OneLogin by One Identity Reviews

Our main use case for OneLogin is managing secure and centralized access across our HealthTech and FinTech platforms, primarily in real-life scenarios when team members need access to tools like the patient management system, financial dashboard, or different admin panels. OneLogin allows us to help them log in and securely access everything they need, and it also helps us enforce role-based security access controls, ensuring sensitive data points are protected.

OneLogin helps us manage role-based security controls by allowing us to define and enforce different access policies based on various user roles, scopes, and attributes, with a primary focus on security. In practice, we generally map users, such as clinicians and support staff or the finance team, to specific roles, with a focus on the HealthTech workflow. For example, whenever a clinician needs to access patient records at the treatment tool, the finance team should not have access to that data, while the finance team would have access to financial data. These are straightforward scenarios, and OneLogin also supports automated user provisioning and de-provisioning, which is really helpful. Whenever a user role changes or they leave the organization, their access is updated or revoked instantly, depending on the workflow.

The primary feature that we value about OneLogin is the security access control, and apart from that, there are many management features. First is Single Sign-On, or SSO, which allows users to access multiple platforms and applications with a single login. Then there is MFA, including risk detection, where the smart factor for risk-based authentication is very helpful for us. User provisioning and lifecycle management are also crucial, as they automate the onboarding and offboarding process, creating, updating, and removing access based on role changes. This reduces manual errors and ensures compliance, particularly in regulated environments like healthcare.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by improving security efficiency and access control. Implementing MFA and role-based access control has significantly reduced the risk of unauthorized access, especially with sensitive health records or FinTech data. We have seen improvements in our user lifecycle management; for example, onboarding and offboarding are much faster and more consistent. The system provides visibility and control, allowing us to manage access effectively and stay compliant with internal policies.

There are a couple of areas for improvement in OneLogin. While it is strong overall, the key areas that could be worked on include the ease of configuration for advanced workflows, as setting up complex role-based policies or integration across different systems in the HealthTech market requires considerable technical effort. A more intuitive setup process or guided configuration would be beneficial.

Visibility is another area that could improve, as determining where problems lie with OneLogin is not always straightforward. Additional logs, clearer error messaging, and better debugging tools would help. Additionally, UI and UX could be streamlined. The integration flexibility with niche platforms can also be improved, but the three key areas I have mentioned are focusing on visibility during troubleshooting and making debugging easier.

I have been using OneLogin for almost four years.

OneLogin is a highly scalable system.

Customer support is pretty good.

Before OneLogin, we relied on Microsoft Active Directory, managing multiple credentials across systems. We also evaluated Okta but ultimately chose OneLogin for the balance of features, ease of deployment, and competitive cost, allowing us to centralize identity management and automate workflows effectively. I previously used Microsoft Active Directory and evaluated Okta, but chose OneLogin for centralized identity management, which supports faster processing for user onboarding, offboarding, and role provisioning.

When analyzing our investment return, there is a clear return regarding measurable time savings and reduced operational overhead, despite any concerns about cost. The comparison of previous manual tasks, which used to take one to two hours, is now reduced to ten to fifteen minutes. From a security standpoint, ROI is also significant, as security breaches cost companies billions each year.

My advice for those looking into OneLogin is to research other options like Okta or Microsoft Entra. Make use of features like SSO, MFA, and SmartFactor, but configure them thoughtfully to balance security and user experience. It is crucial to plan your identity architecture carefully to avoid disruption during rollout or operation. Invest the time upfront in planning, as this will be very beneficial.

I would rate customer support a seven out of ten, which I think is pretty good. My overall review rating for OneLogin is seven out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

OneLogin is used for signing protocol, signing applications, and single sign-on for multiple users across Office 365, Salesforce, and some AWS users.

The best feature of OneLogin is that it is easy to integrate. We found that it integrated seamlessly with our Office 365 and Salesforce, making it the best feature.

Beyond integration, we receive monitoring, but I feel that integration is significantly better than other identity tools when compared to Okta and Azure AD.

My impression of OneLogin is that it is smooth when providing a seamless user experience for signing in and authenticating applications. We do not have to use multiple user IDs and passwords, as we have created one set of users, making it very smooth and efficient to manage user privileges.

