management capabilities need improvement to better manage assets beyond just devices."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting. This is from someone who worked in an MSP, where I would want to run a report and be able to just present that to a client."

"The mobility of Atera is also a feature which needs to be addressed so that it can be used on iPads, iPhones and things of this nature. I would also like to see an agent included on these devices so that I can monitor, maintain and manage them."

"The one thing that could do with improvement is the reporting."

"Having more freedom to perform identity access management would be great — it's one of the things that are necessary for a lot of companies they secured."

"It should improve its processes."

More Atera cons

"The solution is a bit expensive. It could be cheaper."

"If there were a way for users to do access reporting, that would be an ideal addition to the product."

"I would like to see better pricing, more customization, and increased automation."

"If you have one version, like if you have version 14, and the client has version 15, you can't access his computer. If the client is on 14 and the technician is on 15, he can't access the end user who's at home. So there's a disparity in versioning."

"The security of the solution could be more secure."

"There are some challenges with compatibility."

"They are doing many updates all the time. I don't like having so many updates."

"It could be more secure."

More TeamViewer ONE cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be."

"We pay per user. I am the only user. It is $150 per user. If I need to add one, it is not as costly as expanding with other providers."

"In terms of cost, it's not very expensive. I’d rate it around three or four out of ten, considering its value for money."

"It comes with unlimited devices, so the fixed price cost is taken out of my budget. So, I'm all good."

"Our company is a startup. The initial reason I looked into Atera was the fact that you pay by the technician, not per-device. That means you are able to jump right in with a service without having a large overhead."

"The price is reasonable for what we require."

"One of the biggest issues I face is the need to pay per technician. I've dealt with other platforms that you need to have 250-500 devices. Even though the cost declines as the number of devices a person has increases, they still require you to pay for 250 or 500, respectively. With Atera, the number doesn't matter as you always pay the same amount. I approximate that Atera saves me $100 per week."

"The solution cost approximately $200 Canadian per month."

More Atera pricing and cost advice

"It is a licensed product."

"The solution's license is expensive."

"Users need to pay a yearly license for TeamViewer Remote Management."

"The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive. The license is procured on a yearly basis and is expensive."

"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."

"My company uses the free version of TeamViewer Remote Management."

"I have used the free version of the solution."

"We are now using the free version, but probably next year we are going to follow up with the paid version."

More TeamViewer ONE pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	19
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Atera?

The prices have increased over time. After expressing concerns about pricing to account managers, they offered a 30% discount option for annual commitments. The main benefit we see with this produc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Atera?

Reporting is probably the main frustration. Some of the more advanced reports are locked behind higher pricing tiers, which feels restrictive. Atera can be improved in that the remote access can al...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Atera?

My main use case for Atera is remote monitoring and management across all our endpoints. We have devices spread across multiple sites, so having one platform where we can see everything, push patch...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?

Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?

I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs Atera

Compared 9% of the time

JIRA Service Management vs Atera

Compared 7% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs Atera

Compared 6% of the time

Sendbird vs Atera

Compared 5% of the time

ConnectWise Asio Platform vs Atera

Compared 4% of the time

More Atera Competitors

NinjaOne vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Bastion vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 11% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 8% of the time

Vortex vs TeamViewer ONE

Compared 5% of the time

More TeamViewer ONE Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Atera

August 2026

Download Atera product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer ONE

July 2026

Download TeamViewer ONE product report

Also Known As

No data available

TeamViewer IoT

Overview

Atera provides advanced tools for remote monitoring, automation, and ticketing, offering an intuitive design and competitive pricing that supports managed service providers with monitoring, alerts, and system management.

Atera stands out with its automation, remote access, and smooth integration capabilities like PowerShell commands, TeamViewer, and Splashtop. Its monitoring and alert systems allow IT professionals to preemptively address issues, enhancing productivity with features such as a robust ticketing system, patch management, and scripting tools. Cross-platform compatibility and collaboration tools streamline IT operations. Despite its strengths, Atera requires enhancements in identity access management, chat features, mobile device management, third-party integrations, customizable reports, and more detailed role management for technicians. A renewed interface and improved network and cloud service monitoring are desired. Users also look for seamless management across diverse platforms, particularly under connectivity issues.

What are Atera's key features?

Automation: Streamlines processes with powerful automation capabilities.
Remote Access: Facilitates easy access to client machines for issue resolution.
Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design enhances efficiency.
Integration: Seamless TeamViewer and Splashtop integration.
Monitoring: Effective monitoring and alert systems preempt issues.
Ticketing System: Boosts productivity with efficient workflow management.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are always up-to-date.
Scripting: Powerful tools for automation and task execution.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Efficiency: Automation and scripting enhance task management.
Cost-effective: Combines robust features with competitive pricing.
Scalability: Cross-platform compatibility supports business growth.
Productivity: Monitoring and alerts optimize resource allocation.

Atera is widely used by managed service providers and IT support companies to enhance efficiency in industries such as manufacturing and construction. It provides remote monitoring, automation, and comprehensive IT management, ensuring seamless integration with different products and systems for broad site coverage. Businesses leverage Atera's RMM, PSA, ticketing, and IT automation features to improve operational efficiency and responsiveness.

Atera

TeamViewer ONE offers remote access and cross-platform functionality, enhancing IT operations across various systems and clouds like AWS and Azure while streamlining setup and secure connections.

Providing a robust platform for IT professionals, TeamViewer ONE enables efficient remote management with features like interactive chat, file transfers, and seamless session management. Despite its strengths, users highlight the need for improved pricing models, security measures, and enhanced stability. Regular updates are requested to tackle connectivity and lag challenges, and improvements in reporting, integration, and mobile remote functionalities are desired.

What are the standout features of TeamViewer ONE?

Remote Access: Facilitates secure control across multiple devices.
Cross-Platform Functionality: Operates on different OS and cloud environments.
File Transfers: Enables smooth and efficient data exchange.
Interactive Chat: Supports real-time communication during sessions.
Remote Management: Provides a comprehensive view of system resources.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Enhanced Collaboration: Simplifies teamwork with easy connectivity.
IT Support Efficiency: Streamlines troubleshooting and support tasks.
Resource Management: Offers tools for managing system performance.
Security Assurance: Delivers trusted connections for data protection.

TeamViewer ONE is implemented in industries requiring remote support and server management, offering solutions for IT support, remote client connections, and seamless meeting management. It assists in monitoring, troubleshooting, and resolving software and hardware issues for service providers and companies.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

MSPs, IT consultants, and IT departments worldwide trust and use Atera.

Carey Paul Honda

Buyer's Guide

Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

June 2026

Free Report: Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE

Find out what your peers are saying about Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Atera vs. TeamViewer ONE report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors and best Patch Management vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.