Workspace ONE UEM Reviews

We use the solution for device and telecom expense management. 

The solution includes support for remote work. It also features identity management. This setup supports our users remotely by providing default monitoring and tunneling into our environment, eliminating the need for additional VPN software to access backend applications and staff resources.

Its most valuable features are tunneling and telecom management. These features help us to meet our organizational requirements. 

I would like to see technology expense management integrated into the next release. This feature would allow us to manage expenses across various workloads and services, including cloud environments and computing resources.

I have been working with the product for six years. 

The technical support team responds when we call them. However, it takes time. 

The tool is easy to implement because it's cloud-based. Integrating with on-premises infrastructure, like Active Directory or hybrid environments, is straightforward. The platform supports content management, allowing connection to various sources such as SharePoint and on-premises file shares for content sharing.

The solution provides value for what you pay. It's not the cheapest, but it's competitive compared to others like Microsoft Intune, which requires specific licenses.

We've purchased various licenses for VMware Workspace ONE, including premium and gold tiers. These licenses include security measures and support for managing telecom expenses like data and voice usage.

You might face limitations if you're seeking pure MDM rather than unified endpoint management. But if you need comprehensive UEM that meets broader needs, you won't have issues.

The solution was based on Linux and Windows. We used to test other systems. The solution is quite useful if we are not using encryption. The solution was quite good for my private use cases. It is easy to start something and work from scratch.

I tried to use the tool on an encrypted disk, but it was inconvenient. The encryption was difficult. The product must be available for more hardware.

I have used the solution in the past twelve months.

I rate the tool’s stability a ten out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a ten out of ten. I use the product for my daily routine work.

I rate the ease of setup an eight or nine out of ten. The product is installed on our hardware. It's not available for each server and hardware. The deployment took a few weeks.

I rate the pricing a five out of ten.

Currently, I am using Proxmox. Proxmox is more available for simple tasks on PCs and Laptops.

Currently, the firmware is not working on the hardware. I do simple projects. Integrating the solution with other enterprise systems has moderately improved our operational efficiency. I will recommend the product to others. It is quite good. I like the tool. Overall, I rate the solution a five out of ten.

The solution's use cases can vary depending on the organization. For example, we have deployed projects for BYOD, Mac Management, and Windows Management solutions. Each project is different and tailored to the specific needs of the organization. One of the benefits for our customers is the ease of use with a single platform to manage all devices. The dashboard is visually appealing and provides compliance insights for CIOs and CTOs to review.

Windows Patch Management is a wonderful feature of the solution.

The solution is an improved version. Pricing is a limitation. I think it's on the higher side, so if it were cheaper, it would benefit more organizations.

I have experience with VMware Workspace ONE for more than five years. I am working as a SI, and my company has a partnership with Microsoft or VMware. We are a premium partner for VMware. Also, I am using the latest version of the solution.

It is a very stable product.

It is a highly scalable solution, allowing you to start with a hundred licenses and scale up to multiple lakh licenses.

Sometimes, we face an issue and raise a ticket. The technical support team is fantastic and resolves the issue. VMware is a well-known brand that doesn't need any acknowledgment.

The setup process was not complex since my company mostly sells cloud-based instances, which means they are already pre-configured. We only need to configure the policies based on the use cases, and it works seamlessly. Therefore, the setup process is effortless. Additionally, the solution does not require any maintenance as it is a cloud instance, and all maintenance will be taken care of by VMware.

My company's customers have experienced a return on investment using the solution.

Currently, the product is priced at around 50 USD. However, in India, there is a similar product available for around 25 USD.

In comparison to other tools, VMware Workspace ONE has some cons, especially from a pricing perspective. However, one of its pros is that other tools may not manage identity or access as effectively. Despite this advantage, the pricing of VMware Workspace ONE is still considered relatively high.

VMware products, in my opinion, is an exceptional product, and it allows for the management of a complete device fleet from a single console. It can manage Windows, Mac, Android, or iOS devices, and policy configurations are straightforward to deploy. I would recommend this solution to others since I have already recommended it to most of my customers. Overall, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.

The solution is good for controlling mobile devices centrally. When you have a distributed network, it's able to easily manage and centralize.

It's provided us with a lot of benefits. We can control the app and wipe any data remotely in case of loss or theft. 

We can also apply patches to ensure the latest versions are available.

The solution allows us to control everything centrally. 

