Cisco Meeting Server delivers high-quality video and voice conferencing with an intuitive interface and universal device compatibility. Designed for ease of use, it allows for seamless integration across multiple branches, making it essential for modern virtual meetings and conference calls.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Meeting Server | 2.8% |
| Zoom Workplace Business | 7.4% |
| Webex | 5.2% |
| Other | 84.6% |
Cisco Meeting Server stands out with its high-definition video and voice capabilities, ensuring an engaging virtual meeting experience. Users benefit from easy configuration and the ability to connect from any device, positioning the server as a reliable choice for companies aiming to streamline communication. While users appreciate its screen sharing functionality, there is room for enhancement in areas like installation simplicity and integration with other platforms like Zoom and Teams. Expanding recording capabilities and GUI improvements could also elevate user satisfaction, making this server a more comprehensive communication tool.
What are the key features of Cisco Meeting Server?Enterprises across diverse industries leverage Cisco Meeting Server for virtual meetings and conference calls, eliminating the need for physical tools like whiteboards. It supports seamless video conferencing across branches, crucial during periods like pandemics. It also serves as a centralized platform, integrating with systems such as Teams and Zoom to host successful conferences and meetings.
Cisco Meeting Server was previously known as Acano.
Starz
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Voice Network Engineer at Raya Integration | 4.0 | I use Cisco Meeting Server for crucial company conferences and video meetings. The screen-sharing feature is valuable, but the GUI needs improvement. We switched from Cisco Webex due to security concerns and preferred the on-premises deployment and scalability options. |
| Voip Engineer at APK | 4.5 | I find Cisco Meeting Server a good, stable, and scalable product with an easy-to-use UI. While installation is difficult due to non-Cisco commands, I still recommend this solution, rating it highly. |
| Network Analyst at a manufacturing company with 11-50 employees | 5.0 | After COVID-19, we switched to Cisco Meeting Server for home workers from various platforms like Teams and Zoom. It's an easy solution compared to the complex, expensive Cisco TelePresence Server, but it lacks remote screen control features. |
| Technical lead at a recreational facilities/services company with 501-1,000 employees | 4.5 | I find Cisco Meeting Server stable, easy to manage, and ideal for video conferencing, with great technical support. Its configuration is straightforward, but I wish it integrated with Zoom and Teams for better connectivity. |
| IT Support Officer at a non-profit with 501-1,000 employees | 3.0 | I use Cisco Meeting Server for internal staff meetings, finding it effective for calls. My main frustration is the lack of a built-in recording function, which requires a separate purchase. Despite this, I recommend the solution. |
I use Cisco Meeting Server for conferences and video meetings, which are crucial for my company.
The share screen option available during conferences is one of the best features of Cisco Meeting Server.
In Cisco Meeting Server, GUI is an area of concern where improvements are required.
In the future, Cisco Meeting Server should allow its users to become administrators if required.
I have been using Cisco Meeting Server for six months. My company is a customer of Cisco Meeting Server.
I have not seen any breakdowns in the product.
Cisco Meeting Server is a product used by 50 people in my company.
Before the introduction of Cisco Meeting Server in our company, we were using Cisco Webex. Owing to some security reasons, my company chose Cisco Meeting Server, which could be deployed on an on-premises model.
The product's initial setup phase was easy.
The product is deployed on an on-premises model.
Price-wise, Cisco Meeting Server is a product that falls in a mid-range category.
Owing to the fact that Cisco Meeting Server allows its users to deploy it on an on-premises model and the high scalability options provided, my company chose it over other product availability markets.
I recommend Cisco Meeting Server to those who plan to use it.
I rate the overall tool an eight out of ten.
We use Cisco Meeting Server in our organization to host company meetings. It allows us to have a modern meeting without a whiteboard.
The video and voice are of good quality.
The interface is very easy to use. The UI is user-friendly and very good overall.
This product is compatible with any device.
This is a difficult solution to install and it should be made easier.
The command-line interface is difficult to use because the command set it not Cisco-based.
I have been working with Cisco Meeting Server for approximately three years.
This is a stable solution.
This is a very scalable product. We have between 200 and 300 users. As the size of our organization grows, our usage will increase.
The technical support from Cisco is okay.
We also use Skype for Business, Cisco Webex, and Adobe Connect.
This product is easier to implement than the others.
All of the platforms are very good and of high quality.
This is a hard solution to install. This is because it does not rely on Cisco commands but rather, uses the Acano system.
