LogMeIn Central vs N-able N-central comparison

GoTo and N-able are both solutions in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category. GoTo is ranked #14, while N-able is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.4. GoTo holds a 3.0% mindshare in RMM, compared to N-able’s 9.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of GoTo users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of N-able users who would recommend it.

LogMeIn Central

Read 19 LogMeIn Central reviews

658 Views
403 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

N-able N-central

Read 9 N-able N-central reviews

1,516 Views
1,139 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogMeIn Central

N-able N-central

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

N-able N-central and LogMeIn Central compete in remote management solutions for IT professionals. N-able N-central seems to hold an advantage for enterprises with its comprehensive features, whereas LogMeIn Central appeals to small to medium businesses due to its ease of deployment and use.

Features: N-able N-central includes advanced network management tools, automated patch management, and detailed reporting capabilities. LogMeIn Central offers effective remote desktop access, centralized IT administration, and flexible integration with various software environments.

Room for Improvement: N-able N-central could improve its user interface simplicity and reduce complexity in the setup process. LogMeIn Central may benefit from enhancing its feature set for larger organizations, improving security features, and offering more detailed reporting options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LogMeIn Central allows for quick deployment with a straightforward setup, catering primarily to smaller business needs. In contrast, N-able N-central involves a more complex installation, but its support is robust, ideal for handling enterprise-level requirements.

Pricing and ROI: N-able N-central often requires a higher initial investment, justified by its advanced tools and potential long-term ROI for businesses needing extensive features. LogMeIn Central presents a more cost-effective initial price, attracting small businesses aiming for rapid ROI with lower entry costs.

To learn more, read our detailed LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogMeIn Central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

N-able N-central

Ranking in Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) category, the mindshare of LogMeIn Central is 3.0%, down from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of N-able N-central is 9.2%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

Featured Reviews

Kelsey Braun

Information Technology Specialist at Allegheny Coupling

Has good stability and an easy initial setup process

We use the solution for remote access control and endpoint protection features The solution has the best remote access control and protection features. They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower…

Read full review

Dimitri V G

Team Manager Fiber & Backhaul Solutions Center & South at Telenet BVBA

Maximizing operational efficiency with comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities

There are areas in N-able N-central that could be improved. We always started it from the basic purpose of monitoring hardware, where vendors such as HP and Dell try to sell their own services which monitor and provide a dashboard, which is their logic. They want to make their own recurring revenue on that. We notice that SNMP has had a good run and still sometimes is used, but it's becoming an issue to maintain the same capabilities because HP makes it unreliable or even removes certain features that we used to be able to validate redundant array of independent disks. Our service that has been running for 15-20 years suddenly is not working anymore because HP decided in generation 10 plus and above, or generation 10 hardware in servers, storage controllers particularly, they just didn't put the SNMP OIDs anymore. We are now following that market change or business change in hardware monitoring and the future is Redfish, REST API, IPMI type of monitoring with the REST API and Redfish being most common. We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product. That issue could be better if they would be more prepared for that change and give us customers more tools, preconfigured, pre-available custom services for Redfish, REST API, where we just have to put a few items username, password and address and some dots and commas, but that we don't have to reinvent the wheel, which we are doing at the moment. We are using HP iLO commandlets and REST APIs for Aruba. Dell is making it very hard to monitor their hardware. If it has an iDRAC, I can manage it and monitor it, but if it's something that's less common or due to the portfolio, they have done a good job at not exposing information about health. We would just want to have a red or a green dot that indicates if this device is healthy or not healthy. Since nobody's investing in SNMP because it's a liability in security, they should invest in making a REST API and preferably also do the work on making it easy to pull or push information. That's something that the industry in general and Enable in particular could do a significant job to help us monitor.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The initial setup was simple."

"The alerts are helpful."

"Unattended remote assistance."

"No issues with stability. It has worked on every platform I’ve tried it on, and not interfered with anything."

"One of the improvements they made was a LogMeIn Central client - that was a couple years ago - and that has been great. You no longer have to use their web interface. There's actually a client that you can install, which lists all of the machines and servers that you can access. That works really well."

"I like the security aspect, that I can glance down and see quickly who's up to date on patches, and who has virus concerns."

"It is convenient for my workers to be at home. Therefore, it is easier for them as their second job to do the work. That is a plus, and I improve productivity."

"Provides remote access, allows me to get inside our network to be able to fix problems."

More LogMeIn Central pros

"It's a very robust product. They're continuing to invest and put new enhancements into the product. They're very open about what their roadmap is, which is very good for us because then as a business, we can plan."

"The most valuable feature of N-able N-central is the many options it has."

"The support is at a good level. So normally, we can always get to a solution when we are stuck with some monitoring problems that we encounter."

"The most helpful features of N-able N-central include providing a single pane of glass for many insights in an environment regarding their patching, their assets, their devices in general, and the active issues that they show."

"The most valuable features of N-central are its ease of deployment and ease of use."

"N-able N-central has numerous good features. The asset tracking capability is powerful, allowing you to track hardware and software on devices connected to your network. The remote control is smooth, securely enabling remote access to servers and routers. It can be integrated with ticketing systems and other tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR for comprehensive network monitoring and security. The automation feature is handy, allowing you to schedule tasks, respond to system triggers, and automate problem resolution, such as handling disk space issues automatically."

"N-able N-central is very scalable."

"The solution's service is good."

More N-able N-central pros

Cons

"The solution is expensive as hell."

"It is easy to get locked out, which is something that needs to be improved."

"LogMeIn Rescue could be made a lot easier where you could just tell the person where to go and log in, and they could just log in. Or even make it simpler where you could just send a file to a person and they would click on it; just something easier. The way they have it right now, it's not easy."

"Sometimes it just fails to load."

