Adobe Workfront vs PowerSteering comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adobe and PowerSteering are both solutions in the Project Portfolio Management category. Additionally, 90% of Adobe users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of PowerSteering users who would recommend it.

Adobe Workfront

Read 42 Adobe Workfront reviews

6,442 Views
4,252 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PowerSteering

Read 1 PowerSteering review

1,172 Views
527 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Adobe Workfront

PowerSteering

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Adobe Workfront and PowerSteering based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management.

To learn more, read our detailed Project Portfolio Management Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,683 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adobe Workfront

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Management Software (6th), Digital Asset Management (1st)

PowerSteering

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Project Portfolio Management (17th)

Featured Reviews

AdityaGupta1

Adobe Workfront Specialist at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Have faced limitations in functionality and dependability while trying to streamline project management workflows

One of the best things about Adobe Workfront is that we can immediately track each project. We can keep track of all tasks with the help of milestones that we can add to a project. We can monitor everything effectively. The utilization and workload balancer allows us to clearly see if a person is over-utilized or if they are not getting utilized to at least 80 or 90%. This enables better tracking and work assignment with improved clarity. We use custom dashboards in Adobe Workfront to see all statuses. The integration capabilities with other software are quite good, with straightforward connectivity. We have HTTP connectors if we need to connect with external systems via APIs. If we have any API endpoint for any external tool, we can connect it with Adobe Workfront using Fusion. Reporting is a major part of Adobe Workfront, making it not just a workflow management tool but also a tool where we can get data and present it to executives through comprehensive reporting.

Read full review

it_user4230

VP of Product at a legal firm with 51-200 employees

Excellent portfolio management SaaS - strategy, savings, visibility

I haven't used the product for over a year, so this could be out of date but entering information was somewhat cumbersome. PPM systems in general are a challenge to keep populated with current information. The business priority of portfolio visibility must be communicated to users and reinforced that the project doesn't exist unless it's updated in the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Mostly, it has to do with reporting project status updates to the management team."

"Workfront centralizes the tasks, the assignment of tasks, and documents required to do the work, streamlining communication and information availability, thus improving organization and reducing dependency on decentralized methods like email or servers."

"The project transparency in AtTask/WorkFront is amazing, it helped us become so much more organized and gives us so much data to help report in ways it would have taken me weeks to do, and now I can build the report fast and have it at my fingertips to use at any time."

"Adobe Workfront is a very broad platform, and when examining its primary function, it excels at project management and collaborative work management, with flexibility that allows it to be used for many things beyond overall project management in terms of general metadata compiling."

"As per a user survey, 90% of respondents believe that Workfront has increased operational discipline."

"It is a great tool and functions well across an organization."

"The best part of Workfront is that it is a good system for large jobs as well as smaller scale projects."

"We are finding that AtTask is continuously breaking down the silos and facilitating cross-collaboration between groups and teams."

More Adobe Workfront pros

"Very configurable software; almost any stage-gate process can be mapped and defined in the software giving excellent visibility to your project portfolio."

Cons

"Improving the efficiency of converting issues to projects is also essential; when converting issues to projects, users should remain on the same page rather than being redirected."

"I have used the product and instantiated it, almost seven years back. The process was fairly complex, however, I don't know if they have changed the same now. But this is something I think, if not addressed can be improved. Another area that needs a little attention, is the change of implementation lead. Back when we had Workfront instantiated, we often had our timeline delayed due to the change in the implementation lead. Now Workfront is under Adobe and, in case, this issue, isn't fixed it should be given due attention. Also, Workfront is a universal tool, which can pose a difficulty for small businesses and companies, who don't have the required time, effort, and knowledge to configure it periodically."

"More customization of the user interface would be nice."

"We have experienced multiple problems as a result."

"My experience with reporting in Adobe Workfront so far is that the reporting could be better."

"The downtime, while not too long or frequent, is an area for improvement."

"Workfront works well if you are just trying to use out of the box functionality but once you try and get specific to your own business needs, it lacks in flexibility."

"Reporting is a bit limited; while basic reporting is completely fulfilled and you can present the information in clear graphs, when you try to create complex relations (historic vs forecast, capacity vs demand) things get more complicated, there are limitations and you need workarounds to obtain the desired (or closest to the desired) information."

More Adobe Workfront cons

"Entering information was somewhat cumbersome."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Adobe Workfront is an expensive solution."

"The pricing of Workfront is completely license based."

"We are partners with Adobe, so we get the licensing at a cheaper rate."

"Adobe purchased Workfront in the past year, and they're putting work into developing the platform, so I expect the price to rise. It isn't cheap, but it's reasonable for the value it provides. It isn't Monday.com where you pick a license with a set price, and you've got a project manager."

"Speaking about pricing, I wouldn't recommend it to a smaller company because I do think the price point is higher than other solutions that can work."

