Pega Platform Reviews

The rule engines work well.

It is a stable product.

The solution could be more scalable. 

It has some DevOps limitations.

The product could be more robust and faster compared to what they have right now.

Pega is also stable. It is also an old product. They have DevOps limitations if we compare it with Appian. That said, from the tool perspective, Pega is stable and reliable.

It is not as scalable, as, for example, Appian. However, I don't have extensive knowledge and therefore can't speak widely on the scaling process. 

I've never contacted technical support. I'm not sure if they are helpful and responsive. I've never talked directly with them. 

I've also used Appian.

I have limited experience with Pega. I don't have extensive knowledge about the Pega, however, there are a few things, which may be the reason to prefer Appian over the Pega. The engines, the rule engines, internally, on Appian or Pega work. However, in terms of how they process your request Appian is more scalable and more robust.

The setup is also good. It also provides the cloud, so it's not an issue from that perspective. I did not use it very extensively, however, they do have a cloud, so it's fine in terms of implementation.

I can't speak about the exact costs. I don't deal with that aspect of the solution. 

I don't have that much experience on the Pega, however, from what I have experienced, there's a little bit more that can be offered. I'd rate it a six out of ten.

We use the solution basically to run any custom process that the client wants to have, or needs to run their business on. For example, the approval process or any kind of business process that can be run using the Pega Platform.

It's low code. That is very useful. A business value architect will have zero coding to do, and he can create a business flow on top of that. The technical developer can handle further things. 

Apart from that, the kind of APIs that they support is also very nice. It also has a lot of APIs out of the box. It can directly connect to Fitbit, it can directly connect to Google Maps, et cetera. That API exposure is also a good thing. They are very easy and very reliable to use, the APIs.

The setup was simple. 

It's a stable solution.

The solution has very helpful technical support.

It can scale pretty well.

A few things I would like them to improve include, first of all, that they don't have any open-source learning platform. To learn Pega, you need to be a partner. If someone just wants to learn Pega for the sake of learning, they won't be able to do so as they don't give access to that.

I would like to have an integrated process mining capability inside Pega. It will be like an entire digital transformation thing then. You don't need two or three sources. Similar to Signavio. Signavio runs BPM, it does modeling, and it is having process mining as well. In Pega, we have modeling, we have RPA, and we have BPM, however, we don't have process mining right now.

I've been using the solution for three years.

It's quite stable. This means we haven't encountered any issues. And even if there are issues, their support is very responsive.

The product is quite scalable as it's a low-code platform. 

The solution adjusts well to different devices. They have this adaptation that if you open it on a tablet, then the screen will adjust accordingly. If you open it on a PC, the screen adjusts it accordingly in Pega. Android as well.

There are more than 25,000 people on the solution.

We've worked with technical support in the past. Whenever there's downtime or whenever something is not working, we need to get in touch with the Pega technical team.

Neutral

I'm also aware of Appian. Even if Pega says that it's a low-code platform, when I compare it to Appian, Appian is more low code when compared to Pega.

The initial setup is very simple and straightforward. 

You need to pay for licensing. It was quite expensive. I'd rate it four and a half out of five in terms of how expensive it is. 

My organization is a service provider for Pega. We're implementation partners. If we use it completely depends on what the client wants and needs.

If you are using it for the first time, you probably should have a consulted implementation partner as well. That said, it is easy to use. It shouldn't be a problem. It's very flexible.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. We generally don't encounter any issues as far as Pega is concerned. Whenever there's an issue, there's a quick resolution. 

The primary use case includes working with Pega Platform, but the organization is planning to switch to another solution soon.

While there may be stability issues, they are minimal.

The technical support is very low, rated at a one or two out of ten. There is a lack of support and community presence in the country, leading to challenges in finding developers.

There have been some stability issues, however, they are not significant.

The technical support from Pega is very low, rating a one or two out of ten.

Negative

The pricing is expensive, and this is an issue.

The organization is in the process of selecting a new solution.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.

I work in the automobile industry, and I generally use Pega for automating regulations and warranty applications.

Currently, we are in a project where the return on investment is less than six months, which is quite noticeable. Time savings are about three hundred percent when building an application in Pega compared to building in Java.

It's an end-to-end solution and a digital transformation tool. It has a range of modern technologies and proven designs built into it, making it a one-stop solution for many industries, including banking, insurance, automobile, and government. It includes AI, has decision-making capability, and is a rich case management tool.

