Microsoft Teams Reviews

We use the product for communication and as a channel for discussion on projects. 

The solution integrates with project management products like Jira. 

The solution should improve its user interface and recording features. 

I have been working with the product for five years. 

I would rate the product's stability a ten out of ten. 

I would rate the solution's scalability an eight out of ten. My company has 6000 employees. 

Our first line of support is within the company. If they cannot resolve it, we open a ticket and get an immediate response from the Microsoft team.

The product is better than Zoom in terms of features and capabilities. 

Our team did the solution's implementation. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten. 

We use the solution to chat with colleagues. 

The solution helps us to accelerate communication. We use Teams to contact colleagues during emergencies instead of regular electronic phones. It helps to keep everything organized and centralized in the same place. The product is also very easy to use. I am also impressed with the solution's possibility of making quick calls and creating groups. 

The product is not fully integrated in Brazil. 

I have been using the product for more than a year. 

I would rate the product's stability a nine out of ten.

I would rate the product's scalability a nine out of ten. 

The product's deployment is straightforward. 

I would rate the solution a nine out of ten since it depends on the internet connection. I fully recommend users to use all the features of the product. 

We use the solution as collaboration software to schedule meetings with our core team members.

The solution allows us to invite members to attend the meeting efficiently.

The solution's user interface needs to be friendlier. It is challenging to navigate the setting when I want to stop the screen-sharing feature.

We have been using the solution for a year.

We have 220 solution users in our organization.

We have never contacted the solution's technical support team, as our organization has a dedicated support team for Microsoft 365. They handle all the queries.

The solution's initial setup process is easy.

I rate the solution a seven out of ten.

We use Microsoft Teams for group communications.

The solution’s pricing could be improved.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for more than three years.

I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten for stability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for scalability.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its ease of initial setup.

The solution's deployment is done by minimal staff in 30 to 45 minutes.

I rate Microsoft Teams an eight out of ten for its pricing.

We are using the latest version of Microsoft Teams. The solution is deployed on the cloud in our organization.

Overall, I rate Microsoft Teams a nine out of ten.

The solution is being used for Collaboration. 

The Audio Call feature is its most valuable feature. Through this feature, seamless discussions can take place, files can be shared through one single application and the voice quality is also good. Organizations can also build their org chart and share information through emails and phone calls.

The Teams functions can be improved and some other package should be introduced. 

I have been using Microsoft Teams for two years. 

It is a stable solution. I rate the stability a ten out of ten. 

It is a scalable solution. Three hundred users are using Microsoft Teams in our organization. I rate the scalability a ten out of ten. 

I used Slack previously. 

The initial setup is straightforward. It only took a few minutes to deploy Microsoft Teams. I rate the setup a ten out of ten. 

I would like to recommend this solution because it's a native package of Office 365. Once you have combined your ADAP account, you can use it directly. You log in to your Office 365 account and then launched the application. Also, the solution is very simple to use.

I rate the overall solution a ten out of ten. 

The solution has the best feature for video calling effects. Also, its collaborative perspective allows us to integrate different calling features. We can dial out international numbers as well.

The solution's screen-sharing feature could be better compared to Webex and Zoom. There could be more accessibility control for screens shared by other representatives in a work meeting.

We have been using the solution for three to four years.

I rate the solution's stability a nine out of ten. We recently encountered some interruptions with its availability.

It is a scalable solution. I rate its scalability a ten out of ten.

We have never come across any challenges with the solution's technical support. Although, from a technological perspective, there will always be room for improvement.

Positive

The solution's initial setup is easy. I rate the process a ten out of ten.

The solution is moderately expensive than other Microsoft products.

I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

I use the solution for chatting and video conferencing. I use it for video conferencing 75 percent and chatting 25 percent. I use it for scheduling only five to six percent. 

I am impressed with the solution's collaboration with Office 365. 

We have experienced response delays with the product. It can be hard to understand where to click in the solution. Also, the solution should incorporate videos like 'How to use Teams' that can be popularized among customers. 

I have been working with the product for two years. 

The solution is stable. 

My company has 200 users for the product. 

I have not contacted support since we have not encountered issues with it. 

The product's setup is easy. 

I would rate the product an eight out of ten. The tool is great but depends on configuration policies. 

I use Microsoft Teams on a daily basis for conference calls and chatting. Additionally, I use Microsoft Teams for managing emails.

Sharing documents in real-time has been incredibly helpful. I can share documents with my colleagues and make changes directly, which enhances our collaboration. The platform is user-friendly and has positively impacted our communication, allowing us to communicate with people from different countries and cities in real time.

Microsoft Teams could be improved through more synchronization with other platforms like Calendly and Gmail, as we also use these platforms.

I have been using Microsoft Teams for around a year.

I find Microsoft Teams to be quite stable.

I believe Microsoft Teams is pretty scalable.

I used Gmail before switching to Microsoft Teams because it was a decision made by my company.

The initial setup was easy for me.

It's a mix of both positive and negative.

I did not evaluate other options.

Microsoft Teams is pretty good, and I would rate it an eight out of ten.

I use it for meetings. When I talk to people, then I use it for meetings. 

It just does the job. I really haven't played much with it to decide what I like or don't like about it. I know it's good when I just need to do a meeting.

It is easy to use.

There is room for improvement in the stability.

I look forward to AI-based features in future releases.

I have been using it for a long time. 

I would rate the stability a six out of ten. Maybe it's my laptop that's slow, but I've had times when I've had trouble logging on for a meeting.

I used Zoom.

It is easy to set up. I can do it by myself. 

I don't have to physically go to the meetings; I don't have to drive there. I can do it virtually. So, it saves me a lot of money. 

There's a package that I got, so I think it's a yearly subscription that I bought.

Overall, I would rate it a seven out of ten. If you just need a product for meetings, I'd recommend it.