Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

KODAK Info Input Solution vs UiPath Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

KODAK Info Input Solution
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.2
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) (8th)
UiPath Platform
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
914
Ranking in other categories
Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (1st), Agentic Automation (2nd), AI-Agent Builders (1st), Business Orchestration and Automation Technologies (1st), AI Finance & Accounting (2nd)
 

Featured Reviews

NJ
System Manager at Beeble
Efficient data management enhances document processing capabilities and integration ease
The data extraction feature is what I prefer most about the KODAK Info Input Solution. I also appreciate the integrations, data validation, and onboarding process. In terms of using the solution's advanced data extraction capabilities, the manual entry during the extraction process makes it easy to extract data from documents, such as from email, scanner, or mobile devices, as well as cloud storage. The extraction of data may also occur on the APR systems, which helps extract the actual data and enter it in the system compared to manual data entry. This automation helps get data directly from other systems and ecosystems where data resides, allowing it to be imported into the same system, where it can be easily validated and directly linked to existing systems. The KODAK Info Input Solution collects data automatically, which saves time, unlike when someone has to enter data manually. It saves approximately 25% of time. Regarding integration with existing systems, KODAK Info Input Solution integrates with most services such as Microsoft, Google, and Amazon, as well as other tools such as Salesforce. This integration is easy, and these connectors are straightforward to configure, helping manage documents from all those services. It becomes easy because of its simple connections. The solution's intelligent automation feature is faster compared to other services. Because it is faster and works quickly, it becomes effortless to use the intelligent system since everything operates smoothly upon following commands. The multi-language support feature is particularly useful because some documents are sent and some onboarding processes are done in different languages, making it valuable to understand the documents sent. The multi-language support is important for ensuring compliance with various regulatory requirements because, with the system supporting multiple languages, users can translate various languages and access documents and services from different locations easily, accommodating team members from diverse backgrounds who may not speak English, such as those who only know Chinese or French.
reviewer2761431 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager Rpa at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Significantly reduces manual effort and improves team workflows through automated ticketing
We've used Agent Builder, IXP, and Maestro for orchestration. We have created context-grounded searches or chatbots using context grounding, and we also use context grounding within an Agentic flow where a bot or agent reads ServiceNow tickets to determine whether it has been assigned to the right work group. If it has not been assigned correctly due to human error, it automatically reassigns it to the right group. I would assess Agentic AI's ability to extract data points as effective. We created an agent for the purpose of extracting data, though not in a document. We created what we call an email conversation agent that engages with a customer, vendor, or someone in an email conversation with a set goal of extracting specific data points for an action to be performed subsequently. The one automation we have deployed in production involves the agent interacting with team members to collect data points and create a ServiceNow ticket. We appreciate almost all features of UiPath Platform, with one of the most successful ones being the use of Coms Mining. Most of the new features related to AI have all been good, and we use Agentic. We have already created a few agents and have started to use Maestro for a few flows, though we are not yet there to orchestrate an end-to-end workflow. We have good ROI from the automations we have developed with UiPath Platform, which far exceeds the investment in the platform. It has saved us tens of thousands of hours in manual effort, making the team members happy to pursue other things of value.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The KODAK Info Input Solution offers fast workflows for extracting information from even the largest documents."
"I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the software in our company, our system manager discussed it with us and we found the pricing to be reasonable, which is why we recommended it."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution collects data automatically, which saves time, unlike when someone has to enter data manually."
"The most valuable feature of KODAK Info Input Solution is the open intelligence piece, the ability to consume five different OCR engines."
"What makes KODAK Info Input Solution perfect is that it has comprehensive capabilities, features, and tools including its own printers and scanners that can easily connect and share information."
"I rate KODAK Info Input Solution a ten out of ten."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution's customer support is the best."
"The KODAK Info Input Solution offers fast workflows for extracting information from even the largest documents."
"I like Orchestrator and how easy it is to manipulate and get your data, to see what's going on."
"In addition to savings in time and cost, UiPath further saves us money because of the reduction in human error."
"Since using UiPath Platform, we're now able to process between 15 to 18 million dollars a month in invoices that are coming through automatically through the automation."
"In our organization, UiPath Platform improved the P2P process, where there were some manual steps such as the approval process that was done manually, and we suggested making it automated; it helped maintain the hierarchy to get approval and was quite fast, and after that, we saved a lot of time with increased accuracy, which was beneficial."
"The most valuable feature of Studio is the ease of use for developers who do not have a technical background."
"It has reduced human error because there would be some different document types. It's able to detect multiple types versus a user finding one document type when there could be multiple document types that are associated with a letter, while the user is browsing over it that can be missed in the second document type. But when you're looking at machine learning and at the text, it'll be able to easily pick out those keywords from a document that has multiple document types."
"The Orchestrator is great because you schedule it, and that's it, you don't have to worry about it."
"I enjoy the enhancement of UiPath's debugging tools. I like the IDE and integration services. There have been massive improvements. I love to work with Orchestrator. It has become more streamlined and helpful."
 

