Nintex Process Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

iGrafx and Nintex are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. iGrafx is ranked #32, while Nintex is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.3. iGrafx holds a 1.2% mindshare in BPM, compared to Nintex’s 1.8% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 88% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

3,411 Views
2,319 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 25 Nintex Process Platform reviews

6,699 Views
4,086 Comparison Views

88% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and iGrafx Process360 Live Platform compete in the process management solutions space. Nintex leads in customer support and pricing satisfaction, while iGrafx boasts a superior feature set that justifies its higher costs.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers effective workflow automation and document generation, seamless Microsoft platform integration, and simple user interfaces. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides robust process modeling, simulation capabilities, and advanced business process analysis, along with integration of KPIs and process optimization.

Room for Improvement: Nintex could enhance scalability, expand advanced analytics capabilities, and provide more comprehensive documentation resources. iGrafx may focus on simplifying deployment processes, offering more flexible pricing options, and improving its user interface for novices.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex features an intuitive deployment experience and responsive customer service, making integration straightforward for Microsoft users. iGrafx, while offering complex deployment due to advanced features, ensures effective guidance and support during installation.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex offers flexible pricing with strong ROI for Microsoft-dependent organizations through lower setup costs and fast deployment. iGrafx requires higher initial investment but its extensive features can yield significant ROI over time, especially for advanced process analysis needs.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

32nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (19th), Process Mining (17th)

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (18th), Workload Automation (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.8%, down from 2.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Nintex Process Platform	1.8%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	1.2%
Other	97.0%

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Hafiz Muhammad Usama

Manager Mobility & Digitalization at Fatima group

Have experienced challenges integrating with other systems but have benefited from improved process automation

There are multiple areas that need improvement. Nintex Process Platform needs integration with other platforms such as Salesforce and other CRM platforms. There should be actions available so we can directly integrate with these systems. Additionally, there is a gap in mathematical actions and logical actions. We need to parse data, and if we receive data in JSON, there is no action available in Nintex Process Platform to parse the data and extract data from that JSON string. Such actions and logical actions must be available in Nintex Process Platform to increase its capability. For us, Nintex Process Platform is configurable with SQL Server, but there is no configuration option available with Oracle. We also use Oracle in multiple processes, but we have found no way to directly configure Nintex Process Platform with Oracle. We have to use SQL Server in between. We have to create a link server within SQL Server as a bypass to retrieve or post data into Oracle. There were multiple improvement points available.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."

"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."

"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."

"Web diagramming and RACI have helped expedite the process, capture, and ownership initiatives of our organization."

"The solution is very stable."

"The solution's most beneficial feature is the 360 approach, where documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities are in one solution."

"It's a great product, but all the functionalities need to be exploited in order to get the full value of the investment."

"Another good feature is that the numbering of the shapes in iGrafx is much easier and more convenient, in comparison to what is found in Visio. So far I haven't found anything similar to what I have with iGrafx, in that regard."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

"Valuable features include workflows (escalation, reminder, LazyApproval, actions, etc.) and ease of use."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."

"Out of box connectivity with UiPath."

"From what was a 20 to 30-day approval cycle, it has now come down to between two and three days for approving loans and claims."

"Provides the ability to automate SharePoint processes (building sites, lists, updating content). You can also automate document and content processes, onboarding and offboarding, and general IT and HR solutions."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

"It's easy to configure your set of rules to make the form controls work perfectly, removing manual work and making processes seamless."

"In some instances, workflows I’ve built for customers have transformed the business, saving significant time and costs compared to manual, legacy processes."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"This is a tool that covers the low end (e.g. Visio) to high end (e.g. Aris), although it's much less user friendly."

"It can be more user-friendly."

"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."

"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."

"One of the areas in the product with certain shortcomings where improvements are required includes the tool's reporting capabilities."

"Visio is more user-friendly."

"If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right."

"I would like to see a lower price, although when used correctly, you can have a good return on your investment."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

"There have been some glitches, and the workflow fails frequently."

"The tool lacks to offer support for the Arabic language, and it needs consideration."

"I have used Pega and I feel that it offers more than the K2 solution, in terms of the latest technology."

"Nintex is still at the starting point of integrating with AI. It has integrated with a very small piece of artificial intelligence., like only integrated with the Google Cloud. There is a benefit, like a no-code and low-code solution. But, again, if you are a developer, especially if you are a hardcore developer, you are using your code knowledge, its skills, and all. And, suddenly, you are moving into the low-code solution, and then you will feel, like, so many things you can't achieve with the low-code solution."

