GoTo Resolve vs TeamViewer comparison

GoTo and TeamViewer are both solutions in the Remote Access category. GoTo is ranked #27, while TeamViewer is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.7. GoTo holds a 1.5% mindshare in VUS, compared to TeamViewer’s 8.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of TeamViewer users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 19, 2026

TeamViewer Business and GoTo Resolve are both remote support tools. TeamViewer Business has the upper hand in connection reliability and integration, while GoTo Resolve is stronger in navigation and IT management capabilities.

Features: TeamViewer Business shows strong integration capabilities and provides reliable connections, enabling efficient remote support for various devices. It also includes features that streamline the process of connecting with remote systems. GoTo Resolve is characterized by efficient navigation and broad IT management features, making it ideal for IT professionals looking for comprehensive solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TeamViewer Business offers a straightforward deployment process with diverse integration options, ensuring quick setup and efficient service. GoTo Resolve provides a simplified deployment process and accessible customer guidance, aiding in rapid implementation.

Pricing and ROI: TeamViewer Business requires a moderate upfront investment with significant potential for rapid ROI, thanks to its efficient remote connectivity. GoTo Resolve's pricing reflects its comprehensive toolset and extensive support solutions, delivering ample ROI for IT management.

To learn more, read our detailed GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,747 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 6.3%, down from 10.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of GoTo Resolve is 1.5%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer is 8.2%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
TeamViewer	8.2%
Microsoft Intune	6.3%
GoTo Resolve	1.5%
Other	84.0%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

Akash Jogdande

Technical executive at Satcom Infotech

Delivers seamless remote access and excellent support

I don't have experience in ManageEngine. I have experience with GFI LANguard, Qualys Patch Management, and WatchGuard Firebox. I also have experience with GoTo Resolve. I don't know about the advanced security protocols in GoTo Resolve. The solution is very good. The vendor is good, the technical support is good, so there will be no complaint about it. I rate GoTo Resolve 9 out of 10.

Read full review

Shubham-Agarwal

Manager - Projects at Cognizant

Remote access has cut critical issue resolution time and supports faster production troubleshooting

Perhaps on the UI side of TeamViewer because we are connecting to different remote desktop connections or remote server connections. Whenever we are working on one of the production issues and we open multiple connections, it is very hectic or confusing to jump from one server to another server. Perhaps on the UI side, if they can improve something related to the view sessions or which session is connected to which remote server, that would be helpful. Perhaps something related to the authentication because it should have a proper authentication mechanism. Every developer should not access TeamViewer or the remote desktop by using TeamViewer. We always have a proper authentication or multifactor authentication mechanism in place, so only those on on-call support or P1 support at that time can access the remote server, but not anyone else. I chose nine out of 10 because sometimes we face the session timeout issue. Suppose during the production support, we connect to one of the remote servers, and if it is idle for approximately 10 or 15 minutes, the session timeout happens. We have to follow the same authentication mechanism to connect to the remote server again. During the session timeout, it delays our process or the troubleshooting steps, which is the reason I have given nine out of 10 instead of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is that it is more of a one-stop shop, providing an easier experience."

"Microsoft Intune has never crashed for me; it always works without fail."

"We have definitely seen a good return on investment, as it has saved a good amount of time in device setup and support, reducing manual effort by around forty to fifty percent and also fewer on-site interventions since most issues are handled remotely."

"Autopilot is a feature I really like."

"Since implementing this solution, our company has grown substantially, and our talent pool has significantly expanded."

"Microsoft Intune is a very strong and modern endpoint management solution, especially for organizations moving towards cloud and hybrid environments."

"Microsoft Intune reduces the time of our engineers, cuts down costs for the deployment of our endpoints managed by Microsoft Intune, and helps to improve compliance and the security policies we wanted to apply on endpoints, which was not happening earlier."

"The best feature of Microsoft Intune is that it managed the endpoints."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"The ability to change the way that the client works to a service so that we can get a little bit deeper into the operating system, as opposed to just an app running is the most valuable aspect. We also like the unattended sessions. Those are probably the two most important things to us. It's important because we can't do certain things when it is just an application running."

"I think that's the best solution I have ever checked; instead of AnyDesk or TeamViewer, you can use GoTo Resolve."

"We wouldn't be able to offer the services that we offer without a product like this."

"I find the mouse control and the ability to click for them very effective. I can move the mouse and click on buttons as if sitting at their computer. These are the basic features I use most often in the solution. There are tricker features that I don't use much because I don't need them frequently. Overall, it's a great tool for helping others with their computer issues without traveling to their location or another building."

"TeamViewer is stable."

"It's a user-friendly product."

"It has been useful and it has increased our productivity by some 400 percent."

"The quality of the call and the quality of the sharing have been excellent."

"TeamViewer allows us to do multiple controllers on a Host, which is great. We have a lot of Macs in our organization, and TeamViewer being cross-platform is a good thing."

