Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
WaveMaker Logo

Top 10 WaveMaker Alternatives

Vendor: WaveMaker
4.0 out of 5
Leave a review

Top WaveMaker Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to WaveMaker based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, and Oracle Application Express (APEX). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

WaveMaker Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with WaveMaker, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
WaveMaker Logo
WaveMaker Logo
Microsoft Power Apps
3.9 out of 5
Microsoft Power Apps excels in integration and customization, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, WaveMaker offers simplicity and easy navigation, focusing on rapid app development. Power Apps is suited for in-depth investments, while WaveMaker provides cost-effective, speedy app creation.
Microsoft Power Apps has a setup cost that appeals to enterprises with larger budgets, while WaveMaker offers a more cost-effective setup suited for smaller businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft Power Apps has a setup cost that appeals to enterprises with larger budgets, while WaveMaker offers a more cost-effective setup suited for smaller businesses.
WaveMaker Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Mendix
4.1 out of 5
Mendix is favored for its extensive capabilities and advanced functionalities. In comparison, WaveMaker excels with ease of use and a simpler interface. Mendix offers superior advanced features, while WaveMaker focuses on user-friendly attributes. Mendix provides reliable deployment, whereas WaveMaker delivers a smoother deployment experience.
Mendix has a higher setup cost than WaveMaker. WaveMaker offers more cost-effective initial setup compared to Mendix.
View comparison
Pricing
Mendix has a higher setup cost than WaveMaker. WaveMaker offers more cost-effective initial setup compared to Mendix.
WaveMaker Logo
WaveMaker Logo
Oracle Application Express (APEX)
4.1 out of 5
Oracle APEX offers robust support and affordability, making it ideal for organizations with existing Oracle Database use. In comparison, WaveMaker provides extensive customization and a user-friendly interface, which tech buyers might find worth the investment despite its higher cost.
Oracle Application Express (APEX) has a low initial setup cost, while WaveMaker requires a higher setup cost due to more complex requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
Oracle Application Express (APEX) has a low initial setup cost, while WaveMaker requires a higher setup cost due to more complex requirements.
WaveMaker Logo
GitHub CoPilot
4.1 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
GitHub CoPilot
4.1 out of 5
WaveMaker offers ease with its rapid app development and strong support, catering to those prioritizing cost and speed. In comparison, GitHub CoPilot enhances productivity through AI-driven code suggestions, ideal for developers seeking advanced functionality despite a higher price point.
WaveMaker incurs significant setup costs contrasted with GitHub CoPilot's minimal initial expenses, highlighting a stark difference in entry price between the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
WaveMaker incurs significant setup costs contrasted with GitHub CoPilot's minimal initial expenses, highlighting a stark difference in entry price between the two services.
WaveMaker Logo
WaveMaker Logo
ServiceNow Now Platform
4.1 out of 5
WaveMaker provides a robust low-code platform for rapid application development, while ServiceNow Now Platform excels in automating and managing business processes. In comparison, WaveMaker offers competitive pricing and ease of use, whereas ServiceNow Now Platform delivers superior features and extensive integration capabilities.
WaveMaker has a straightforward initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Now Platform involves higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
WaveMaker has a straightforward initial setup cost, while ServiceNow Now Platform involves higher upfront expenses.
WaveMaker Logo
QuickBase
4.5 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
QuickBase
4.5 out of 5
QuickBase excels in ease of use and integration capabilities, while WaveMaker offers visually appealing development tools and comprehensive mobile app features. QuickBase is praised for automation and reporting, whereas WaveMaker is favored for drag-and-drop interface and pre-built templates.
QuickBase has a higher setup cost compared to WaveMaker, making WaveMaker a more cost-effective option. WaveMaker's lower initial investment might appeal to budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
QuickBase has a higher setup cost compared to WaveMaker, making WaveMaker a more cost-effective option. WaveMaker's lower initial investment might appeal to budget-conscious users.
WaveMaker Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Studio Creatio
4.3 out of 5
Studio Creatio offers valuable pre-built templates and process automation capabilities. In comparison, WaveMaker provides extensive API integrations and custom widgets. Studio Creatio requires enhanced customization options, while WaveMaker needs better documentation and customer service. Studio Creatio is more cost-effective, whereas WaveMaker's broader features justify higher costs.
