Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs N-able N-central comparison

The compared Fortinet and N-able solutions aren't in the same category. Fortinet is ranked #5 in Firewall Security Management , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 4.3% mindshare in the category. N-able is ranked #5 in RMM , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Read 80 Fortinet FortiGate Cloud reviews

4,353 Views
1,001 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

1,881 Views
1,580 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and N-able N-central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Firewall Security Management

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewall Security Management (5th)

N-able N-central

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and N-able N-central aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is designed for Firewall Security Management and holds a mindshare of 4.3%, down 5.3% compared to last year.
N-able N-central, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), holds 7.4% mindshare, down 11.6% since last year.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud	4.3%
AlgoSec	20.3%
Tufin Orchestration Suite	19.8%
Other	55.599999999999994%

Firewall Security Management

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-central	7.4%
Kaseya VSA	15.0%
NinjaOne	11.9%
Other	65.7%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Firman Sanjaya

Security Engineer at Exclusive Networks

Cloud logs have supported long-term auditing but security vulnerabilities still raise concerns

It depends on the user. When he needs maybe data retention for one year, for three months or more, I recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. If he doesn't want to set the log on FortiAnalyzer, I will recommend him with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. It depends. As I mentioned before, if they don't have a syslog server or any other SIEM, I will recommend it. If they need an audit for one year of data retention, I will recommend it because it's worth the money for one year of log retention. It's straightforward. If I enable Fortinet FortiGate Cloud feature on the FortiGate on-premise or VM, it will copy the configuration on the cloud. Depending on my license, I can configure it or have it as read-only with a limited license. That's one of the main purposes of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for me. The report doesn't have many templates, but the log retention is so good with one-year retention. If you compare it with the FortiAnalyzer or maybe with any other product such as a FortiSIEM template, with the limited license, you only get the 360 template, it's called. I think the security function, I mainly use it for configuration purposes and log retention purposes. The security is the same as the VM or the hardware, I think. The sandbox. I think it has it, but not a lot if you only have the default capability with only 10 files per minute. I think the user needs to be selective with the files that they want to send to the sandbox on the cloud.

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a solid solution for business environments. Investing in this technology can yield significant cost and security enhancements."

"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud are the IPS, SSL Wireless, and VPN. Additionally, packet inspection and point-to-point VPN application control are useful."

"The hardware is reliable, and their support is excellent."

"The security features, for example, URL filtering, AMP, and advanced threat protection, are very valuable."

"FortiGate Cloud's key features are the user interface and ease of access."

"I have found the SD-WAN, flexibility, and security the most valuable features."

"The solution is very easy to use."

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud has valuable firewall, SSL VPN, and web filtering features."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pros

"The solution's service is good."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"The Linux version currently lacks some of the latest features, notably in the IPv6 tool stack, which is available for Windows clients."

"If you need to scale, you do need to trade up to a new Fortinet solution."

"Fortinet could improve FortiGate Cloud by providing better integration with third-party applications and features."

"Having a built-in SOC solution like an XDR platform within the solution would be convenient for customers."

"The console or demonstration tool could be more user friendly."

"The initial setup is considered to be difficult."

"Lacks some security against external attacks."

"ACL is an area with shortcomings that needs to be improved."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud cons

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

"N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be beneficial if N-central could expand its MDM support to include Android devices."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price was more affordable compared to other models and brands we considered."

"The solution is relatively cost-effective compared to alternatives."

"The tool's pricing is fair. I rate it a six out of ten. You don't have to pay any additional costs."

"The price of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is reasonable when compared to Juniper and others, we are happy. We have a three-year subscription."

"Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is a cost-effective solution. I rate its pricing a six out of ten. Pricing depends on the firewall model. If the firewall model's pricing is high, the solution's pricing also increases."

"When comparing this solution to others it is less expensive and there is an annual license required."

"I rate the product pricing as seven out of ten."

"The price of FortiGate Cloud is generally cheaper than other similar products."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pricing and cost advice

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Real Estate/Law Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	22

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am very satisfied with the price and licensing cost of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, rating it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

It needs to improve the vulnerability that I found recently regarding the single sign-on from Fortinet FortiGate Cloud account. That became a concern for my user. The CVE that was leaked recently a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am not a user at this time. I am a system integrator. Mostly firewall and network protection. Rarely with endpoint protection. I can say a partner and reseller, I think.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiManager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 61% of the time

AWS Firewall Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 6% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

Fortinet FortiPortal vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 3% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 22% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 20% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 13% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 12% of the time

LogMeIn Central vs N-able N-central

Compared 3% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

March 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

March 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

FortiCloud, FortiGate Cloud

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

FortiCloud can help with your wireless and security challenges in a number of ways. Our solution addresses common IT difficulties including time-consuming provisioning, high investment costs, complex management, vulnerability to advanced threats, and the need to easily scale with growth.

Fortinet

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Firewall Security Management

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, Tufin, FireMon and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.