The UI layer is a concern since it is native to them and embedded into the code. I cannot have my own UI layer at the moment. Also, finding a person with the right knowledge for Pega, since it has fewer resources available, is a challenge.

I have been using it for 18 years now.

When you say stable, it all depends on how you have approached the application or the design. If you choose it and design it correctly, it is 100% sustainable.

There is no need to be concerned about scalability. It is scalable across regions and divisions.

The support is okay. I would rate it as six or seven. They have a process-driven approach that can delay problem-solving.

Neutral

I have used WorkFusion and Kofax in one of the solutions. However, Pega clearly outperforms them in all aspects.

As a cloud-based solution, it's a click away. If you are talking about on-premises, it hardly takes an hour, and one person is enough for installation.

Currently, we are working on a project where our return on investment is less than six months.

Pega is at the higher side of medium pricing, but with the cloud, it should be manageable.

I have used WorkFusion and Kofax before. However, Pega clearly outperforms them.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

We primarily utilize it for automating a multitude of business operations, including finance, accounting, manufacturing, and product development. These processes play a crucial role in managing our day-to-day operations and we find that the automation provided by our use of this technology streamlines and simplifies these processes greatly.

The most valuable feature of Pega BPMI would be the academy courses, specifically the Product Development Network (PDN). Additionally, our organization has a dedicated Customer Engagement Team that we work closely with to achieve our goals.

The training aspect of Pega BPM requires significant enhancement. There should be more opportunities for third-party training and engaging events, such as hackathons where individuals can share their expertise. Additionally, the training structure itself should be more organized, as I have received feedback from my colleagues in the COE that the current training approach is overwhelming and requires excessive referencing to obtain accurate information. Another area for improvement would be the user experience with regard to RPA. Simplifying the IDA for citizen developers would make it easier for them to adopt the RPA tool.

I have been using Pega BPM for approximately five years.

I rate the stability of Pega BPM an eight out of ten.

I rate the scalability of Pega BPM a nine out of ten.

The setup of Pega BPM is not complex.

I rate the initial setup of Pega BPM a six out of ten.

I rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.

In conducting our evaluations and comparisons between UiPath and Pega BPM, we found that both systems hold a comparable standing. Although, it is evident that UiPath outperforms in certain aspects such as user experience and ease of use in the development process. On the other hand, Pega BPM excels in addressing complex customization needs and offers more cost-effective solutions. Ultimately, our assessment concluded that both systems score equally in terms of their capabilities and effectiveness.

UiPath is best suited for smaller-sized companies. Pega BPM is better suited for large-sized businesses. 

I would recommend this solution to others.

I rate Pega BPM a seven out of ten.

Our customers range from banking to insurance to telco. In banking, customers use Pega for marketing, sales management, and onboarding processes as in loan onboarding or customer onboarding. They also use it for customer service, for example, when a customer calls up the bank to handle a payment inquiry or a problem. Pega also handles collections. We also deal with many of the operational processes inside the banks. 

In insurance, we work with Pega on property, casualty, and health. In insurance, we have built underwriting systems, and systems to manage attack claims, as well as the sales and customer management service part.

When it comes to telcos, it's primarily in the marketing area. Besides that, we have customers in the government sector. So, in government sectors, it is primarily to automate many of the citizen services, as well as to automate many other online operations.

Pega has traditionally been very good in inclusion automation, which primarily deals with case management, and following the automation along any other processes.

Pega has a capability called the Pega series, which is a customer lesson hub. With it, you can offer or create a business conversation with the customer. For example, if a customer comes onto a bank's website and they're searching for a loan, we have to present the right offer to the customer in milliseconds. With Pega, you can quickly understand the customer and therefore be able to present the right, most personalized offer to them.

Many customers use Pega for customer service also. It's quite useful for that.

It is stable.

We find the product to be scalable. 

Customers expect more out-of-the-box solutions. Right now, Pega is a platform on which you can build anything; as a platform, it's very powerful. However, what customers also expect is a quick turnaround. That is one area where they can improve. If they could create more business-friendly, customer-friendly solutions in the areas where customers traditionally use Pega, that would be helpful. That way, the same solution can solve similar problems for other customers, and it is more plug-and-play.

They are building in process mining. They acquired a technology company in Brazil, so they're bringing process mining over into the product. Process mining will help the customers to do continuous business implementations since they will find challenges to help adjust processes. That is one thing that we're looking forward to. 

We've been a Pega partner for seven years. 

