Unitrends Reviews

Our main use case for Unitrends is taking our on-premise virtual machines or bulk data store and backing it up on a daily basis, or more frequently depending on requirements, and testing the virtual machines to ensure they are backing up appropriately.

The best features of Unitrends include the daily reporting functionality. When backups fail, it is obvious in the logs what caused the issue. Most times it is a credential problem, which is relatively easy to resolve. Though I have experienced a few more challenging issues, nothing has affected critical backup restore functionality. Every time I have needed to restore something, it has worked successfully. The support team is readily available when I need assistance, and they help walk me through issues, solving them within a reasonable timeframe.

The automated backup scheduling feature has helped our organization in managing backup timelines and consistency by handling all the work automatically. We set the schedule, breaking things into smaller chunks since our main common area for files is large. I have staggered the backups so some areas receive more attention than others, particularly for less active data. Adding, removing, excluding, and inputting elements is straightforward. The system makes it simple to schedule portions and generate reports on their functionality.

The impact of Unitrends' instant recovery features on strengthening data security measures is significant. I generally use instant recovery when restoring specific files or instances where we need data that has changed. The process involves loading the backup, selecting the desired version, waiting for it to unpack, and retrieving the file. Every restore attempt has been successful. I run instant recovery daily in test mode on two virtual machines. I use it to test my domain controller and file server to ensure they communicate properly in the test environment. This ensures that in case of failure, I can activate the recovery and restore server functionality.

I would evaluate the impact of Unitrends' ransomware detection for strengthening our data security measures as somewhat misleading. The ransomware detection from the appliance incorrectly identifies one of my machines as infected with ransomware. This is due to a custom application I developed for FTP uploads of webcam footage to our website. Because it deletes files every 10 minutes, the system interprets my program as ransomware. I have not pursued a solution to prevent these false positives.

The support team is consistently helpful when I request assistance or submit tickets, and they resolve issues within a reasonable timeframe.

I would rate Unitrends' support as excellent. Every support interaction has been successful. They have resolved or provided workarounds for all issues. They remained dedicated during more complex problems, such as connecting to their external backup appliance. My Kaseya representatives conduct monthly check-ins to monitor progress and address any concerns about expansion or other issues.

Positive

I was directly involved with pricing and licensing because I handled the quote and budget evaluation. The peace of mind justifies the cost, even with two appliances doubling the expense. It has transformed our operations compared to our previous solution, Veeam. Though Veeam performed adequately, I realized that running backup software on a system I might need to restore created potential issues. If the virtual machine with Veeam installation failed, restoration would be impossible. This led to the decision to implement a dedicated backup solution.

Regarding Unitrends' integration with leading cloud services, I utilize Spanning, which handles Microsoft 365 environment backup for a location without direct file server access. Their SharePoint data storage is backed up through this tool. The integration is limited to their dashboard, as the appliance does not interact with Spanning, and I do not utilize their cloud storage beyond this implementation.

Instead of using cloud offerings, I implemented another Unitrends appliance approximately 18 months ago. This second appliance is in a separate location, connected through fiber cable, providing redundancy in case the primary appliance fails.

I rate Unitrends a 10 out of 10 for its comprehensive backup solutions and reliable performance.

We use Unitrends to back up all our servers and Hyper-V cluster nodes.

The backup feature and recovery option are good because they allow the instant recovery of Hyper-V nodes and files. Since we have set up versioning on our file servers, often there is no need to recover using the Unitrends appliance. We use the instant recovery option to recover if it's an entire server.

The solution’s support and onboarding process needs to be improved.

If you purchase a Unitrends appliance, they'll give it for free but charge you heavily for the support. We got the Unitrends appliance worth $ 67,000 for free but paid $ 90,000 for three years of support. We've had a couple of renewals since then, and we've negotiated and got better renewals per year, paying around $ 16,000 to $ 18000 per year instead of $ 30,000.

Unitrends' support is super expensive, and sometimes they are unresponsive.

We have been using Unitrends since 2017.

I wouldn't rate Unitrends a ten out of ten because we had some hard drive failures in the appliance. Typically, when you have OneDrive, you can get it replaced. For some particular reason, the situation caused the entire system to crash. We had to reinstall the CentOS operating system on it, and we lost all our backups.

