Claroty Platform vs ISL Online comparison

Claroty and ISL Online are both solutions in the Remote Access category. Claroty is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.2, while ISL Online is ranked #32. Claroty holds a 1.7% mindshare in VUS, compared to ISL Online’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Claroty users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ISL Online users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 7, 2024

Claroty Platform and ISL Online both offer robust solutions for cybersecurity and remote support, respectively. Users prefer ISL Online for its comprehensive features and smoother deployment process despite the favorable pricing and support of Claroty Platform.

Features: Claroty Platform's valuable features include strong cybersecurity measures, extensive third-party integrations, and advanced monitoring capabilities. ISL Online provides remote support tools, accessibility, and multi-platform compatibility. Users favor ISL Online's diverse and user-friendly features over Claroty Platform's specialized functions.

Room for Improvement: Users suggest that Claroty Platform needs enhancements in its documentation, simpler configuration options, and better usability. For ISL Online, users recommend improved integration with other software, more intuitive navigation, and expanded integrations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Claroty Platform has a straightforward deployment model but can be complex for first-time users; it offers solid customer service. ISL Online provides an easy and quick deployment process, which users find very efficient, accompanied by responsive customer support. Users generally find ISL Online easier to deploy and support more responsive than Claroty Platform.

Pricing and ROI: Claroty Platform is considered cost-effective and delivers good ROI over time. ISL Online's setup cost is slightly higher, but users find the premium worth it due to its extensive features, and it also offers strong ROI. While Claroty Platform is appreciated for its affordability, ISL Online's robust feature set justifies its higher pricing for many users.

To learn more, read our detailed Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,800 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Intune

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Remote Access category, the mindshare of Microsoft Intune is 5.4%, down from 10.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Claroty Platform is 1.7%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ISL Online is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Remote Access Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Intune	5.4%
Claroty Platform	1.7%
ISL Online	1.3%
Other	91.6%

Remote Access

Featured Reviews

OluwashileAdeniyi

Senior Infrastructure Security Engineer at a outsourcing company with 51-200 employees

Centralized endpoint security has improved and supports hybrid work and BYOD policies

Regarding what I dislike about Microsoft Intune and its downsides, I would say that more Mac controls are needed because we have limited Mac and Linux control. When comparing controls and policies between Windows, Mac, and Linux, Windows has almost everything you can think of, while Mac and Linux have limited types of control. You cannot implement certain things on Mac and Linux that you can on Windows. The limited controls are a major issue. Additionally, if Microsoft could find a way to embed servers into Microsoft Intune, that would be beneficial. Microsoft Intune is not really designed for servers or Windows servers. It is more tailored towards Windows 11 and Windows 10 operating systems. Windows servers are not fully supported. Enterprise organizations usually have both servers and endpoints, which are users' workstations. For servers, most people look for other solutions such as SCCM, which is Configuration Manager. However, SCCM is what Microsoft Intune is trying to replace. Both SCCM and Microsoft Intune belong to Microsoft. Microsoft is trying to transition organizations into Microsoft Intune, the native cloud solution. However, because this update is still in process, servers are not fully compatible with Microsoft Intune and cannot be managed by it. The current policy that has emerged from issues with clients is what they call co-management, which is relatively new, and I do not know if adoption is significant. Many legacy or older customers who have been using these products for decades still have SCCM. When it is time for them to manage their Windows devices, they use what is called cloud attach. Cloud attach is a term whereby your SCCM is connected to your Microsoft Intune. Most people do not know about it, but I have deployed it for several organizations. Cloud attach and co-management work together so that your device is in SCCM, but some policies are pushed from Microsoft Intune. It is like two different solutions working hand in hand. That is what they call co-management. Microsoft Intune does not bring all of your endpoint and security management tools into one place, which is the goal and how it should be. However, as I mentioned, servers are not included. If we talk about end users, Microsoft Intune does bring all your devices together. In a typical enterprise environment, you have end users with workstations, laptops, company-issued phones, and bring your own devices. You can create policies for all of these. However, for the backend, your servers do not have much coverage. Servers are not really covered by Microsoft Intune in that way.