My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly.

The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs. Additionally, policy customization needs improvement as we cannot assign specific policies to specific customers. The admin dashboard is cleaner but can be improved, and from my point of view, it is not as user-friendly compared to others such as Okta and Azure AD.

In my comparison of OneLogin with other solutions and vendors, I state that it provides us smooth integration, as it integrates easily, but it lacks deeper end-to-end analytics and broader integration support, which Okta previously provided. Okta also offers deeper analytics and its admin dashboard is cleaner, but the user-friendliness and integration are smoother with OneLogin.

I do not rate it a ten because from the policy perspective, there needs to be improvement. We cannot give fine-grained access to users, and the policy is not mature enough.

We have recently moved from Okta to OneLogin by One Identity approximately eight to nine months ago.

I give OneLogin a stability rating of eight point five.

I rate scalability for OneLogin as a ten.

For support, I give it a ten because we have not had to initiate any support beyond the initial integration. Once again, I rate support a ten.

Positive

The advantages of customer identity and access management in OneLogin for external clients include cutting costs since we were using Okta before, along with providing a seamless user experience. When deploying Okta, we faced multiple issues with logging and user synchronization as users did not sync to multiple identities.

OneLogin is easy to maintain, and since it has not been that long since it was deployed, approximately nine months, we have not had to perform any maintenance on OneLogin.

We are the customers of OneLogin, and we have integrated this product.

When considering the pricing of OneLogin, I find it to be cost-efficient, especially when comparing it heavily with Okta, which is much more expensive.

OneLogin was purchased through a direct purchase via the marketplace, rather than through the AWS Marketplace.

OneLogin has not had Vigilance AI or adaptive login flows enabled because of compliance audits. I do not have complete knowledge of HR's role in managing employee identities. As a technical engineer, I have deployed and maintained the solution, but regarding HR, I do not have the complete picture of how they integrate since it is a separate HR team.

My advice to others looking into OneLogin is that if they want a solution that can easily integrate with their current infrastructure, then I would advise them to consider OneLogin because it integrates easily with multiple solutions and logins. My overall review rating for OneLogin is nine out of ten.

My use case for OneLogin is centralized identity and access management, particularly for secure single sign-on and user authentication across enterprise applications.

In my experience, some of the best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, SSO, Multi-Factor Authentication that is MFA, centralized identity management, and automated user provisioning.

The feature that stands out the most for us is Single Sign-On, SSO. It has made a significant difference by simplifying access management for employees who use multiple enterprise applications daily. Before implementing SSO, users had to manage separate credentials for different systems, which often resulted in password-related issues, login delays, and increased support requests.

One feature that became more valuable over time was the automated user provisioning and de-provisioning capability. Initially, I focused mainly on SSO for authentication improvements, but later I realized how automated lifecycle management could improve operational efficiency and security. It helps streamline onboarding based on user role and position changes.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by improving security, productivity, and access management efficiency. Employees can securely access multiple enterprise applications with a single authentication process, which reduces login friction and minimizes password-related issues.

OneLogin is a strong identity and access management platform overall, but there are a few areas where it could be improved. One challenge is that some advanced integration and configuration settings can become complex, especially in large enterprise environments with multiple applications and custom authentication requirements.

The administrative interface could also be improved further to make navigation, reporting, and policy management more intuitive for new users. While the platform is feature-rich, certain configuration and troubleshooting activities can take time to understand. Another area for improvement is reporting and analytics. More customizable dashboards for visibility into authentication trends, access activity, and security events could help administrators monitor its efficiency.

I have been working with OneLogin for around two years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable with good uptime and reliable performance, especially for standard authentication and user access management activities. Its cloud-based architecture also helps support scalability and availability for distributed and hybrid work environments.

Customer support is good.

I have seen a positive return on investment from using OneLogin, mainly through improved operational efficiency, reduced support overhead, and strong centralized access management. I also saw time savings through automated user provisioning and de-provisioning workflows. New employees get access faster because access permissions are assigned automatically.

My advice to organizations considering OneLogin would be to spend time planning their identity management architecture, application integration, and access policies before deployment. I would also recommend involving security, infrastructure, and application teams early in the implementation process, especially in enterprise environments with multi-cloud applications. I would rate this product an 8 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for OneLogin is to secure applications, especially when logging into multiple applications as the most secure platform for accessing confidential data.