They said there was no way to retain it, and it was pretty devastating and concerning that a drive failure would cause the loss of all the data on the appliance. It was extremely disappointing, and we had to start from scratch after three years worth of backup data.

I rate Unitrends a nine out of ten for stability.

While buying a Unitrends appliance, you must specify the size you think you'll need for three to five years. They have an 18-terabyte and a 120-terabyte type of appliance. So it's your responsibility to at least provide them with the amount of data you have. Then when you work with the person quoting from Unitrends, they'll provide a quote based on their existing data and what will be calculated over three to five years. That way, you are sizing up the correct appliance.

Unitrends is used in our organization by the IT team, comprised of a small group of IT professionals who manage and support it.

I rate Unitrends an eight out of ten for scalability.

It's easy to create a support request through their portal, but often, the support person is not responsive or doesn't get back to you when they say they're going to. You find yourself bouncing back and forth to get them involved. It shouldn't be that complicated, considering the amount we pay each year.

Neutral

Previously, I have worked with NetBackup Enterprise, Commvault, and Veeam solutions.

The solution's initial setup is fairly easy. Setting up the jobs and establishing the SLAs for each job is easy with Unitrends. It is easy to configure each protected asset to have a specific retention. Since Unitrends didn't explain the process during the initial setup, we learned how to establish retention over the years and got better at it. Maybe Unitrends has a better process now, but back in 2017, when we initially acquired the appliance, its onboarding was not that intuitive.

After the first year or so, the engineers on my team scheduled time with the support people who helped them. So it is something that is covered under the support cost. We could have had a better overall onboarding experience when we initially set up the appliance. Maybe Unitrends has improved now because some other organization acquired it. They've expanded their toolset, and they have a much broader option of packages besides the backup appliance, like a service desk.

The solution’s deployment took two to four weeks. We implemented Unitrends through an in-house team.

Unitrends is an expensive solution. We've negotiated deals where they've given us the $ 62,000 to $ 64,000 appliance for free but charged $ 90,000 for three years of support.

We are using Unitrends Version 10.6.7-2.202209062126.

We're still a Unitrends customer for one site.

Unitrends is deployed on-premises in our organization. We do have a support agreement where we can upload data to the cloud. Unitrends does have its own cloud offering, which is decent but pricey. Initially, we had a total of nine terabytes, and it was a bit expensive for their offering. Maybe Unitrends will be more competitive now since Nutanix and Wasabi offer cloud backup data.

I advise users to consider how they negotiate the price of the tool. The way we negotiated with them was that they would have promotions and give us the appliance for free. Although it seems like you're getting it for free, you're paying a lot more for support, making you wonder if they're hiding the appliance's cost in the support they're charging you. I like the appliance. Although I was unfamiliar with it, it was a decent product after its use. The only thing I would be concerned with is the solution's price.

Overall, I rate Unitrends a seven out of ten.

I use Unitrends to back up my VMware virtual machines and files, ensuring redundancy for both disks and protection against ransomware. I have implemented an air gap strategy by keeping some backups physically disconnected for added security.

Using Unitrends has significantly improved our organization's functionality. The onboarding process was helpful, and now I can create scripts for virtual machines. With the sandbox environment, I can test functions like pinging between the domain controller and file server, transferring files, and checking SQL Server queries—all from the backup without affecting our live environment. The automated process provides a detailed report, giving me confidence in the backup's reliability for potential restores. It is a great peace of mind to see everything in the green.

The most valuable feature of Unitrends for me is the automated feedback. It lets me know that tests have been successful without the manual effort, saving time and avoiding getting bogged down in the details.

In terms of improvement, the UI, especially in the recovery section, is unclear about which repository it uses—I had to hover over to find that information. Figuring out the scripting part wasn't straightforward; it took some time and had a few hiccups. Simplifying the scripting process and improving UI clarity would be beneficial.

In the next release of Unitrends, I would like to see the ability to set retention based on the destination repository. Currently, I can set retention based on the data being backed up, but having the flexibility to specify retention periods for different repositories would be beneficial. This would allow me to tailor retention settings based on the importance and nature of the data stored in each repository.

I have been using Unitrends for four months.

I would rate the stability as a ten out of ten.

I would rate the scalability of Unitrends as a ten out of ten. It is highly scalable, allowing easy expansion to multiple locations or environments. The cloud dashboard feature is well-suited for bringing everything together in one place. Currently, it is servicing data for about 70 users.