It's meeting our requirements right now. It's aligned with our internet policy as well as our security policy. 

It's stable and reliable. 

The solution can scale. 

The setup is pretty straightforward. 

Sometimes, we have challenges with remote patching and remote version upgrades. We'd like the product to improve these capabilities to make patch management especially a bit more straightforward. 

We do not need any extra features. 

Technical support could be better. 

I've been using the solution for five years.

The solution is stable and reliable. There are no bugs or glitches, and it doesn't crash or freeze.

The solution is scalable and easy to expand. 

We have 100 users on it right now. 

Technical support is okay, however, it needs a bit of improvement. 

Positive

We did not use a different solution previously. 

The initial setup was very easy. 

We did a standard deployment process only. There are no customizations that we made. 

There is no maintenance required. 

We handled the solution's deployment in-house, as well as with help from the vendor. 

I can't speak to the exact pricing and licensing. It's pretty reasonable in terms of the cost. 

I am using the latest version of the solution. 

While it depends on the business needs and the policy requirements, I'd recommend the solution. 

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. 

We are using VMware Workspace ONE for mobile devices.

The most valuable feature of VMware Workspace ONE is it provides the ability to find out the location of devices and manage end-point solutions when they are deployed, and keep them secure.

The length of time it takes to deploy an application could improve.

I have been using VMware Workspace ONE for approximately seven years.

VMware Workspace ONE is reliable.

The solution is scalable.

We have hundreds of thousands of users using this solution.

The technical support is good.

I rate the support from VMware Workspace ONE an eight out of ten.

Positive

I have not used other similar solutions in the past.

Our teams decide which device the solution has to be implemented. The time it took to implement all our devices took approximately five hours.

We have a team that deploys VMware Workspace ONE.

I have received a return on our investment using this solution.

The price of the solution is costly for the number of users I am using it for.

We use approximately three engineers for the maintenance of this solution.

I would recommend this solution to others.

We will soon be discontinuing the use of VMware Workspace ONE and using an in-house solution.

I rate VMware Workspace ONE an eight out of ten.

I'm a reseller and help our customers implement the solution. We're using version 20.

Most of our customers deploy the solution on a public cloud. It's the VMware shared cloud. Most of our customers are small enterprises because most of the businesses in Hong Kong are small. Our customers usually have 20 to 100 devices.

There are two distributors in Hong Kong. We buy from the distributor, resell the solution, and we help other IT or telecom companies to implement the solution for their customers because they don't have professionals to do it.

Our customers request this solution because they like the repetition.

The solution is too complicated. A lot of end customers don't know how to start when they go into the console. They request our service to help them implement the MDM policy.

The distributor and VMware's people can't tell me what's the differentiation or the spec, because MDM products are very similar these days. Some of that might be because the vendor thinks it's good but it's not what the customer wants. That's why it's very difficult.

I have used this solution for about three years.

I would rate the stability as eight out of ten.

I would rate the scalability as eight out of ten.

I would rate technical support as six out of ten.

Usually, we solve most of the problems that our customers have. If they have a problem and need us to raise a ticket to VMware, then usually it's a very serious problem, and it takes time to find the right person to solve it.

Last time, it took three to four weeks for technical support to find the right person to solve the problem.

I'm also working with SOTI and Samsung Knox.

If it's the government center, we usually recommend that they use SOTI. If it's a commercial center, what we recommend depends on their budget. Depending on the budget and the type of device that the customer uses, we would recommend either Samsung Knox or Workspace ONE.

Most of our customers deploy the solution on the cloud, not on-premises. The most complicated part of the installation is installing the server.

Implementation can take six weeks to two months.

First, we get the requirement from the customers. They tell us what they want on the mobile and the features or result that they want. Then, we input and create the policy for them. After that, we test the result on the device. If it's okay, then we do the training after implementing the policy.

For deployment, usually one project manager and two engineers are needed.

If you lower the price too much, then the reseller and distributor don't earn money and they won't promote your product because software is a service.

The solution is about $45 per device for a 12 month subscription. The price is standard across the world. 

For the enrollment service, if the project is too big and there are too many devices, sometimes a customer will outsource the enrollment service or the professional service.

I am also working with SOTI and Samsung Knox.

I would rate this solution as seven out of ten.

My advice is to find a company that knows MDM. For example, the team in my company mainly specializes in MDM, which is why we can help customers. Not many companies in Hong Kong can help customers to implement.

