Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Microsoft Purview Information Protection Logo

Microsoft Purview Information Protection Reviews

Vendor: Microsoft
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader

What is Microsoft Purview Information Protection?

Featured Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

Microsoft Purview Information Protection mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of Microsoft Purview Information Protection in the Data Governance category stands at 2.1%, down from 2.5% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Governance Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Purview Information Protection2.1%
Microsoft Purview Data Governance11.5%
Collibra Platform8.6%
Other77.8%
Data Governance

PeerResearch reports based on Microsoft Purview Information Protection reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryData GovernanceMar 25, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Microsoft Purview Data GovernanceMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Collibra PlatformMar 25, 2026Download
ComparisonMicrosoft Purview Information Protection vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Mar 25, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Microsoft Intune4.1N/A94%334 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Entra ID4.3N/A95%271 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 25, 2026

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise10
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business110
Midsize Enterprise69
Large Enterprise257
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
11%
Retailer
7%
Government
6%
Manufacturing Company
6%
Healthcare Company
6%
Insurance Company
4%
University
4%
Construction Company
3%
Transportation Company
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Educational Organization
3%
Non Profit
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Consumer Goods Company
3%
Performing Arts
2%
Comms Service Provider
2%
Real Estate/Law Firm
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Hospitality Company
2%
Media Company
2%
Marketing Services Firm
2%
Non Tech Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
 
Microsoft Purview Information Protection Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Associate Director at LTI - Larsen & Toubro Infotech4.0I utilize Microsoft Purview Information Protection for comprehensive data discovery, classification, and protection. It integrates seamlessly with existing tools, offering cost-effective solutions via an E5 license, though improvements in response time and structured data classification are needed.
Director Security Architecture at a financial services firm with 5,001-10,000 employees3.0I found Microsoft Purview Information Protection useful for easy DLP configuration and data protection, but it struggles with false positives and inconsistent policy enforcement. It meets security objectives but lacks ROI benefits and needs improvement in accuracy and compatibility.
Principal Consultant at Sector 1254.0I’ve used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for over two years and find it easy, stable, and straightforward to deploy and integrate, with strong security fit. Pricing is acceptable, but I’d like richer AI and third‑party integrations. I rate it 8/10.
Technology Partnerships Senior Principal at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for four years, valuing its sensitivity labels for protecting unstructured files. It's stable and scales well, though I desire a more seamless user experience. It's ideal for heavy Microsoft shops.
Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees4.0I use Microsoft Purview Information Protection mainly for sensitivity labeling, which simplifies policy enforcement, though limitations in AI classification, scalability, and occasional instability hinder efficiency; setup and licensing are also confusing, but overall, it integrates well within our Microsoft ecosystem.
Director, Network & Cloud Infrastructure at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees4.0I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection for sensitivity labeling, which applies policies automatically, though its AI-driven classification isn't precise enough. It's promising but unstable at times, hard to scale, and has confusing pricing and deployment processes.
Technical Services Manager, Cloud at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees3.5I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection primarily for document labeling, appreciating its automated controls and integration with our tools, though AI classification and dictionary features need improvement; overall, it enhances our data security and compliance.
Program Manager, Worldwide at a tech services company with 11-50 employees4.0I've used Microsoft Purview Information Protection to prevent data leakage and appreciate its classification and eDiscovery features, though licensing complexity and AI label integration need improvement; overall, it's reliable, scalable, and valuable despite support and setup challenges.