I would evaluate Unitrends' tech support as a nine out of ten. They have been responsive, addressing my questions promptly and effectively resolving the issues I encountered.

I switched from Veeam to Unitrends because I had difficulty with Veeam's scripting, and I preferred Unitrends' offer of a physical hardware appliance at a similar price point. Veeam provided only software, and I missed the inclusion of free hard drives for extra storage. After using Veeam for about two years, I decided to try Unitrends for a two-year trial, and it has been working well for me.

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup of Unitrends as an eight out of ten, with the scripting part being a bit challenging. It took about three weeks to complete, mainly due to waiting for post-backups and testing. The appliance was up and running within a day and a half. The deployment process involved assistance from a Unitrends representative, guiding me through the setup and configuration in either the appliance or web interface, based on preference.

Overall, I would rate Unitrends as a nine out of ten.

We use Unitrends to back up our virtual machines and files. Every once in a while, we also use it for restoring files.

What I found most valuable in Unitrends is its simple user interface. It also works reliably.

It's a little complicated for us to speak about areas for improvement in Unitrends because the previous director didn't renew its maintenance, so we're running an old version. We haven't been talking with the Unitrends team about updating to the most recent version, but one of the problems we have is that the device will be EOL in two years. We could switch to their software, but we're not sure we want to go through that.

Unitrends can be challenging to scale.

I've been using Unitrends for about four months, but my company has used it for about five years.

Unitrends has been stable, and I've not been making any changes to it either. It's more of a setup-and-run, where I set up new VMs, and then add the VMs, and that's about it.

The version of Unitrends used within my company isn't easy to scale as it's a hardware appliance. If the company needs to add more storage, it wouldn't be able to.

We spoke with Unitrends support about renewing the maintenance on the appliance and the features we're looking for. We were looking to back up our Microsoft 365 in addition to our local backups. We were also looking to move some VMs into Azure, so we asked if they had another product for cloud-based backup, and they suggested the software version of Unitrends.

I used Symantec and Commvault. I used Commvault in the previous cloud company I worked for, where I implemented solutions, and the implementation department used Commvault for backups.

The initial setup for Unitrends is pretty straightforward. I implemented it at my previous company and found it easy.

I rate the implementation as seven out of ten.

I don't remember how long the deployment of Unitrends took.

I stepped into this environment with Unitrends already running, so I have no information if there's ROI from it.

When we renew the Unitrends maintenance contract and update it to the latest version, the cost would be $5,000 per year. We don't want to venture into a project where, two years from now, we have to search for a new backup system because Unitrends will be EOL in two years. We'd instead present a cohesive package to the executive committee, so we're hesitant to continue with Unitrends.

There are no hidden costs. They've been transparent with the costs.

We have Veeam as our prime candidate. Most likely, we're not going to continue with Unitrends because it will reach its end of life in less than two years. We have a major project with a time horizon of five years, not two years.

My company has a whole variety of products, but it's using Unitrends as a backup solution.

I can't recall the version number I'm using for Unitrends.

I advise anyone looking into using Unitrends to check if the particular device is going EOL, particularly if running the physical version. However, I have no idea if Unitrends is going EOL on all physical devices or just the version my company uses, which goes EOL in two years.

My rating for Unitrends is six out of ten.

My company is a Unitrends customer.

We are using the solution for real-time synchronization. Also, we use Unitrends RXDA.

The instant power-on feature of the operating system and real-time synchronization are some of the features which I have found to be valuable in the solution.

The solution’s UI can be improved. I am saying this because I have seen solutions with better UIs.

I am uncertain whether the solution already includes these features, but I suggest synchronization and support for VXLAN capabilities as the additional features to be incorporated in the future release of the solution.

I have been using this solution for one year. I don't remember the version of the solution I am using. However, talking of the model, it's a hardware appliance. Also, I am a customer of the solution.

Stability-wise, I rate this solution a nine out of ten.

It is a highly scalable solution, and for scalability, I rate this solution an eight out of ten. The plan to increase the solution's usage is something we, in our company, will definitely consider. Basically, as and when the need arises, we will increase the solution's usage.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is low, and ten is high, I rate the solution's technical support an eight.

Positive

We didn't switch over to Unitrends from any other solution. Actually, DR was a new requirement in our company.

