No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
ShareFile Logo

Top 10 ShareFile Alternatives

Vendor: ShareFile
4.2 out of 5
Leave a review

Top ShareFile Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ShareFile based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Google Workspace, Box, and OpenText Content Management. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ShareFile surpasses its competitors by offering robust file sharing, advanced security features, and seamless integration with various productivity tools, ensuring efficient and secure collaboration for businesses of all sizes.

ShareFile Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ShareFile, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ShareFile Logo
Google Workspace
4.1 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Google Workspace
4.1 out of 5
Google Workspace excels in seamless app integration and real-time collaboration, appealing to those prioritizing ease of use and lower cost. In comparison, ShareFile's advanced security and compliance features attract tech buyers focused on data protection, despite higher initial investment.
Download Google Workspace vs. ShareFile Report
Google Workspace requires an initial setup cost that is straightforward, while ShareFile has a more complex setup cost structure. These differences highlight the varying approaches to initial investment between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Workspace requires an initial setup cost that is straightforward, while ShareFile has a more complex setup cost structure. These differences highlight the varying approaches to initial investment between the two platforms.
ShareFile Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Box
4.2 out of 5
Box excels with seamless integration and content management, appealing to organizations needing flexibility. In comparison, ShareFile focuses on robust security, ideal for sectors requiring stringent data protection. Box's broad compatibility contrasts with ShareFile's targeted security, catering to diverse business needs.
Download Box vs. ShareFile Report
Box has a higher setup cost, while ShareFile offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Box has a higher setup cost, while ShareFile offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategies.
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
OpenText Content Management
4.0 out of 5
OpenText Content Management offers comprehensive integrations and collaboration tools ideal for large enterprises needing advanced document management. In comparison, ShareFile excels in user-friendly deployment and secure file sharing, making it suitable for small to medium businesses seeking efficient, adaptable cloud solutions.
Download OpenText Content Management vs. ShareFile Report
OpenText Content Management incurs higher setup costs compared to ShareFile. ShareFile offers a more cost-effective initial setup, providing a budget-friendly entry point.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Content Management incurs higher setup costs compared to ShareFile. ShareFile offers a more cost-effective initial setup, providing a budget-friendly entry point.
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
Dropbox Business - Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
Dropbox Business - Enterprise attracts tech buyers seeking seamless third-party application integration and enhanced collaboration. In comparison, ShareFile is preferred by those prioritizing advanced security features and customization, appealing to enterprises with stringent data protection requirements and a need for granular file access control.
Download Dropbox Business - Enterprise vs. ShareFile Report
Dropbox Business - Enterprise offers flexible setup costs tailored to the scale of deployment, while ShareFile provides a more predictable but potentially higher initial setup cost, highlighting the variance in pricing approaches between the two products.
View comparison
Pricing
Dropbox Business - Enterprise offers flexible setup costs tailored to the scale of deployment, while ShareFile provides a more predictable but potentially higher initial setup cost, highlighting the variance in pricing approaches between the two products.
ShareFile Logo
Office 365
4.3 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Office 365
4.3 out of 5
Office 365 excels in integration with Microsoft's suite, offering seamless document handling. In comparison, ShareFile emphasizes secure file sharing with top-tier security. Tech buyers might choose Office 365 for its collaborative tools, while ShareFile caters to those prioritizing security and file management.
Download Office 365 vs. ShareFile Report
Office 365 setup costs are typically higher than ShareFile, providing more features and integration options, while ShareFile offers a more competitive initial setup cost but with fewer advanced functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Office 365 setup costs are typically higher than ShareFile, providing more features and integration options, while ShareFile offers a more competitive initial setup cost but with fewer advanced functionalities.
ShareFile Logo
DocuSign
4.2 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
DocuSign
4.2 out of 5
