Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
reviewer1579950 - PeerSpot reviewer
IT infrastructure manager at Indicom eDocument Care Srl
Real User
Jun 3, 2021
Savings time has been reduced by almost half
Pros and Cons
  • "Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, saving times have been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction."
  • "In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."
  • "In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space."

What is our primary use case?

We were looking for backup software to permit us to save our big environment in a fast and easy way. After a  careful analysis of the market leaders, we chose Nakivo. We use Nakivo to save all our Virtual Machines in a VMware environment and to save all the data in our file system. In our environment, we have around 100 Virtual Machines. Those Virtual Machines are both of production and staging. We are saving around 4 TB in our file systems. Daily, the backup saves more than 900MB from file systems and more than 1 TB from VM.

How has it helped my organization?

Before using Nakivo Backup & Replication, all of our data backup processes took a long time and did not optimize the disk space reserved for backup. With the introduction of Nakivo Backup & Replication, savings time has been reduced by almost half (thanks to the use of several simultaneous transporters) and the space occupied has also had a very important reduction.

In addition, all restore test processes are carried out quickly and easily. You can restore a single file, a single folder, or a single database in a very simple way. There is also the possibility to receive the restored files or folders directly on our PC by downloading the browser or by receiving e-mails   

What is most valuable?

We have found many fundamental features in Nakivo Backup & Recovery.

The main ones are: 

  • The ability to use multiple transporters in parallel to have very efficient speed savings
  • A very clear graphical interface and guided procedures in a simple and fast way
  • The method of restoring the various backups that allow you to restore even the individual
  • Virtual Machines on the same Hypervisor but with a different name or the ability to choose a different destination network. 
  • Finally, the data compression that the software is able to carry out by saving costs related to disk space. 

What needs improvement?

The Nakivo Backup & Recovery product is already a very complete product and fully satisfies all of our current needs. Lately, thanks to the personalized presentation that was made to us by both the marketing and technical teams, we have learned about the new features released in the latest versions. Among these, the ability of having the replica of our Virtual Machines in a dormant state and ready to be activated in case of problems on the primary site has great value on the Disaster Recovery site. 

In the press releases, it would be useful to make sure that the manual space reclaim procedure does not have to be performed but that it happens automatically, thus optimizing the use of space.

Buyer's Guide
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about NAKIVO Backup & Replication. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nakivo Backup & Replication for more than three years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is very stable, in more than three years we always had daily backups.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

It is very scalable and affordable.

How are customer service and support?

All our requests were dealt with within one hour of opening.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used another solution but the performance and stability were not comparable to that offered by Nakivo.

How was the initial setup?

It was very easy.

What about the implementation team?

We implemented it ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Nakivo has a pricing solution that can meet the various needs of companies in order to pay only for actual use and needs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We also tested Veeam.

What other advice do I have?

I would recommend Nakivo to those who need to have safe, performing, and simple backup software.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
it_user1557354 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Admin at Maternity Magánklinika
User
Apr 28, 2021
Good data compression, easy to manage, and sends email alerts to notify us of problems
Pros and Cons
  • "It is easy to manage all of the individual backup jobs, check the status every day, and it can even send an email to keep us informed."
  • "In our daily use of this program, we have no experienced any issues."
  • "I would like to have a built-in SNMP client, which is important if we want to monitor it using Zabbix, Nagios, or another monitoring solution."
  • "I would like to have a built-in SNMP client, which is important if we want to monitor it using Zabbix, Nagios, or another monitoring solution."

What is our primary use case?

The primary use case for Nakivo backup is to have all of our data secured, and easily accessible if there is any data loss. 

It backs up our SQL databases, web servers, and application servers.

How has it helped my organization?

Using this solution has organized the data structure. Prior to using it, we could only back up three or four machines, manually to external storage, and it was impossible to keep consistent or to manage for a long time.

This software has the ability to centralize, organize, and manage all of our data. When something is changed or missing, you know where to look for it.

It has improved our backup speed, reducing the time we spend on performing backups every week. This gives us more time to improve other areas at the company. File recovery from a virtual machine is also great.

