Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.


| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veeam Data Platform | 4.3 | 6.6% | 94% | 431 interviewsAdd to research |
| Commvault Cloud | 4.3 | 3.9% | 95% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 1 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 86 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 34 |
| Large Enterprise | 68 |
Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.
What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.
Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] was previously known as Dell AppAssure.
PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Country Manager at Prianto Ltd | 4.5 | I find Quest Rapid Recovery ideal for small companies needing enhanced security and compliance. Its speed and granular recovery are valuable, though improved customer support is needed. I choose between Quest and Macrium based on budget and technical requirements. |
| Technical Manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd | 4.5 | I use Quest Rapid Recovery for data backup, replication, and recovery, valuing its rapid VM recovery capabilities. However, improvements are needed in snapshot handling on Hyper-V and enhanced traffic security features, like Active Directory integration. |
| Engineering Director at MC Microcomputación | 4.0 | We sold Quest Rapid Recovery to replace competitors like Veeam, appreciating its full integration, particularly with VMware. It combines three products in one, but it's costly. We evaluated Veeam, Commvault, and Veritas before choosing it. |
| Senior Systems Engineer at Ministry of Awqaf & Islamic Affairs | 5.0 | I use Quest Rapid Recovery primarily for disaster recovery of specific servers. Its most valuable feature is its effective data center recovery process. While speed could improve, I have no significant issues, previously using Veritas NetBackup and Quest NetVault. |
| Technical manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd | 4.5 | I find Quest Rapid Recovery excellent for VM backup and DR replication, with valuable VM standby and quick RPO/RTO. It's stable and easy to set up, but I wish it offered a combined appliance and folder backup feature for broader use. |
| IT Admin at LDV, Inc. | 5.0 | I rely on this solution for comprehensive data backups, which drastically reduced my admin time and enables quick recoveries. It's stable, scalable, offers valuable features like deduplication and replication, and has excellent customer support. My only minor suggestion is to eliminate agent reboots for updates. |
| President at BTCO Inc | 4.5 | I love Rapid Recovery's ease of use, which drastically cut recovery times and eliminated tape management, saving crucial admin hours. It's stable, with excellent support, though I believe the self-service learning resources could still be improved. |
| Network Administrator at a manufacturing company with 51-200 employees | 5.0 | No summary available |