DocuSign focuses on e-signature capabilities, with advanced integration options enhancing its appeal for signature-driven needs. In comparison, ShareFile offers robust file management and flexible storage, making it ideal for businesses seeking comprehensive solutions beyond signature functionality.
Download DocuSign vs. ShareFile Report
DocuSign has a straightforward setup cost, while ShareFile presents a more budget-friendly option with minimal initial fees, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two services.
View comparison
Pricing
DocuSign has a straightforward setup cost, while ShareFile presents a more budget-friendly option with minimal initial fees, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two services.
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
Microsoft OneDrive for Business
4.2 out of 5
Microsoft OneDrive for Business excels in integration with Microsoft Office Suite for seamless operations. In comparison, ShareFile appeals with advanced security for stringent compliance needs, offering specialized deployment and support for companies prioritizing data protection over broader service integration.
Download Microsoft OneDrive for Business vs. ShareFile Report
Microsoft OneDrive for Business requires no initial setup cost, offering an affordable entry, while ShareFile incurs a setup fee, creating a notable cost distinction for businesses considering cloud storage solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Microsoft OneDrive for Business requires no initial setup cost, offering an affordable entry, while ShareFile incurs a setup fee, creating a notable cost distinction for businesses considering cloud storage solutions.
ShareFile Logo
Egnyte
4.2 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Egnyte
4.2 out of 5
Egnyte attracts tech buyers with robust security and seamless app integration. In comparison, ShareFile provides advanced collaboration tools, superior customer service, and straightforward deployment. ShareFile's enhanced features may justify higher costs, while Egnyte's competitive pricing appeals to cost-conscious businesses.
Download Egnyte vs. ShareFile Report
Egnyte has a moderate setup cost, while ShareFile offers low-cost setup, highlighting a key financial difference for businesses seeking economical solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Egnyte has a moderate setup cost, while ShareFile offers low-cost setup, highlighting a key financial difference for businesses seeking economical solutions.
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
Google Drive Enterprise
4.2 out of 5
Google Drive Enterprise offers seamless collaboration and integration with Google Workspace apps, enhancing productivity within Google's ecosystem. In comparison, ShareFile excels in secure file sharing and compliance, appealing to businesses prioritizing data security and regulatory adherence.
Download Google Drive Enterprise vs. ShareFile Report
Google Drive Enterprise has a minimal setup cost, appealing for businesses looking for a cost-effective cloud solution, while ShareFile requires a more significant initial investment, which may be a consideration for those seeking robust enterprise-level features.
View comparison
Pricing
Google Drive Enterprise has a minimal setup cost, appealing for businesses looking for a cost-effective cloud solution, while ShareFile requires a more significant initial investment, which may be a consideration for those seeking robust enterprise-level features.
ShareFile Logo
Amazon WorkDocs
4.0 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Amazon WorkDocs
4.0 out of 5
Amazon WorkDocs enables secure document collaboration and management, offering features like file sharing and activity tracking. It supports seamless integration with AWS services. Its cloud-based nature enhances accessibility, but enhancements could be made in offline access and navigation to improve usability.
Download Amazon WorkDocs vs. ShareFile Report
It's cheaper compared to similar products available
View comparison
Pricing
It's cheaper compared to similar products available
ShareFile Logo
Adobe Sign
4.7 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Adobe Sign
4.7 out of 5
Adobe Sign excels in e-signature capabilities and extensive integration options. In comparison, ShareFile stands out for advanced file storage and secure sharing, ideal for organizations needing detailed file handling. A tech buyer might prefer Adobe for integrations or ShareFile for storage-focused needs.
Download Adobe Sign vs. ShareFile Report
Adobe Sign requires no initial setup cost, while ShareFile involves a setup fee. Differences in setup fees highlight accessibility preferences for Adobe Sign's target audience, in contrast to ShareFile's approach to implementing its service structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Adobe Sign requires no initial setup cost, while ShareFile involves a setup fee. Differences in setup fees highlight accessibility preferences for Adobe Sign's target audience, in contrast to ShareFile's approach to implementing its service structure.
ShareFile Logo
FileCloud
4.0 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
FileCloud
4.0 out of 5

FileCloud enables secure file sharing and synchronization with version control, encryption, and access management. It consolidates storage across NAS and AWS and integrates with Microsoft Office and Google Drive. While users appreciate role-based access and audit logs, improvements are needed in user interface, real-time collaboration, and Linux compatibility.