What is most valuable?

It is easy to manage all of the individual backup jobs, check the status every day, and it can even send an email to keep us informed. If there any problem, we can fix it before the next backup.

There is centralized storage, where the compressed backup data is reduced by almost half of the size, compared to the actual data. This means that we save a lot of space.

Another great feature is the VM backup. The job creation is clear and only needs a few steps. Once it up and running, it keeps data safe for a long time without any interaction from us.

What needs improvement?

I would like to have a built-in SNMP client, which is important if we want to monitor it using Zabbix, Nagios, or another monitoring solution.The snmp protocol can be used for monitoring systems,to ask the statuses of all process.If the software has some problem,freezes etc,it cant send an email of its status,but snmp can discovers problems.The snmp client can be installed manually.So altough its not a big loss,but nice if we have it built in.

It would be helpful if there were more cloud services supported as a backup repository.Now only amazon services is available,but there is other smaller cloud providers too.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nakivo for maybe a month.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

The stability has been great.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Scalability-wise, this product is great.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is great they want to help.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We did not use another solution prior to Nakivo.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was not complex at all.

One of the valuable features is that it can be easily deployed as an OVF template. It can also be installed on network-attached storage.

Time-wise, it will be up and running in under five minutes.

What about the implementation team?

We used an in-house team.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This product is cheaper than other big rivals.

It has a demo version that you can try and it has almost all the features. Moreover, when you buy it, you just activate it rather than having to reinstall it.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Veeam before selecting this product.

What other advice do I have?

Overall, this is a good solution. I can only think of a few cons, there are a lot more pros.

The next release should only include little tweaks or bug fixes if there are any of them. In our daily use of this program, we have no experienced any issues. It performs all of the commands that we give it, and there have been no errors yet.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
March 2026
Learn what your peers think about NAKIVO Backup & Replication. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.
884,976 professionals have used our research since 2012.
it_user1557180 - PeerSpot reviewer
System Administrator
User
Apr 25, 2021
Helps to centralize backups, easy to recover data, effectively saves space with incremental backup using a proprietary change-tracking method
Pros and Cons
  • "This product has helped to centralize backups and made it easy to recover data."
  • "The most valuable feature is full-VM recovery from ashes."
  • "I would like to see support for backing up from other platforms, such as physical machines."
  • "I would like to see support for backing up from other platforms, such as physical machines."

What is our primary use case?

Our primary use case is disaster recovery in case of a cyber attack, crypto-virus, etc.

We are using it to back up virtual machines from a VMware ESXi server, and there are individual jobs for every day. It keeps track of the daily changes and backs up only the changed data, which is much smaller than the whole virtual machine.

Nakivo has its own change block tracking. It is available in the free edition of VMware and it's not allowed to be used for backup software, but it's not a problem because Nakivo uses its own method to track changed blocks.

How has it helped my organization?

This product has helped to centralize backups and made it easy to recover data.

It can be deployed as an individual virtual machine to the VMware ESXi environment.

It doesn't need a lot of computing power, whether RAM, processor or otherwise.

Its runs silently and has a webpage where we can manage all of our backups. The webpage is clean and fast.

There aren't any major problems and it's easy to update.

There are a lot of options such as sending emails from each job about its status every day.

It manages the repositories well, it can clean space if it's needed, and it has self-healing capabilities.

What is most valuable?

The most valuable feature is full-VM recovery from ashes. If there is a data loss or a virtual machine in the VMware environment gets corrupted by a cyberattack or storage failure, there is a full consistent backup in the Nakivo backup repository. It can be recovered to the same hardware, or to a brand new VMware ESXi environment in less than half a day, even if there is a lot of data.

We have been covered by this software over the past year, and the recovery has been tested in our production environment. As such, we are satisfied with this solution, even when compared to others.

What needs improvement?

I would like to see support for backing up from other platforms, such as physical machines.

The mail recovery options could be improved. We used this feature often but it's a bit slow.

