Workspace ONE UEM Reviews

I use this solution as a single sign-on, and I can join other domains in my environment. You can also get permission from the users to access something from my desktop or portable.

The most valuable feature is that it will use my credentials to access various parts of the infrastructure or other solutions, such as vRealize.

If some kind of disaster happens then it is possible to restore the identity manager database from a backup.

I would like to integrate this solution with VRE and VDI. They can now be installed, but they operate as separate components.

Many of the features that exist in Active Directory do not exist in Identity Manager, which means that people depend on Active Directory.

This is a scalable solution. We can have dual or multiple identity managers and replicate data between them.

The technical support is good and we have had no problem with them.

The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.

This is a solution that I recommend.

For the purpose that this solution is designed for it works great, but it doesn't compare well with other solutions.

I would rate this solution a five out of ten.

The Organization group approach they have taken to manage both Device and Administrative access

It has help in providing administrators with a way to separate devices based on business use cases.

There are currently canned reports that provide a a great deal of device detail. But, there could be room for the solutions to allow for custom reporting for ad-hoc reports

3 years

This is an area that could use some improvement. we have had a few incidents where the level of support was not what it was pictured to be.

There are a lot of very skilled engineers well versed in all aspects of the solution.

We have used multiple solutions. We are responsible for service delivery so we are expected to be familiar with the main players in the industry.

It depends. On-prem is a lot more involved than SaaS. There are a lot of moving parts for the on-prem version of the solution that can be consolidates if it is the desire of the client/customer.

Vendor. We have had a great experience with all of our current clients.

Yes, MobileIron, MaaS360, Blackberry, XenMobile, Afaria, Soti, Good.

It has all of the features that we need to use and that we want to use.

I would like to see some integration with native Microsoft products such as anti-value.

Pricing is an area that could be improved. 

They are much better than Microsoft but it is difficult to compete against them.

Microsoft has everything embedded and VMware is a different product.

I would rate VMware Workspace ONE an eight out of ten.

My customer is a Microsoft and Apple site, 99 percent of the system in Windows Servers, and the company gives every manager an iPad or iPad Pro (500-plus devices).

We deployed the MDM functionality of AirWatch to control all devices and MEM is the next step. We are struggling in MBM/MAM because all the applications are IE compatible.

The company used DEP to manage all devices previously. Now, with AirWatch (Workspace ONE Advanced) they can manage all devices and apps more easily. Among the most important improvements is the ability to set up different groups with different deployment policies.

MEM is valuable because all push emails can be monitored.

MBM/MCM could be improved. MBM can support specific versions of development tools. If VMware would let the customer know this more clearly, we would not need to waste time explaining this and delaying the project.

Also, the Content Locker cannot inherit permissions for the Windows Public Folder. If they could integrate with Microsoft on this point, it would be the perfect functionality.