"The pricing is a barrier to implementation. It is expensive compared to other competitors. Speaking about licensing, they have a private manager license for $1000, which you can use for administration as well. Then they offer a worker license for $500, and then a reviewer or contributor license which is free."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Project Portfolio Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Healthcare Company

11%

Construction Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	30

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Workfront?

The per-user cost in the ultimate plan of Adobe Workfront is approximately $1,232 when purchasing 800 to 1,000 licenses. The ultimate plan includes Fusion, which is an excellent automation tool. In...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Workfront?

The platform could benefit from additional customization features. The external lookup field, which allows custom API calls to fill data, is limited to two thousand results, which is insufficient f...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Workfront?

We specifically implement Adobe Workfront for other clients as Deloitte is a partner of Adobe. We work with different clients to implement Workfront and streamline marketing resource management wit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Jira vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 6% of the time

Wrike vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Asana vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Oracle Primavera Portfolio Management vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 5% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs Adobe Workfront

Compared 4% of the time

More Adobe Workfront Competitors

Microsoft Project Server vs PowerSteering

Compared 16% of the time

Broadcom Clarity vs PowerSteering

Compared 14% of the time

OpenText Project and Portfolio Management vs PowerSteering

Compared 11% of the time

Planview Portfolios vs PowerSteering

Compared 10% of the time

Planisware vs PowerSteering

Compared 8% of the time

More PowerSteering Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adobe Workfront

September 2026

Download Adobe Workfront product report

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Download PowerSteering product report

Also Known As

AtTask, Workfront DAM

No data available

Overview

Adobe Workfront provides customizable tools for project management, including dashboards and reports, promoting efficient workflows and team collaboration.

Adobe Workfront supports organizations with features like real-time data access, creative tool integration, and automated processes. It facilitates resource allocation and project tracking with role-based access control, making it a versatile platform for diverse methodologies. While its interface is user-friendly, some areas like reporting and custom fields could use simplification and faster system scalability.

What are Adobe Workfront's key features?

Customizable dashboards and reports: Facilitate data-driven decision-making with personalized insights.
Workflows and automation capabilities: Streamline processes and enhance productivity with Fusion.
Integration with creative tools: Seamlessly connect with CRM and DAM for synchronized operations.
Secure role-based access: Protect sensitive data while ensuring appropriate access levels.

What benefits or ROI should users expect from Adobe Workfront?

Improved project efficiency: Optimize resource planning and task management.
Enhanced collaboration: Ensure smooth communication within distributed teams.
Centralized project tracking: Maintain clear visibility on campaign progress and performance.
Streamlined approval processes: Reduce bottlenecks with automated workflows.

In marketing, Adobe Workfront is implemented for managing project timelines and resources, integrating with CRM and DAM tools. Companies streamline workflows to improve campaign planning and performance. By utilizing agile methodologies, they maintain a centralized hub for tracking and collaboration, enabling more efficient project completion.

Adobe

PowerSteering is a versatile tool designed for strategic project portfolio management, enabling organizations to align projects with business objectives and improve decision-making through data-driven insights.

PowerSteering offers organizations the ability to efficiently manage complex project portfolios, prioritize initiatives, and allocate resources effectively. It enhances strategic alignment and improves accountability by providing visibility into project performance and facilitating informed decision-making. PowerSteering's adaptability caters to diverse project management requirements, making it a valuable asset for optimizing project outcomes.

What are the most important features of PowerSteering?

Portfolio Management: Offers comprehensive oversight and management of projects aligning with strategic goals.
Resource Allocation: Enables efficient resource distribution across projects to optimize utilization.
Data Analytics: Provides insights through advanced reporting and analytics features, aiding decision-making.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Strategic Alignment: Aligns project goals with business objectives, enhancing strategic focus.
Informed Decisions: Facilitates data-driven decision-making, improving project success rates.
Efficiency: Streamlines project management processes, increasing productivity and reducing waste.

PowerSteering is implemented across many industries, including manufacturing, healthcare, and finance, where strategic portfolio management and resource optimization are crucial for operational success. Its flexibility allows adaptation to specific industry requirements, streamlining workflows, and accelerating project delivery.

PowerSteering

Sample Customers

Advance Autoparts, Emerson, Covario, Cisco, Caroma, TREK, Sapient Nitro, ATB, LexisNexis, CarPhone Warehouse

Church Pension Group, UK Highways Agency, US Department of Defense, Electrocomponents, Novation, Staples, Molex, Polyone, NHS Lincolnshire

Buyer's Guide

Project Portfolio Management

August 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Broadcom, Planisware, monday.com and others in Project Portfolio Management. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,683 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Project Portfolio Management vendors and best Project Management Software vendors.

We monitor all Project Portfolio Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.