Sometimes, the backup speed to the NFS repository that we use in our environment drops from 400 MB/s to 50 MB/s, but it might be a problem in the network, which is something that we're investigating.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nakivo for more than one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

This product is very scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Technical support is helpful.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Prior to Nakivo, we were using Duplicity.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup is easy.

What about the implementation team?

We set it up ourselves.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

This product provides good value for the price.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Veeam but opted for Naviko.

What other advice do I have?

This is a product that continuously improves over time.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Assistant manager at Fiiitjee Ltd
Real User
Apr 17, 2021
Can be easily installed and is stable and scalable
Pros and Cons
  • "The initial setup is very straightforward."
  • "The initial setup is very straightforward, and I love the Linux version as well; also, NAKIVO is scalable and stable."
  • "Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available."
  • "The licensing cost may be high, but the setup is easy."

What is our primary use case?

I use it for day-to-day backup tasks.

What is most valuable?

The initial setup is very straightforward. I love the Linux version as well. Also, NAKIVO is scalable and stable.

What needs improvement?

Integrations maybe helpful for NAKIVO. I think end-to-end backup and user backup will be useful to have. The price could be reduced as well. I also think that AD integration should be more available.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working with Nakivo for a year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It is a stable solution.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

NAKIVO is scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

I have found the technical support to be satisfactory.

How was the initial setup?

The initial setup was easy and straightforward.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

From the perspective of Indian users, the cost is a little bit high.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I looked at Veeam and Arcserve.

What other advice do I have?

The licensing cost may be high, but the setup is easy.

On a scale from one to ten, I would rate this solution at eight.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Senior Director, Production Engineering at ATOS
Vendor
Feb 8, 2021
Intuitive GUI, good documentation, efficient compression and deduplication features
Pros and Cons
  • "This product has a very clean and intuitive GUI."
  • "For the most part, I don't have anything I'd change for this small type of environment."
  • "I had to manually install SNMP, which wasn't hard, but a step I had to take, to plug this into the monitoring system."
  • "I had to manually install SNMP, which wasn't hard, but a step I had to take, to plug this into the monitoring system."

What is our primary use case?

After looking around the internet for a quick, simple, and easy solution, I gave Nakivo a chance. I implemented it for backing up a small customer environment with one VMware host and four guests. The guests are two Linux and two Windows servers.

It's connected to a Synology NAS station via an NFS mount. The customer was looking for a quick way to back up their environment after recently suffering a significant data loss due to a user error. It had a real impact on their business and they asked for my help in putting something in place.

How has it helped my organization?

The customer didn't have any backup solution in place to protect their current server environment. This was a very quick and simple solution that fit their needs, and it was free!

They are now able to get a daily backup of their environment, including their main file share that has thousands of files stretching back for at least seven years. The loss they sustained cost them at least two man-weeks of effort to restore. 

What is most valuable?

Nakivo is very easy to set up and configure, and I chose the simplest install option possible. It is an OVA running on their server, which plugged right into their environment.

Nakivo's installation and background documentation is on point, answering a few simple questions I had.

This product has a very clean and intuitive GUI.

After running this for a week, I've found that the data compression and data deduplication is extremely valuable and efficient.  The server also has a very low overhead impact on the VMware server.

What needs improvement?

I would think that as it's used in larger environments that might be more than one server, and you're going to need a better authentication mechanism. For example, integration into Active Directory or some other form of LDAP would be helpful.

I had to manually install SNMP, which wasn't hard, but a step I had to take, to plug this into the monitoring system.

For how long have I used the solution?

I've been using Nakivo for a couple of weeks.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Nakivo has been extremely stable so far.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

I am not sure about scalability because I haven't used it in a large situation yet.

How are customer service and technical support?

I haven't needed to interact with technical support.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

They had no previous backup system.

How was the initial setup?

Very simple and easy to use via an OVA setup.

What about the implementation team?

I deployed it myself.

What was our ROI?

The ROI is Infinite because it's free for this kind of small environment!

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

As a free solution for a small environment, this is a great solution!

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I spend about an hour browsing other free solutions, but they were either limited by too few backup targets or didn't provide dedupe.

What other advice do I have?