"I like that it helped a lot, even with low bandwidth network connectivity. For example, while I was traveling, sometimes there were requirements for me to join a TeamViewer session and provide technical support. I was able to do that without much of an issue. It is also a secure solution."

"Getting started with TeamViewer was easy, with a very straightforward usage"

More TeamViewer pros

Cons

"Microsoft Copilot in Microsoft Intune is absolutely useless for protecting my environment."

"No option to do end-to-en macOS management. Slow implementation of policies."

"The reports aren't complete, and it's not easy to build custom reports."

"It would be beneficial to have a more straightforward understanding of Intune's capabilities, presented in a simplified manner."

"I'm not able to scale because of the issues with macOS management."

"Microsoft Intune lags market leaders, such as Apperian, in its MAM capabilities."

"The main disadvantage seen today is regarding Linux clients. We have a lot of development resources that have Linux on their clients, and we can't manage them on the same platform, as we do with other clients such as macOS and Windows. So, it should have support for Linux clients. It should also have better support for macOS."

"Enhancements for managing MacOS more comprehensively would be beneficial."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"The pricing of GoTo Resolve is very high compared to other solutions."

"If they included some sort of monitoring system for managed services so we can have it all in one package, that would be helpful. There are managed services solutions that allow us to remote into the computers, but a lot of them have too much overhead. Usually, the remote connection is not as simple and as fast and cannot be run as a service."

"I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive."

"I believe the graphical resolutions can be improved on the product, as apart from this, the product is very easy to use and easy on the eye."

"One thing that would really help with TeamViewer Business is if they were able to provide an easier way to deploy TeamViewer Business on all devices using group policy, as the current solution is quite clunky and very technical to set up; I have struggled and spent many days trying to get TeamViewer Business pushed out via group policy, and it has never worked as we would prefer, so we end up doing it manually, which is a drain on resources."

"It would be nice to see TeamViewer load screens faster."

"Only the paid version allows for file transfer. Also, it is annoying that I have to upgrade every time they release a new version because I can't use an older version to access a new one even if my version is paid and their version is a trial."

"The performance could always be better."

"The one area which needs improvement for both the standalone and enterprise versions would be inter-operability between versions."

"I didn't like the fact that you had to install a client for remote support. If you didn't install the client, you were very limited in terms of what you could do. For a whole enterprise, it is just not an easy task to install a client on everything. Even if you're using SCCM, it is an undertaking. For transient clients that you don't necessarily support a hundred percent of the time, it would be nice to be able to connect to them and support their issues without having to install something on their machines. In my previous company, we were looking at this solution as being a collaborative tool for the enterprise in terms of video conferencing, calling, and scheduling. They were working on bringing a bunch of products together to make their suite a little more integrated, but it really wasn't at the point where we wanted it to be in terms of integration. We looked at it, reviewed it, and tested it out a bit. We then decided to go with Microsoft Teams. It has the clunkiness of having separate modules that aren't totally integrated. There are different methods for doing different things, which makes it a little bit more complicated. There should be the same way whether you are doing remote support or just calls."

More TeamViewer cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive. The cost depends on the license that we choose."

"Our enterprise agreement includes Microsoft Intune at no additional cost."

"It's a part of Microsoft 365 and E5 licenses. Microsoft's strategy of making every feature in Microsoft Intune paid needs optimization. Remote control is one of the basic features, not a luxury feature, yet we must pay for it. I"

"It is reasonable for the features it has."

"Microsoft Intune is available for individual purchase at a low per-device cost."

"The cost of the license and the features are justified for myself as a technical person."

"The pricing is competitive, but it is not cheap."

"Microsoft Intune's costliness stems from licensing fees and the overhead associated with its management, user experience, and device remediation."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"It's very inexpensive. The seats are $25 monthly apiece or something. There aren't additional costs that I'm aware of."

"The price of the license could be less expensive."

"I used the free version of TeamViewer."

"We are not using the solution for commercial use therefore it is free to use."

"The cost of the licenses depends on how you buy them. They just had a buy one get one free deal going, and they do that every once in a while. Where you buy one license, and they will give you the second one free, or you can try to get discounts. Most of our licenses that we have we tried to do something like that just to save some money."

"We have an annual subscription that is just under $1,900 with no additional costs. We get these promotions about upgrades and stuff like that, but we haven't had a need to add more seats. Users can also use TeamViewer for home use with a non-commercial free license."

"I am using the free version of TeamViewer. There is a subscription fee to use the premium features."

"There is a free and paid version of this solution. I am currently using the free version."

"I rate pricing a ten on a scale from one to ten, where one is low and ten is high. There are no additional costs attached to the licensing of the solution."

More TeamViewer pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Government

Computer Software Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Media Company

Manufacturing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	185

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	44
Midsize Enterprise	37
Large Enterprise	39

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with GoToAssist?

