Conga Composer vs Windward Core comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Conga and Windward Studios are both solutions in the Document Generation Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Conga users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Windward Studios users who would recommend it.

Conga Composer

Read 19 Conga Composer reviews

2,024 Views
1,113 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Windward Core

Read 36 Windward Core reviews

4,457 Views
936 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Conga Composer

Windward Core

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Conga Composer and Windward Core based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about PandaDoc, Windward Studios, Docmosis and others in Document Generation Tools.

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Conga Composer

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Document Management Software (3rd), Document Automation Software (1st)

Windward Core

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Reporting (19th), Document Generation Tools (2nd)

Featured Reviews

Skumar Skumar

Salesforce Application Support Specialist at Vectra AI

Document creation has become faster and more accurate but complex templates still need improvement

In terms of improvements for Conga Composer, we did start seeing a lot of requests related to customization, which were initially difficult. As people got to know that it's very easy to customize it, we started to get those more and more, and we saw fewer errors. Earlier, there were many requests to manually adjust the contract value, which was not possible with the CPQ quote documents. With Conga Composer, we can customize it to some level. For exception cases, we can modify the template and generate the contract in a way they want it. While we did not record any metrics, looking at the overall tickets and the reduction in errors we used to see, I think it has improved efficiency by a lot, and our stakeholders agree. However, I would say that despite being easy to set up these templates, there are limitations around looping. Some functionalities break when dealing with large templates, around 30 to 40 pages long. We jumped on their support, but we could not come to a resolution, so we ended up reducing the overall complexity of our template. I think Conga Composer could improve its adoption for Conga Composer Sign. Right now, the adoption is not very great. People use Conga Composer mainly for document generation and then go separately for DocuSign. To get a better hold of the market, Conga should definitely invest more into Conga Composer Sign.

Read full review

Christopher Heinz

Sr. Systems Analyst at a tech services company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Strong layout and design capabilities; leverages every aspect available in Word-native formatting

The licensing key is a little bit twitchy. I'd like to see more HTML formatting support in templates. It has a basic stock of HTML formatting capability, but it doesn't have a rich vocabulary. I have to work around that sometimes. The help documentation and blog posts are extensive, but not always up to date. The error reports also need improvement. If you don't key it in right, it's a little hard to find the root cause. It gives you information as much as it can, but it doesn't really hone in and tell you explicitly what you should do to correct the problem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The declarative features and automatic API selections are great as they help with pre-built documentation, query generation, template generation, and articulation."

"Conga Composer helps to create documents faster and saves time."

"The initial setup of Conga Composer is easy."

"I have never faced any issues with stability."

"The most valuable feature is the automatic generation of invoices and the ability to merge fields from Salesforce into the document, creating a clean and professional invoice."

"It's quite simple."

"What I like about Conga Composer is that it's much easier than Salesforce's native templating. It's simple to add merge fields, write queries to pull data and access up to four levels of related objects. This makes it very comfortable to get all the needed data into templates."

"I like Conga Composer because it's simple and flexible. I can manage complex formatting and queries easily and integrate it with other tools like DocuSign for the signing process. I’ve used it in Salesforce by installing the Conga Composer package, creating Conga solutions, queries, templates, and using different parameters. Integration with DocuSign allows me to send documents for signatures with just one click, which has greatly improved workflows. By automating processes, such as generating quotes, it has reduced human errors significantly. I also find the ability to generate documents in various formats like PowerPoint, Excel, and Word very useful. However, I haven't worked with its AI capabilities yet."

More Conga Composer pros

"The ability for users to have design and layout control is very important because it allows them control over the design and layout of their reports, without the help of IT."

"Technical support is very good. They reply immediately and follow-up with any questions."

"Customer Service: As good as the product is, the customer service is even better."

"It's great; it's a good product, and for a relatively technical person, it's relatively easy to use."

"Since we moved from using a self-built reporting engine to a hybrid engine which uses the Windward solution as its primary reporting engine, running out new reports is significantly quicker, meaning we can get new reports to customers far more quickly."

"Our company is using Windward because it works well with Microsoft Office."

"The solution is very flexible, so you can create anything you want. Think of the possibilities you have in Excel or in Word, because these are the two document generators that are used the most. I only use Word, but I can use nearly every feature in Word, including making charts and tables, and produce those features in Windward, parametrically."

