Eggplant Test vs Zephyr Enterprise comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Keysight Technologies and SmartBear are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Keysight Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3, while SmartBear is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.0. Keysight Technologies holds a 2.7% mindshare in TMT, compared to SmartBear’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Keysight Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

5,927 Views
1,008 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Zephyr Enterprise

Read 9 Zephyr Enterprise reviews

2,072 Views
1,865 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Zephyr Enterprise

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Zephyr Enterprise and Eggplant Test are robust test management tools competing in the test management software category. Based on user reviews, Eggplant Test appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive features.

Features: Zephyr Enterprise users value its comprehensive test cycle planning, integration capabilities with various development environments, and user-friendly interface. Eggplant Test is praised for its automation efficiency, cross-platform support, and advanced analytics features.

Room for Improvement:Zephyr Enterprise users highlight the need for a more modern and intuitive interface, reliable reporting functionalities, and enhanced customization options. Eggplant Test users seek improvements in the script debugging process, performance of extensive test suites, and the user interface design.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Users find Zephyr Enterprise easy to deploy, with comprehensive customer service and detailed documentation. Eggplant Test deploys smoothly but faces criticism for its steeper learning curve. Despite this, Eggplant Test's customer service receives higher marks for its responsiveness and effectiveness.

Pricing and ROI:Zephyr Enterprise is noted for its cost-efficiency and swift ROI with its value seen in the setup cost. Eggplant Test, while more expensive, delivers substantial ROI through its powerful automation features. Users willing to invest in Eggplant Test generally feel the superior test automation justifies the higher price.

To learn more, read our detailed Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (10th)

Zephyr Enterprise

Ranking in Test Management Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Eggplant Test is 2.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zephyr Enterprise is 5.0%, down from 7.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Zephyr Enterprise	5.0%
Eggplant Test	2.7%
Other	92.3%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Integration with tool streamlines test management but needs better exporting options

I use it for test management within Jira This tool boasts an incredibly user-friendly interface that integrates seamlessly with other Jira tools. I particularly appreciate its intuitive features for designing test plans, creating test cases, and executing test cycles. Some areas for improvement,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Its scalability is good. It is useful for desktop applications, and it also uses OCR and does image recognition."

"GUI testing is the strength of the tool, we have been satisfied with the tool, and not only the tool, but the service behind it, as the tool works as expected and the response from eggPlant, as a company, has been quick and substantial."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"These days I use only Eggplant since it is very easy to use, especially in the function test, and in the UI test, and it's better than other tools."

"The solution is a stable one."

"It has enabled true end-to-end testing."

"Good text reading ability."

"We did see a massive return on investment from using Eggplant."

More Eggplant Test pros

"It has integration with test automation tools."

"It has a very intuitive user experience."

"It's very simple to use, which is beneficial, and it has 90% of the basic features you need without having to pay a lot of extra money."

"We use the solution for test case management."

"Zephyr Enterprise is a stable solution."

"Zephyr really improves the testing of the product on many levels - planning, test case creation, automation goals, test reporting, and verification of the testing."

"At this moment, it is fulfilling our requirements."

"If anyone is looking for a good, lightweight, flexible and agile test management product, I think they would do very well with Zephyr Enterprise."

More Zephyr Enterprise pros

Cons

"Eggplant Test should emphasize on improving its offering in non-Windows environments."

"The solution would crash from time to time."

"I would like to see standardized actions already built into Eggplant. For example, "wait eight seconds". That way, I wouldn't need to create it as an action. Right now, I have to program that wait and describe it as an action so that everybody knows it is an action that waits eight seconds... That way, somebody who is not familiar with programming processes like "if-else", or "for", or "while", would be able, from the first moment, and without programming, to put some easy-to-use, standardized, actions in place."

"Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence could improve by lowering the price."

"They need to update the Linux. I think it's kind of an outdated Java Swing application, it almost gives you the impression that the application was written in Java Swing."

