No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Logo

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.3 out of 5

What is Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management?

Featured Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management mindshare

As of May 2026, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category stands at 1.8%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management1.8%
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager10.4%
Delinea Secret Server4.5%
Other83.3%
Privileged Access Management (PAM)

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryPrivileged Access Management (PAM)May 9, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs CyberArk Privileged Access ManagerMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs One Identity SafeguardMay 9, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Privileged Access Management vs Okta PlatformMay 9, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
CyberArk Privileged Access Manager4.310.4%95%230 interviewsAdd to research
Okta Platform4.33.3%96%109 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Healthcare Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Comms Service Provider
8%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Construction Company
5%
University
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Media Company
3%
Performing Arts
3%
Logistics Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Insurance Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Retailer
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
International Affairs Institute
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management with alternative products

Learn more about Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management

Related questions

 
Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Consultant Security and Compliance at inSpark4.5Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management effectively enhances data security when integrated with other solutions, offering robust auditing, reporting, and compliance features. However, improvements are needed in sensitive information relevance and AI tool tracking for full effectiveness.
Systems Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 201-500 employees4.0I use Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for managing cloud access in Azure and 365, appreciating its approval-based controls, though I wish the reporting tools were more robust; overall, it complements my on-prem solution well.
Business Owner at Smacanalytics4.5I use Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management to control system access by providing elevated privileges on demand. It integrates well with Azure Identity, offering robust security features, but could improve integration with non-Microsoft cloud platforms like AWS and Google Cloud.
Officer at SFIL4.0I utilize Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for Outlook, Word, and Excel. Its menu and Microsoft Security features are user-friendly, though data management can be tricky. Despite no clear ROI, it's an improvement over Office 2010.
Director, Cloud and Modern Workplace at Informanix Technology Group4.5We use Microsoft Purview Privileged Access Management for data protection, appreciating its just-in-time access and alert features that enhance security. However, documentation clarity needs improvement, and better support would enhance the overall experience while automation boosts productivity.