One area where I have been using OneLogin is when I am working on an application that secures employee data, such as payroll. I usually access that data through OneLogin, which is the main secure database that I regularly use OneLogin to access.

Regarding my main use case with OneLogin, it is clear that when I am working on various applications from my screen, it saves me time by allowing me to log in to multiple applications at once from OneLogin as the main security entry. The other factor is that it is safe and provides a more secure user experience.

OneLogin positively impacts my organization as it serves as the main password management tool, preventing unauthorized access from malware attacks and cyber attacks. That is one of my main uses now.

One of the best features OneLogin offers is two-factor authentication, which is safe and relatively straightforward.

What I appreciate most about the authentication feature is that it is easy to use and also secure. The most important aspect for me is the security it provides.

OneLogin has significantly impacted our organization, saving costs by reducing the number of employees needed to monitor application performance since you can access many applications from one entity. Working as a single user from anywhere is very beneficial for our enterprise as it promotes efficient growth through saved costs.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust has made things easier and more secure for users, as it can detect malware attacks and prevent any unauthorized data attacks from fraudulent activities.

I have used Vigilance AI from the login flows, and it is very efficient when it comes to risk behavior detection. It is more secure than manual data connection entries and can detect threats easily compared to human capabilities.

I occasionally face some connectivity outages and glitches with OneLogin, which sometimes delay the login process when I am trying to access my data from various applications.

I am open to the needed improvements. If they can work on the network part to ensure that it is more stable throughout, that would be sufficient for me.

I have been using OneLogin for one and a half years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin's scalability is highly effective. It is easy to use and can be accessed easily when you have the product in your enterprise.

The customer support is proactive. They are experts who respond quickly when you call them and provide the support needed.

I have not used a different solution recently comparable to OneLogin.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing were formal, and they are scaled according to user capability. They provide you with the price, and then you decide which package suits you based on how you plan to use OneLogin for enterprise purposes. If it is for multiple applications, the cost should be higher.

Our enterprise did not evaluate most applications that could work as OneLogin. When we identified OneLogin, we settled on it to see if we could check for other relevant applications.

I am impressed with OneLogin as the main data entry point for accessing most websites from a secure login entity, which is why I could really recommend it to other enterprises.

I advise others looking into using OneLogin that it is a more secure entry point that can secure your data and password. It simplifies everything regarding security and can lead to cost savings while being very efficient.

I am satisfied at this time and can say that OneLogin is the best when it comes to enterprise security solutions, and I recommend it fully. I gave this review a rating of eight out of ten.

On-premises

My main use case for OneLogin is for single sign-on, MFA enforcement, and centralized user access management for most SaaS applications.

I use OneLogin to give employees one secure login for applications like Microsoft 365, VPN access, and internal SaaS tools, while enforcing MFA policies based on user roles and access location.

OneLogin made a significant difference for my organization during remote work expansion because it centralized employee authentication and MFA policies across cloud apps without adding too much complexity for users.

The best features OneLogin offers include the single sign-on experience, adaptive MFA, centralized access management, and the large number of pre-built integrations with SaaS applications. SmartFactor, the adaptive authentication feature, is especially useful because it adjusts security requirements based on login risk and user behavior.

SmartFactor has worked well because it adds extra verification only when a login behavior appears risky, so users are not constantly dealing with MFA prompts during normal day-to-day access.

OneLogin has positively impacted my organization by improving user access management, simplifying the login experience for employees, and strengthening MFA enforcement across cloud applications without adding too much administrative overhead.

The integration library is definitely one of the strongest parts of OneLogin platform, but more granular reporting and customization options would make administration even better.

OneLogin can be improved by enhancing the reporting and the dashboard customization for more flexibility, and troubleshooting federation or integration issues can sometimes take more effort than expected.

The UI is generally easy to use, but some advanced sections feel a bit outdated, and more detailed troubleshooting documentation would help during complex integration.

Better granular policy control and more advanced analytics for authentication activity would be useful, especially for larger enterprise environments.

