No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

BlackBerry Workspaces vs ShareFile comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

BlackBerry Workspaces
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
25th
Average Rating
7.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
ShareFile
Ranking in Content Collaboration Platforms
11th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
eSignature (Electronic Signature) (10th), Cloud Data Exchange Services (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Content Collaboration Platforms category, the mindshare of BlackBerry Workspaces is 1.4%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ShareFile is 5.4%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Content Collaboration Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
ShareFile5.4%
BlackBerry Workspaces1.4%
Other93.2%
Content Collaboration Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

RE
Principal Director at implefy
Facilitates monitoring and control of our repositories, but would benefit from the inclusion of workflows
Our primary use case for this solution is secure file sharing All of our different repositories of documents, like SharePoint and Box, were linked to Workspaces to ensure that sharing content was monitored, controlled, and secure. The most valuable features are the ability to revoke rights after…
David Donaldson - PeerSpot reviewer
Regional Information Technology Director at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees
Flexible plans, stable, and scalable
I used another solution at the same time, which was far worse. The American company I worked for used a similar file-sharing solution called LeapFile, a secure file transfer service. Personally, I found Citrix ShareFile to be much better than LeapFile, which was quite clunky. I later used a solution called Egnyte, which my company used as its main file transfer solution, though I'm not sure if it's still in use. The company moved to Egnyte because it is more of an enterprise-level solution. Egnyte was expensive, but it worked. I believe Citrix ShareFile is aimed at smaller to medium-sized organizations, making it a more appropriate solution than Egnyte due to its pricing.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"All of our different repositories of documents, like SharePoint and Box, were linked to Workspaces to ensure that sharing content was monitored, controlled, and secure."
"The most valuable features are the ability to revoke rights after sending the document, and shoulder browsing protection."
"This provides us with a secure way of sending tax returns without having to use passwords."
"It's an enterprise-scalable product with security."
"Easy to manage and fully secure."
"It provided end users with a secure file-sharing option with which they can share big files."
"The solution is scalable."
"ShareFile gives you all of the features of cloud providers, but in an on-premises solution."
"We recommend ShareFile to any of our customers who are looking for file sharing capabilities because it's very compatible, flexible, easy to manage, with encryption and good security."
"For a few hundred dollars a month, my entire organization (42 users) can effectively share unlimited files with external partners."
 

Cons

"I would like to see workflow implementation, as well as a lite version for non-business users."
"Some of our customers are facing issues if they've deployed in hybrid mode."
"Some of our customers are facing issues when sending files outside their company."
"Would like more granular folder ownership administration."
"Everything they have should be integrated into one item."
"Deployment by vendor was not done right. We were looking for a HA solution but it is not configured like that."
"The configuration on the mobile devices is a little clunky, in terms of setting up the application."
"They should integrate the solution with more email services."
"Reporting features could be better Support could be better; we don't usually need it but I have read a number of complaints from users with more complex implementations (API use, AD integration) that have had issues."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I give the cost of the solution a five out of five."
"You have to work hard in order to get the suitable licenses."
"Citrix has a very good file auditing features and security features."
"If you are already a Citrix customer, I recommend having the Platinum licensing level, as it provides licensing for a number of various features that all integrate together."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Content Collaboration Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
11%
Construction Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise3
 

Also Known As

WatchDox
Citrix RightSignature, Citrix ShareFile
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

QIC, Evides
SecondMarket, KBC Partners, Twilio, You Know Who Design, oDesk Corporation, CMT Agency, Townhog
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Google, Dropbox and others in Content Collaboration Platforms. Updated: July 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.