We have some VMware products, and the company uses Workspace ONE since we use the virtualization product, VMware. This is just a virtualization product. 

In work before, we have used the VMware direct connection.

In VMware, its virtualization is good.

I found the initial setup to be easy.

We can scale the solution if we need to. 

The pricing is good. 

Support is helpful and responsive. 

We have some problems with Workspace ONE. We have used the politic MDM for mobile, and it was probably one month before one account just removed it. It's likely an error from Samsung since this device gets updates from Samsung. Once an update happened, they remove this from the MDM platform from Workspace ONE. However, I could not track down the reason this happened. 

We'd like to see a better connection to Microsoft Azure and a better connection with Check Point. 

It's not completely stable. 

While we have some wrappers in the product, I don't usually find what I want. 

The two-factor identification process needs to be easier. 

I've been using the solution for four months. 

The solution isn't too stable. We've had some errors with the device. I'd rate the stability ya three out of five in terms of stability.

The solution can scale. 

We have around 250 people using it currently. About ten people use the admin panel. 

We've used technical support in the past since we have had problems along the way. Typically, issues can be resolved within a week. That's not too long to wait.

Positive

We're still using VMware Workspace ONE and now starting to use Microsoft Intune.

We are just now starting to use Microsoft Intune, and it's much better than Workspace ONE. It's easy to use for updates. And for control, it's also simpler since we have Office 365 and we have an all-in-one approach with Intune and Azure Active Directory. InTune is just better in a Microsoft environment. 

It's not very difficult. The platform is pretty easy. I did find, however, that the two-factor authentication took some time. I'd rate the overall process a three out of five in terms of ease of setup. 

It is not an expensive solution. The pricing is good. It's also less expensive than InTune. I'd rate their pricing five out of five.  

I'm a customer and end-user.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten. I've been pretty happy with its capabilities.

The primary use case was to containerize data and allow us to deploy applications securely. That was the use case that was predicated on and funded as a security initiative.

We had no MDM in place before, and we had one after the fact. When we had a departing employee, we were able to close off their access immediately.

Basically, the data containerization and the ability to publish and consistently push apps is the most valuable aspect of the product.

It has good stability.

The product can scale. 

There was nothing that the product couldn't do except force upgrades of iOS on iPhones.

The management interface needs to be better.

We'd like more useful support.

The scripting language is all very unique to the product as opposed to using any kind of industry-standard methods. That might be frustrating for some teams. 

The initial setup can be complex.

I've worked with the solution for three years. 

The solution seems to be stable. 

This product scales well. 

At the high water mark, we had 3,200 users. We're down to about 2,100 now.

We do not have plans to expand the solution for a few reasons. Number one is cost. Number two is the management interface is poor. Number three is the absence of support from the vendor. Number four would be how hard it is to support Gene Pool. Finding people with expertise with the product are few and far between.

Support is absolutely horrible. 

If I was not escalating through the account team that I've got, I would have practically no support on it whatsoever. In terms of quality, it's an absolute one out of ten.

Negative

Initially, the setup itself is quite complex. We had bought what VMware called a starter kit, which came with some professional services to get us up and running with the product. I'd rate it a four out of five in terms of ease of deployment as we did have those professional services to help us.

Unfortunately, the implementation, I would have to call a fail. We had several existing devices, and installing the product properly involved wiping the phone and installing and then restoring the user's information. And we had a very large resistance to that approach from our client community. We ended up installing more of a BYOD model, which limited the value of the platform to our organization.

We had the help of VMware professional services. 

While they were helpful, we were not prepared for the amount of change it would be inflicting on our user base, and as a result, it was not as successful as we would've liked.

The ROI was predicated on a more secure environment. That was achieved.

It's a subscription from VMware. We have a hybrid setup with a physical gateway on site, however, beyond that, it's subscription-based.

We are paying about $145,000 a year on a three-year subscription with no ability to scale up or scale down within that class model.

I was not here when the initial purchase was made, so I don't have that comparative analysis from three years ago. It does not strike me as particularly expensive, however, given that Intune is now included with my E3 subscription, it's on the expensive side now.

Typically, the solution comes as part of a package deal. 

We are end-users. 

I'd warn future users not to underestimate the impact on an existing environment.

I'd rate the solution three out of ten. It's hard to use in the absence of support. It does what it needs to do. However, I don't like it.