I have been using OneLogin for over one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin scales effectively for enterprise environments, especially for organizations managing large numbers of users and cloud applications, and the centralized SaaS integration model makes expansion fairly straightforward.

Customer support for OneLogin is very good and solid.

Before OneLogin, I primarily used native application logins and some Microsoft AD Federation Services, but I switched to OneLogin to obtain simpler cloud-based SSO, stronger MFA capabilities, and easier SaaS integration management.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing shows that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integrations and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

I have seen a good return on investment, mainly through reduced password-related support tickets, faster onboarding, and less time spent managing user access across multiple SaaS applications. The centralized SSO and MFA management also reduced a lot of repetitive admin work for the IT team.

I evaluated other options including Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity before choosing OneLogin.

My advice for others looking into using OneLogin is to plan your application integrations and MFA policies carefully from the beginning because OneLogin works best when access management and authentication workflows are standardized early on.

OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that can simplify access with SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administrators. I would rate my overall experience with OneLogin as an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

My main use case for OneLogin is single sign-on and MFA enforcement with centralized user access management across SaaS applications.

A specific example of how I use OneLogin for single sign-on and user access management in my daily work is that we use it for new employees to provide one secure login for applications like Microsoft 365, VPN access, and internal SaaS tools while enforcing MFA policies based on user roles and access location.

OneLogin made a difference for us during the remote work expansion because it centralized authentication and MFA policies across cloud apps without adding too much complexity for users.

The best features that OneLogin offers for my team are the single sign-on experience, adaptive MFA, centralized access management, and the large number of pre-built integrations with SaaS applications. The Smart Factor adaptive authentication feature is especially useful because it adjusts security management based on login risk and user behavior.

The adaptive authentication feature makes things easier or more secure for my team because Smart Factor adds extra verification only when login behavior looks risky, so users are not constantly dealing with MFA prompts during normal day-to-day access.

The integration library is definitely one of the strongest parts of the platform, but more granular reporting and customization options would make administration even better.

Based on my experience, improvements needed for OneLogin include better granular policy controls and more advanced analytics for authentication activity, which would be especially useful for larger enterprise environments.

I have been using OneLogin for two years.

OneLogin is stable in my experience.

OneLogin scales well for enterprise environments, especially for organizations managing large numbers of users and cloud applications, and the centralized SaaS integration module makes expansion fairly straightforward.

Customer support is excellent.

Before OneLogin, we mainly used native application logins and some Microsoft ADFS, but we switched to get simpler cloud-based SSO, stronger MFA capabilities, and easier SaaS integration management.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integration and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

I have seen a return on investment as the adaptive login features with Vigilance AI have been useful for identifying unusual login patterns and automatically applying stronger authentication when the risk level increases. We have seen good results mainly through reduced password-related support tickets, faster onboarding, and less time spent managing user access across multiple SaaS applications. The centralized SSO and MFA management also reduced a lot of repetitive admin work for my IT team.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the pricing is competitive compared to other enterprise IAM platforms, and the setup was relatively straightforward for standard SSO deployments, although more advanced integration and policies required additional planning and configuration effort.

We evaluated Okta, Microsoft Entra ID, and Ping Identity before choosing OneLogin.

The advice I would give to others looking into using OneLogin is to plan your application integrations and MFA policies carefully from the beginning because OneLogin works best when access management and authentication workflows are standardized early on.

Overall, OneLogin has been a reliable and user-friendly IAM platform that helps simplify SSO and strengthen MFA adoption without creating too much complexity for users or administration. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Hybrid Cloud

Microsoft Azure

As an engineer, I primarily use OneLogin to implement single sign-on and manage authentication for different applications, which has significantly helped us connect Active Directory with cloud apps and control user access. This makes user management easier for both the IT team and end users.

When a user logs in from the office network, they gain direct access to apps without additional steps. However, if the same user logs in from a new device, multifactor authentication is triggered, ensuring smooth access for employees.

I use SmartFactor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time based on the risk score associated with the login attempt. Each login attempt is evaluated in real-time based on several parameters including the user's real-time location, device trustworthiness, IP reputation, and behavior patterns. The risk score determines whether to allow the application, trigger MFA, or enforce strict verification.

