Microsoft Intune Reviews

We use the solution for endpoint management, which includes security and compliance. 

We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere. 

Microsoft Intune's most valuable feature is Autopilot. 

We faced issues with macOS support. The product should have better inventory and asset management. 

I have been using the product for four to five years. 

Microsoft Intune is stable. 

My company has 200 users. 

Microsoft Intune's deployment is straightforward. 

We did the deployment in-house. 

I liked the tool's pricing until P2 came into effect. I am unsure about the current value versus the cost of the new licensing model. 

Microsoft Intune has improved access to devices for remote wipes. We can act quickly whenever someone leaves a company or a device gets stolen. It offers more visibility into our IT group. 

The tool's cloud-focused availability has improved the organizational security posture. It has helped to save time. We can do a lot more with a smaller team.

I rate the product a nine out of ten.  

We use Intune for device management to ensure mobile devices such as laptops and tablets comply with our organization's regulations and requirements. We have some on-prem resources and operate a hybrid, primarily cloud-based environment.

We have seen many benefits from using Intune, especially in security. We have fewer company data leaked to the public as our security is tighter, and our company network is safer.

The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage.

The solution offers excellent visibility into all devices connected to the network and whether they are safe or compromised.

There are some issues using the solution with macOS and iOS, and it offers limited granular control with them. Intune works better on Windows and Android. 

I've used the solution for two to three years as an end user and an IT admin.

Intune is very stable. 

The solution's scalability is excellent, though it could be improved regarding macOS and iOS.

We've reached out to Microsoft technical support many times, and they have always helped resolve our issues promptly and efficiently; I rate them ten out of ten.

Positive

We previously used Microsoft System Center Configuration Manager (SCCM) for group and on-prem policies, which we also pushed out to devices. We switched because Intune is more modern and cloud-based, so it fits our organization better.

As an IT admin, I was involved in the deployment of Intune as a consultant. The implementation was very straightforward as we're an experienced team of security professionals consisting of two IT admins and an IT manager. There was also a test environment for our benefit, and moving that over to a production environment was seamless.

We carried out the implementation internally. 

We definitely have an ROI with Intune, and the benefits are compounding. Security is a non-negotiable area; our business has to be secure, and our sensitive company data has to be protected from malicious actors. The security of company resources is always an ROI for the business, so it's essential.

The product is relatively pricey, but considering its benefits, I'd say it's fair. The benefits outweigh the expensive licensing fees, especially for large organizations, but medium-sized and smaller businesses may be unable to afford it.

We didn't consider other options; we wanted a Microsoft product, as it's great to add to our existing suite of business applications, and the integration is more seamless than it would be with third-party products.

I rate the solution ten out of ten. 

We implemented the solution to solve security concerns; users access our company resources from outside the network, and we must ensure the devices they connect from are safe. As an admin, I have complete visibility into devices connecting from outside and can ensure they are safe and secure.

My advice to those considering the solution is to be aware of its capabilities, limitations, and their business needs. These factors will allow you to determine if Intune is the best device management tool for you. Depending on the environment, you may have to combine Intune with an older technology to manage all company devices.

Intune provides a platform for managing all our devices, including mobile iOS devices and PC workstations. It can also control some aspects of servers.

We can automatically enroll our devices with Intune. It helps us implement company-wide policies and ensure regulatory compliance because we can restrict how company devices are used. Intune improves security by enabling us to set conditional access policies for each device. 

Intune can wipe devices. For example, if a disgruntled employee wants to leak the data on their company phone, Intune can terminate their access and wipe the entire device with a click. Conditional access is another essential feature. 

You can set up two profiles on every device to keep personal data separate from company data, and the employee cannot copy data between them. This is a critical requirement for most companies to avoid the loss of sensitive data.  

Intune doesn't provide much control over Windows servers. It's something we struggle with.

I have worked with Intune for six years.