"Our clients are having issues with printing."

"The initial load is terribly slow and often has delays with the login page loading."

"I do not like the antivirus."

"The screen. Make it clearer. The screen resolutions don't always line up. So clarity of the screen, and speed."

More LogMeIn Central cons

"Involving AI in the platform could improve it further."

"The support from our direct team is very good, but the support from their day-to-day ongoing help desk isn't that good. They have still got some work to do on that, but they have been focusing on that a lot over the last number of years. So, it has gotten a lot better than it was."

"At this moment, we encounter stability issues with N-able N-central from time to time."

"The solution's overall integration should be improved."

"We have to do the effort ourselves because Enable is not really strategically going there because I assume there's not much money to make to improve that or to convince customers to start with their product."

"The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-central still relies on older protocols like SNMP."

"N-able N-central could improve the remote access, my technicians have complained about it. They have used other free tools instead to compensate, such as TeamViewer. Additionally, when using remote access on the web, it is lacking reports."

"The integration with other applications could be better."

More N-able N-central cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It used to be a lot cheaper but then the price shot up (doubled over the span of two years), but it's hard to switch, and most competing products are similarly priced anyway."

"It really is an expensive product for me."

"Pricing is a little on the expensive side, compared to what TeamViewer has offered."

"We went with it for pricing reasons, that it was the biggest bang for our buck, by combining the ability to have a central security console, as well as a central point for user administration."

"It's probably worth the value, but the price increases over the last five years are getting harder to justify."

"We are an educational institution, so anything to make it cheaper would be better because we don’t grow money on trees."

"We've been trying to nail its cost down ourselves, and it is a disaster in that area because you get different numbers all the time. They say this is what it is, but the numbers don't make a lot of sense to me. I know that the numbers change. So, the more you have, the less they are per seat, but I don't really understand where those breakdowns are. Its billing is confusing. It is definitely the worst part. For 7,500 seats, it might be between 2,250 and 2,700 a month. It is somewhere in there."

"The only thing I found is that they've gotten very, very expensive over the years. I started out with about about 100 users on it. Two years ago it was about $600 for 100 users. Now, it's that price for 25 users."

More LogMeIn Central pricing and cost advice

"N-able N-central is not an expensive solution."

"The pricing and licensing are average, almost six out of ten."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

16%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogMeIn Central?

It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogMeIn Central?

The solution's price is reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogMeIn Central?

They should provide intermediate device limit options. It would be helpful for users who require more remote control capabilities than the lower device limit plans.

See all answers

What do you like most about N-able N-central?

The solution's service is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N-able N-central?

One of my personal challenges with N-able N-central is the monitoring of services for server hardware. The industry has moved towards Redfish for out-of-band and in-band monitoring, yet N-able N-ce...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N-able N-central?

Our primary use case for N-able N-central is monitoring. As an administrator, I frequently work with N-able N-central for monitoring, spending approximately fifty percent of my time on it.

See all answers

Comparisons

NinjaOne vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 20% of the time

ConnectWise RMM vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 15% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 13% of the time

Atera vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 10% of the time

ConnectWise Automate vs LogMeIn Central

Compared 9% of the time

More LogMeIn Central Competitors

Kaseya VSA vs N-able N-central

Compared 26% of the time

NinjaOne vs N-able N-central

Compared 25% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 15% of the time

Atera vs N-able N-central

Compared 10% of the time

N-able N-sight Remote Monitoring & Management vs N-able N-central

Compared 8% of the time

More N-able N-central Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central

June 2025

Download LogMeIn Central product report

Buyer's Guide

Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM)

June 2025

Download N-able N-central product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds N-central, SolarWinds MSP N-central

Overview

LogMeIn Central enables you to effectively monitor, manage, and secure your endpoint infrastructure with a robust endpoint management feature set.

GoTo

N-able N-central is a comprehensive tool for monitoring networks, managing assets, automation, remote access, patch management, and ensuring system security. It is predominantly used by managed services providers to manage systems, servers, routers, and firewalls.

N-able N-central provides robust remote management and monitoring functionalities. It offers a user-friendly GUI and strong asset tracking capabilities. Integration with ticketing systems, CrowdStrike, and N-able EDR enhances monitoring and security. Automation features allow scheduling tasks, responding to system triggers, and automating problem resolution. Users appreciate ongoing enhancements and transparency about its roadmap.

What are the key features of N-able N-central?

Remote Connectivity: Provides smooth remote control for troubleshooting and support.
Reporting Suite: Offers comprehensive reporting tools for network insights.
Patch Management: Efficiently manages system updates to maintain security.
Intuitive GUI: User-friendly interface backed by solid support.
Asset Tracking: Powerful tracking of all managed devices.
Integration: Supports ticketing systems and security tools like CrowdStrike and N-able EDR.
Automation: Schedules tasks and automates problem resolution.

What benefits and ROI should users look for in the reviews?

Enhanced Efficiency: Automation and integration streamline workflows.
Improved Security: Robust monitoring and security features protect networks.
Cost Savings: Comprehensive tool reduces the need for multiple solutions.
Ease of Use: Intuitive interface and strong support simplify management.
Scalability: Grows with business needs, managing a large number of devices.

N-able N-central is widely implemented across various industries, providing essential network management and security functionalities. It is particularly useful for managed services providers in sectors such as healthcare, finance, and education, where robust monitoring, remote access, and asset management are critical for operational efficiency.

N-able

Sample Customers

Au Bon Pain, BELL (Building Educated Leaders for Life)

Premier Technology Solutions

Buyer's Guide

LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

June 2025

Free Report: LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central

Find out what your peers are saying about LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogMeIn Central vs. N-able N-central report.

See our list of best Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) vendors.

We monitor all Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.