Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform vs OutSystems comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NewgenONE Digital Transform...
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
23rd
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OutSystems
Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms
5th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
53
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (1st), Rapid Application Development Software (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform is 0.4%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OutSystems is 8.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Low-Code Development Platforms Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
OutSystems8.4%
NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform0.4%
Other91.2%
Low-Code Development Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer2445606 - PeerSpot reviewer
Automated process efficiency enhanced with improved setup simplicity
I use NewgenONE to automate processes such as onboarding, trade finance, and complete lending. It allows us to automate these processes efficiently NewgenONE has helped to automate repetitive manual tasks and data inputs, reducing the need for user intervention. It is good because it automates…
Sukrut Joshi - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables users to develop applications quickly and has a responsive and helpful technical support team
The time to market is quite good. We can quickly develop an application using the tool. OutSystems is developed using .NET and Java. We can easily find technical resources who have worked on .NET and Java and leverage their previous knowledge to develop OutSystems applications. It can also be used for application development. If an end-user does not want to use the solution after two to three years, OutSystems sends the source code and the applications to the end-user. There is no dependency. It’s one of the major factors I found quite good in OutSystems.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"NewgenONE's document management and workflow approach tools are very useful."
"The integration capabilities have benefited my customers by providing many connectors out of the box, allowing for the integration of external applications or business applications."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"OutSystems is a robust and rapid application development platform with a less steep learning curve."
"Scalability proved to be an exceptionally beneficial feature."
"One of the valuable features of OutSystems is the very small lead time for the delivery of projects."
"Their out-of-the-box UI is quite good."
"One thing I like about OutSystems is that there's no lock-in. You can keep running your applications because it's on .NET and hosted centrally. That's one of the advantages I see there in terms of not having an IT strategy that has a dependency on a particular platform."
"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
 

Cons

"Setting up NewgenONE is still a technical task. Simplifying the setup process would make it easier for users."
"Writing custom code still needs to be done via Integration Studio. This might have been added to the IDE."
"The asynchronous processing and multithreading tasks for which the current resources of the platform are very generic and not built for the end-user. Any asynchronous jobs have to be constructed with an end-user dashboard to allow inspection of the status of the activities."
"When shared extensions are updated, all the applications are redeployed."
"The prices should be lower. It is a little bit too high for a small market."
"The product could benefit from improved connectors to integrate with outside platforms."
"It is hard to find the logic in OutSystems. From an improvement perspective, I want to be able to properly use logic in OutSystems."
"One of the biggest areas for improvement is that every time an existing data element is modified, it creates a new data element. It doesn't really modify that particular data element. So, a user has to follow an extra step of removing the existing data element and bringing in the new and modified data element that is being added, which sort of goes into negative productivity."
"Currently, in mobile applications, we don't have push notifications."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution is expensive. The platform is not suitable for all of my clients. I work with labor unions and other smaller organizations that would not be able to afford the platform's current pricing model. It would be beneficial if there were a scaled-down version or a tiered pricing option that would allow me to build an app or a web app that is more cost-effective for my clients. Currently, the platform's pricing is too high for many of my clients, who would not be able to afford something in the $50,000 to $100,000 range."
"It's not cheap. It's pretty expensive."
"It is too expensive for small companies."
"OutSystems was open to a deal that worked for both sides."
"There is a free trial to use this solution and other options available, such as enterprise. There are different subscription plans."
"The product is expensive and I would rate its pricing a seven out of ten. You need to pay a yearly subscription to use the product."
"I would rate it five to six out of ten."
"OutSystems is expensive, and they changed the pricing model in the last couple of years. It's changing too much and it's becoming unstable. They are constantly shifting their prices based on users, courses, and other factors."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise7
Large Enterprise29
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform?
Setting up NewgenONE is still a technical task. Simplifying the setup process would make it easier for users. Even when using other systems like MQ, you need some technical skills for integration.
What is your primary use case for NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform?
I use NewgenONE to automate processes such as onboarding, trade finance, and complete lending. It allows us to automate these processes efficiently.
What advice do you have for others considering NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform?
NewgenONE works well for business process automation (BPA) and suits specific work for the BFS side. However, it requires considerable improvement in certain areas.
Which solution is better for developing non-ITSM applications: OutSystems or Service Now?
The short answer is that OutSystems is far better for 2 main reasons. Firstly, with Service Now you are locked into that platform for good. The business model is to lock in and then keep pumping th...
What industries do you think OutSystems is most useful for?
I cannot really name an industry in which OutSystems cannot be beneficial. Who does not want to make top-notch applications that work in no time? And OutsyStems does exactly that. The low-code plat...
How did you decide which OutSystems edition was the best one for you?
We started using OutSystems fairly recently, so we are still on the free version of it. My company is still testing how we like the platform, but so far, we have been satisfied with it and will li...
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

BNB Bank, National Commercial Bank Jamaica, United Bank, Tokio Marine HCC
Randstad, Warner Brothers, HP, Intel, ING, Banco Popular, Thrivent Financial, Bacardi, Kent State University, Bacardi, FICO, ING, Vodafone, AbbVie, Estafeta, Siemens, Vopak
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Oracle, Appian and others in Low-Code Development Platforms. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.