Cons

"The KODAK Info Input Solution can improve its connection with scanners. It connects most effectively with Kodak's own scanners, specifically the S S S SMAX Scanners, while connections with other brands, such as Epson or HP, can take more time."
"The only area I think KODAK Info Input Solution could improve on is making their user interface more user-friendly and offering full customer customization of features."
"The most significant area for improvement in the KODAK Info Input Solution is its ability to support custom definitions and auto-learn."
"Integrating KODAK Info Input Solution with other software, such as Laserfiche, presents challenges due to inadequate documentation and an unintuitive web services interface."
"The most significant area for improvement in the KODAK Info Input Solution is its ability to support custom definitions and auto-learn."
"Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. Sometimes while connecting to the database, it shows errors, such as SQL login failed, your port is blocked, or not reachable."
"Integrating KODAK Info Input Solution with other software, such as Laserfiche, presents challenges due to inadequate documentation and an unintuitive web services interface."
"Currently, we have to additionally implement UiPath Fabric. It would be easier if it is already integrated with UiPath rather than having to add it. We have to take the dependencies by searching them. We should be able to go for the default ones."
"UiPath could improve on-prem availability. I would like to see a load-testing feature, but that's coming."
"UiPath should improve its support team."
"We have used it with Windows and it has been perfect. But recently, we tried it with Linux and we faced some issues regarding this automation. The auto-recording didn't happen as much as in other operating systems. They need to add more user-friendly automation and templates for that. They don't have many templates for other operating systems."
"What we have in mind in terms of what the robots could do for us is significantly more than what UiPath does now, but it takes more work. From my perspective, there is just a wide scope of implementation that goes beyond what we're starting right now. That is essentially the improvement."
"From a licensing and pricing perspective, scaling becomes challenging."
"When you're nesting certain workflows, it can get a little complicated as you start getting deeper."
"UiPath should improve the test case criteria in future versions because the test cases are not well-designed. I feel everything is fine other than that."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Although KODAK Info Input Solution's pricing is competitive within the industry's consumption-based model, its approach is overly complex."
"The pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution in Mexico is very expensive, and the government's purchasing process requires convincing many stakeholders."
"I understand that initially, businesses or clients might perceive UiPath as expensive."
"UiPath is a good deal all round."
"I would definitely recommend UiPath, although the major concern is that it's not super cheap. Despite its higher price, I understand the complexity behind it since it's the most comprehensive RPA solution."
"We are using its enterprise version. Its price seems okay, but I'm not sure because I'm not involved with the finance side. I'm more on the development side."
"We have a cost model for operating expense savings. It is usually about $100,000 to $125,000 and takes us six weeks to develop and implement. That's development, testing, and implementation. We do code reviews on everything. That does not include all the documentation, assessment, etc."
"I do not know the specifics within my role, but from what I do know, everything has been very fair. Especially with the licensing that we have for our team, we have been able to accommodate everybody on our team with the roles and access that they require. So far, so good."
"UiPath is more expensive than other solutions on the market, such as Microsoft Power Automate."
"The cost of UiPath is higher in Africa than in Europe and Asia due to differences in salary levels."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Robotic Process Automation (RPA) solutions are best for your needs.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Manufacturing Company
14%
Educational Organization
10%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Marketing Services Firm
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise1
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business250
Midsize Enterprise143
Large Enterprise669
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I find the pricing of KODAK Info Input Solution to be friendly and affordable because before implementing the software in our company, our system manager discussed it with us and we found the prici...
What needs improvement with KODAK Info Input Solution?
Sometimes there is an accuracy problem with KODAK Info Input Solution. When the document is not scanned properly, the accuracy problem arises. From old Xerox copies, if the handwriting is not clear...
What is your primary use case for KODAK Info Input Solution?
I will use KODAK Info Input Solution in our college for admissions processing. When many people come for admissions, I use this to scan their data and automatically store that record into my File E...
Best RPA tools for IBM iSeries
I can only speak to UiPath since that is the only RPA solution that I have used. I know that there are specific packages that you can integrate into your project that is specifically made to work w...
RPA that Bots can run without centralized control?
Yes, Attended Bots which can run without centralized control Module. RPA Tools like Automation Anywhere, uiPath ,Power Automation they do support this.
How do I choose between UiPath and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft‌ ‌Power‌ ‌Automate‌ ‌is‌ ‌intuitive‌ ‌and‌ ‌easy‌ ‌to‌ ‌integrate‌ ‌and‌ ‌use.‌ ‌I‌ ‌like‌ ‌that‌ ‌there‌ ‌is‌ ‌no‌ ‌coding‌ ‌experience‌ ‌necessary,‌ ‌and‌ ‌appreciate‌ ‌the‌ ‌automated‌...
 

Also Known As

No data available
UiPath Maestro, UiPath Apps, UiPath Agent Builder
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Accenture 2. Deloitte 3. PwC 4. IBM 5. Capgemini 6. KPMG 7. Ernst & Young 8. Infosys 9. Cognizant 10. Wipro 11. Tata Consultancy Services 12. HCL Technologies 13. Genpact 14. Tech Mahindra 15. DXC Technology 16. Atos 17. NTT Data 18. CGI 19. L&T Infotech 20. Hexaware Technologies 21. Mindtree 22. Mphasis 23. Virtusa 24. Syntel 25. Zensar Technologies 26. WNS Global Services 27. Hexaware Technologies 28. Larsen & Toubro Infotech 29. Persistent Systems 30. QuEST Global 31. Sonata Software 32. Zensar Technologies
Find out what your peers are saying about KODAK Info Input Solution vs. UiPath Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.