On a scale of one to ten, where one is difficult, and ten is easy, I would rate the setup process of the solution as seven. For concrete completion of the deployment process in our company, it took two weeks. Apart from that, the entire setup was done in three to four days.

An expert from Unitrends based in the UK directly assisted our company with the complete setup process, and their assistance was excellent.

Based on a scale of one to ten, with one being low and ten being high, I would rate the pricing of this solution as a three. Also, there are no additional costs involved in the standard licensing of the solution.

Overall, I rate this solution a seven out of ten.

The tool helps us to run a report on how the backups have been completed, which is a really good feature because it's time-saving.

I am impressed with the tool's reporting and UniView features. 

The solution's base operating system needs to be improved. 

I have been using the product for 18 months. 

We have had some issues with stability hence I would rate it an eight out of ten. 

I would rate the tool's scalability a ten out of ten. We have around 15,000 users for the solution. 

I would rate the product's setup a nine out of ten. The tool's deployment took half a day to complete. It mainly depends on the amount of data that is to be backed up and connectivity. 

I would rate the solution's pricing a four out of ten. The licensing is yearly and it depends on the customers. 

I would rate the product a nine out of ten. The tool does everything that we want it to do. 

We used Unitrends for Microsoft Hyper-V Cluster, VMWare ESXi Clusters, physical servers, virtual servers, SQL databases, and Exchange DAGs databases.

We consolidated down from several disparate backup applications to Unitrends and AvePoint.

The daily reports that showed Red, Green, Yellow status for each asset/server/database protected.  Simple and easy to use for daily logging, providing assurance all was well.  The main dashboard screen contained a wealth of useful concise information: protect/unprotected, replication stats, current jobs running.

It seems like Unitrends moved away from enterprise customer engagement and moved more towards the managed service provider market. I'm familiar with that market because I do that type of work on the side. That's great, but that's a whole different market and avenue from the enterprise backup market; how they interact is totally different as well. I don't know what happened, but their customer engagement went completely downhill on their sales side. You just can't do that.

I don't know what happened, but I looked at their cloud product and it just looks like an IaaS implementation of their on-premise product. Cloud products really need to be engineered to be cloud-aware. I haven't looked at it for several months now, but at that time, I wanted it to work out, it just did not seem like it was cloud-aware in terms of being able to have tiered storage and different capabilities that I wanted.

We used Unitrends August, 2015 until July, 2020. We did make the switch to another vendor.

All I can tell you is my friends made fun of me because of how often I had to call technical support.

It's not easy to scale it. At some point, it requires a forklift upgrade. So that's not very conducive to scaling well; at least for what we were using it for.

The technical support was awesome. They were very good people to work with and I liked them a lot, but the product needed some work.

We used a lot of different solutions before Unitrends. We had so many different solutions that we were using to meet our needs and Unitrends was able to help us bring that down to just Unitrends and DocAve. Before all of that, we were using a combination of Symantec Backup Exec, Dell AppAssure, Dell Quest vRanger, and a little bit of Metalogics — there were just too many. It was painful trying to work with all those. With Unitrends we were able to get down to just Unitrends and AvePoint.

The main reason we left Unitrends to go with Rubrik was due to its lack of a clear cloud unification and direction. For several years I liked the product in terms of their support and willingness to keep it going. It was very cross-platform compatible in the number of things that it could back up — way more than I ever needed. We had licensed it in August of 2015 when they were selling it as software; however, they no longer sell it as plain software anymore; unless you're talking about their cloud products. I just felt like it got to the point where the company was no longer responsive.

We told them we were getting ready to evaluate new products and wanted them to submit a plan as we were going to start over with them, but we never heard anything back from them. I blame that on Kaseya (who bought them), which I feel bad about that because I really liked the company. I really liked the people. I really liked the support. I really liked the product. It was the first time I had ever seen a very good reporting system that provided a daily report that I call a "traffic light"  report.  That's why I was so in love with it — that report made my job a lot easier. Before choosing Rubrik, we looked at several other products: Zerto, Cohesity, DELL IDPA, Arcserve, Veeam, and several other solutions, we had to weed through hundreds of reports and carefully read through them to determine whether they were successful or not — how much they backed up and so forth.