I use the adaptive login flow for Vigilance AI, which has greatly impacted our risk detection and control over authentication.

OneLogin provides a smooth single sign-on experience for users, along with SmartFactor improving security and usability while significantly reducing password-related support tickets.

Automation is an additional valuable feature that helps us assign applications to users automatically, reducing manual work for the IT team and making onboarding much faster than previously experienced.

The integration of phishing-resistant device trust offers a strong authentication process, significantly enhancing security by preventing phishing-based attacks. Post-adaptation, it makes authentication easier and faster for employee users compared to traditional multifactor authentication.

Based on my hands-on experience with OneLogin, I do not see any features lacking and it provides a full feature set with no immediate need for improvement.

The one area for enhancement I can suggest is the initial setup, which requires considerable planning to execute the deployment. Otherwise, everything else is excellent and I do not see any improvement needed for OneLogin at this time.

I have been using OneLogin for more than two years.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is outstanding in terms of scalability and I have not faced any challenges as it is highly scalable, especially for growing organizations and enterprise environments.

The customer support team is strong and effective, assisting in troubleshooting challenges related to single sign-on setup, Active Directory sync-up, and multifactor authentication policies.

I have been using OneLogin from day one and there was not a different solution prior to this.

The initial setup requires considerable planning to execute the deployment. Automation helps us assign applications to users automatically, reducing manual work for the IT team and making onboarding much faster than previously experienced.

I have seen a return on investment with OneLogin in the past few years, evidenced by both time-saving and reduction in challenges.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

OneLogin is a very excellent solution and I highly recommend considering OneLogin for any environment, as it proves beneficial for single sign-on and multifactor authentication, controlling application access based on real-time user behavior. OneLogin delivers a very good user experience with true single sign-on that minimizes authentication overhead and allows consistent access across applications. I rate OneLogin 10 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

OneLogin's main use case in our organization is ensuring that the right person has access to the right tools by bringing everything under control. It serves as one place to manage all access and provides one login for all employees. OneLogin helps manage access for our employees by giving every employee a single login to access everything they need. They log in once at the start of their workday with their company username and password, and they are ready to go without waiting for anything. There are no more forgotten passwords to juggle and no more account lockouts, just one simple login and employees are ready to work.

The best feature that OneLogin offers in my experience is how much time it saves everyone, not just IT but every single employee in the organization. Employees no longer waste time logging in with credentials because before OneLogin, people wasted considerable time trying to get into applications, dealing with forgotten passwords, account lockouts, and waiting for reset emails. These issues have been completely solved with OneLogin.

Users benefit from a good user interface to log in that is very simple and user-friendly. Employees are very satisfied with this solution because they are not stuck having to remember multiple passwords or log in to each application individually whenever they need it. Logging in once provides access to everything.

Before OneLogin, security was inconsistent across applications, where some applications had strong passwords while others had weak ones, and some had multi-factor authentication while others did not. After implementing OneLogin, the same strong security standard applies everywhere because authentication goes through OneLogin first. This has closed many security gaps we had in our application login processes.

OneLogin solved a significant challenge for us regarding the orphan account problem, which was our biggest and most embarrassing issue before implementation. We ran an audit for deployment and found multiple accounts still active in our various applications belonging to people who had left the company, which was flagged as high priority. This problem no longer exists because automated de-provisioning means that the moment someone leaves the organization, every access point is closed immediately.

OneLogin has made three important improvements to our organization. It has significantly increased the security of our SaaS applications, it is saving time for every user because there are no manual processes, and anyone with just one login can access everything with security.

I do not see any significant issues or challenges with OneLogin because it provides good security with simplified management of the login process for users. However, one thing that could be simplified is the initial setup because it was somewhat tricky during implementation in the initial phase.

I have been using OneLogin for more than three years.

OneLogin is stable.

The scalability of OneLogin is outstanding, and there are no issues with scalability as it is achieving all our needs.

We have had a great experience with the customer support team, who are very responsive whenever we encounter any issue or technical problems.

From day one, we have been using OneLogin and have not used any other solution.

One thing that could be simplified is the initial setup because it was somewhat tricky during the implementation in the initial phase.

I have had a great experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales team was very helpful in setting up the solution, resulting in a great overall experience.

