As an Okta Identity engineer, I implement Okta for different clients such as banks, telecoms, and insurance companies. These companies need an IAM solution to manage their employees securely and provide them with access to the right applications. Okta is used to automate provisioning and support any errors encountered during and after deployment.
Companies use Okta Workforce Identity to manage their employees' secure access to applications and to minimize the effort required by IT teams to manage identities. The solution helps organizations allow their employees to log into their applications without re-entering credentials and securely access their applications via MFA.
The most valuable functions are Single Sign-On (SSO) and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA). These two modules serve as dual components, essential for securing application access for employees.
Okta could improve by making their learning materials more user-friendly. They could also enhance the flexibility of their MFA feature, allowing clients to implement preferred MFA methods without restrictions.
I've been handling Okta Workforce Identity for five years now.
There might be occasional glitches or bugs that need improvement, so I would rate its stability as eight out of ten.
Okta scores a nine out of ten for scalability.
Okta support is efficient, actively responding on time. They deserve a rating of eight out of ten for their technical support.
I handle CyberArk IAM solutions alongside Okta. I find Okta to be more user-friendly and flexible than CyberArk, especially regarding MFA and SSO features.
The setup process for Okta is relatively straightforward and not overly complex.
Okta is one of the more expensive IAM solutions, and I would rate it an eight regarding cost.
The main competitor to Okta Workforce Identity is CyberArk Identity.
I would recommend Okta Workforce Identity to other users.
I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.