"The product’s support for the mobile platform and its ability to handle artificial loads could be better."

"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."

"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."

"The license pricing is too high currently for Nintex Workflow."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"The initial investment in K2 is heavy. Currently, the expenditure is $28,000 for a year. After we go to the cloud, it is going to be per seat and probably cheaper. Currently, there are unlimited users."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Nintex products are expensive, but valuable. Licensing in on-premise was historically based on a perpetual model, where you’d license per Web front-end. However, they are switching exclusively to a consumption (subscription) model, where you purchase the number of workflows you think you’ll use in your environment, and can scale up from there."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"The product’s price is competitive compared to other vendors."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Construction Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	26

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?

I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iGrafx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iGrafx?

The solution is used for the documentation and visualization of the main processes. The customers have hundreds or thousands of processes, but they start with the top 20 processes. The next step is...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for K2?

Our organization is a fertilizer company where we develop workflows regarding processes occurring at the plant. Most of them are safety projects, and a few other projects include off-boarding proje...

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 5% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

IBM BPM vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

WorkflowGen vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 4% of the time

AWS Step Functions vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

KiSSFLOW vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 3% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

July 2026

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform integrates IDEF0, supports Lean Six Sigma, and offers comprehensive process modeling, making it a versatile choice for industry-specific needs including risk assessment and enterprise object usage.

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is known for its capabilities in streamlining workflows, process mining, and scenario simulation. While it simplifies the complexities of BPMN, and provides powerful tools for workflow plotting, documentation, and simulation, it faces challenges in ease of linking with new ERP systems, web modeling complexity, and costs. The platform offers predefined templates for easy process creation, yet it lacks depth in reporting tools and has limited multi-language support which could be improved for broader usability.

What are the key features of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

IDEF0 Integration: Simplifies process analysis using structured graphical representation.
Lean Six Sigma Support: Enhances efficiency and quality management through integration with Six Sigma methodologies.
Process Simulation: Enables scenario testing to optimize workflows.
BPMN Capabilities: Provides tools for clear representation of business workflows.
KPI Integration: Monitors key performance indicators for continuous improvement.
Collaboration Features: Facilitates teamwork and collaboration during process development.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating iGrafx Process360 Live Platform?

Streamlined Workflows: Efficiently manages and optimizes business processes.
Robust Analysis: Offers deep insights into process performance for decision-making.
Process Mining: Identifies inefficiencies and potential improvements within workflows.
Versatile Application: Suitable for industries like banking and service modeling.

Many industries utilize iGrafx Process360 Live Platform for business process modeling, analysis, and management. It is extensively applied in banking for risk assessment, utilizing its BPM capabilities to adhere to ISO 9000 standards. Service-oriented companies use its process design and repository functions for effective process mining and management, making it a valuable tool in managing complex organizational structures.

iGrafx

Nintex Process Platform offers no/low-code development with system integrations and efficient workflow management, ideal for complex business processes. It's known for its scalable workflows, data management through SmartObjects, and a user-friendly visual designer.

Nintex Process Platform enables organizations to automate processes with ease, supporting electronic forms, digital transformation, and seamless department collaboration. Users on SharePoint and other integrated systems leverage its extensive workflow capabilities for approvals, onboarding, and information capture. While its current framework might benefit from performance enhancements and improved management console usability, it remains a strong choice for providing scalable solutions across industries.

What are the key features of Nintex Process Platform?

No/Low-Code Development: Enables users to develop applications without extensive coding knowledge, simplifying process creation.
System Integration: Offers seamless integration with systems like SharePoint and SAP, enhancing operational efficiency.
Workflow Capability: Facilitates the creation of sophisticated workflows suitable for complex processes.
SmartObjects: Centralizes data management, ensuring streamlined data access and usability.
Visual Designer: Simplifies the design and execution of business processes with an intuitive interface.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Increased Efficiency: Rapid deployment minimizes downtime and accelerates process automation.
Cost Savings: Reduces time spent on manual processes, improving operational costs.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines communication and coordination across departments, leading to better teamwork.
Time Savings: Speeds up routine tasks like approvals and onboarding, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.

Companies in sectors like government, HR, and financial services implement Nintex Process Platform for its ability to streamline and connect internal processes. It supports approval workflows, notifications, and data capturing, proving its versatility for diverse business needs. However, challenges with document conversion, performance, and cloud feature parity suggest room for enhancements, particularly in industries handling complex workflows.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

August 2026

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.