Hyland OnBase vs WaveMaker comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hyland and WaveMaker are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while WaveMaker is ranked #31. Hyland holds a 1.6% mindshare in LCDP, compared to WaveMaker’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WaveMaker users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 19 Hyland OnBase reviews

9,278 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WaveMaker

Read 4 WaveMaker reviews

2,362 Views
1,630 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

WaveMaker

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and WaveMaker are enterprise solutions in document management and application development. WaveMaker seems to have the upper hand for rapid development and ease of integration, while Hyland OnBase is superior in document management and workflow automation.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers comprehensive document management, workflow automation, and robust security features. WaveMaker provides a low-code environment, faster deployment, and ease of integration with existing systems.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase needs a more intuitive configuration process, better integration with modern cloud services, and improved user interface. WaveMaker requires enhanced support documentation, more advanced customization options, and better user training resources.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase has a complex deployment often requiring professional services and is lauded for its dedicated customer support. WaveMaker offers a quicker deployment process with its low-code platform and receives positive feedback for its comprehensive customer support.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase typically has a higher initial setup cost due to its extensive implementation process but provides high ROI for document management and automation. WaveMaker has a more cost-effective initial setup, quicker time-to-market, and presents attractive ROI for businesses looking to accelerate application development.

To learn more, read our detailed Low-Code Development Platforms Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

WaveMaker

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

31st

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (29th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WaveMaker is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.6%
WaveMaker	1.4%
Other	97.0%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

it_user576294

Business Software Developer at a tech services company

This is a RAD tool to build business apps, tables, and forms.

It needs a desktop version for developers with license type CE. I would like to have the possibility to have a CE that lets me migrate from SQL Server Express, Access, and OpenOffice Base and keep all UI front-end development in just one system. In short, the 6.7 was good enough. The question is: Will there always be a desktop version CE that will let me work with, for example, five users for free, and then start to pay from user six, or in my case, three users? Right now, I do not see WaveMaker in this field, and there are others points to ask for from a desktop.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use as long as you know what your business requirement are or the specifications are straightforward."

"I like the cloud and its integrability."

"Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) allowed us to enforce strict data privacy requirements like LGPD by ensuring users could only access authorized records based on their role, while making user onboarding and permission management much faster and more reliable."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

"What I find exceptional is the document storage itself; it's outstanding how quickly you can find documents, content within documents, or images."

"I like the flexibility and its modular nature that allows us to create solutions that meet our business needs."

"OnBase is a remarkable tool. It is a well-done product. Hyland has a lot of experience in building it and looking for new things for clients in terms of functionalities. It has amazing stability, and it can grow horizontally and vertically. It is built for growth. Their technical support is also quite good and available throughout the year."

"The impact of Hyland OnBase on our organization is that automating manual processes has had an incredible effect on our return on investment, and the man-hours saved by automating processes pays for the system, ranging from one to five hours."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"It is a Rapid Application Development (RAD) tool to build business apps that lets you work with many diverse data stores and build tables and forms easily."

Cons

"As the system grows in terms of number of modules, features, and functionality, options can be confusing and they can conflict with other options that you enable."

"I believe Hyland OnBase can improve its cost structure as a platform or software as a service because currently they only sell a few packages that come bundled with many modules likely not used by clients."

"I find OnBase's monolithic architecture to be expensive, and adopting microservices could be beneficial."

"The pricing structure could be more thought-out; if it were cheaper than it is now, I think it would be more useful and more companies could use it over other competitors."

"There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind."

"We found the size of images to be a restriction, though this may have been due to the API used rather than the Hyland application."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"For user experience, they would have to do more with the interface. It is not easy to work with and is a little messy. It is getting better, but it is not yet good enough. Other products are comparatively doing better in terms of the user interface. I have been hearing about Box, which is very easy to use and learn for the users. OnBase has to work on this aspect. It should have BPM capabilities. We compete with tools that provide the BPM feature and support those standards. They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"It needs a desktop version for developers with license type CE."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"The tool's price is high."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Mendix vs WaveMaker

Compared 10% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs WaveMaker

Compared 9% of the time

RadSystems Studio vs WaveMaker

Compared 7% of the time

Jitterbit Vinyl vs WaveMaker

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Application Express (APEX) vs WaveMaker

Compared 3% of the time

More WaveMaker Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

October 2026

Download WaveMaker product report

Also Known As

OnBase

Pramati

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

WaveMaker is a platform designed to simplify app development by enabling rapid creation and deployment of scalable applications using a low-code environment.

WaveMaker stands out with its advanced capabilities tailored for developers aiming to speed up delivery timelines. It offers a robust environment that supports the full application lifecycle from prototyping to deployment. By leveraging its low-code capabilities, businesses can streamline development processes and reduce time-to-market. The platform integrates with numerous backend services, allowing seamless data management and collaboration among development teams, enhancing coding flexibility and innovation.

What are WaveMaker's most valuable features?

Low-Code Development: Facilitates quick application creation using visual interfaces.
Custom Code Generation: Offers flexibility to integrate custom code where necessary.
Third-Party Integration: Supports integration with a variety of backend services.
Responsive Design: Automatically adjusts layout for multiple device types.
Workflow Automation: Simplifies process automation to enhance productivity.

Which benefits should you consider when evaluating?

Increased Time Efficiency: Reduces development cycles with rapid prototyping capabilities.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes expenses related to traditional development methods.
Scalability: Supports growth by accommodating expanding app requirements.
Ease of Collaboration: Facilitates teamwork thanks to built-in tools and integrations.

WaveMaker is particularly beneficial in industries like banking and telecommunications, where rapid deployment and integration with existing systems is critical. Its ability to support scalable applications and automate workflows makes it a preferred choice for enterprises looking to modernize legacy systems while encouraging continuous innovation.

WaveMaker

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Vanenburg, Flanagan

Buyer's Guide

Low-Code Development Platforms

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Mendix, OutSystems and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.