SAP Signavio Process Manager vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform comparison

iGrafx and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. iGrafx is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while SAP is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. iGrafx holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 8.4% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of iGrafx users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of SAP users who would recommend it.

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Read 17 iGrafx Process360 Live Platform reviews

1,583 Views
871 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 62 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

10,990 Views
4,726 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and SAP Signavio Process Manager are key players in process management solutions, with SAP Signavio Process Manager leading due to its extensive feature offerings.

Features: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform impresses with strong process modeling, robust simulation, and seamless application integration, focusing on process optimization analytics. SAP Signavio Process Manager offers collaborative process mapping, advanced analytics, and extensive third-party application integration, appealing to organizations seeking comprehensive process management.

Room for Improvement: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform could improve by enhancing its user interface, expanding its mobile compatibility, and integrating more real-time collaboration features. SAP Signavio Process Manager might benefit from better customization options, more intuitive user navigation, and expanding its range of supported languages to improve global usability.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform provides a straightforward deployment process with responsive customer service, aiding efficient system integration and user training. SAP Signavio Process Manager utilizes cloud-based deployment with dedicated support, offering structured guidance throughout implementation, ensuring a smooth transition for businesses.

Pricing and ROI: iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is cost-effective, offering quick ROI due to lower initial setup costs. SAP Signavio Process Manager requires a higher initial investment but promises substantial long-term ROI through in-depth analytical features, catering to enterprises focused on technological advancements.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

iGrafx Process360 Live Plat...

Ranking in Business Process Design

19th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

21st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Mining (9th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

4th

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

6th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is 2.0%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.4%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SAP Signavio Process Manager	8.4%
iGrafx Process360 Live Platform	2.0%
Other	89.6%

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Martin Rohde

Solution Consultant at a healthcare company with 51-200 employees

Provides documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities

If customers want to change the color or the logo, they have to go through every page to verify everything is right. We have a strategic approach for the customer. I was involved in almost 100 sessions where the customers were looking for a one-time process visualization or one-time process mining, not for a long-term association with this tool. The customer's requirements are more tactical than strategic. We had some challenges during this time frame as I was with iGrafx, and electricity costs rose in Germany. One customer stopped a large deal because they had to reduce every non-invested investment due to the electricity bill rising by 500% to 800%.

Read full review

Eury Reyes P

Analista sr. de procesos de transformación digital at a consumer goods company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Reveals real bottlenecks, but pricing and usability need work still require improvement.

SAP Signavio Process Manager could be improved in several areas to make it more competitive and accessible. From my experience, the strongest opportunity lies in enhancing its process mining capabilities. While Signavio offers solid functionality, other tools like Celonis provide deeper insights and more seamless integrations, especially when working with large datasets or complex execution paths. Strengthening the integration layer and expanding native process mining features would significantly elevate the platform. Another area for improvement is pricing. The solution tends to be positioned at a premium level, which can limit adoption compared to other tools that offer similar or stronger capabilities at a more accessible cost. A more flexible or tiered pricing model would make the product more appealing to a broader range of organizations. Regarding usability, while the platform is powerful, it can feel advanced for users who do not have a process engineering background. Improving the user interface and offering more intuitive guidance for non-technical stakeholders would help increase engagement and ease of use across teams. In terms of support, the setup experience is manageable, especially with technical assistance, but there is room for SAP to provide more consistent and accessible support to ensure a smoother learning curve for new users. Overall, enhancements in process mining depth, integration capabilities, pricing flexibility, and user-friendliness would make SAP Signavio Process Manager a more compelling and widely adoptable solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is very stable."

"The solution's most beneficial feature is the 360 approach, where documentation, process mining, simulation, and automation capabilities are in one solution."

"The solution's technical support is of good quality since they offer fast and seamless services."

"We found the technical support to be helpful."

"This product fulfills ninety percent of our needs, and we're happy as users of it."

"iGrafx gives you the capability of documenting your process and then the ability to use it as a tool for analysis to identify the loopholes and shortcomings of your process."

"Finding the right symbol and creating links, horizontal and vertical are the features I use."

"Simulation is most valuable."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform pros

"The collaboration function in the project views is valuable because people can comment on the processes and we can respond."

"The most valuable feature is that you can customize it completely with all of the attributes that you need."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the portal for spreading it over the organization, the usability, and the workflow generator in the background."

