Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs N-able N-central comparison

Why PeerSpot?

The compared Fortinet and N-able solutions aren't in the same category. Fortinet is ranked #5 in Firewall Security Management , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 5.5% mindshare in the category. N-able is ranked #6 in RMM , with an average rating of 8.3, and holds a 5.4% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Fortinet users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Read 80 Fortinet FortiGate Cloud reviews

5,844 Views
1,636 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

2,898 Views
2,434 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and N-able N-central based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, FireMon, Tufin and others in Firewall Security Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Firewall Security Management Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Firewall Security Management

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,806 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Firewall Security Management (5th)

N-able N-central

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (6th)

Mindshare comparison

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud and N-able N-central aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is designed for Firewall Security Management and holds a mindshare of 5.5%, up 4.6% compared to last year.
N-able N-central, on the other hand, focuses on Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM), holds 5.4% mindshare, down 8.7% since last year.

Firewall Security Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Fortinet FortiGate Cloud	5.5%
AlgoSec	15.8%
Tufin Orchestration Suite	15.3%
Other	63.4%

Firewall Security Management

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-central	5.4%
NinjaOne	10.0%
Kaseya VSA	9.8%
Other	74.8%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Firman Sanjaya

Security Engineer at Exclusive Networks

Cloud logs have supported long-term auditing but security vulnerabilities still raise concerns

It depends on the user. When he needs maybe data retention for one year, for three months or more, I recommend Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. If he doesn't want to set the log on FortiAnalyzer, I will recommend him with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. It depends. As I mentioned before, if they don't have a syslog server or any other SIEM, I will recommend it. If they need an audit for one year of data retention, I will recommend it because it's worth the money for one year of log retention. It's straightforward. If I enable Fortinet FortiGate Cloud feature on the FortiGate on-premise or VM, it will copy the configuration on the cloud. Depending on my license, I can configure it or have it as read-only with a limited license. That's one of the main purposes of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for me. The report doesn't have many templates, but the log retention is so good with one-year retention. If you compare it with the FortiAnalyzer or maybe with any other product such as a FortiSIEM template, with the limited license, you only get the 360 template, it's called. I think the security function, I mainly use it for configuration purposes and log retention purposes. The security is the same as the VM or the hardware, I think. The sandbox. I think it has it, but not a lot if you only have the default capability with only 10 files per minute. I think the user needs to be selective with the files that they want to send to the sandbox on the cloud.

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Our customers implement this solution so that they can be assured of security in their environment."

"Managing is very simple via Fortinet, which really is a value-add to our technology - at least, the infrastructure portion, the management part."

"The solution works well for remote or branch offices with unlimited links, and that's where we've found the most benefit."

"It's easy to use and the fact that I can schedule the report to come to my inbox at set times is very convenient for me."

"The hardware is reliable, and their support is excellent."

"The most valuable FortiGate Cloud feature is logging. It's there seven days a week, and there is no hard limit on logs or size restrictions. This much capacity will show up for that seven days. FortiGate Cloud offers many other valuable features like Fortinet Secure Gateway, SASE, and the Fortinet Security Fabric."

"We introduced FortiGate to our customers because we know it works properly and our customers are satisfied with it."

"FortiGate Cloud's key features are the user interface and ease of access."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pros

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth; we were confident that our migration would not affect any operations, and it was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"Things are moving increasingly towards hardware agnostic appliances, an area in which I would like Fortinet to be more focused and fast moving with that product line."

"We had a problem with external attacks in the previous solution we were using so I'd always like to see additional security around that problem."

"The solution should include a commit button that allows for review of changes and deployments before they are submitted."

"They could improve the product features for telemetry and interoperability with third-party monitoring tools."

"The solution’s pricing and stability could be improved."

"The solution should allow users to keep the data for longer than the current periods."

"The scalability is not good because there have been many barriers to scaling."

"Improving the platform's intuitiveness and consolidating functionalities, such as reporting and firewall features, could enhance user experience and reduce the need for multiple product purchases."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud cons

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool's pricing is cheap."

"The price of the product is approximately 10,000 Qatar Riyal ($2,750 USD), and another 10,000 Qatar Riyal for a three-year license."

"The license for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is annual."

"The pricing is competitive."

"The solution is neither cheap nor expensive."

"All the consulting and deployment charges are included in the product's licenses. There are no additional costs."

"It's relatively cheap."

"The tool's pricing is fair. I rate it a six out of ten. You don't have to pay any additional costs."

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud pricing and cost advice

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Firewall Security Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	52
Midsize Enterprise	10
Large Enterprise	21

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am very satisfied with the price and licensing cost of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud, rating it an eight out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

It needs to improve the vulnerability that I found recently regarding the single sign-on from Fortinet FortiGate Cloud account. That became a concern for my user. The CVE that was leaked recently a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

I am not a user at this time. I am a system integrator. Mostly firewall and network protection. Rarely with endpoint protection. I can say a partner and reseller, I think.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Comparisons

Fortinet FortiManager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 37% of the time

Palo Alto Networks Panorama vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

FireMon Security Manager vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

FortiGate Cloud-Native Firewall (FortiGate CNF) vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 5% of the time

Skybox Security Suite vs Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

Compared 4% of the time

More Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Competitors

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 21% of the time

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 9% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 8% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs N-able N-central

Compared 4% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

September 2026

Download Fortinet FortiGate Cloud product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

September 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

FortiCloud, FortiGate Cloud

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers centralized management with advanced security, scalability, and network management capabilities. It simplifies multi-site management with SD-WAN, real-time threat intelligence, and seamless integration, ensuring robust protection.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud is known for delivering extensive network security features, specializing in robust firewall functions and SD-WAN capabilities. It offers real-time threat intelligence, intrusion prevention, and VPN features. Users appreciate the ease of deployment and integration capabilities, making it suitable for managing devices across multiple sites. However, areas such as support, VPN streamlining, and dashboard enhancements require attention to improve usability. Pricing and technical complexity can be challenging, and better third-party integrations are desired.

What are the key features of Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management with intuitive controls.
SD-WAN Capabilities: Ensures efficient and secure network performance.
Reliable VPN Features: Protects connections with advanced encryption.
Centralized Management: Streamlines control across multiple locations.
Real-Time Threat Intelligence: Provides up-to-date security insights.

What benefits are users finding in Fortinet FortiGate Cloud?

Scalability: Easily adapts to growing network demands.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex network operations.
Effective Policy Control: Enhances security through detailed configurations.
Network Performance: Optimizes traffic management and routing.

Industries implement Fortinet FortiGate Cloud for network security management, serving as a firewall and enabling SD-WAN tunneling. Organizations use it to manage devices and secure cloud as well as on-premises environments. It assists with application filtering, identity management, and integrates with major cloud providers for comprehensive security. System integrators offer it as a managed security service, benefiting companies that need to secure network infrastructures across multiple sites.

Fortinet

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Sample Customers

Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Firewall Security Management

September 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about AlgoSec, FireMon, Tufin and others in Firewall Security Management. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,806 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Firewall Security Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.