Hyland OnBase vs Pillir comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hyland and Pillir are both solutions in the Low-Code Development Platforms category. Hyland is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0, while Pillir is ranked #33. Hyland holds a 1.6% mindshare in LCDP, compared to Pillir’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Hyland users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Pillir users who would recommend it.

Hyland OnBase

Read 19 Hyland OnBase reviews

9,278 Views
2,505 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Pillir

Read 2 Pillir reviews

1,903 Views
1,579 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Hyland OnBase

Pillir

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 18, 2024

Hyland OnBase and Pillir compete in enterprise content management and application development platforms. Pillir seems to have the upper hand due to its modernization capabilities and rapid deployment.

Features: Hyland OnBase offers robust document management, workflow automation, and case management tools. It is also known for its integration capabilities and comprehensive solution suite. Pillir focuses on modernizing legacy systems, features a low-code environment for rapid application development, and excels in providing modernization tools.

Room for Improvement: Hyland OnBase has a steeper learning curve and requires more technical expertise for customization. It could benefit from improved usability. Pillir needs to enhance its support resources and address performance issues during peak times. Additionally, it should focus on refining its technical support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Hyland OnBase has extensive deployment options but often needs significant time and resources for full implementation. Customer service receives mixed reviews, with some delays in support. Pillir has quick deployment times and an efficient onboarding process. Its customer support is generally responsive, though there are occasional lapses.

Pricing and ROI: Hyland OnBase has higher upfront setup costs, but offers long-term value translating into a positive ROI. Pillir has lower initial costs and faster deployment, providing a more immediate ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Hyland OnBase

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (13th), Enterprise Content Management (5th)

Pillir

Ranking in Low-Code Development Platforms

33rd

Average Rating

10.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Rapid Application Development Software (36th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Low-Code Development Platforms category, the mindshare of Hyland OnBase is 1.6%, down from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Pillir is 1.3%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Low-Code Development Platforms Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Hyland OnBase	1.6%
Pillir	1.3%
Other	97.1%

Low-Code Development Platforms

Featured Reviews

Joao Santiago

Analista at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Digital workflows have transformed meeting minutes and document tracking across departments

There are some particular aspects of Hyland OnBase, such as layouts or some modules that have just been built, that are not designed with the end user in mind. That's something they need to improve. However, even if it's not adequate for the end user, you can still take that and, with custom development, use those modules and APIs in a user-friendly way. They need to improve the interface and usability of Unity and think more about usability. In terms of tool usability, sometimes there are too many clicks to perform an action, which, if you developed it yourself, you could do in two clicks, whereas within Unity you need four or five clicks to do the same process.

Read full review

it_user130401

Application Developer Manager at a tech company with 10,001+ employees

Helpful dashboard, supports offline capabilities for SAP, professional support, and a simple pricing model

I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment. We have people going through all of their shifts without connectivity, yet it automatically later synchronizes well with SAP, without creating extra documents or anything like that. The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us. I love how easy it is to manage the design of the process using drag and drop. I know they are working to make the developer experience even better, and I'm very excited about it. The modernizer element that converts existing ABAP business logic to the cloud-native mobile-friendly solution is a very powerful tool that I haven't seen in the market.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use as long as you know what your business requirement are or the specifications are straightforward."

"The retention module is one of the most valuable features. Whatever we scan onto the system can be identified and we are notified when the records are due to be disposed."

"Hyland OnBase is a powerful enterprise management platform that is scalable, flexible, and secure in storing, retrieving, and making workflow automations."

"The product's initial setup phase is not difficult."

"Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) allowed us to enforce strict data privacy requirements like LGPD by ensuring users could only access authorized records based on their role, while making user onboarding and permission management much faster and more reliable."

"I like the flexibility and its modular nature that allows us to create solutions that meet our business needs."

"The AI integration in recent releases of Hyland OnBase allows for better analysis and is a standout feature."

"Hyland OnBase is valued for its security, especially for those in the finance domain who require data confidentiality."

More Hyland OnBase pros

"Since you only pay for active users, and since it gives you an immediate improvement in efficiencies, the ROI is very quick."

"The ability to take ABAP code and automatically convert it to a mobile app and then adjust it to our needs is something that I haven't seen in any other low-code solution on the market, and it has been life-changing for us."

"I love how they took the MIT Scratch concept and implemented it into the in-app backend. It makes the app creation so much more intuitive and easy to use."

"I believe that this is the only product in the market that truly supports offline capabilities in an SAP environment."

Cons

"Hyland OnBase can be improved because Report Services is an additional license and should be included with the base product."