For the most part, I don't have anything I'd change for this small type of environment. It has been super simple and easy to install, configure, and use. The operation of the application works as advertised.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

On-premises
Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1495233 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Director at Daedalus Computing Limited
Real User
Jan 27, 2021
Installs and is managed from a low-cost NAS, simple to set up, and the support is responsive
Pros and Cons
  • "The main advantage from our perspective is the ability to plug this solution into an existing infrastructure on a cheap device and point the backup at the server targets and configure the backup options in a simple menu; linking to a cheap cloud resource for a simple solution for off-site storage."
  • "The main advantage from our perspective is the ability to plug this solution into an existing infrastructure on a cheap device and point the backup at the server targets and configure the backup options in a simple menu; linking to a cheap cloud resource for a simple solution for off-site storage."
  • "It would be helpful to be able to have a custom footprint so that only the required features are installed."
  • "There has been a slight tendency to bloat, where each new feature uses slightly more resources."

What is our primary use case?

We have used Nakivo to provide a fully automated backup solution without user intervention with on-site backup and copy to the cloud. 

We provide support and consulting services to SME businesses in the UK, and simplicity and a lower cost are paramount. 

We have implemented Nakivo for these clients, installed to a stand-alone NAS device. This can sit on the network alongside the existing systems and simply be pointed at the servers and workstations targeted for backup. It can manage the backup externally and the backed-up resources will run without any staff intervention. 

How has it helped my organization?

This has allowed us to move our clients to an automated solution that simply plugs into their existing infrastructure, removing the need for manual media handling. We have seen an increase in resistance to clients using staff resources to manage manual media handling. 

Nakivo's solution based upon a discrete NAS has provided a very neat "plug-in" solution that connects to their networks and targets their existing servers and creates a local disc-based backup resource. To this is added a simple AWS EC2 resource, which is an automatically configured host for cloud copies of the local backups for DR and archive. 

What is most valuable?

The ability to install a solution to a stand-alone, low-cost NAS and run and manage from there has been a very helpful facet of the projects. The ability to eschew manual media handling is an essential change in SME environments, where the staffing overheads for media handling and storage in the age of cloud backups was becoming onerous. 

The main advantage from our perspective is the ability to plug this solution into an existing infrastructure on a cheap device and point the backup at the server targets and configure the backup options in a simple menu; linking to a cheap cloud resource for a simple solution for off-site storage.

What needs improvement?

There has been a slight tendency to bloat, where each new feature uses slightly more resources. It would be helpful to be able to have a custom footprint so that only the required features are installed.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nakivo for approximately two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

It has proved very stable on the whole.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

As it can be run from different platforms, it is very scalable.

How are customer service and technical support?

Nakivo support has been very flexible and responsive. 

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Previously, we used Veritas BackupExec and we changed due to the ease of use of Nakivo and the LCO.

How was the initial setup?

Very simple to set up, including automatic installation of agents and build of AWS resource. 

What about the implementation team?

This is a product that we set up and manage for our clients.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Cost is very appropriate for SMEs.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Acronis before choosing Nakivo.

What other advice do I have?

Support has been very good and product development and enhancement very active.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. We are a reseller of this product, supplying it as part of our solutions to SME clients.
PeerSpot user
reviewer1475781 - PeerSpot reviewer
Membro at IT-Group
Reseller
Dec 22, 2020
Cost-effective, provides a simple to use and well-structured interface
Pros and Cons
  • "We really appreciate the simplicity of the solution."
  • "We really appreciate the simplicity of the solution."
  • "What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests."
  • "What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests."

What is our primary use case?

We are using Nakivo internally for backup/replication and cloud backup of our little datacenter, in a server farm.

Our customers use Nakivo Backup & Replication on a daily basis for backup and recovery of VMs and files. These environments are heterogeneous, as we have many Linux VMs, Windows VMs, and dedicated virtual appliances. This is no issue with the backup and recovery of entire VMs or single files, granularly.

We also appreciate the easy-to-use web interface, and our customers are completely independent in the management of Nakivo.

How has it helped my organization?

