Cisco TelePresence and Skype for Business compete in the video conferencing and collaboration tools category, with Skype for Business having an edge due to its feature-rich flexibility and integration with Microsoft tools.
Features: Cisco TelePresence offers immersive video conferencing with dual cameras in MX800 Dual screens and the highly valuable SpeakerTrack feature for tracking multiple participants. It delivers excellent video and sound quality suitable for high-stakes meetings, providing a lifelike meeting room experience. Skype for Business excels with its integration capabilities with Microsoft Office, supporting instant messaging, conferencing, and VoIP. It offers seamless file sharing, scheduling meetings integrated with Outlook, and the ability to conduct meetings with up to 200 participants.
Room for Improvement: Cisco TelePresence could enhance its configuration options to provide greater flexibility and reduce the need for extensive hardware. Reducing the cost of additional licenses and improving ease of use for non-specialized users would be beneficial. Enhancements in remote management tools and a simplified user interface could improve accessibility. Skype for Business, while feature-rich, suffers from video quality limitations compared to TelePresence. Its stability under high load and reliance on a strong internet connection can be problematic. The software could benefit from enhanced security measures and improved support for third-party integrations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Cisco TelePresence requires professional installation due to its hardware-intensive nature, leading to complexity in deployment and maintenance, but offers dedicated customer service. Conversely, Skype for Business ensures straightforward deployment across various devices due to its software-based approach, bolstered by Microsoft's comprehensive support network. Its ease of scalability and integration with existing infrastructure makes it appealing to many businesses.
Pricing and ROI: Cisco TelePresence demands significant upfront investment due to specialized equipment, though it provides high-quality returns for businesses focusing on premium video conferencing. Skype for Business is a more cost-effective option with lower initial expenses and a subscription-based billing strategy, facilitating a quick ROI. Its compatibility with existing Microsoft infrastructure provides efficient budget utilization for companies.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Skype for Business | 5.2% |
| Cisco TelePresence | 2.9% |
| Other | 91.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 2 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 27 |
We monitor all Virtual Meetings reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