Read full review

TarunKumar11

Global Leadership Council at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Improved industrial asset visibility has transformed risk management and compliance monitoring

I think there are some areas of weaknesses in Claroty Platform. The pricing could improve, as some of the features require licensing tiers and therefore the pricing could be higher. Claroty Platform could benefit from simpler licensing and pricing structures. The executive dashboard can improve as well, and they can expand their third-party integration. Additionally, their predictive AI-driven recommendations can be improved. I think it does provide for very good behavior analysis through AI capabilities and risk prioritization, which is generally quite trustworthy. As the capability of AI enhances, I think it can provide for better risk recommendations. Claroty Platform can have a better and simpler licensing arrangement. Their third-party integrations can expand. They can have better executive dashboards and more AI-driven predictive risk recommendations. I would rate them an eight for these reasons. Dashboards, licensing, integrations, and AI-driven recommendations are areas for improvement. Probably one more to add is that they can have better and more enhanced automated remediation workflows.

Read full review

ErikDas

Owner at Cherub

Easy to deploy, stable, scalable and safe

I previously used TeamViewer. ISL Online is definitely the better choice compared to TeamViewer, as it offers a more secure connection that does not involve peer-to-peer transport, and all data is encrypted. A single license for ISL Online costs about the same as TeamViewer but with multiple licenses, ISL Online is cheaper.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I would say the biggest benefit is the single-pane view. There's no jumping around multiple UI's to do your overall management."

"The policy and compliance monitoring of devices and the software deployment are most valuable."

"These capabilities have made a significant impact in my work, providing a comprehensive view of all devices and features in a single platform."

"The pricing for Microsoft Intune is reasonable and our clients are satisfied."

"The main advantage is that Intune performs its intended functions effectively."

"EAM is a godsend."

"The most valuable feature of Intune is the central dashboard for compliance and policy management."

"Autopilot is the most valuable feature."

More Microsoft Intune pros

"Claroty is very beneficial for learning and adds value to your resume."

"I like how the tool does passive and active discovery and threat detection and shows risks, recommendations, and vulnerabilities. It gives risk scores and gathers everything in one place - IP, device name, etc. We can integrate it with other tools for overall network mapping. It's useful for audits, compliance, and monitoring of all devices in the industry. It provides both monitoring and control. We also have SRA for incident response, which lets us search all alerts if we deploy the Claroty Platform."

"Claroty provides continuous threat protection and identifies pre-empty stuff and false positives."

"The platform ensures security without imposing significant delays."

"I believe the two main aspects where Claroty stands out are their ability to provide a complete platform and their OT-specific focus."

"After implementation of Claroty Platform, the visibility goes up to one hundred percent, which otherwise was probably in the range of 60 to 70 percent, and this really has a lot of business impact on security, compliance, and operations."

"I appreciate the active coding, deep inspection of packages, and data retrieval. The tool covers information about assets and attack vectors, which I find superior to other tools. Based on alerts, I create reports detailing how an attacker can penetrate the plant, both externally and internally."

"The product helps mitigate potential threats, especially if its users have signature rules. The product also provides alerts."

More Claroty Platform pros

"We are just much more responsive, we can be faster, and we can support our customers in a better way because when they have a problem, we can be on their computer immediately."

"I personally really appreciate the file transfer feature as it is really easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is safety."

"The solution has a lot of features. It does what it is made to do and that's all we can ask for, really."

"ISL is a fundamental partner for us since, throughout all these years, it has allowed us to grow and solve the problems of our customers and their users in a very fast and agile way without having to move, even providing service abroad."

"ISL Online is easy to use and it provides a single platform for various challenges we face in IT."

"Overall, we are very pleased with this solution, for us, it simply works 99.9% of the time."

"The code can be delivered in multiple ways, including an email with a link for an unattended connection."

More ISL Online pros

Cons

"Microsoft Intune needs to support out of the box Apple Managed Device and Apple Business Managed Device with zero-touch deployment capabilities, which is something competitors provide."

"There needs to be more support for Mac operating systems."

"Intune lags all of its competitors in terms of report generation."

"We had an APNS certificate set to expire last week. We tried to renew it two days before it expired. We logged in to the APNS portal but could not find that certificate. We didn't know where it went. All the iOS devices stopped working. We contacted the Apple and Microsoft teams, and each blamed the other. This is something that Microsoft should take care of. Last week, we had so many escalations from high-profile users who couldn't access corporate data on their devices."

"Microsoft Intune has a latency response time issue. The latency has room for improvement."

"There are differences in protecting the data on a mobile device and on iOS. When you protect the data on iOS, you protect the entire device."

"However, Autopilot enrollment is not available for Mac devices yet, which would be a great addition if implemented."

"There are a lot of updates happening on Microsoft."

More Microsoft Intune cons

"There are a few protocols that Claroty doesn't currently support."

"The pricing could improve, as some of the features require licensing tiers and therefore the pricing could be higher."

"There is room for improvement in the user interface to make it more vibrant and interactive, similar to IT tools. Improvements could also be made in the Secure Remote Access (SRA) user interaction and graphical representations of recordings."

"The graphical user interface is quite poor."

"There should be AI security solutions implemented."

"I think the only issue is that the hardware Claroty uses is expensive."

"Claroty Platform only gives the vulnerabilities based on the make and model of the devices, so it doesn't provide any resolution or any detailed explanation of how one can resolve such issues."

"Introducing an AI chatbot to assist you when you have doubts could be beneficial."

More Claroty Platform cons

"They need to better advertise the features."

"We miss the possibility to communicate via head-set in ISL. At the moment, we combine ISL for visual communication with Skype for verbal communication."

"They should improve the integrations with other incident management software to be able to send the link directly from these platforms."

"What bothered me the most was that when I connected to the computer at the office, I was afraid that someone would turn on the monitor and watch what I was doing."

"There could be a section in the menu describing the new features and changes."

"If there is an update or new feature on ISL Online, I don't know about it. I would be happy to receive a newsletter or notification of new features or updates."

"Updating the program could be improved. When they're pushing updates, you don't really know that there's an update available."

"I would like to be able to access and manage all brands of smartphones."

More ISL Online cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its price is in the medium range. It is acceptable because you're paying for the features. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"On a scale of one to ten with one being the cheapest, the cost of Microsoft Intune is a five."

"I rate Intune five out of 10 for pricing. It's expensive."

"I am not that aware of the pricing, but as compared to other MDM solutions, Microsoft is providing a lot of things at the organizational level. So, it is quite reasonable as compared to other MDM solutions."

"It is cheap, but as compared to Google, it is costly. Google is cheaper, but quality-wise, Microsoft Intune is better."

"Microsoft Intune is moderately priced. There is a monthly license required to use the solution and it is approximately eight dollars per month."

"The tool is cheaper than our company's other MDM tools."

"If you're subscribing to Premium or E3, there are no additional costs for Intune, it's included."

More Microsoft Intune pricing and cost advice

"The tool is quite expensive."

"The licensing for physical devices is cheap, but the software version is expensive. The software version costs around 26-28 dollars. I was surprised and even double-checked. It was shocking."

"It's a bit expensive compared to other solutions."

"We have a pay-per-use license available for 500 minutes within one year for 95 Euros. However, this option is not popular. Alternatively, we can purchase a one-year license for 339 Euros; if we need two licenses, the cost is double, and for three licenses, the cost is triple with a ten percent discount. For 99 Euros a year, we can open multiple sessions on the same computer with a multi-session subscription."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Remote Access solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Energy/Utilities Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Performing Arts

14%

Comms Service Provider

11%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	192
Midsize Enterprise	62
Large Enterprise	186

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

How does Microsoft Intune compare with VMware Workspace One?

Microsoft Intune is a great tool for managing a mobile device fleet while keeping access control. The solution makes ...

See all answers

What are the pros and cons of Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune is a great configuration management tool and has a lot of good things going for it. Here are some of...

See all answers

How does Google Cloud Identity compare with Microsoft Intune?

Microsoft Intune offers not only an easy-to-deploy data protection and productivity management solution, but also ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Claroty Platform?

I think there are some areas of weaknesses in Claroty Platform. The pricing could improve, as some of the features re...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Claroty Platform?

I think a lack of visibility into industrial assets is the main use case for Claroty Platform. Claroty Platform is a ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Claroty Platform?

Claroty Platform has impacted my organization positively by reducing cyber risk, by making the incident detection fas...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM MaaS360 vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 11% of the time

Jamf Pro vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 10% of the time

Workspace ONE UEM vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

ManageEngine Endpoint Central vs Microsoft Intune

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Intune Competitors

Nozomi Networks vs Claroty Platform

Compared 15% of the time

Armis vs Claroty Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Dragos vs Claroty Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Tenable OT Security vs Claroty Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Honeywell Forge vs Claroty Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More Claroty Platform Competitors

TeamViewer vs ISL Online

Compared 26% of the time

Splashtop Remote Support vs ISL Online

Compared 16% of the time

Citrix DaaS (formerly Citrix Virtual Apps and Desktops service) vs ISL Online

Compared 10% of the time

ScreenConnect vs ISL Online

Compared 9% of the time

More ISL Online Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Intune

July 2026

Download Microsoft Intune product report

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform

August 2026

Download Claroty Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

ISL Online

July 2026

Download ISL Online product report

Also Known As

Intune, MS Intune, Microsoft Endpoint Manager

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Intune is a cloud-based service designed for device management, security, and compliance. It supports automation and facilitates endpoint management for Windows, iOS, and Android devices, ensuring data protection and efficient policy enforcement.

