IceWarp vs Microsoft Exchange Online comparison

"IceWarp has multiple applications that are easy to use for many people."

"An effective, functional, very good tool for controlling resources."

"The most valuable feature of IceWarp is the chat rooms and file-sharing, they are useful. It is convenient that everything is in one place. You can easily share and collaborate documents, making the program's unity a significant advantage."

"The solution is easy to manage and includes features such as smart documents and the archiving of user data."

"The solution has a very good log-in to the UI when compared to other solutions."

"The groupware module is the most valuable feature."

"The TeamChat feature has been really good for our email management. It lets us collaborate, share files, and invite guests like Google Spaces or Microsoft Teams. I like the two-factor authentication for security. However, they need to improve their document collaboration tools, as their Word, Excel, and PowerPoint features are basic compared to Microsoft and Google."

"The solution's voice services work well for our company."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is its integration with Microsoft Outlook and Microsoft Teams for shared calendars."

"The data prevention and protection feature is good."

"The product enables us to have remote meetings."

"Exchange Online's performance and stability are very good."

"It has helped us because we don't have to worry about servers crashing."

"It is for emails, and it seems to work okay."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is very simple and easy to use."

"Its most valuable feature is the unlimited storage. It also has very little downtime."

"The solution needs improvements in security, particularly regarding document management."

"I would like to have a trial for mobile applications and more documentation similar to Google Drive with mobile applications."

"The solution has traditional SSL integration, SAML, and Federation Services. In its latest version, it added SAML integration. However, it needs to work on API integration, especially for dashboards or integration with SAP for log and data system management. It doesn't yet have the kind of API that Google and Microsoft provide for synchronizing users with Active Directory."

"With multiple databases for VOIP, chat and web IMAP, maintenance is cumbersome."

"Although the documentation is extensive and in depth, you must familiarize yourself with it before taking full advantage of the product."

"The tool's configuration capabilities are not straightforward. Apart from that, if I want to archive emails into a vault so that they can be retrieved again later, the integration doesn't work, and IceWarp crashes."

"It is difficult to disable user rights on the console so some users accidentally delete their documents or user details."

"The solution should improve the mailing list feature. Google has a similar feature where you can automate sending files to different people in a sequence, but that feature is no longer available in the current version of IceWarp. Other features may also have been removed in the current version."

"Using this solution is initially quite complicated."

"There is room for improvement in terms of optimization."

"The problem with Exchange is that the attributes aren't flexible enough. I'd like to see more interaction with Office 365 and tighter integration between on-prem Exchange and Exchange Online. There's still a disconnect between mailboxes and the cloud."

"The price could be cheaper."

"What I don't like about Microsoft Exchange Online is too much integration because now it has many services connected to it. In the beginning, it was just email, and now it's also Teams and Visio, and many other services which I don't like. Microsoft Exchange Online should focus on one service. The product now lost focus, and this is its area for improvement. I would also like more freedom in choosing to use just one service, for example, just Microsoft Exchange Online, which means I don't need Teams or any other Microsoft product or service there. Right now, all services are either in the Microsoft Office suite, or there are more products or services integrated with Microsoft Exchange Online, and I'd like to just focus on one."

"The solution must provide better security features."

"It should integrate better with social media formats."

"We'd like to have the ability to recall emails on the web. I'm not sure if that is available yet."

"The solution is inexpensive which is its main benefit."

"Price-wise, it's a cheaper solution, without a doubt. Price is the reason we are still using the tool."

"Pricing and licensing is very competitive and in some cases, cheap."

"Our licensing is on a yearly basis. There were no additional costs."

"The solution is priced well."

"It is definitely one of the lowest price solutions."

"Costs far less than other solutions."

"I don't see any challenges for the Indian market. For example, 1 GB is available for around 399 INR, and 2 GB for 499 INR. They offer a range of plans, from basic to professional and enterprise, with multiple features. IceWarp's aggressive pricing is competitive compared to other market solutions like Zoho and Microsoft. One significant advantage is that IceWarp does not impose user capping like Google and Microsoft, which allows for substantial cost savings and flexibility in user conversion."

"I am using Office 365 and Microsoft Exchange Online comes as the package. It cost approximately $13 per month."

"The price of the license depends on a lot of factors, such as the number of licenses and company specifics."

"We pay per user per year for the cluster with over a thousand users."

"This is an expensive solution."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution."

"The licensing cost increased at least 15 to 20 percent recently and it would be helpful for them to be reduced."

"Microsoft Exchange Online is too expensive."

"We have yearly licensing costs."