LogMeIn Central vs N-able N-central comparison

GoTo and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. GoTo is ranked #14, while N-able is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3. GoTo holds a 3.4% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 7.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

LogMeIn Central

Read 19 LogMeIn Central reviews

1,192 Views
870 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 10 N-able N-central reviews

1,881 Views
1,580 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogMeIn Central

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

N-able N-central and LogMeIn Central compete in remote management solutions for IT professionals. N-able N-central seems to hold an advantage for enterprises with its comprehensive features, whereas LogMeIn Central appeals to small to medium businesses due to its ease of deployment and use.

Features: N-able N-central includes advanced network management tools, automated patch management, and detailed reporting capabilities. LogMeIn Central offers effective remote desktop access, centralized IT administration, and flexible integration with various software environments.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-central could improve its user interface simplicity and reduce complexity in the setup process. LogMeIn Central may benefit from enhancing its feature set for larger organizations, improving security features, and offering more detailed reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogMeIn Central allows for quick deployment with a straightforward setup, catering primarily to smaller business needs. In contrast, N-able N-central involves a more complex installation, but its support is robust, ideal for handling enterprise-level requirements.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-central often requires a higher initial investment, justified by its advanced tools and potential long-term ROI for businesses needing extensive features. LogMeIn Central presents a more cost-effective initial price, attracting small businesses aiming for rapid ROI with lower entry costs.

To learn more, read our detailed LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogMeIn Central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of LogMeIn Central is 3.4%, down from 4.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 7.4%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
N-able N-central	7.4%
LogMeIn Central	3.4%
Other	89.2%

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Kelsey Braun

Information Technology Specialist at Allegheny Coupling

Has good stability and an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for remote access control and endpoint protection features The solution has the best remote access control and protection features. They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower…

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"No issues with stability. It has worked on every platform I’ve tried it on, and not interfered with anything."

"We install our PCs at customer locations throughout the country and are able to support them remotely rather than having to travel to those locations."

"I like being able to dial in and transfer files for updates."

"The ability to manipulate and do things to the computer and file manager, then boot to safe mode, and see what is going on and track alerts. I use it all."

"It saves us drive time, we don't have to go to clients, we can just use remote access."

"The initial setup was very easy."

"I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."

"This solution has allowed granular permission access to machines, very consistent and solid most of the time."

More LogMeIn Central pros

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."

"The transition to N-able N-central was very smooth; we were confident that our migration would not affect any operations, and it was easy to migrate our clients into the new solutions."

"The solution's service is good."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"They should provide intermediate device limit options for the users."

"It needs backwards compatibility for non-Microsoft-supported operating systems, for example, XP and 2003. In situations where I have no options but to run older operating systems, I would like for it to be backwards compatible."

"I do not like the antivirus."

"The solution is expensive as hell."

"LogMeIn Rescue could be made a lot easier where you could just tell the person where to go and log in, and they could just log in. Or even make it simpler where you could just send a file to a person and they would click on it; just something easier. The way they have it right now, it's not easy."

"The only thing I found is that they've gotten very, very expensive over the years."

"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."

"I have had issues where LogMeIn has not been useful, then we have not been able to work that day. This happens probably two or three times a year."

More LogMeIn Central cons

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"There is room for improvement in the development of custom monitoring services."

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"It was previously expensive and tedious to manage different licenses."

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's getting more expensive and we are starting to evaluate other products. It's starting to become unaffordable."

"It sucks that I am paying for LogMeIn Central, LogMeIn Pro, and LogMeIn Rescue, plus LogMeIn Ignition, which is the mobile app. It costs me a lot of money every month at LogMeIn. "

"The price is a little high but it's competitive. The licensing process is fairly easy."

"We've been trying to nail its cost down ourselves, and it is a disaster in that area because you get different numbers all the time. They say this is what it is, but the numbers don't make a lot of sense to me. I know that the numbers change. So, the more you have, the less they are per seat, but I don't really understand where those breakdowns are. Its billing is confusing. It is definitely the worst part. For 7,500 seats, it might be between 2,250 and 2,700 a month. It is somewhere in there."

"It used to be a lot cheaper but then the price shot up (doubled over the span of two years), but it's hard to switch, and most competing products are similarly priced anyway."

"The price needs improvement. It is ridiculously expensive now, and no features have really changed."

"Pricing is a little high. They require for LogMeIn Central to go into brackets. If you go over a certain amount of PCs or servers to access, going up to the next bracket is a big jump."

"I complain about the price all the time. It's gone up from relatively inexpensively to, right now, about $2000 a year for me, based upon the number of machines I have. You say $2000 is not that bad, but the price has jumped up significantly over the past few years. They went three or four years without any price increases, and then they did a dramatic increase, three or four times the annual fee, two years in a row. But last year and this year it has been pretty stable."

More LogMeIn Central pricing and cost advice

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

Performing Arts

Healthcare Company

Educational Organization

Comms Service Provider

15%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

The MSP part of N-able N-central has evolved over the years. They have been trying to move from professional or network server and desktop licensing to make it more comprehensive. With professional...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

We have been dealing with Enable EDR and N-able N-central, which is a management center. It's the NOC solution that we are currently running our asset management on. We are managing tasks in that e...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering N-able N-central?

There's a new node for N-able N-central which they have addressed. Our outstanding items include reviewing our pricing and partnership level, which can provide additional benefits when we exceed 10...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 12% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 8% of the time

Microsoft Configuration Manager vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 8% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 7% of the time

LogMeIn Rescue vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 6% of the time

More LogMeIn Central Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 22% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 20% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 13% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 12% of the time

Spiceworks vs N-able N-central

Compared 2% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central

March 2026

Download LogMeIn Central product report

Buyer's Guide

N-able N-central

March 2026

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

LogMeIn Central enables you to effectively monitor, manage, and secure your endpoint infrastructure with a robust endpoint management feature set.

GoTo

N-able N-central is an all-encompassing IT management platform geared towards efficient network oversight. It offers comprehensive tools for monitoring and automation, which are crucial for managed services providers managing complex network environments.

N-able N-central provides solutions tailored to IT management, offering remote connectivity, asset tracking, and integration with systems like CrowdStrike. Its single-pane interface supports extensive device monitoring, script execution, and automation for task scheduling. The platform emphasizes robust patch management and reliable support, making it suitable for client integration and compliance audits. However, improvements are needed in remote access, application integration, and mobile device support. Users suggest investing in Redfish and REST API monitoring due to unreliable SNMP and an increased focus on AI to enhance maintenance recommendations.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Intuitive Remote Connectivity: Facilitates seamless access and management from anywhere.
Asset Tracking: Offers robust tracking of hardware and software assets within a network.
Automation: Streamlines task scheduling and resolution processes.
Patch Management: Ensures systems are updated and secure efficiently.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with systems like CrowdStrike for enhanced security.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Comprehensive Monitoring: Helps manage diverse network environments with ease.
Scalability: Supports expansion in IT management capabilities as businesses grow.
Security Enhancement: Strengthens organizational security through integrated patch management and antivirus capabilities.
Efficient IT Management: Simplifies tasks through automation, reducing manual effort and increasing productivity.

N-able N-central is embraced in industries requiring robust IT management solutions, particularly managed services providers. It's widely used for monitoring systems, remote access, and asset tracking. Industries leverage its automation and integration capabilities to maintain system stability and security, addressing threats without heavy IT infrastructure on clients' premises.

N-able

Sample Customers

Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

March 2026

Free Report: LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.