LogMeIn Central vs N-able N-central comparison

GoTo and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. GoTo is ranked #14, while N-able is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3. GoTo holds a 3.3% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

LogMeIn Central

Read 19 LogMeIn Central reviews

953 Views
639 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

1,716 Views
1,441 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogMeIn Central

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

N-able N-central and LogMeIn Central compete in remote management solutions for IT professionals. N-able N-central seems to hold an advantage for enterprises with its comprehensive features, whereas LogMeIn Central appeals to small to medium businesses due to its ease of deployment and use.

Features: N-able N-central includes advanced network management tools, automated patch management, and detailed reporting capabilities. LogMeIn Central offers effective remote desktop access, centralized IT administration, and flexible integration with various software environments.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-central could improve its user interface simplicity and reduce complexity in the setup process. LogMeIn Central may benefit from enhancing its feature set for larger organizations, improving security features, and offering more detailed reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogMeIn Central allows for quick deployment with a straightforward setup, catering primarily to smaller business needs. In contrast, N-able N-central involves a more complex installation, but its support is robust, ideal for handling enterprise-level requirements.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-central often requires a higher initial investment, justified by its advanced tools and potential long-term ROI for businesses needing extensive features. LogMeIn Central presents a more cost-effective initial price, attracting small businesses aiming for rapid ROI with lower entry costs.

To learn more, read our detailed LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogMeIn Central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of LogMeIn Central is 3.3%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 7.9%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
N-able N-central	7.9%
LogMeIn Central	3.3%
Other	88.8%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Kelsey Braun

Information Technology Specialist at Allegheny Coupling

Has good stability and an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for remote access control and endpoint protection features The solution has the best remote access control and protection features. They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower…

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"LogMeIn Central allows numerous active clients, say... 50, to use licenses for remotely accessing a computer from home, taking advantage of all the solution's built-in security features."

"It allows you to transfer along with many other functions."

"The initial setup was pretty straightforward."

"No issues with stability. It has worked on every platform I’ve tried it on, and not interfered with anything."

"I like the options for multiple displays. The unattended access is very useful, but it can also be misused. So, it is something you have to be careful with."

"It saves us drive time, we don't have to go to clients. We can just use remote access."

"I like being able to dial in and transfer files for updates."

"I like the encryption and security of LogMeIn. I think the end-to-end security on it, in and of itself, is really good. I use the two-point login system and it's great."

More LogMeIn Central pros

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central is an easy tool to implement with customers."

"I like the remote connectivity, reporting suite, and patch management module."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"The solution's service is good."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."

"I have had issues where LogMeIn has not been useful, then we have not been able to work that day. This happens probably two or three times a year."

"The screen. Make it clearer. The screen resolutions don't always line up. So clarity of the screen, and speed."

"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."

"It's not really a true RMM product but more of just a remote access."

"There are some screens that are just ugly and difficult to manipulate."

"The update issues are an absolute pain. It says it is updating things, but the updates do not go through, and you try your hardest to get the updates to go through and they don't. You go to the PC, but there is no update there, then you go back and it says there are updates."

"They should provide intermediate device limit options for the users."

More LogMeIn Central cons

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-central has limited mobile device management (MDM) support, specifically for Android devices. This limitation affected a deal with a client who had numerous Android devices to manage. It would be beneficial if N-central could expand its MDM support to include Android devices."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"It was previously expensive and tedious to manage different licenses."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It sucks that I am paying for LogMeIn Central, LogMeIn Pro, and LogMeIn Rescue, plus LogMeIn Ignition, which is the mobile app. It costs me a lot of money every month at LogMeIn. "

"I complain about the price all the time. It's gone up from relatively inexpensively to, right now, about $2000 a year for me, based upon the number of machines I have. You say $2000 is not that bad, but the price has jumped up significantly over the past few years. They went three or four years without any price increases, and then they did a dramatic increase, three or four times the annual fee, two years in a row. But last year and this year it has been pretty stable."

"It is a little pricey. I have more than five seats, so I pay a $1000/year."

"The only thing I found is that they've gotten very, very expensive over the years. I started out with about about 100 users on it. Two years ago it was about $600 for 100 users. Now, it's that price for 25 users."

"We've been trying to nail its cost down ourselves, and it is a disaster in that area because you get different numbers all the time. They say this is what it is, but the numbers don't make a lot of sense to me. I know that the numbers change. So, the more you have, the less they are per seat, but I don't really understand where those breakdowns are. Its billing is confusing. It is definitely the worst part. For 7,500 seats, it might be between 2,250 and 2,700 a month. It is somewhere in there."

"Pricing is a little high. They require for LogMeIn Central to go into brackets. If you go over a certain amount of PCs or servers to access, going up to the next bracket is a big jump."

"It really is an expensive product for me."

"It used to be a lot cheaper but then the price shot up (doubled over the span of two years), but it's hard to switch, and most competing products are similarly priced anyway."

More LogMeIn Central pricing and cost advice

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

10%

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Insurance Company

Comms Service Provider

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 13% of the time

NinjaOne vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 10% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 9% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 9% of the time

LogMeIn Pro vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 7% of the time

More LogMeIn Central Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 24% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 19% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 14% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 11% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud vs N-able N-central

Compared 3% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central

January 2026

Download LogMeIn Central product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

January 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

LogMeIn Central enables you to effectively monitor, manage, and secure your endpoint infrastructure with a robust endpoint management feature set.

GoTo

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Sample Customers

Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

December 2025

Free Report: LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.