Studio Creatio has a lower setup cost compared to WaveMaker, which offers a more extensive setup at a higher price. WaveMaker provides a robust setup investment reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Studio Creatio has a lower setup cost compared to WaveMaker, which offers a more extensive setup at a higher price. WaveMaker provides a robust setup investment reflecting its comprehensive features.
WaveMaker Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
KiSSFLOW
4.3 out of 5
KiSSFLOW offers simplicity and ease of use, ideal for businesses wanting straightforward solutions. In comparison, WaveMaker appeals to tech-savvy users with its advanced features, despite its complexity. KiSSFLOW excels in quick deployment; WaveMaker's extensive features justify its longer setup time.
KiSSFLOW offers a lower setup cost compared to WaveMaker, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. WaveMaker, on the other hand, has a higher setup cost, which may be justified by its advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
KiSSFLOW offers a lower setup cost compared to WaveMaker, making it a more budget-friendly option for initial deployment. WaveMaker, on the other hand, has a higher setup cost, which may be justified by its advanced features.
WaveMaker Logo
FlutterFlow
4.2 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
FlutterFlow
4.2 out of 5
WaveMaker offers extensive customization for complex enterprise integrations. In comparison, FlutterFlow excels in intuitive design for mobile apps. WaveMaker’s deployment is suited for larger projects. FlutterFlow’s affordability appeals to smaller businesses, though it has fewer advanced features. WaveMaker provides positive ROI in enterprise environments.
WaveMaker offers a higher setup cost compared to FlutterFlow, which provides a more affordable initial investment for users.
View comparison
Pricing
WaveMaker offers a higher setup cost compared to FlutterFlow, which provides a more affordable initial investment for users.
WaveMaker Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Zoho Creator
4.3 out of 5
Zoho Creator is recognized for its affordability and ease of use, featuring a drag-and-drop interface and pre-built templates, ideal for simpler use cases. In comparison, WaveMaker offers advanced customizability and enterprise-level capabilities, making it suitable for complex applications needing robust solutions.
Zoho Creator has a setup cost that can be ideal for small businesses, while WaveMaker's setup costs can be higher but potentially offer more advanced features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zoho Creator has a setup cost that can be ideal for small businesses, while WaveMaker's setup costs can be higher but potentially offer more advanced features.
WaveMaker Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Jitterbit Vinyl
4.4 out of 5
Jitterbit Vinyl excels in support and deployment, appealing to those needing ease of use and straightforward integration capabilities. In comparison, WaveMaker stands out for its robust customizations and rich development environment, attracting tech buyers who prioritize comprehensive features and flexibility despite higher costs.
Jitterbit Vinyl has an affordable setup cost making it budget-friendly, whereas WaveMaker has a slightly higher setup cost reflecting its premium feature set.
View comparison
Pricing
Jitterbit Vinyl has an affordable setup cost making it budget-friendly, whereas WaveMaker has a slightly higher setup cost reflecting its premium feature set.
WaveMaker Logo
Adobe ColdFusion
4.3 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Adobe ColdFusion
4.3 out of 5
Adobe ColdFusion excels in features, offering powerful web application development and scalability. In comparison, WaveMaker is more cost-effective, with a simplified drag-and-drop interface and built-in templates. Adobe ColdFusion has more advanced features, while WaveMaker ensures easier deployment and better customer support.
Adobe ColdFusion has a higher setup cost, while WaveMaker offers a more cost-effective setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe ColdFusion has a higher setup cost, while WaveMaker offers a more cost-effective setup.
WaveMaker Logo
Alpha Anywhere
4.0 out of 5
WaveMaker Logo
Alpha Anywhere
4.0 out of 5
WaveMaker offers simplicity and cost-effectiveness, ideal for those seeking a quick learning curve and seamless deployment. In comparison, Alpha Anywhere provides extensive features, offline functionality, and higher ROI, appealing to those who prioritize comprehensive capabilities despite a steeper learning curve and higher price.
WaveMaker has a straightforward setup cost while Alpha Anywhere offers a complex, tiered cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
WaveMaker has a straightforward setup cost while Alpha Anywhere offers a complex, tiered cost structure.
WaveMaker Logo
WaveMaker Logo
RadSystems Studio
1 out of 5

RadSystems Studio is a powerful tool for web and mobile app development. Users leverage its no-code/low-code environment for the swift creation of CRUD applications and REST APIs, slashing coding time and enhancing database management. Its intuitive interface, drag-and-drop functionality, and pre-built modules allow for easy, visually appealing projects. Integration with various databases and real-time testing further streamline development. Organizations benefit from improved efficiency, data management, collaboration, and reduced costs, making RadSystems Studio an essential tool for rapid application development and organizational growth.

View comparison

Related categories

Rapid Application Development Software
Low-Code Development Platforms
Mobile Development Platforms