"The Collaboration Hub is especially useful for collaborative tasks and ensuring transparency across teams."

"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."

"It is a stable solution."

"It is a scalable solution."

"It is a very scalable solution."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"It would be nice to have a Spanish user interface available to us."

"I would love to see a template and shapes for customer journey mapping."

"It can be more user-friendly."

"The solution could benefit from improvements to its interface. More specifically, when compared to other tools, the process modeling features lack symbols or object types that are used to represent the information or data within the process."

"It would be helpful to be able to do more analytics and generate reports on historical documents that have already been uploaded to the server."

"In the next release, I would like to see more layers like three, four, and five. It might be possible but I haven't seen it yet."

"The look and feel, along with the ease of use of the solution's web modeling version, is an area with certain shortcomings."

"One of the areas in the product with certain shortcomings where improvements are required includes the tool's reporting capabilities."

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform cons

"After SAP acquired Signavio, the prices increased significantly, making it too expensive for our small company to afford."

"There is room for improvement in the reporting function. At the moment, for example, while it is possible to report on how many users you had in the last month, you can't use it to tell you how many users you had from the first week to the second week. This is really a drawback because when you have an activity to promote Signavio or BPI, it would be good to be able to measure how many people you had in the system."

"There is a need for more varied access packages. The access packages that I have used are not cheap enough. They also provide a complete set of tools that are not always used. Sometimes, you need more segregated things, e.g., Signavio includes functionality for a company that has not yet matured. Since there are no basic packages, the company must pay for a package that is not fully used. Typically, process management is started in a company of a certain maturity."

"Typically, a business process management suite would cover the whole lifecycle, from discovery to optimization and operations. This is running on the process server and providing some kind of low-code environment for developing business solutions. I think the latter part is missing, where SAP Connector comes in. Specifically, the execution of processes is missing, where you would design forms to take orders. This is typically part of some development environment for the process server to run processes from out of the models."

"The free trial needs to have more options for end users, such as including Process Intelligence as a trial version."

"I would like to have the option to select the color of items and subgroups in the glossary because right now it is fixed."

"I think the price of SAP Signavio Process Manager is a little bit high. Although it is an SAP solution, the price is the most notable issue I found, as other options have better prices for their solutions."

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive."

"The licensing part is one of the problems. Its licensing depends on the number of users, so it sometimes gets expensive."

"Our license is a subscription-based model that is per user. The solution is not expensive, I believe a subscription-based model is $10 per user."

"Earlier, the licensing part was complex because there were so many modules and elements in the tool. Over the last one and a half years, a lot of work has gone into how the product has priced and positioned its tools in the market."

"My company is trying to replace iGrafx because the license is a little bit expensive."

"Comparatively, it is a bit costly when you look at similar tools with similar features."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"The product is expensive."

"The solution is quite expensive compared to other vendors."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

"SAP Signavio charges a lot of money."

"I rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	7
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	7

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	44

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for iGrafx?

I have heard that the solution's pricing is very competitive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with iGrafx?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for iGrafx?

The solution is used for the documentation and visualization of the main processes. The customers have hundreds or thousands of processes, but they start with the top 20 processes. The next step is...

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

The price of SAP Signavio Process Manager was quite high but could be afforded by an organization with a sensitive data scale.

See all answers

Comparisons

ARIS BPA vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 13% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Visio vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Bizagi vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

BIC Platform vs iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More iGrafx Process360 Live Platform Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 34% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 9% of the time

Visio vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

January 2026

Download iGrafx Process360 Live Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2026

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Signavio Process Editor

Overview

The iGrafx Process360 Live Platform is a comprehensive software platform tailored for organizations undergoing digital transformation. Its core functionalities include process mining, process design, simulation, predictive analytics, and AI-based automation. By leveraging these tools, businesses can gain valuable insights into their processes, streamline design and optimization efforts, and harness automation for enhanced efficiency. Whether analyzing existing processes, visually modeling workflows, simulating potential changes, or employing predictive analytics, Process360 Live facilitates a seamless journey towards process intelligence and management, pivotal for modern businesses aiming for operational excellence.

iGrafx

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

SAP

Sample Customers

Multinational Bank

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

December 2025

Free Report: SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Signavio Process Manager vs. iGrafx Process360 Live Platform report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors and best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.