Intune is mostly stable. Microsoft guarantees 97 percent availability throughout the year, so it's pretty stable. 

Intune is scalable. 

I have used multiple endpoint management solutions in the past nine years. I also work with Jamf, a solution that focuses on iOS devices. Compared to Jamf, Intune also has some limitations when working with iOS. For example, Jamf can create specific policies for each iOS device, whereas Intune can't go that far. It also has role-based and device-based features. You can do more customization on iOS devices with Jamf. 

The initial installation isn't too difficult, but it can be complex if you have a large number of devices and need to do lots of customization. It is more complicated to onboard Windows PCs versus mobile devices, which are pretty easy.

The number of staff members required also varies according to the job and the timeline for deployment. For example, I would probably need additional resources if I'm enrolling 20,000 devices in under a month. However, we don't need too many resources if we have enough time

Intune is a cloud-based solution, so Microsoft is responsible for maintaining the infrastructure. We only need to handle the administrative and configuration adjustments on our side. 

Most clients get the ROI they expect, with the exception of those organizations that primarily use Mac and iOS. Jamf is more appropriate for iOS users. You may need to buy two solutions if you have a mixture.

Intune is reasonably priced. When we design a solution, we always compare costs for the client, but I don't know the price of Intune off the top of my head right now. It varies depending on the size of your organization, the market, and the reseller. You can buy a stand-alone license for Intune, or it may be included in a 365 license. 

I rate Microsoft Intune nine out of 10. 

Before implementing Intune or any endpoint management solution, I recommend looking at your internal requirements. Are most of your devices iOS or Android? Do you need automated enrollment? Go for Intune if you're using mostly Android mobile devices and Windows PCs.

I use Intune to manage all the organization's PCs.

We use a local Active Directory, but we weren't able to manage all our on-site systems without a solution like Intune, and we needed to deploy software like VPNs and other things. It's seamless now to do this through Intune.

The reporting is subpar. That's the only issue we have with Intune. We use another solution for that purpose. 

I have used Intune for about two years.

Intune is stable. 

Intune is scalable.

We purchased our licenses locally. We contact the reseller when we have support issues, and they contact Microsoft support. We've only needed to contact them once or twice. 

Deploying Intune isn't easy, but it isn't too complicated. Someone with two or three years of experience can do it. I completed the initial installation quickly, but migration took a long time because it's a manual process. We deployed Intune in-house with only two people. 

After deployment, Intune doesn't require any maintenance. It's a cloud solution, so Microsoft is responsible for maintaining it. However, we need to handle any tenant-level configuration.

Intune has somewhat of a monopoly. There aren't many alternatives for this kind of solution, so we have to pay what they're asking. Still, I think it's reasonable. 

We are primarily using Microsoft products, so our options were Google Cloud or Intune. We decided that it was better to go with Intune because the learning curve would be steeper with Google. 

I rate Microsoft Intune eight out of 10. We have never faced any serious issues with Intune. My advice to future users is to plan before you deploy or migrate. 

We use Microsoft Intune to deploy the software to Windows and iOS for the campus and to isolate any intrusion.

We can centrally control the software and the settings of the devices on the multi-platform using Microsoft Intune.

The most valuable feature of the solution is compliance. We have one MDM that works with Windows, iOS, and Android.

Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement.

iOS devices have certain features that are not supported, which is not beneficial for end customers in terms of open deployment and device control.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for around three years.

Microsoft Intune remains stable if it is deployed correctly.

Microsoft Intune is scalable.

The initial setup is not complex. We started by setting up the environment on the cloud, then configured the devices and profiles. However, certain aspects of the deployment required the assistance of engineers.

The implementation was completed in-house.

I give the solution a seven out of ten.

We used Microsoft Intune because it is the only solution that can also support iOS.

In cases where a device encounters compatibility issues or technical problems preventing it from receiving the MDM profile, maintenance may be required. The maintenance is acceptable.

I recommend the solution to others.