"There was no free trial in it."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"eggPlants data input is text based and does not easily conform to data driven test, and this makes data management painful."

More Eggplant Test cons

"Additionally, they could improve the daily reporting. It does generate reports, but they are screen based reports."

"Zephyr Enterprise needs to redesign the reporting."

"The only thing I have missed is an easy way to configure showing the latest execution results of all test cases linked in JIRA (story/epic), thus, receiving the state of a feature."

"Security needs improvement to protect customer information better."

"The solution is not really stable. Sometimes in the past, some pages wouldn't load due to issues."

"We have a lot of automation for our products, and we require a utility for its integration with automation. Currently, we have to write this utility ourselves. It would be great if they can provide such a utility."

"The reporting, and the ability to reorganize the test repository, which are a little stifling. There is definitely room for improvement there."

"Creating better default varieties of reporting would make the product much better and more popular."

More Zephyr Enterprise cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"It costs a couple of thousand dollars for a little more than 125 users, per month."

"DFS is more expensive than Zephyr. DFS is around $32 per person, whereas Zephyr is $10 per person. There is a major difference in the price, which is the main reason why we are trying to shift to Zephyr."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Construction Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	2
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

Questions from the Community

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zephyr Enterprise?

Some areas for improvement, include its export capabilities. Exporting test cases, especially those with screenshots or attachments, can be cumbersome, hindering easy sharing and scalability.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Zephyr Enterprise?

I use it for test management within Jira.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Zephyr Enterprise?

I would recommend it mainly for manual testing and test management. Within Zephyrscale, they also have automated testing, however, I would recommend it only for test management. The overall rating ...

See all answers

Comparisons

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

OpenText Application Quality Management vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 21% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis qTest vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

TFS vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Silk Central vs Zephyr Enterprise

Compared 5% of the time

More Zephyr Enterprise Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

September 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Buyer's Guide

Zephyr Enterprise

August 2026

Download Zephyr Enterprise product report

Also Known As

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

SmartBear Zephyr

Overview

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

Zephyr Enterprise is known for its flexible design, enabling easy linkages and quick updates accessible to everyone. Supporting multiple users, it offers test management solutions for web and mobile testing, integrating smoothly with other Jira tools.

Recognized for its lightweight configuration, Zephyr Enterprise allows for efficient test execution planning and report generation. The interface is intuitive, integrating seamlessly with other Jira tools for effective test plan design and execution. Users, drawn to its automation capabilities, leverage it for both web and mobile testing environments. However, areas such as test case version tracking, report variety, and export processes require improvement. Enhancements in security and test repository management are also noted. Primarily used for diverse test management methodologies, the transition from waterfall to agile frameworks presents challenges, yet integration with automation tools and Jira remains a strong use case.

What are the most important features?

Lightweight Design: Enables easy modifications and accessibility for all users.
Multi-user Support: Facilitates simultaneous user access with a global perspective.
Automation Integration: Essential for both web and mobile testing environments.
Comprehensive Reporting: Generates detailed reports with an emphasis on simplicity.
Jira Integration: Seamless interaction with Jira tools enhances test planning.

What benefits or ROI should users expect?

Efficient Test Management: Supports agile and waterfall methodologies with ease.
Improved Accessibility: Multiple users can view updates and modifications efficiently.
Cost-effective Integration: Works well with existing automation frameworks, reducing costs.
Streamlined Processes: Simplifies sales and customer verification processes.

In specific industries, Zephyr Enterprise is instrumental for test management in sales and customer verification. While initially tailored for waterfall projects, its adoption in agile frameworks, coupled with Jira and automation tools, supports continuous integration practices. This adaptability makes it a viable option across multiple sectors with cost considerations prompting some to use alternative tools like DFS for specialized projects.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Hyundai, Fujitsu, Google, David Jones, Burger King, Ingenico, Websense, Dow Jones, Harris, Saab

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise

September 2026

Free Report: Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise

Find out what your peers are saying about Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Eggplant Test vs. Zephyr Enterprise report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.