RSA Archer provides robust risk management, compliance, and vendor management with intuitive features for customizable and streamlined governance tasks.

| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| RSA Archer | 5.9% |
| MetricStream | 3.2% |
| AuditBoard | 3.2% |
| Other | 87.7% |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEGA HOPEX | 3.9 | 1.3% | 86% | 42 interviewsAdd to research |
| Netwrix Auditor | 4.6 | 1.1% | 100% | 8 interviewsAdd to research |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 165 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 97 |
| Large Enterprise | 395 |
RSA Archer delivers integrated solutions supporting risk management and compliance tasks. Its adaptive interface and customizable options enhance workflows, making it valuable for organizations requiring automation, advanced workflows, and easy integration capabilities. While offering flexibility and configuration power, users note potential enhancements for integration, reporting, and interface updates.
What are the key features of RSA Archer?In the finance, public, and IT sectors, RSA Archer is utilized for managing risk and compliance. Organizations leverage its capabilities for third-party risk, policy management, and security assessments, providing tailored solutions for regulatory compliance and operational risk management. Integration with platforms like ServiceNow enhances its utility within enterprise environments.
RSA Archer was previously known as Archer.
T-Systems, Bridge Point, Equifax, First Data, Global Imaging Company, Manulife Financial
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Information Security Specialist at Dubai Health Authority | 4.0 | I use Archer for security, governance, and risk, finding its configuration easy and dashboards insightful. However, it needs fewer clicks, better initial support, and its AI is not market-leading. Despite some performance issues, I rate it 9/10. |
| Works | 4.0 | We utilize RSA Archer for operational risk management, appreciating its revamped AI-driven interface and automation capabilities. However, improvements are needed in integration features, as transitioning from other platforms like ServiceNow should be more seamless and efficient. |
| SW tester / Support, Helpdesk / Test Manager at ICZ a.s. | 3.5 | I find RSA Archer valuable for integrated compliance management, though it's pricey and lacks two-way integration. Deployment is easy, support could improve, and while dashboards are helpful, accessing detailed data is sometimes challenging. I rate it seven out of ten. |
| Head OT Risk Management & Compliance at Abu Dhabi National Oil Company | 3.5 | I primarily use RSA Archer for compliance and risk management. The tool is stable and automates processes effectively, but it lacks user-friendly graphics and dashboards, making it difficult for top management to use due to its outdated and complex interface. |
| Senior Information Security Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | I use RSA Archer for daily security assessments in Azure, finding it user-friendly and easy to understand. It offers good ROI, and although ticket handling could be improved, it suits our needs best compared to other evaluated tools. |
| Executive Network Administrator at Tredence Inc. | 4.0 | We use RSA Archer primarily for ongoing risk assessment activities in the system control module. It's helpful in aligning controls with standards, but the user interface could be improved due to inconvenient small text boxes for data entry. |
| System Integrator at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | RSA Archer provides a comprehensive suite for IT risk, service management, and compliance. Its integrated data model is valuable for managing risk controls, although the technology is outdated compared to newer solutions like Workiva and AuditBoard, making integrations more challenging. |
| Owner | 4.0 | I find RSA Archer stable and scalable, with excellent data integration and reporting. Initial setup is straightforward. It is expensive, and I'd like real-time vulnerability and threat data streaming. Overall, it's a strong solution. |