We use Microsoft Intune for controlling and managing all of our in-house and remote devices. It allows us to deploy applications to all devices.

The most valuable feature of Microsoft Intune is having all our devices compliant with our policies.

The solution can have some compliance problems in general and the end-point user can bypass easily the company policies in Intune.

I have been using Microsoft Intune for approximately three years.

I have not had any problems with the stability of Microsoft Intune.

The solution is deployed for end users and all of our devices.

Microsoft Intune scales well.

I have not used the support from Microsoft Intune.

I have not used a similar solution to Microsoft Intune.

The solution is worth the money for us.

We have the business premium licenses for the solution.

I rate Microsoft Intune a nine out of ten.

We're an MSP, and our primary use case is for fleet management; our entire fleet is handled through Intune, so all our mobile devices are logged in through the Azure portal, and we can manage our apps that way. We've been able to lock down our devices and control our field of frontline workers.

The solution allows us to keep track of an extensive device fleet so we know where they are and whether they're secure and compliant. Those that aren't compliant enter a pool, and our tech staff work to rectify that. Intune improved our organization by helping keep our data secure.

The security-related tools are excellent; these features allow us to secure devices, lock them down, and ensure compliance.

Due to the abundance of features, there's a lot to organize, which makes managing and setting up the solution challenging. The setup is immense, and it would be good to see improvement in this area.

The stability could be improved. 

We've been using Intune for around six years. 

Intune is a stable platform for the most part, though Microsoft can still make some improvements in this area. 

The solution is very scalable. 

Microsoft has slow technical support; getting through to anyone typically takes a day or two. Once we get through, then the support is good.

Neutral

The deployment is relatively straightforward; we send out an email, and our users click the link; it downloads the tool to their phones, and they can log in using their credentials. If it's set up correctly, then the deployment is easy.

The solution requires a small amount of maintenance; I have one full-time member of staff to maintain 420 total devices split between two of our clients. 

The cost is handled through our Office 365 license, so I have yet to be able to compare it directly with other tools in its class.

I rate the solution seven out of ten. 

My advice to those evaluating Intune is that you need to know Azure. This isn't a product you can jump into without prior Azure knowledge.

I use Intune for endpoint management. We manage our workstations via Intune because we have remote users on and off the corporate network. It's deployed across over 500 Windows workstations. We're also trying to incorporate cell phones, but we haven't reached that point as yet.

Intune reduces the load on our on-prem Active Directory by having everything go to one Intune panel. That way, we can configure group policies, deploy applications, and manage devices. It has really improved our operations. In the past, the device had to be on our corporate network, but now we can provision a device remotely.

I like the group policy management feature, which performs application monitoring and device enrollment.

It would be nice to have a location tracker for the mobile device management tool. I'm not sure if it exists but hasn't been configured or if it's missing, but we've been unable to utilize the location features.

I have been using Intune for about two months.

Intune is pretty stable. It's also great for helping us maintain compliance in our environment. If it's a hybrid deployment, you should be fine as long as the sync is running. 

Intune is easy to scale because it's in the cloud. There are no limits on what you can manage.

Microsoft support isn't too bad, but it depends on the department you called. Intune support is better than support for Defender for Endpoint. I would rate it about a six out of 10.

Neutral

I was previously using on-premise Active Directory with group policy management. Intune puts your dashboard and panels in the cloud, but they sync with the on-prem Active Directory. Most of the management is done from in the cloud. All we need is internet access to manage the devices.

Setting up Intune was straightforward. Microsoft provided all the materials we needed, and we had support from their team. We had about five guys working on the solution. It can be from one to five guys, depending on the scale of the solution. 

We went through the reseller.

The price isn't too bad

Yes, we've tried ManageEngine and SolarWinds.

I rate Intune 8.5 out of 10. My advice to future users is to perform a proper inventory before enrollment. This is essential cost-wise. You need a good idea of how much it will cost per month so you don't overrun your budget. 