The pricing of GoTo Resolve is very high compared to other solutions. Pricing is a room for improvement for them, to ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for GoToAssist?

For patch management, I use GFI LANguard and GoTo Resolve. I am a distributor. In my company, Satcom Infotech, we dis...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering GoToAssist?

I don't have experience in ManageEngine. I have experience with GFI LANguard, Qualys Patch Management, and WatchGuard...

See all answers

Should I choose Teamviewer Tensor over the regular Teamviewer?

The number one advantage of TeamViewer for me is its ease of use, specifically as it relates to the client side. By f...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TeamViewer?

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for TeamViewer Business are relatively very competitive and cost-effective.

See all answers

What needs improvement with TeamViewer?

I believe latency can be optimized, and security control sometimes goes over the top and feels excessive. Virus scann...

See all answers

Comparisons

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs GoTo Resolve

Compared 15% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs GoTo Resolve

Compared 13% of the time

GoToMyPC vs GoTo Resolve

Compared 11% of the time

ScreenConnect vs GoTo Resolve

Compared 9% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs GoTo Resolve

Compared 4% of the time

More GoTo Resolve Competitors

BeyondTrust Remote Support vs TeamViewer

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Remote Desktop Services vs TeamViewer

Compared 5% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs TeamViewer

Compared 4% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

LogMeIn Pro vs TeamViewer

Compared 3% of the time

More TeamViewer Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

June 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Access

June 2026

Download GoTo Resolve product report

Buyer's Guide

TeamViewer

May 2026

Download TeamViewer product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

GoToAssist

TeamViewer Tensor

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

GoTo Resolve enhances enterprise tech support by integrating remote management with intuitive problem resolution, providing efficient service delivery and robust client communications for businesses.

GoTo Resolve stands out by offering streamlined remote support capabilities, allowing IT teams to efficiently address technical issues. Its integration with existing systems ensures seamless operations without disrupting existing workflows. Designed for scalability and adaptability, it offers flexibility for various business environments. Easy onboarding and straightforward management operations enhance team productivity, leading to more effective service response in dynamic enterprise settings.

What are the key features of GoTo Resolve?

Remote Management: Enables secure access and control of devices to provide timely assistance.
Collaborative Tools: Facilitates team communication to improve troubleshooting accuracy and speed.
Integration Capabilities: Seamlessly integrates with business platforms for enhanced operational efficiency.
Issue Tracking: Monitors requests and solutions to ensure accountability and performance analysis.
Scalability Options: Adapts to business size requirements and industry-specific needs.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Increased Productivity: Streamlined processes allow employees to focus on core tasks.
Cost Reduction: Efficient issue resolution minimizes downtime and reduces operational costs.
Improved User Experience: Reliable support enhances satisfaction and reduces service delays.
Enhanced Security: Protects data and devices through secure remote access protocols.
Comprehensive Reporting: In-depth insights aid in strategic decision-making and resource allocation.

GoTo Resolve is implemented across sectors like finance and healthcare to strengthen IT infrastructure. In banking, it secures data while providing remote support. Healthcare institutions leverage its capabilities to maintain uninterrupted patient service delivery, ensuring confidentiality and compliance with industry standards. Its adaptability makes it suitable for diverse operational demands, enhancing service efficiency in competitive landscapes.

GoTo

TeamViewer offers a license type mainly for small teams, focusing on remote connectivity solutions. It includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises with specialized needs.

TeamViewer Business isn't standalone but a primary license for small teams. Its remote connectivity suite includes TeamViewer Remote and TeamViewer Tensor, the latter offering enhanced features for enterprises. It enables secure, high-speed remote access, collaboration, and troubleshooting. Major users suggest aligning product descriptions and improvement in interfaces and user experiences.

What are the key features of TeamViewer?

High-speed and secure remote access: Fast connections with strong security measures.
Robust collaboration tools: Enhances team productivity remotely.
Screen sharing: Easy display sharing for presentations and meetings.
Session recording: Documentation and review of remote sessions.
Easy integration: Seamless compatibility with other platforms and tools.

What benefits do users highlight?

Improved workflow: Streamlines processes and reduces downtime.
Efficient troubleshooting: Quick resolutions to technical issues.
Compliance assurance: Meets necessary security standards and regulations.
Time and resource savings: Minimizes the need for physical presence and travel.

Organizations use TeamViewer for remote desktop connectivity to manage and solve IT issues. It allows technical support, collaboration, and training with real-time assistance and secure access. By enabling remote support for employees and customers, it ensures efficient issue resolution across industries, such as healthcare, finance, and education.

TeamViewer

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Information Not Available

Porsche Informatik, Philips, DHL, Intel, Motorola, Microsoft, IBM, Siemens, Fujitsu, American Red Cross

Buyer's Guide

GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer

June 2026

Free Report: GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer

Find out what your peers are saying about GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,747 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our GoTo Resolve vs. TeamViewer report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors and best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.