"This tool is great for tagging documents from different data sources such as XML, SQL, and other databases."

More Windward Core pros

Cons

"The documentation could be improved."

"Conga Composer can be improved because it has a steep learning curve, especially for new users."

"The debugging skills could be improved as we need to stay alert for issues."

"Conga is getting more and more expensive."

"When setting conditions, it doesn't work as expected, requiring us to rework the code."

"If there could be a preview option available directly in the application for testing templates instead of having to download and test them manually, it would save time."

"The initial setup is at an intermediate level of difficulty since understanding Conga Composer for the first time can be confusing."

"For newcomers to the platform, the removal of certain suggestions in recent releases can be a pain area."

More Conga Composer cons

"Customer Service: Their ability to help us troubleshoot is too low – they really need to help us troubleshoot in our environment – not their testing environment."

"Is there any way to avoid AutoTag loading in Word/Excel each time? I need to use it from time to time - quite rarely. AutoTag affects performance of Word/Excel. I do not want to install/uninstall AutoTag each time I need it."

"It needs better support for upgrades and more control over layout of elements. Upgrades tend to break existing output. Elements do not position where expected due to insertion of blank lines and page breaks. It takes time to fix these through trial and error."

"It would be nice to have a black-and-white, ideal setup for servers, to maximize capabilities. We went through a lot of scenarios to get something that is scalable. An ideal AWS-package server setup could have saved us a lot of time. But I understand this is very company specific."

"As Autotag constantly upgrades it does more post processing on the documents."

"Was limited by XML path restrictions. There were a couple of times I wanted to do something in the formulas which was prohibited by XML path but okay to do in Excel and the product is sold as being able to do whatever Excel can do in terms of formulas."

"I would like to see examples included within the Wiki information to show how each function option could be used."

"The only problem with the pricing of Windward is the limitation on the number of reports generated."

More Windward Core cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Regarding pricing, I believe it’s around fifty dollars, but I’m not entirely sure. Overall, I find the pricing reasonable and am quite satisfied with the product. The value we get from it justifies the cost, as it requires minimal maintenance and is straightforward to use. The functionality it provides aligns well with the investment."

"It's not cheap, but it's not overly expensive either."

"I think the tool costs around six dollars per user."

"The cost is reasonable."

"CapEx fits our requirements, OpEx is higher due to the 20% service and maintenance cost, where we normally pay 15%."

"Pricing is a bit higher than normal desktop applications, but it's well worth it. The ROI is simple to understand and the monthly payment for an annual license is affordable and worth it."

"The only problem with the pricing of Windward is the limitation on the number of reports generated. It is costly in that sense. If you want to increase, you have to pay more, based on the number of reports generated per day. It is not the same with Crystal Reports. With the latter, you buy a license at one point in time and that's it."

"Windward is very expensive when the volume of documents being generated is low and it is cheap when the volume is high."

"It is absolutely worth the value. They have flexibility, depending on what you're looking for from a buying standpoint. The current pricing models are quite flexible, with the ability to use it on an as-needed basis, or to get a perpetual license that covers a customer that might have extensive needs. I think it's pretty good."

"I'm starting to hear clients squeal about the price of their software. The cost of the software has gone up."

"We negotiated our prices many years ago, and while they go up a little bit here and there, they've been pretty steady."

More Windward Core pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Document Generation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Marketing Services Firm

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	20
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	8

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Conga Composer?

Not Sure, As i implemented the Quote Documents as per business need but client directly buy it for salesforce

See all answers

What needs improvement with Conga Composer?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Conga Composer?