Generally, the top three uses are operating system deployments, software updates and patching, and software deployments to endpoints.

If you're a small shop, a two-person organization, yet you have many endpoints, five to 10,000, you can easily manage them. You can manage the masses with one person part-time and it's a good automation tool that takes away the need for multiple folks to do a lot of things in the environment like software deployments or patch management. It's very good at automating those functions.

The reporting aspect is very nice. It's got about 450 canned reports in it. They're easily customizable. You can get really good granular reports for inventory, patch management, status, and everything. It's very good at reporting.

It's not hard to set up. It's easy to manage.

Third-party patching and other solutions integrate with Endpoint Manager. From that perspective, there's no deficiency. 

The UI is good. You can filter things out so that you'll only see things that are pertinent to your function. 

It's really matured and improved over the years by assimilating competing products. There are a lot of things that used to be better than Endpoint Manager or not available in Endpoint Manager that were absorbed or purchased and placed into this product. From a deficiency perspective, I can't recall coming across anything substantial. I'm trying to think of a weakness. I compared it to Ivanti. From a new user's perspective, it may be a little overwhelming because there are quite a few things to look at in the console, however, once you are sort of acclimated and are familiar with your core functions, it's fairly simple and straightforward.

You can modernize the UI a little bit, however, change for a sake of change isn't always a good thing.

I've been using the solution for 25 years. It used to be called SCCM.

The solution is very stable.

The scalability is great.

The largest user base I've ever supported, for example, was a headquarters and they had 220,000 endpoints. In contrast, small colleges and educations may only have 500 users, so they can get by with a single server hosting everything. SQL and everything can be one server.

For us, the solution is extensively used.

If you're looking forward to deficiency, I'd say that the Endpoint Manager support at the lower levels is poor. As you go higher and you get like a more engineering level, then you're fine, however, the early stages of support are not the best.

I've worked with Ivanti and LANdesk and other tools.

I've used Endpoint Manager every day. I'm currently using it. I've been using it for 25 years. However, there are other ones like BigFix, which I've rarely used. I've used LANdesk a few times. And people would try to use LANdesk to avoid the expensive Endpoint Manager, however, at the end of the day, it costs them more in time to use the LANdesk solution. Ivanti is a competitor, however, they're cobbled together with Shavlik, for patch management they've got Altiris. They bought Altiris and Altiris has been passed around like a cheap hoe from Symantec to Intel, to everybody.

Altiris was actually developed to support Endpoint Manager and provide asset management. At the time, Endpoint Manager didn't have good asset management, so they actually worked with Altiris, only to find out that Altiris was actively taking Microsoft customers. Microsoft booted them to the curb and they haven't done well since. That was back probably in the late nineties that they did that. Endpoint Manager has been around the longest, it's survived, it's matured and it's the top dog in general.

Complexity-wise, it's not hard to set up. It's just a lot of small steps, such as making sure the firewall ports are open and certain things are in place, and all the perquisites are taken care of, as the wizard, the installation wizard for Endpoint Manager, is pretty straightforward. As long as you have SQL and some other features turned on to support the different functions of Endpoint Manager, you're fine. You'll need WSS or you'll need WSS for patching and you'll need SQL reporting services for the reporting portion of it. All those small things. The more lights you turn on, the more configuration you have to do.

The deployment itself took me four hours end to end, to put all the prerequisites in, however, understanding, of course, may take a while for someone new. I've done this now for over 25 years. For me, it's pretty straightforward and I have, a lot of these things PowerShell scripted so it works very well. You can create a PowerShell script and set the whole thing up from Powershell, which is what I've done.

Maintenance requirements are low. Since it lives on SQL, if you put a SQL maintenance plan in place, it's pretty much, it's very healthy, it's very stable.