Whereas with Unitrends, you just got an indicator — red, green, or yellow: green means everything is good; red means you definitely need to look at it; yellow means look at it tomorrow and make sure it's not yellow tomorrow unless you know it's okay for it to be yellow. That was the beauty of Unitrends that I really liked. Cohesity does have that feature, which is a nice thing about Cohesity. Rubrik Compass hopefully will also be included in the future as part of their product. When you're looking at hundreds of backup jobs every morning, and you want to know how they performed, it's too much to try to read dozens if not hundreds of reports and lines. I'd rather see red, green, or yellow.

Rubrik and Unitrends both give you seven days at a view. So whatever day you were looking at, you always had the previous seven days. For that alone, the three products — Rubrik, Cohesity, and Unitrends — were wonderful for my needs. I Almost bought Zerto. I kept begging Zerto to show me their reports and I'd actually almost committed to them. Finally, I got tired of waiting; I then configured the reports on my own and they were awful. Zerto makes a fine product as well, but their reporting is awful. I hate to say it, but that's a big deal for me — daily reports that make sense and are easy to understand and use.

Because we deployed Unitrends on our own hardware, setup and configuration was not trivial.  And, for that same reason - upgrades were also complicated as Unitrends updates were built looking supporting a limited hardware set.

No.  We built our own hardware and just had Unitrends support to help with the software install and configuration.

Unitrends licensing depended on the number of CPUs you had, simple.

It was competitive with other products. I think it was around $1000 a CPU a year. We have about 40 CPUs so It was costing us about $40,000 a year — that was our renewal price. I think the initial price may have been more. We didn't buy their hardware. We built our own and deployed their solution on our hardware, which was a blessing and a curse.

ArcServe, Veeam, Zerto, BackupExec, vRanger, vmPro, AppAssure, Metalogix.

If you go Unitrends, then buy everything from them. I don't even think you even have a choice anymore. After us and another big client, they told me they did away with the idea of selling their software. They only sell solutions that are their hardware and their software. You can't install it on your own equipment anymore. Also, beware of the forklift upgrades that are required at a certain point.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Unitrends a rating of seven.

Our primary use for the Unitrends Backup solution is to protect our physical and virtual servers at our small rural K-12 school. By installing the agent on each necessary server, we can back up both our physical servers (HP or Dell, etc) and also our Windows Server 2012R2, 2016, or 2019 versions.

We use the website graphical user interface to continually configure, monitor, and verify our various backups as well as get daily email reports that show our current status of backup success and failures.

Other than getting daily email reports to review the status of success or failure backups of individual physical or virtual servers in our environment, we do not have to worry about the backups.

I like that the installer file was easy to download from their website and easy to install for Hyper-V appliances. 

I really like the reporting options you get for various email reports. I look forward to looking at those each day, which gives me a great overview of the current status of the whole Unitends Backup system.

The website's graphical user interface is well-thought-out and has been tweaked to be more friendly and nicer looking in the last year or so.

The updates are fairly frequent, so I'm happy they continue to improve everything.

For smaller K12 schools, I wish they offered a beefier free version with more storage and options. This would enable poorer schools to stay safe and secure from all the threats out in the world, especially ransomware and the horrible consequences of that problem.

I would like to see more storage options for the free version.

We have been using Unitrends for five years in a rural K-12 school.

We did not use another backup solution prior to Unitrends.

Our Unitrends Backup solution was easy and straightforward to install.

We were able to do it without third party assistance. We only had to do the installation once too, which is a benefit. Then we planned out and set up our configuration once, and pretty much forgot about it. We check it probably once a year if we make server changes.

With respect to cost, my advice is to get what you need.

We did not evaluate other options.

I do like that they keep improving the website user interface. It is much more user-friendly than the one years ago and makes it easier for an administrator to make configuration changes.

Our primary use case for Unitrends is backup. 

Probably the biggest issue I've had is actually paying for the unit and part of that problem is that they use a third party for the billing. When my sort needs to be renewed, I'm never notified. So, six months later, I will have an issue and try to get support for it, and then it will be a big hassle because I was never built for the support to begin with and then they wouldn't give me the support.

I have been using Unitrends for five years.

Recently, we've been having some issues that I haven't reported yet. They're related to backups being skipped because some of our servers need an update. I'm not sure why it's happening. It doesn't happen to every server; it's just one server occasionally. And as soon as I do the update, then it's fine. 