From a stability point of view, Pega is increasingly used in markets like Southeast Asia, where the volumes are very high. From that perspective, it's able to handle large volumes. Also, as a modern SaaS technology, it is compliant with all the standards which are required. It is very compliant and very stable.

When it comes to using software in a low-volume market and a few of the other smaller markets, scalability is not much of a factor. When it comes to implementation in countries in Southeast Asia like Vietnam or Indonesia, then the volumes are very high, and we have seen Pega stand up to those challenges. It is scalable.

Technical support on Pega has improved in recent days with the advent of the cloud. If there is any kind of improvements that are required, Pega manages that.

For anything where any of the customers require advanced support from Pega, the support team is always available. They have specialized teams now to basically provide the exact support that is needed. Earlier, it used to be one team. Now, most specialized teams are available on Pega to provide the required support based on the need.

The initial setup is very straightforward, although if it is a customer who is new, they might find it challenging. If they involve the right system integrator, then along with the right system integrator, I don't see a challenge there.

Pega is also available on the cloud as well as on-prem. It is one of the few types of software which is available both on-prem and on the cloud. With the cloud solution, starting up is pretty easy. A successful setup is basically a combination of using the right partner and going onto the cloud to reduce the initial friction to onboard Pega.

From a staff point of view, for a standard application, it requires 10 to 12 resources, and they would involve people who are lead architects and developers.

It would require business analysts or someone who can work with the business to understand and visualize the solution.

It requires one engagement lead to work with the customer and manage the entire project and one or two clusters. With a team of 10 people, we have seen we can deliver end-to-end applications on Pega quite easily.

When it comes to maintenance on production, it requires a team of either two or three based on the size of the application.

We have witnessed an ROI. 

It varies based on the business case of the customer. For traditional operational processes where either the operation process is not automated - or even if is - it can create time-saving scenarios. 

In the scenarios where Pega is used in the market capabilities where it's more for offer generation or to upsell and cross-sell to the customers, we have seen an uptick in the revenue as Pega did show a conversion-based increase in outcomes.

When it comes to other scenarios, like based on the business context, if it is a customer's service application, that's where we have seen Pega help improve the average call handling. It has the capability of RPA. Therefore, during the call with the customer, if you have to fit information from other systems and quickly provide all the information in a very short time in front of the call center representative. It has helped reduce the average call handling time and the number of FTS required to manage customer service.

Therefore, it has had an impact on customer satisfaction, as well as reducing the overall cost related to servicing customers.

We are one of the largest Pega partners.

They have a primary product: case management, clean automation, and customer engagement. Various customers will be in various versions of Pega, and we deal with all versions.

If customers require an enterprise-wide implementation, they should be aware that there are requirements that are specific to the various lines of business. If they require such complexity to be addressed in a very specialized way, Pega can work well.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

It is just for business rules. An example would be that you want to apply for a credit card limit, and if the credit limit amount is less than a certain value, we won't necessarily do a real-time check. We do basically auto adjudication. So, the rules can be used as part of the flow.

They're pretty easy to create, and they're pretty easy to deploy. 

In theory, business rules tend to be something that business users can use. What I mean by that is that I don't know whether it always works out that well because the problem in banking specifically is that you need auditing and you need some kind of control. So, even if you're doing rules, there has to be an approval process. You can do all that in Pega, but it is not exactly everything that the vendor says it is. I've spent some hands-on time with the platform, and you can do those things, and it is all low code, but is it as easy as they make it sound? No. That's my two cents. For example, if I want to do something, there is no way to switch from low code. I just want to do a simple If-Then-Else rule, but I have to go through their low-code tool and do dragging and dropping. I'm a development person, and in my opinion, even some business users could do this easier. There is no way to go back and forth to an editor where I can just type in an If-Then-Else rule, which would be much faster than drawing in their low-code editor. They don't support that. They lead you too much. It depends on your level of expertise, but in some cases, it is just not that easy to use.

I don't like their whole deployment pipeline. It is very closed in nature. You have to use their pipeline to push things out to production. It is a turnkey solution, and I'm not a big fan of that. That was one of the things that we liked better about Salesforce. With Salesforce, we could use our own deployment tools or we could use a third-party deployment tool. Pega is a pretty closed system. It is closed in the sense that the deployment pipeline and some of the things that you do go through their tool. They don't integrate with GitHub, Azure DevOps, and so forth, which are really effective for versioning. I just don't like that.

It works, and it is effective.

At a previous organization, there were a couple of thousand users executing PegaRULES, and there were 30 to 50 users creating and modifying rules.