We've seen an ROI. It enables you to pair down the resources necessary for configuration management. You don't need a large shop to maintain your environment. If you want to develop it, if you want to create new images all the time and that sort of thing, then you're going to need to staff yourself accordingly, however, not necessarily to support Endpoint Manager, just to develop those and payloads that it delivers.

I'm a partner. I'm using the most up-to-date version of the solution.

While the solution was on-prem initially, now it's converted to more of a hybrid. They have co-management so you can manage on-prem and cloud together.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

Microsoft Endpoint Manager is simply a desktop, a laptop, a smartphone, or a tablet. An endpoint is exactly what it sounds like. Microsoft, on the other hand, makes use of that tool.

Endpoint allows you to deploy the operating system level. It enables the packaging and deployment of applications. It enables you to secure systems with BitLocker and incorporate things with Active Directory.

We are a consulting firm.

Our clients use it to simplify desktop builds and to maintain the patch management on their servers and desktops, as well as to have an easy mechanism for both rolling out BitLocker, which is a Microsoft tool and publishing new updates for their various software packages.

Microsoft is investing significantly more in the cloud. For our use and our clients' use, and again, our clients who use Endpoint number over 500, with an increase of 1,000 users. It is effective. It significantly reduces the overhead associated with providing support. It actually works quite well.

The installation could be improved to be simplified.

I have been working with Microsoft Endpoint Manager for the last 12 months.

We are Microsoft partners. 

We have been working for well over a decade with SCCM, and now with Microsoft Endpoint Manager.

They are deployed both on the cloud, and on-premises.

Microsoft Endpoint Manager is quite stable.

Microsoft's cloud has a capacity of 100,000 users. Depending on what you are dealing with, it's highly scalable, depending on how and where you deploy it.

It's from Microsoft. However, we are a Microsoft Premier partner. As a result, we are quite familiar with the product. Again, there isn't much of a need for it. However, our clients call us if they run into problems, which happens very rarely.

You do not have to maintain the Microsoft Endpoint that is built into their cloud, it's a cloud-based service. Locally, there is now maintenance every 16 months if you are deploying the local endpoint or creating a hybrid to Microsoft's cloud. You have to upgrade if you are deploying the local deployment. The current build changes every 16 months, but the upgrade is a very low skill set, you don't need anyone to upgrade it.

SCCM is no longer known as SCCM. It's known as Endpoint. Microsoft no longer recognizes that product. Endpoint refers to both the local and cloud-based installations. And, prior to their acquisition by Dell, we were a long-term partner with Quest. We've had clients use Quest products, but we haven't.

According to Microsoft, SCCM is no longer in use. Microsoft Endpoint is the new name for the current build. You can now deploy an Endpoint structure locally or pull Endpoint from Azure.

SCCM is no longer active.

I have worked with both Microsoft Endpoint Manager as well as Quest in the last 12 months. We have clients running the Quest Software.

The most recent Quest software we've seen is the Exchange PTS, or mail migration tool. That is probably the tool that we've had clients deal with twice. However, that is apples to oranges in comparison to SCCM.

It is the mail migration utility. According to my understanding, Quest recently sold that to a different company. So it's an old Quest product.

The initial setup is complex.

You have to appreciate two points with Microsoft Endpoint Manager. Microsoft Endpoint is based in Microsoft's cloud, 365 Azure. And Microsoft has simplified it quite a bit. They also work well with Intune. Many of their services are complementary to the solution. Autopilot is being sent out. You can have a machine auto-built from a remote location, or you can order an Autopilot deployment from your HP, Dell, or Lenovo. They've simplified it considerably since the old days, but there is still a technical element. For those with a technical nature, it is quite simple. Anything is simple if you understand the product.

You should probably consider cloud deployment before local deployment because Microsoft has made significant investments in the cloud. The local deployment is still in place. Microsoft's cloud comes with a lot of extra features that are free of charge. Furthermore, if you deploy it locally, you must own SQL, whereas, in the cloud, SQL is not required.

I would rate Microsoft Endpoint Manager a nine out of ten.