Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR Reviews

My primary use for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR is to protect the workstation for the end-users.

The most valuable features of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR are the remote controller from the workstation that can execute commands and isolate the systems outside of the network. Only the system with an internet connection can execute the task because the main console is in the cloud.

Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could improve the look, feel, and management of the cloud console. Additionally, the user could be more easily integrated.

I have been using Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR for two years.

We have approximately 1,000 users using Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR in our organization. The solution is scalable.

We only require one or two staff to deploy the agent of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR because it is very simple. One for the server and the other for the workstation.

The price of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR could be reduced. We are always looking for a discount. There is an annual license needed to use this solution.

I rate Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR a ten out of ten.

I mainly use Cortex XSOAR to automate cybersecurity and the SOC environment.

To minimize manual tasks and increase level of automation. 

Cortex XSOAR drastically reduces trivial tasks inside the SOC environment, which provides a huge benefit for L1 analysts.

Cortex XSOAR's most valuable features are the playbooks, custom integration, the machine-learning model, and the layout, classifier, and mapper.

Corex XSOAR could be improved by reducing the time it takes to process large amounts of data and increasing the number of integrations. In the next release, Palo Alto should include popup features - for example, if someone is working on an incident, it should pop up and display in front of me once it's clicked.

4 years

Cortex XSOAR is very stable in our environment, and we haven't seen any platform issues with it.

Cortex XSOAR is scalable.

Palo Alto's support services require a lot of improvement.

I used Qradar SOAR . Cortex xsoar support is very good and contain lot of OOTB playbooks but comparatively qradar soar lack in OOTB Playbooks. 

The initial setup is very easy. Also in latest version platform is managed by Palo alto cloud itself and rest of the configuration is done from UI itself. 

So zero load in configuring platform. 

Cortex XSOAR's license price could be lower.

I would give Cortex SOAR a rating of eight out of ten.

The strengths of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR stem from the fact that it provides functionalities related to patching and URL blocking, and its strengths are the major reason why I recommend the product to others.

With Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR, managing its setup phase can be a complicated task. The aforementioned aspects of the solution can be considered for improvement. In the future, I need the product to provide me with the ability to manage its base.

In the future, I want Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR to provide me with an option that allows me to do an automatic setup process. I also want Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR to plan a way to minimize the need for too many configuration processes in an architecture. I feel that currently, the setup process of the product is really hard.

I have experience with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. My company has a partnership with Palo Alto Networks.

We don't face any issues with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR in our company right now. Certain issues only crop up with the firewall devices from Palo Alto Networks.

It is a scalable solution.

I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.

Positive

I only handle Palo Alto Networks.

I did not manage the initial setup of the product, as it was taken care of by a product specialist.

I am more comfortable with Palo Alto Networks compared to its competitors.

I can say that I am a bit satisfied with Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR. I manage the product's setup phase, so I am getting familiarized with it.

I can only recommend Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR after I personally complete the setup phase of the product in our environment. In general, after I complete the setup process of Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR in my company, I will recommend it to others.

I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.

I'm currently evaluating XSOAR to see what the solution can do. I'm playing around with the various features. 

The drag-and-drop interface enables analysts with no programming knowledge to create playbooks easily. 

XSOAR could have more integration options. 

I have used XSOAR for two months.

XSOAR is stable. 

Setting up XSOAR is straightforward and takes about 30 minutes. It doesn't require any special technology to implement it in any architecture.  You create a virtual machine, move the file to it, launch the installer, and let it run. It doesn't require any complex tasks. 

I rate Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR nine out of 10. 

We use the solution to create playbooks for all the operational programs.

The solution's integration with non-security solutions will be helpful.

We have been using the solution for almost two years now.

The solution is stable. I rate its stability an eight.

I rate the solution's scalability as an eight. It is complex to scale.

The solution's technical support team takes longer to reply to the queries.

Neutral

The solution's initial setup process is straightforward.

The solution's cost is reasonable. I rate its pricing as a five.

I rate the solution an eight.

Our company uses the solution for security management and threat response. 

Many different playbooks are available and can be customized. 

Integrations with other applications are challenging and need to be improved. 

Reports or issues are often duplicated. 

The solution requires DV but does not support open-source DV elastic searches. 

I have been using the solution for seven months. 

The solution has stability issues from the performance side and often duplicates reports or issues.

The solution is not a Palo Alto product so technical support is inadequate. 

There is not a big focus on support for the solution so it takes a lot of time to receive responses for issues. 

The setup might not be easy because it requires official customers. 

Our company received technical support during installation.

The solution is based on an annual licensing model that is expensive. 

The solution is a good product that would be even better if technical support is improved and prices are discounted. 

Support is very important because there is a lot of follow up after implementations to properly manage changes and issues. 

I rate the solution a six out of ten. 

It is a help desk ticketing tool. It's a sought platform, however, it is just a help desk ticketing tool.

It was useful as a ticketing tool. However, it's been discontinued. 

It doesn't have any integrations. It lacks multiple integrations. 

It is been decommissioned by Palo Alto. There's no more trying to support it. There will be no more additional items added.

The initial setup was complex.

I've been using the solution for a year or more. 

The stability is not there. 

I'm not sure how scalable the solution is.

I can't speak to technical support's capabilities. I don't have much experience with them. 

The setup has a bit of complexity. I'd rate the complexity five out of five. 

I'm not sure how long the deployment took.

We were a reseller. 

I'm not sure which version of the solution we're using. It might be behind a version or two. Demisto has been purchased by Palo Alto. There's a difference in versions between the organizations. The latest version is not defined by the organization.

Potential users should not purchase this product. They decommissioned the product, and it is now at end of life. 

I'd rate the solution three out of ten. It was sold to another company and decommissioned. 

I'm using Cortex XSOAR to manage our network security.

I've been using Cortex XSOAR for about one year.

I have no complaints about Cortex's stability.

As far as I know, Cortex XSOAR's scalability is okay. I'm just a user, so I don't know.

Setting up Cortex is straightforward. This use case is the easiest to implement. I had help from two or three technicians.

I rate Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR eight out of 10. I would recommend it to others.