We have seen a return on investment as we started seeing measurable benefits from the first month after we went live. The full return on investment, including licensing, deployment, and training, was achieved within one month, making it significant.

I have had a great experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing because the sales team was very helpful in setting up the solution, resulting in a great overall experience.

OneLogin was the first solution we looked at, so we have not evaluated other options.

I would recommend to others looking into using OneLogin to sit down and list every single application your organization uses before doing anything. Start with an application inventory and prioritize your most-used and most-sensitive applications, and clean up your Active Directory before connecting to OneLogin. This review receives a rating of 9.

On-premises

My main use case for OneLogin revolves around application integration and user authentication. I primarily utilize it to implement Single Sign-On across internal and external applications, which significantly simplifies the login process for users.

I use OneLogin for Single Sign-On with an internal project management tool that our team uses alongside a customer relationship management CRM system. Before integrating OneLogin, users had to remember separate login credentials for each application, which was a hassle and often led to frustration. The process has become much smoother with login pages, authentication, and access granted.

The best features OneLogin offers are Single Sign-On, multiple Multi-Factor Authentication, and user provisioning.

Multi-Factor Authentication is generally useful for adding an extra layer of security, which is crucial, especially for the sensitive nature of the data we handle.

OneLogin has had several positive impacts on my organization in several key areas. Single Sign-On and Multi-Factor Authentication have been beneficial. Additionally, the user authentication has been improved remarkably. Before OneLogin, our team was burdened with managing multiple credentials, but now it is much more efficient.

Since implementing OneLogin, I have been seeing a significant reduction in login-related support tickets, approximately a 30% decrease.

I do utilize Smart Factor Authentication with OneLogin. I find it to be a really valuable feature for balancing security and usability.

OneLogin can add more analytics and reporting and integrate with more third-party applications.

I have been working in my current field for a year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is a good scalable product.

Until now, it is great. I have not used their customer support.

Positive

The initial setup was not that difficult. I have used it, and while it was a bit tricky for some time, it was manageable.

The setup was good and easy. I am still using the free trial, but I will be purchasing it.

Other organizations can use OneLogin, but they can also refer to Okta. I have not used Okta until now, but I am hearing that it is more great than OneLogin.

I am still using OneLogin, so I am still exploring the app and need some more time.

The experience has been smooth and quite positive. My review rating for OneLogin is 8.5 out of 10.

Public Cloud

Other

OneLogin provides secure and simple access to business applications while maintaining centralized control over user identity and authentication policies.

When employees join our company, their application access is provided through OneLogin based on their roles and responsibilities, which depends on the department. This allows new joiners to start working immediately without waiting for manual access requests.

OneLogin has provided strong access security for our organization, and day-to-day operations are more efficient for both users and administrators.

We have observed approximately 45 to 50% fewer password-related support tickets, faster user onboarding by nearly 60%, and reduced errors.

The most valuable features of OneLogin are unified application access, multifactor authentication, and automated user provisioning.

Automated user provisioning has had the most significant impact for my team. Before OneLogin, creating and removing access across multiple systems required several manual steps. Today, most processes happen automatically, which reduces delays and the risk of human errors.

The initial setup could be more simplified; apart from this, everything is perfect and a very smooth solution.

I have been working in my current field for more than two years.

OneLogin is a stable solution.

OneLogin has excellent scalability, making it a scalable solution.

Our experience with the customer support team for OneLogin has been positive, as cases are generally handled professionally and the technical resources are knowledgeable.

I would rate the customer support for OneLogin eight out of 10.

We have not switched from a different solution; we have been using OneLogin from day one.

The initial setup could be more simplified; apart from this, everything is perfect and a very smooth solution.

We are receiving a positive return on investment with OneLogin since we have seen a reduced amount of time spent managing user accounts by 50% and shortened onboarding cycles, allowing us to save time and money.

The pricing, setup cost, and licensing for OneLogin are handled by a different team.

We have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin.

My advice for others looking into using OneLogin would be to spend time planning the identity and identity architecture before jumping into deployment and to define proper user roles. Using multifactor authentication from the beginning and automating provisioning will be helpful. I would rate this review nine out of 10.

Public Cloud

Microsoft Azure