They're decent. A big organization or a big bank is going to want to pay for the premium tech support. If you don't, then you got to be willing to wait. They're no different than any other enterprise solution. Their support, as an example, is better than MuleSoft because we had rather big challenges with MuleSoft support, but Pega was better.

We also have an IBM rules management solution, and we also have Appian, but the situation is that we're having challenges getting the productivity out of them.

I've also used FICO Blaze rules, but that was not here. It was at a previous job.

It took a while to onboard.

They're very cagey in giving out prices, and it is very difficult to find out the real price any organization is going to get. It is almost never their list price, if you can find it, and there are a lot of factors that go into the whole pricing. 

Their SaaS deployment model, which was the way we were going at a previous organization, had some benefits over Salesforce, but the concern was the price they were going to charge depending on the number of rules or something like that. We were afraid that the cost was going to blow us out of the water. We didn't choose it. We went with Salesforce.

Pega can be effective, but it is not trivial to get it set up, get it deployed, and get people to know it. That's not unlike some of the other big enterprise solutions. Even for Salesforce, as an example, you're going to need to staff appropriately. Pega isn't one of those solutions that you can basically put in an ecosystem and expect three or four people to roll out successfully. I just don't think that's the case. You're going to have a challenge finding people who already know it.

When we were doing the RFQ, there were some other organizations we talked to, and they were very successful, but now, they had quite a large installation base. I know at one of the organizations when they installed Pega, and this was circa 2018, they had a lot of road bumps. They had to get Pega consultants in. Maybe they had SI in because I was indirectly working with it with consumer lending, and it was one of the many factors that they were late and over budget for delivery. That's the challenge with these big platforms. For a simple point-click solution, they can be quick to get going, but most organizations, especially banks, don't have something simple. You've to integrate with a bunch of APIs. You have to do testing, and you got to do the deployment, etc. So, you need to create a center of excellence, and I hate that term, at least to get started until you get some organizational-wide talent.

In terms of maintenance, if you've got it on-premise, you're going to need two or three admins to work with your infrastructure team to stay on top, but it isn't something they're going to do full-time all the time. SaaS offering has a lot of advantages because it gets you out of that whole deployment perspective. To most companies, I would recommend seriously looking at the SaaS version and not getting involved with on-premise.

I'd rate it a seven out of ten.

The solution offers business process modeling when it comes to processing your models or maybe your workflows. 

Every company will have a process where it goes from case initiation to different stages based on the business need or business requirement. Pega helps get processes routed to different or next stages depending on the business rules and based on where it needs to be routed. 

Out of the box, Pega provides processes where the assignment will be picked based on some criteria or many other attributes. It's purely based on your business needs. It ensures the process is routed through the correct criteria from start to end and helps manage the entire flow, the process, and everything.

The solution offers many use cases. 

The case management is great. 

Pega provides a lot of advanced smart shapes wherein you can just create a case for using the smart case itself. You can integrate or maybe add any integration points you need there. 

A lot of Pega is out-of-the-box. You can use it as is or configure it in just one click.

The UI part needs improvement. 

Some integrations can make it unstable. They need to strengthen the integration aspect and make the process more seamless. 

It would be nice if Pega provided suggestions while users were on it. It already gives you some warnings, however, in relation to specific rules, it would be ideal if Pega could provide suggestions to help users make improvements here or there.

I've used the solution in almost every project I've worked on. 

We have hundreds of people using the solution in our company. 

The scalability is good in general. I would rate the ability to scale eight out of ten. 

Technical support has been good overall. 

Positive

I worked on a Vis ID tool and a BPM tool. It was for a short span of time. Pega was far better than that.

While it is not too complex to set up, you do need to understand the solution and know the rules. 

We have people in place just to set up the pipeline and everything. The Pega team has to work with the system team to set up everything and maybe one or two people are involved over there. From the core setup perspective, it's the role of a developer who has to do it. There's typically a lead and two or three developers that handle the setup and validate things once deployed. 

We did have some help from Pega during the initial implementation. Mostly, we handled the setup in-house. 

We have witnessed an ROI while using the solution. 

The pricing is quite good in general. I'd rate it nine out of ten in terms of affordability.

We've deployed the solution both on-premises and on the cloud.

It's a pretty good tool. If you're using it as an adjusted rules engine, Pega gives you the flexibility to integrate with different applications seamlessly. You can give the responses back as well. It has scalability. It makes it easy to maintain rules and you can delegate things seamlessly from Pega when you're doing that. 

I'd rate it nine out of ten overall.