One of the main use cases for Conga Composer would be to generate quote documents. We had different types of quote documents in our business process, so we used different kinds of Conga Composer te...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Box - Intelligent Content Management vs Conga Composer

Compared 10% of the time

CA View vs Conga Composer

Compared 9% of the time

SS&C Blue Prism vs Conga Composer

Compared 9% of the time

DocuWare vs Conga Composer

Compared 7% of the time

SearchExpress vs Conga Composer

Compared 4% of the time

More Conga Composer Competitors

Microsoft Power BI vs Windward Core

Compared 15% of the time

SAP Crystal Reports vs Windward Core

Compared 12% of the time

TIBCO Jaspersoft vs Windward Core

Compared 7% of the time

Docmosis vs Windward Core

Compared 7% of the time

Longview Analytics vs Windward Core

Compared 2% of the time

More Windward Core Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Conga Composer

October 2026

Download Conga Composer product report

Buyer's Guide

Windward Core

October 2026

Download Windward Core product report

Also Known As

Conga

Windward, Windward Studios

Overview

Conga Composer offers a powerful document generation tool with seamless Salesforce integration and dynamic data merging, allowing users to create customized templates for efficient workflows.

Featuring an intuitive interface, Conga Composer streamlines document creation through automation, reducing manual tasks and enhancing accuracy. Integrating with Salesforce, it supports dynamic data merging and customizable templates for Word and Excel. E-signature incorporation and multilingual support provide added functionality. Despite its capabilities, users note concerns over cost, documentation depth, and integration challenges beyond Salesforce. Improvements in template management, user guidance, and debugging support could enhance its usability.

What are the key features?

Intuitive Interface: User-friendly design simplifies document creation.
Seamless Salesforce Integration: Allows for smooth data merging and document generation within Salesforce.
Customizable Templates: Provides flexibility with Word and Excel templates.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks and enhances accuracy in workflows.
E-signature Support: Facilitates digital signing processes.
Multilingual Functionality: Supports multiple languages for broad applicability.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Increased Efficiency: Automation and dynamic data merging enhance productivity.
Improved Accuracy: Reduces errors in document creation with customizable templates.
Streamlined Workflows: Simplifies processes through integration with platforms like Salesforce.
Enhanced Functionality: Offers flexibility with e-signatures and multilingual support.

Conga Composer is widely applied in sectors like healthcare and finance, automating document creation for invoices, proposals, and reports. It integrates seamlessly with DocuSign for e-signatures, focusing on improving document accuracy and customization for different applications.

Conga

Windward Core integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Office, enabling users to create and manage templates efficiently. Its intuitive design, combined with support for data sources like XML and SQL, makes it versatile for generating high-quality documents and reports in multiple formats.

Windward Core provides a powerful document generation platform tailored for businesses aiming to streamline report creation. The AutoTag feature simplifies complex report designs, allowing non-technical users to craft reports with minimal learning effort. The system's versatility is reflected in its compatibility with multiple data sources and superior output formats, including PDF and HTML. Effective training enhances user proficiency, though improvements are sought in areas like PDF generation, Word format consistency, and a more intuitive interface. Users also seek expanded reporting features and better error handling to enhance troubleshooting processes.

What are the standout features of Windward Core?

Microsoft Office Integration: Enables seamless template management and creation.
AutoTag Feature: Simplifies complex report design, reducing development time.
Data Source Flexibility: Supports XML, SQL, and other sources for enhanced versatility.
Output Format Options: Produces documents in various formats, including PDF and HTML.
Intuitive Design: Minimizes the learning curve for non-technical users.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating Windward Core?

Reduced Development Time: Accelerates report creation with intuitive features.
Enhanced Flexibility: Works well with diverse data sources.
Improved User Proficiency: Effective training resources aid skill acquisition.
Versatile Document Outputs: Multiple format options meet different needs.

In specialized industries like law and finance, organizations utilize Windward Core to produce extensive reports and manage document templates effectively. Law firms and banks leverage its technology to create templates for legal and financial documents. It also supports dynamic document creation for tax communications and targeted outputs in sectors like elevator manufacturing.

Windward Studios

Sample Customers

Arkus, CollegeTracks, Colorado Creative Industries, Davies Office, Delta Air, Depersico, Diagnostic Innovations, Digital Dolphin, Finnzymes

HAL, Inc., Axe Group, White Clark Group, Blueprint Software, Aspect Security, Nucleus Software, LeBlanc’s Food Stores, South Sound 911, Aegon, Barclays, Fidelity Investments, ArisGlobal LLC, USDA, RepLink, AON Hewitt

Buyer's Guide

Docmosis vs. Windward Core

September 2026

Free Report: Docmosis vs. Windward Core

Find out what your peers are saying about Docmosis vs. Windward Core and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Document Generation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Document Generation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.