Download FileCloud vs. ShareFile Report
View comparison
ShareFile Logo
SignNow
4.3 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
SignNow
4.3 out of 5
SignNow excels in affordability and support, ideal for businesses seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, ShareFile's advanced features and robust security measures make it suitable for organizations prioritizing extensive collaboration and data protection. SignNow appeals through simplicity, while ShareFile meets complex enterprise needs.
Download ShareFile vs. SignNow Report
SignNow setup costs are straightforward and minimal, while ShareFile may involve higher initial expenses. SignNow is suitable for cost-conscious users, whereas ShareFile offers more complex pricing for those with specific requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
SignNow setup costs are straightforward and minimal, while ShareFile may involve higher initial expenses. SignNow is suitable for cost-conscious users, whereas ShareFile offers more complex pricing for those with specific requirements.
ShareFile Logo
Tresorit
1 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Tresorit
1 out of 5
Tresorit provides secure cloud storage focusing on encryption and privacy. Users appreciate the end-to-end encryption, seamless integration, and file-sharing capabilities. While its secure features are valuable, some note it could improve in terms of pricing competitiveness or expand integration with other apps.
View comparison
ShareFile Logo
Zoho Sign
4.1 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Zoho Sign
4.1 out of 5
Zoho Sign offers seamless integration with Zoho applications, appealing to cost-conscious users with strong support. In comparison, ShareFile attracts with advanced document collaboration and security features, including encrypted email, catering to enterprises emphasizing comprehensive security and long-term functionality.
Download ShareFile vs. Zoho Sign Report
Zoho Sign incurs zero setup costs, offering straightforward implementation, while ShareFile requires an initial setup fee, highlighting a cost difference between the two. This distinction may influence cost-sensitive users when selecting a document management solution.
View comparison
Pricing
Zoho Sign incurs zero setup costs, offering straightforward implementation, while ShareFile requires an initial setup fee, highlighting a cost difference between the two. This distinction may influence cost-sensitive users when selecting a document management solution.
ShareFile Logo
ownCloud
5.0 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
ownCloud
5.0 out of 5
ownCloud serves as a robust platform for file sharing and data synchronization. It offers features like security and access control. While it excels in versatility, room for improvement exists in terms of speed and scalability to fully meet large-scale collaboration demands.
View comparison
ShareFile Logo
eXo Platform
1 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
eXo Platform
1 out of 5
eXo Platform offers a collaboration and communication hub with features like document management and social networking. It effectively supports team collaboration though some users suggest areas for improvement in customization options. It benefits organizations seeking a robust solution for enhancing internal interaction and engagement.
View comparison
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
BlackBerry Workspaces
3.5 out of 5
BlackBerry Workspaces is used for file sharing and security, offering valuable features like encryption and access controls. Users appreciate the seamless mobile integration, although improvements in speed and collaboration tools would enhance the experience. It is ideal for businesses prioritizing data protection.
View comparison
ShareFile Logo
Nintex eSign
4.0 out of 5
ShareFile Logo
Nintex eSign
4.0 out of 5
Nintex eSign is known for its efficient electronic signature functionalities and quick deployment, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, ShareFile offers extensive cloud storage and document sharing, attracting enterprises needing a comprehensive digital workspace despite a potentially complex setup.
Download Nintex eSign vs. ShareFile Report
Nintex eSign involves moderate setup costs, while ShareFile offers a more cost-effective setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Nintex eSign involves moderate setup costs, while ShareFile offers a more cost-effective setup fee.
ShareFile Logo
ShareFile Logo
Leapfile Managed File Transfer
1 out of 5
Leapfile Managed File Transfer assists businesses with secure file exchange. It offers reliable encryption, seamless integration, and easy access management. Users appreciate fast transfer speeds but note that it could benefit from improved mobile accessibility and more customization options to better align with specific needs.
View comparison

Related categories

eSignature (Electronic Signature)
Content Collaboration Platforms
Cloud Data Exchange Services