We have deployed it in five or six organizations.
One or two people are required for the installation.
Licensing fees are billed yearly.
In summary, this is a good product that is very easy to use, and I recommend it.
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Users worked from home after COVID-19, and we couldn't give them physical devices. Users were coming from different platforms like Teams and Zoom. We had to bring them on a single platform. We didn't integrate CMS with Teams or Zoom. We used CMS as a single platform and tried sending them invites to use CMS.
Cisco Meeting Server is an easy and less complex solution.
Cisco Meeting Server should include a feature to control another user's screen during a remote session.
I rate Cisco Meeting Server ten out of ten for stability.
Cisco Meeting Server is a scalable solution.
We previously used Cisco TelePresence Server. We switched to the Cisco Meeting Server because the Cisco TelePresence Server was complex and expensive. The Cisco TelePresence Server was not scalable and didn't have a guest portal where guests could join.
The solution's initial setup is very easy.
On a scale from one to ten, where one is difficult and ten is easy, I rate the solution's initial setup ten out of ten.
We installed Cisco Meeting Server in two or three days. We took one day for installation and the other day for certificates.
Cisco Meeting Server saves us time and expenses because we had to go to different cities to have meetings earlier.
The main thing which we were concerned about was expenses. So, the operating expense (OpEx) was good because we didn't have to incur as much cost as we did earlier. For our previous server, we had to pay more for technical support. We also had to pay for the space acquired by those servers. There was only one server for Cisco Meeting Server.
We don't need a device for the Cisco Jabber integration with CMS; we can do it on a browser. I don't need a physical device to connect to you. I'll have a link, which I can open on a browser and connect with you.
The security parameters for the Cisco Meeting Server are the same as the Cisco TelePresence Server. The encryption algorithm used for Cisco Meeting Server is the same as in Cisco TelePresence Server.
The technical support we buy from Cisco helps us maintain the solution.
Overall, I rate Cisco Meeting Server ten out of ten.
The client use case for Cisco Meeting Server is video conferencing. The client has an on-premises server, and my company recommended Cisco devices. The client has twelve branch offices and two headquarters. In 2019 and 2020, there was a get-together for officials. It was during the pandemic, which was why my company deployed the solution and the Cisco servers and endpoints.
What I like most about Cisco Meeting Server is its quick management. The solution also has a straightforward configuration.
What would make Cisco Meeting Server better is integrating it with Zoom and Teams so that you can connect or make a call through any of the two third-party solutions.
I've worked with Cisco Meeting Server since 2019.
Cisco Meeting Server is a stable product.
My client has Cisco Meeting Server on an on-premises server, and it's currently only for three concurrent meetings and thirty-five users. Still, the product is scalable to one thousand users and ten concurrent meetings.
Cisco Meeting Server has the best technical support, so I'd rate support a five out of five. Support is customer-friendly. Cisco also has polite technical engineers that provide resolutions within a faster time frame.
Cisco Meeting Server is easy to set up.
Deploying Cisco Meeting Server took twenty to twenty-five days for the whole server and all the endpoints and web user configurations.
Cisco Meeting Server has reasonable licensing costs, though I cannot give the exact figure as I'm not from the purchasing department.
I've worked with Cisco CallManager and Cisco Meeting Server.
My company deployed Cisco Meeting Server 1000 version 3.4 for the client.
The client currently has thirty-five users for Cisco Meeting Server.
To deploy and maintain the Cisco Meeting Server, my company has three staff that take care of the server and the local network.
I'd recommend the solution to any customer with video conferencing requirements.
My rating for Cisco Meeting Server is nine out of ten.
You can use the Cisco Meeting Server to set up conference calls and virtual meetings. Those are the two primary functions of Meeting Server. Most people in the company are using Microsoft Teams, so we only use Meeting Server when we have an internal meeting for all staff.
A few features are missing on the Meetings app, like a recording function. My understanding is that you need to buy a separate recording solution. It's modular, so you have to enable some functions if you want to use them. For example, we had to enable the Mood function. Recording is the primary feature we'd like to see in the app.
We've been using Cisco Meeting Server for about three years.
We use it to connect around 100 users in our company.
I've never had a reason to call support. It's a rented solution.
We had a consultant handle the installation for us. In fact, it's a rented solution.
We pay for a yearly license.
I rate Cisco Meeting Server six out of 10. I would recommend it.
