OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and Oracle are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #18 with an average rating of 7.0, while Oracle is ranked #27. OpenText holds a 2.0% mindshare in FT, compared to Oracle’s 1.5% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

OpenText Functional Testing...

Read 19 OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web reviews

4,306 Views
3,273 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

3,736 Views
2,204 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

OpenText Functional Testing...

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

Oracle Application Testing Suite and OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web compete in the software testing domain. OpenText Functional Testing Lab has the upper hand due to its superior features.

Features: Oracle Application Testing Suite offers comprehensive scalability, flexible integration options, and an excellent co-relation with Oracle applications, making it ideal for enterprise applications. OpenText Functional Testing Lab provides extensive mobile testing capabilities, supports all mobile platforms, and uses cloud-based environments for enhanced agility.

Room for Improvement: Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve its cloud integration, reduce deployment complexity, and enhance mobile testing features. OpenText Functional Testing Lab can enhance its integration with Oracle applications, streamline its customer support, and improve its scalability for large enterprises.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers a quick cloud-based deployment, reducing infrastructure needs and facilitating rapid implementation along with responsive customer service. Oracle Application Testing Suite requires more extensive on-premise setup, leading to longer deployment times but benefits from a robust support network.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Application Testing Suite involves a higher initial cost but offers substantial ROI by reducing test cycles and enhancing reliability. OpenText Functional Testing Lab offers a flexible subscription model, lower maintenance costs, and significant ROI potential despite a modest upfront investment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (4th)

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

27th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Performance Testing Tools (14th), Load Testing Tools (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.5%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Oracle Application Testing Suite	1.5%
Other	96.5%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The product is easy to use."

"We escalate tickets to HPE, and we don't have problems."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"We find the front-end interface of this solution to be very user-friendly, meaning easy navigation even for novice users."

"OATS provides the functionality to institute a corporate-wide standardized method and approach for all types of application testing."

"The function test feature is valuable."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"The most valuable features are functional testing and the central repository that contains various scripts."

"The most valuable feature is the object identification feature, the recording feature is the prime feature that open script has, and I also like the connectivity with Oracle Forms as it is very compatible."

"It has allowed more thorough testing with performance-based testing, in addition to regression testing and regular testing with each software release."

"It's user friendly and in-built API support makes it very easy to automate or develop an automation framework."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web could benefit from implementing a low-code, no-code solution that aids in quick automation code preparation."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"Because of connection errors, we've haven't yet been able to set it up properly at my company."

"However, in some cases we discovered some issues for HPE support regarding the latest enhancements; the delivery time for these enhancements is not as fast as we would like."

"Deployment was an issue. Each time we set it up and deployed, it failed and we had to relaunch it again."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"The tool runs out of memory when the recording flows are long and involve many screens despite increasing the memory settings for OpenScript."

"We have stability issues with the server logging off when a script runs from OTM."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite does encounter some lag. When I am trying to record something, the tool gets stuck."

"Oracle Application Testing Suite could improve by offering desktop-based application automation. It is lacking in this area at the moment."

"I think that licensing policies could be more intuitive; when we installed this application for the first time, we couldn't understand why there were only two users."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"The test installation pretty much destroyed my computer’s laptop performance."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Construction Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	13

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 9% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 8% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 7% of the time

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

OpenText Functional Testing vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText Professional Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Professional) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Selenium HQ vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Core Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Cloud) vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 3% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

October 2026

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

October 2026

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

OATS

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

Oracle Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive tool supporting test management, functional automation, and performance testing. With features like OpenScript and Oracle Load Test, it streamlines testing for Oracle applications with script reuse and detailed reporting.

Oracle Application Testing Suite targets functional testing, automating Oracle Forms and Oracle ERP integration. It ensures seamless operation with Oracle products, offering compatibility with web and non-Oracle applications. Challenges exist in performance, browser compatibility, and object identification, particularly in memory management during lengthy recordings. Users note integration with CI/CD tools and desktop application automation should be more flexible. Despite its limitations, it remains a reliable choice for quickly creating scripts and accelerating testing processes. Organizations often face issues with parameterization, licensing clarity, and installation but utilize its powerful features for regression testing, especially in cloud deployments.

What features make Oracle Application Testing Suite stand out?

OpenScript support: Offers powerful scripting for automation.
Oracle Load Test: Enables efficient performance testing.
Seamless Oracle integration: Works well with Oracle applications.
Script reuse: Supports across multiple test scenarios.
Detailed reporting: Provides built-in API support for insights.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Automation efficiency: Speeds up testing processes significantly.
Cost-effective: Reduces the need for separate tools.
Scalability: Supports cloud deployments across teams.
Detailed insights: Offers comprehensive testing analytics.

Oracle Application Testing Suite sees implementation across governmental and private sectors. It plays a crucial role in regression testing and business intelligence operations, heavily relied upon for testing, training, and development. Large teams leverage its capabilities in both web and non-Oracle environments to streamline processes.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

September 2026

Free Report: OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.