Nakivo Backup & Replication reduces the time to set up and configure a backup solution in a VMware environment with many types of backup destination.

Before Nakivo, our technicians spent a lot of time every day assisting end-users or our customers' IT departments. Now, all is very clear and simple.

What is most valuable?

We really appreciate the simplicity of the solution. Every tab in the web interface has a simple target, and everything is structured such that it can be found in a few seconds.

Another great feature of Nakivo Backup & Replication is support for backup to the Wasabi cloud infrastructure. This allows us to offer a complete solution to our customers.

Setup on a NAS device helps us to have a distributed backup solution, in case the customer has many remote offices. We can install a little NAS on the remote site and have a bandwidth-optimized offsite backup.

What needs improvement?

What must be improved is the response time to technical support requests.

For how long have I used the solution?

We have been using Nakivo for five years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

This product has great stability.

How are customer service and technical support?

Generally, I don't have issues with Nakivo. The sales department is very responsive to every request and they reply in a few hours. However, technical support could be faster.

Often, as a reply to my email, I receive a message that says "We have received your message and the second level of support will reply to you soon". When they reply fast, at least two days pass!

In case of emergency, where we must recover something and it does not work as we expect, 48 hours to have a reply is too much time.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

Nakivo Backup & Replication also have another great value, which is that it is one of the lowest prices on the market. The customer does not need to spend many thousands of Euros, and in the sales phase, we have fewer issues with the CFO or management.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Prior to Nakivo, we tested Acronis, Veeam, and Anexia.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Other
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer. I'm a Nakivo Reseller
PeerSpot user
it_user1341348 - PeerSpot reviewer
President and CEO at DimenXional Cloud Technologies
Real User
Nov 23, 2020
Great for whitelisting, competitively priced, and has great features
Pros and Cons
  • "Most valuable for DimenXional Cloud is the API provided by Nakivo which allows us to implement the software in all types of solutions."
  • "Nakivo has allowed us to price the product about 10-15% below the competition, and that's significant when you are talking about small dollars."
  • "While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."
  • "While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."
  • "While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API."

What is our primary use case?

Nakivo software is available on a white-label basis. The DimenXional Cloud product with our enhancements is called WatchDog-BaaS for Backup as a Service. DimenXional Cloud has also developed WatchDog-DRaaS, which is Disaster Recovery as a Service. The white-label solution provides the API capabilities that DimenXional Cloud not get from other suppliers of this type of software. The finished solutions are bundled with the tasks for our market. The DimenXional Cloud (Very Small Business) market doesn't care what name is on it. They care about if it works or not and if it is reliable. Above all, our markets want to know that the software is easy to use and it has the right price.

What is most valuable?

1. Most valuable for DimenXional Cloud is the API provided by Nakivo which allows us to implement the software in all types of solutions.

2. It has all the features we need for our customer base.

3. The solution is very competitively priced.

What needs improvement?

While the solution provides mostly what we need, it would be ideal if there were some additional feature capabilities for the API.

I can't really specify which features are missing, as they've done everything that we've asked for so far. Our plate is full of getting what they've done into the marketplace. It's going to take us another two, three months to do that, including engineering work and testing and that type of stuff. I wouldn't be able to answer the question of if there are missing features for at least another three to six months.

For how long have I used the solution?

We haven't been using the solution for too long.

DimenXional Cloud started our programs with Nakivo in the past year.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We used Veeam, and we still have legacy systems that use Veeam. We are switching because of the price advantage Nakivo provides.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

If we're talking about Veeam, it costs us 30% more to do what we are doing. That 30% made us uncompetitive. Nakivo has allowed us to price the product about 10-15% below the competition, and that's significant when you are talking about small dollars. With COVID-19 and the current market conditions, it's important to be very competitive.

What other advice do I have?

We're part of the RESA MSP program. It's basically a partnership with the solution.

Overall, I would rate the solution at a nine or a ten. They've been a very good product so far. It's basically everything we need.

Disclosure: My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
PeerSpot user
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2026
Buyer's Guide
Download our free NAKIVO Backup & Replication Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions.