No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

GoToMeeting vs Webex comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

GoToMeeting
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
26
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Webex
Ranking in Virtual Meetings
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.3
Number of Reviews
131
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Virtual Meetings category, the mindshare of GoToMeeting is 3.2%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Webex is 5.0%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Virtual Meetings Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Webex5.0%
GoToMeeting3.2%
Other91.8%
Virtual Meetings
 

Featured Reviews

Gavin Tomlins - PeerSpot reviewer
Chief Information Officer at a pharma/biotech company with 11-50 employees
Clunky with poor interface, lacks sufficient functionalities; it did reduce need for in-person meetings
We're phasing out the use of GoToMeeting because of some of its deficiencies. It lacks ease of connectivity, calendar integrations, and third-party app integrations. The user interface is quite poor and needs to be reworked and the product is quite clunky in comparison to its competitors. It currently lacks the ability for sharing collaborative materials during a meeting. We also found that the ability to switch between audio and video configurations isn't as intuitive as in other applications. I generally do 20-30 hours of video conferencing a day, so it makes a difference to have these features. It doesn't integrate as easily into phone systems as well as other organizations and it doesn't integrate as easy into instant messaging and collaboration tools or into software solutions. In general, some of the functionalities need to be improved.
DO
Web Designer / Developer & Creative Professional at Federal University of Technology Akure
Virtual training has supported collaborative learning and now needs a simpler and clearer interface
Webex can be simplified in terms of user interface, where many features should be displayed in a compact view, with similar features grouped together and a minimalistic design helping users understand what each button does. If specific features are not needed, they should not distract you, and some features should appear as sliding elements for ease of access. Additionally, connecting to Webex can be technical, and it would be beneficial to have a way to connect anonymously using a simple code instead of going through microphone issues.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"With GoToMeeting, I like that it works well for seminars and similar events. Finding a platform where multiple people can share their images, split the screen with content, and manage presentations smoothly is uncommon. It allows the presenter to handle questions, answers, and other opinions."
"The most valuable feature is the dial-in capability."
"Overall, this solution is very good, with only the management and pricing in need of improvement."
"GoToMeeting took a very short time to install and it worked without a hitch."
"Ease of setup and login by attendees. Facilitates sharing visually, and not just via audio."
"I like GoToMeeting because it is lighter than other solutions, such as Webex."
"GoToMeeting's low latency is crucial because everybody is using VPN to connect to their PCs at work. The sound and video quality are solid, and the whiteboarding features were especially useful. The administrative side of it was fairly simple and intuitive to use."
"It's easy to set up."
"The product is very easy to use, it's user-friendly, and the overall simplicity of the solution is great."
"The solution has many features, for example, it has more features than Zoom, which we also use, and you can configure whatever you want in great detail, making it very flexible and allowing the solution to scale well."
"WebEx allows both host and participants to engage in an online class, conference, training session, or support case with ease."
"Doing presentations on the solution is very good. There isn't much they could do to improve this aspect. It's excellent."
"I enjoy being able to make video calls."
"The tool alerts us when there are issues with our Kubernetes environment, such as excessive container usage. This allows our operations team to quickly identify and address these issues, reducing the time it takes to resolve them."
"What I value most about Webex is its stability compared to other solutions."
"The solution is very stable; we have no complaints, I haven't had to deal with bugs or glitches, there haven't been crashes, it doesn't freeze, and I consider it to be a reliable service."
 

Cons

"It is not so stable. They're trying to bring in too many things and make it look really complex."
"GoToMeeting is too slow, which is why we no longer use it."
"The solution must include archive options to save the recorded meetings for future reference. The recording functionality can benefit our team by improving how meetings are recorded and shared. Previously, only admins could record meetings, sometimes leading to issues if recordings were missed or not shared properly. The recent update now allows hosting GoToMeeting sessions with the ability to delegate recording rights to other team members."
"The tool needs to have a virtual room where users can pass through. It also needs to integrate a real-time translator."
"Poor error recovery, too sensitive to transmission errors. Needs better codecs and more robust system software that can handle network glitches."
"The solution could always be more secure."
"I didn't like the fact that they tried to make their new version look like Zoom."
"In addition to the features it already has, I think GoToMeeting should also have additional features that are not present at the moment."
"CWMS on-premises solution does not integrate either with CMR nor with Jabber as of yet."
"The solution should come as a big client for the system. It should be able to be used just like chat software when necessary, similar to instant messaging."
"I was in a meeting on the free version where there were no controls. You couldn't mute somebody or put it in dedicated speaker mode. It was an important meeting, and because of the lack of an ability to control who the speakers were, we got a version of a heckler. Well, it wasn't really a heckler per se. It was just somebody who thinks they know everything."
"The pricing could be improved."
"The price of the solution could be slightly reduced."
"Nowadays, it is hard to set up meetings using Webex since it has become a complicated process."
"The only reason why we could not stay with Webex was because they didn't have a data center in the African region."
"We no longer use Webex because we found Microsoft Teams to be more stable."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"GoToMeeting is a little bit expensive compared to other products."
"It is a little expensive although now, with the competition from Zoom and other products, they have lowered their prices and it is better."
"Negotiate for discounts."
"I am using the free version of Webex."
"There is an annual license required for this solution."
"The charges attached to the subscriptions of the product are okay. There are no extra charges to be paid in addition to the standard licensing fees."
"I use the solution for free because I don't use the solution's enterprise version."
"We purchase the product's yearly license. It is expensive."
"This is an expensive product compared to Teams and it should be cheaper."
"My organization took care of the licensing. I'm guessing they did some subscription cycle, but I used the free version."
"I believe the license to be monthly."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Virtual Meetings solutions are best for your needs.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Construction Company
11%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Outsourcing Company
13%
Construction Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise25
Large Enterprise72
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Webex?
My experience with Webex pricing, setup, and licensing has generally been positive. Since Webex is offered as a cloud-based service, deployment and onboarding were relatively straightforward compar...
What needs improvement with Webex?
I would appreciate clearer controls for switching between shared applications during a presentation, with a more prominent indication of exactly what participants can see. I would also appreciate h...
What is your primary use case for Webex?
My main use case for Webex is for conference calls, workshops, and team meetings. I use Webex for communication and collaboration at work, valuing the ability to discuss technical topics directly w...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
Cisco Spark
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AAPT, ACD Groupe, Addison Fire, Avigilon Corporation, Basic Industries Ltd., Bitdefender, Branson School Online, Budd Van Lines, Business Fitness, Business Wire
Seagate Technology, Kohn Pedersen Fox, World Vision International, Glen Raven, University of Notre Dame, CEV Multimedia, The Food Group, LUMEDX, California Baptist University, and Georgetown University Law Center.
Find out what your peers are saying about GoToMeeting vs. Webex and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.
920,939 professionals have used our research since 2012.