Microsoft Intune offers seamless integration with tools like Windows Autopilot to automate device setup and deployment. Integrated with Azure Active Directory, it enhances policy management while providing robust reporting and analytics tools for compliance tracking. Despite its intuitive interface aimed at simplifying navigation and device security management, there are challenges such as compatibility issues with Linux and Mac, limited policy support for Android, and demands for better third-party integration. It's widely used for both corporate-owned devices and BYOD scenarios in dynamic IT environments.

What are the key features of Microsoft Intune?

Windows Autopilot: Automates device setup for rapid deployment.
Azure Active Directory Integration: Enhances user policy management.
Reporting and Analytics: Improves compliance visibility.
Mobile Application Management: Ensures app security without compromising personal data.
Cloud-Based Management: Allows management from any location.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Time Efficiency: Automation reduces time in policy enforcement and configuration updates.
Enhanced Security: Ensures data protection across corporate-owned and BYOD devices.
Improved Compliance: Advanced reporting tools enhance compliance visibility.
Flexible Management: Cloud-based nature supports management from any location.

In industries such as finance and healthcare, Microsoft Intune is implemented to ensure data protection and compliance with regulatory standards. Manufacturing sectors utilize Intune for managing a distributed workforce across global locations, while educational institutions employ it to secure and manage devices in learning environments supporting both students and faculty.

Microsoft

The Claroty Platform is tailored for monitoring and securing industrial control systems. It offers deep visibility into OT networks, enabling effective anomaly detection and vulnerability assessments. Its user-friendly interface and robust reporting tools facilitate easy management and compliance, enhancing organizational efficiency and cybersecurity posture in industrial environments.

Claroty

ISL Online provides secure, cross-platform remote access and user-friendly features. Its unattended access and robust security options enhance IT operations without needing user interaction, making it ideal for versatile applications.

ISL Online stands out with its comprehensive remote access capabilities, facilitating controlled, secure connections across numerous platforms. Its ease of setup and stability make it a trusted option for diverse customers, enabling organized computer management and efficient customer support. Cloud and on-premise hosting flexibility underlines its adaptability in varied environments. The platform's strong unattended access mechanisms, seamless file transfer capabilities, and intuitive utilities such as drawing tools ensure efficient remote sessions. Strong encryption and generated security codes underscore its commitment to maintaining high security standards.

What are the key features of ISL Online?

Secure Remote Access: Allows control without user interaction.
Platform Versatility: Compatible with multiple systems.
Unattended Access: Enables efficient access when users are absent.
File Transfer: Provides seamless data exchange.
Intuitive Drawing Tools: Facilitates communication and collaboration.
Categorized Computer Management: Enhances IT efficiency.

What benefits can be expected when evaluating ISL Online?

High Security: Offers reliable encryption and code generation.
Stability: Users report robust performance during sessions.
Ease of Setup: Quick and straightforward configuration.
Cloud and On-Premise Flexibility: Supports different deployment models.
Efficient Customer Support: Improved response times and issue resolution.

ISL Online is widely used for remote technical support and customer assistance, enabling IT firms and managed service providers to remotely manage client devices and troubleshoot server issues. Government offices and broadcasting entities rely on it for secure access to unattended servers. ERP system providers benefit from its problem-solving and seamless file transfer capabilities, while cross-platform compatibility supports integration into unique IT environments, enhancing client interactions.

ISL Online

Sample Customers

Mitchells and Buzzers, Callaway

Rockwell Automation

Mitsubishi Chemicals, Konica Minolta, Raifeissen bank, Terpel, Singtel, Teleroute, SOS Kinderdorf, Arsys, EMAAR, Dutco, Alterdata

Buyer's Guide

Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online

June 2026

Free Report: Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online

Find out what your peers are saying about Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Claroty Platform vs. ISL Online report.

See our list of best Remote Access vendors.

We monitor all Remote Access reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.