Scalability is where I'm running into more of an issue right now. To upgrade is pretty expensive. It's not like you can just buy a smaller appliance and put it with the one you already have. You need buy a larger appliance and that can get fairly pricey.

When I have had to use tech support, they've been very good. I've had a couple instances where something wasn't happening correctly and I called them and got a call back within the hour and we were able to get through it. I've been very happy with the couple times that I needed them.

We were using Backup Exec before that, but they had made updates to their software which I just didn't like at all. It also did not give me the ability to do a bare metal restore if I needed to; that's why I went with the Unitrends.

It was pretty straight forward in setting up at the beginning. The original software was probably a little easier to use than their current software.

I think it's a decent platform to go with; I don't have any issues with it. I guess the one thing that I would say is get a bigger unit than what they recommend because if I had done that, I wouldn't need to be upgrading now; I could have stayed with the same size.

I've been deploying it for most of my clients because it comes in an appliance model and supports any operating system, including legacy operating systems. Some customers prefer the appliance model rather than just getting the software and worrying about integrating it.

It's been useful for our customers who rely on legacy systems and fail to find backup solutions that are compatible with their legacy systems. For example, in the industrial sector, we have people relying on a system that's running on Windows 2000 for 20 years. Nobody really supports these operating systems these days, and only a very few vendors do that.

Unitrends really has cross-compatibility and a broad area of support for various operating system backups. I like the fact that you can recover the VMs inside the appliance. For example, they're basically running this appliance on a Linux-based distribution, and they're spinning off KVM virtual machines inside. The customer has downtime to his advantage. He can absolutely spin-off some VMs from inside the backup appliance itself to start production or close instantly or as soon as possible.

Unitrends has a unique point in deduplication because it has global deduplication, and it can help make backup sizes much smaller than the software they're using. Because it deduplicates from a storage area and has a feature to recover a VM inside the appliance.

Their technical support is also good. It's actually one of the selling points, and we show the customer that their support is reliable.

becoming software defined rather than appliance based oriented, establishing alllainces with major oem vendors as that opens flexibility on HW

We've been using Unitrends for about a year and a half.

Unitrends is pretty much stable. It's been around in the market for quite some time. It's not very famous around here in the region of Saudi Arabia, but it's a well-established backup company, and they've been well-established in the market. It's pretty safe to say that it's stable.

Unitrends is not really enterprise-ready. It can scale, and there's a lot you can do with it, but it's more suitable for small and medium appliance-based backup solution models.

Technical support was great at the time. They had this chat feature, and they are happy to support you. That's actually one of the selling points, and we show the customer that their support is reliable.

The initial setup is pretty straightforward. There's a good interface where you can log in, and you can start deploying it in your business and start backing up the environment and the appliance. In terms of configuration, it's straightforward. The nightmare is racking and stacking the appliance. It's pretty heavy.

The deployment time is relative to the customer's environment. Some customer environments will be very smooth. It won't take much time to deploy and backup the environment. Some customer environments will have some bottlenecks, whether it be on the network or the storage level. Some things can be deployed in minutes, but the challenges are to be faced on site, and sometimes it can cause delays for as long as a month.

We integrate this solution for our customers. It's a 2-person job. We go on-site and implement this solution. You just need to have product training and learn how to deploy it from the portal. You can just go on site and start deploying it. I mean, that really relies on the customer side. If he's an enterprise customer, then you need more than one person. It would help if you had a team to deploy it.

I wouldn't recommend this product to potential customers because it's an appliance-based model, and you'll be locked in with that vendor. You'll have to pay whatever that vendor demands for the hardware. It's always best to go with a software-based solution because it scales, and basically, it's flexible for you to use compared to the hardware-based model.

I heard that they have software now, and you can deploy a software-based model and work with that. You don't need to tie yourself to their hardware. The other thing is the fact that the hardware becomes an area of support. 

For example, I have one customer in the industrial sector. Three years ago, I sold them an appliance, and right now, that hardware is at the end-of-life stage. He needs to purchase new hardware unless he has some agreement with Unitrends, which they call a "pledge agreement." You pay more when you buy the appliance, but in exchange, when you renew their support, if the hardware reaches the end-of-life stage, they'll basically replace it.

On a scale from one to ten, I would give Unitrends a 7.