Barracuda Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Barracuda Networks and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Barracuda Networks is ranked #46 with an average rating of 7.5, while OpenText is ranked #22 with an average rating of 9.0. Barracuda Networks holds a 1.1% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Barracuda Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Barracuda Backup

Read 7 Barracuda Backup reviews

2,162 Views
1,838 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

3,326 Views
3,060 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Barracuda Backup

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Barracuda Backup are leading solutions in data protection and backup. Barracuda Backup seems to have the upper hand due to higher user satisfaction and ease of use.

Features: OpenText Data Protector offers comprehensive data protection capabilities, scalability, and a robust feature set. Barracuda Backup is noted for its simplicity, reliability, and excellent integration capabilities.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve usability and introduce more intuitive management tools. Barracuda Backup could enhance its reporting functionalities and expand support for additional platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Deploying OpenText Data Protector can be cumbersome with a steep learning curve and need for technical expertise. Barracuda Backup offers a straightforward deployment process and excellent customer support.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has a high setup cost, impacting its perceived value. Barracuda Backup is considered cost-effective with a faster ROI due to lower initial costs and efficient performance.

To learn more, read our detailed Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Barracuda Backup

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

46th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (44th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Barracuda Backup is 1.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Barracuda Backup	1.1%
Other	97.9%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

GANESAN K

Senior Technical Engineer at Safezone Secure Solutions Private Limited

Rating shows fast restoration and reliable support with scope for improved integration and database backup options

The product needs improvement to become better. For example, we attempted to integrate with Postgres SQL server to backup the database alone, which was not supported. For this reason, we required a separate solution for database backups. While other SQL servers are supported, Barracuda Backup has limitations with database backups. The main area for improvement is integration and support for databases.

Read full review

Ahmad-Hassan

Project Manager And Technical Consultant at EEMC

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Barracuda Backup is that it's on the cloud, so there is no need for hardware."

"Barracuda email security works effectively with O365, and we have been able to achieve many use cases that other competitive products such as Micro, Fortinet, Trellix, or Forcepoint could not accomplish."

"The solution has been stable for us."

"The solution’s scalability is good because its space is unlimited. We can start in Office365 with one terabyte bit of information and leverage through an enterprise solution of 1000 users."

"One valuable feature of Barracuda Backup is that it can be used as thin VMware storage."

"Barracuda Backup is cost-effective because there is no licensing cost per server or VM."

"Micro Focus Data Protector's most valuable feature is its interaction with the fiber share. It is easy to use, we use it to back up without any problem to VTLs, and can use the Fiber Channel that is still the TCP."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...The initial setup process for the solution is easy."

"Data Protector was cheaper and would do what we needed to do."

"The tool's most valuable aspect is its ease of management. It was not complex. In terms of features, I can mention a couple of things. For example, if you need to restore a VM, you can do it with multiple streams in OpenText Data Protector, which is an advantage over Commvault, from what I've noticed, having worked with multiple tools. Another thing is the Oracle backups; configuring Oracle backups is much easier in OpenText Data Protector."

"Data Protector is quite simple and easy to deploy. The deployment is always the same. It's on a server, and the agents are deployed to the machines in a straightforward way. We have two engineers who deploy and manage all our backup solutions."

"The initial setup was relatively easy."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

"The command-line interface is user-friendly and well documented in the reference guide."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"Barracuda Backup's support could be improved because sometimes the support team is situated outside the country, leading to time zone issues."

"It would be nice if a user could delete something and then recover it themselves. That would be a nice feature."

"The product needs improvement to become better. For example, we attempted to integrate with Postgres SQL server to backup the database alone, which was not supported."

"Barracuda Backup's user interface needs to be renewed as it appears outdated."

"In using Barracuda Backup, sometimes the VM has issues and becomes non-functional, requiring support tickets to resolve."

"An improvement is required in reports and backups for sharing on Linux and Unix."

"The Micro Focus Data Protector support is not as good as Veeam Backup & Replication's support."

"In SAP restoration, we faced issues with changing the SIDs and changing the path for every backup object. It is quite a lengthy process to do that."

"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."

"OpenText Data Protector is more difficult to use and configure than OpenText VIM. The user-friendliness of OpenText Data Protector has to be increased, and the complexity of the tool needs to be reduced."

"If you compare the solution with the same specific features and enhancements on another solution, Data Protector is expensive. This is especially true when compared to, for example, Veeam."

"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."

"We have so many specific technological cracks in Micro Focus, but we are not getting the features, facilities, or coordination between the global delivery centers and the R&D team that we need to express our ideas."

"We think troubleshooting is one of the most difficult parts in this product. It is hard to find any signs for job errors and why a job did not run successfully."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The product is cheaper than Commvault."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."

"The licensing cost was not annual. We didn't pay any license. We paid when we deployed and we didn't pay for anything after that. There were no additional fees after the initial payment."

"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."

"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"The licensing cost is too high."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Barracuda Backup?

The pricing is very competitive. Licensing is on a yearly basis, and Barracuda even provides replacements after three years if a device reaches end of life, without any extra charges.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Barracuda Backup?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Barracuda Backup?

We are partners with Trellix Move Antivirus and we have sold it previously. That particular bundle has changed as Trellix has moved to Complete Protection and the DLP comes under another bundle. We...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs Barracuda Backup

Compared 6% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Barracuda Backup

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Storage Protect vs Barracuda Backup

Compared 4% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Barracuda Backup

Compared 4% of the time

Synology DSM vs Barracuda Backup

Compared 3% of the time

More Barracuda Backup Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 10% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

Dell Data Protection Advisor vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

February 2026

Download Barracuda Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

LiveVault, Barracuda Virtual Backup, Barracuda Backup Appliance

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Overview

Barracuda Backup maximizes data protection for businesses by automating and managing backups, providing secure and scalable storage options both on-premises and in the cloud, and simplifying restore processes.

Barracuda Backup is designed to protect critical business data through automated backup processes and efficient disaster recovery. It ensures data integrity while offering secure, scalable storage solutions. Users value its capability to simplify backup management, reduce manual intervention, and support hybrid environments, making it adaptable to different infrastructure setups. The solution's easy installation, reliable data protection, and seamless integration across environments are notable advantages.

What are the key features of Barracuda Backup?

Easy Installation and Configuration: Simplifies the setup process for users.
Efficient Deduplication and Compression: Optimizes storage use and reduces data volume.
Robust Replication Capabilities: Ensures that backup data is consistently replicated.
Versatile Restore Options: Provides multiple ways to restore crucial data.
Seamless Integration: Works well with different environments.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed insights into backup activities.
Excellent Customer Support: Provides reliable assistance and support services.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Reliable Data Protection: Ensures data integrity and minimizes loss risks.
Lower Manual Intervention: Automates processes, saving time and reducing errors.
Scalable Storage: Offers flexibility with on-premises and cloud storage options.
Efficient Disaster Recovery: Provides quick and reliable backup restoration.
Better Backup Management: Simplifies the overall backup and restoration workflow.

Barracuda Backup is deployed across several industries including finance, healthcare, and education, where data protection and quick recovery from disruptions are crucial. It adapts to sector-specific needs and provides reliable backup and recovery solutions, ensuring data security and availability in critical sectors.

Barracuda Networks

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Ochsner Health System

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

March 2026

Free Report: Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Barracuda Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.