![Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/durwsc3z47nd2vx5dltpkmpv49gk.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
Micro Focus Service Test is based on Virtual User Generator (VuGen) like Micro Focus LoadRunner software, which is code-centric and uses a technical interface that can be challenging for functional testing teams to utilize. It has also had instances of difficulty parsing some Web Services Description Languages (WSDLs) for complex services.
Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] was previously known as Service Test, HPE Service Test.
John Lewis, SEED Infotech, Bajaj Allianz, TMNAS, Hexaware, Brewin Dolphin, A U.S. bank
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| VRM - Venue Results Manager at a sports company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I value its performance, drag-and-drop usage, and HP QC integration, which made monitoring easy. Setup was straightforward, and I experienced no issues. I would recommend adding SVN integration for script sharing. |
| Software Quality Assurance Engineer at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I found this SOA testing tool simplifies automation with C-scripting, superior to SoapUI. Easy setup, stable, and scalable. WS-security needs improvement, and support requires follow-up. Despite high cost, I consider it a top solution. |
| Senior Engineer with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I find the external DLL feature valuable, as it sped up data validation. It's easy to set up, stable, and support is good. But licenses are costly, and a service status tool is needed. |
| Test Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I found this tool good for scripting web services and reducing module time. However, it needs easier coding utilities, automation is complex, WSDL changes are difficult, and initial setup is challenging. Service was average. |
| Software Engineer at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees | The graphical workflow is valuable, enabling us to automate MAT tests. However, the HP license server requirement created significant stability and deployment issues for our automated test infrastructure, frequently causing tests to fail. | |
| CEO at a tech company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | I appreciate Service Test's easy-to-use, drag-and-drop interface for flexible, end-to-end non-UI tests. However, it struggles with scalable headless systems and doesn't support UI applications like QTP. |
![OpenText Functional Testing vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/durwsc3z47nd2vx5dltpkmpv49gk.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}
![TestingWhiz vs Micro Focus Service Test [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/2sv8zc2c4chhv7yfqv0ywo43bik4.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}