"The look and feel could be better. The integration with the user could be better. It could also be more user-friendly."

"The dashboards do have some room for improvement as compared to the other vendors which are there in the market."

"As the system grows in terms of number of modules, features, and functionality, options can be confusing and they can conflict with other options that you enable."

"We need to troubleshoot why our reports didn't get downloaded in a day. There is a workflow feature which powerful but also complicated."

"The application could potentially be more open-source, allowing integration with more solutions."

"An area for improvement would be the training - getting our people up to speed on how to use it required more training than we expected due to the complexity of the solution."

"Hyland OnBase could be improved in terms of service support response time."

More Hyland OnBase cons

"The modernizer element should convert a higher percentage of the ABAP code, moving it from approximately 75%, closer to 100%."

"While we're not in a place of letting LOB analysts build apps, at some point, we may want to give them a bit more freedom - as long as we can limit their ability to harm the ERP data. I would like to see more tools pertaining to this area."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"They can do better in terms of the pricing model. It is a really expensive tool in Latin America. They should have different prices for different regions."

"The tool's price is high."

"There are a number of different types of licenses. There are concurrent licenses, individual licenses and imaging licenses."

"The solution costs around $6,000 per month."

"OnBase is reasonably priced."

"It is straightforward consumption based on the number of end-users."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Low-Code Development Platforms solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	16

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Hyland OnBase?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it is very cost-effective and affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Hyland OnBase?

More training videos, if they are more findable, would improve documentation and training documentations from Hyland's side, because there is a lack of documentation and training materials from Hyl...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Hyland OnBase?

As a business analyst, while working on a recent project, I used Hyland OnBase as an enterprise-like document management tool. It was used for storing, organizing, and retrieving invoices regarding...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SharePoint vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

IBM FileNet vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 5% of the time

Alfresco vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 4% of the time

OpenText Documentum Content Management vs Hyland OnBase

Compared 3% of the time

More Hyland OnBase Competitors

Mendix vs Pillir

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Power Apps vs Pillir

Compared 11% of the time

Salesforce Platform vs Pillir

Compared 6% of the time

Adobe ColdFusion vs Pillir

Compared 5% of the time

QuickBase vs Pillir

Compared 4% of the time

More Pillir Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase

October 2026

Download Hyland OnBase product report

Buyer's Guide

Rapid Application Development Software

October 2026

Download Pillir product report

Also Known As

OnBase

appsFreedom

Overview

Hyland OnBase is acclaimed for its robust document management, automating workflows, and improving organizational efficiency across various industries. Praised for its ability to manage records compliantly, especially in regulated sectors like healthcare and finance, the tool also integrates smoothly with other enterprise systems. Users benefit significantly from streamlined processes, reduced manual tasks, and enhanced data accuracy, boosting productivity and customer satisfaction.

Hyland

Pillir is a platform offering rapid application development for enterprises looking to modernize their processes. With its low-code capabilities, Pillir is designed to optimize operational efficiency and accelerate digital transformation efforts.

Pillir enables organizations to convert legacy systems into modern, cloud-ready applications without extensive coding. It supports innovative application development, allowing businesses to tackle complex workflows seamlessly. By integrating with major ERP systems, Pillir streamlines process optimization efforts, facilitating easier management and deployment of solutions tailored to industry-specific requirements.

What are the valuable features of Pillir?

Low-Code Environment: Accelerates app development with minimal coding.
Cloud-Native Capability: Offers robust scalability and flexibility.
Seamless Integration: Easily connects with ERP systems for streamlined workflows.

What benefits or ROI can users expect from Pillir?

Reduced Development Time: Speeds up project timelines significantly.
Lower Costs: Minimizes the need for extensive programming resources.
Enhanced Flexibility: Supports quick adjustments to business changes.

Pillir's impact is significant in industries like manufacturing and logistics, where it enables swift adaptation to evolving market demands through effortless modernization of existing systems, aligning technology upgrades with strategic goals.

Pillir

Sample Customers

Honda France Industries, Hill County Texas, Hylant Group, ING Lease France, State of South Carolina, Syracuse University, Swindon College, Rhode Island Department of Human Services, Rochester Institute of Technology, Moen, Odense University Hospital

Dole packaed food, Par Pacific, Brown Forman (Jack Daniels and other brands), Mobile Mini, Nabors

Buyer's Guide

Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

September 2026

Free Report: Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir

Find out what your peers are saying about Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Hyland OnBase vs. Pillir report.

See our list of best Low-Code Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Low-Code Development Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.