N2W vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

N2WS and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. N2WS is ranked #8 with an average rating of 9.9, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 9.0. N2WS holds a 0.7% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of N2WS users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

N2W

Read 20 N2W reviews

2,247 Views
1,213 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Data Protector

Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews

2,912 Views
2,650 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

N2W

OpenText Data Protector

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 16, 2025

OpenText Data Protector and N2W compete in data protection solutions. N2W seems to have the upper hand in AWS environments due to its simplicity and optimization tools, while OpenText Data Protector is favored for its robust integration capabilities.

Features: OpenText Data Protector is robust in system integration, supporting environments like SAP, Oracle, VMware, and Hyper-V, offering advanced deduplication. It integrates seamlessly with a variety of applications. N2W is noted for its simplicity, policy-based automation, cross-region disaster recovery, and cost optimization tools such as tiering snapshots.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could improve its graphical interface, support framework, and backup scheduling. It faces criticisms for complexity and an outdated interface. N2W could enhance disaster recovery options, provide better integration in multicloud environments, and improve manual backup retention and onboarding processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector focuses on on-premises deployment, suitable for enterprises with such infrastructure, although customer service receives mixed reviews. N2W, optimized for public cloud deployment, receives praise for its straightforward customer service, especially in AWS environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector has higher pricing with a complex licensing model, less ideal for small to medium businesses. High ROI comes from its extensive integration and reliability. N2W offers a flexible pricing model, cost-effective for the SMB market with positive ROI, aided by efficient snapshot management and clear AWS Marketplace pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

N2W

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

8th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Backup (6th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (7th)

OpenText Data Protector

Ranking in Backup and Recovery

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

102

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of N2W is 0.7%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Backup and Recovery Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
N2W	0.7%
OpenText Data Protector	1.0%
Other	98.3%

Backup and Recovery

Featured Reviews

reviewer2757345

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automation has transformed our backup process and validated our disaster recovery strategy

While the product is excellent, there are a couple of areas for potential improvement. The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update. It would be extremely useful to have the ability to set a retention period on manual backups. Occasionally, we take a manual snapshot before a major deployment, and currently, these can be forgotten, leading to unnecessary storage costs. Adding an 'auto-delete after X days' option to manual backups, similar to scheduled policies, would be a fantastic addition for cost management and general housekeeping. The EKS backup module should be a great feature, and it would have been a useful functionality to have for cluster backup management.

Read full review

reviewer1751496

Project Manager and Technical Consultant at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides effective backup for physical servers and needs improvements for cloud compatibility

We use OpenText Data Protector for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers. It is effective for direct backups to EMC library or storage without using a repository. However,…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A recovery process that had previously taken a team of engineers the better part of a day was successfully completed in under an hour."

"N2WS is a powerful solution with a rich set of features designed to address even the most complex backup and disaster recovery requirements."

"N2W has significantly improved our operational efficiency and our confidence in our business continuity plan."

"The product is successful with the SMB market."

"N2WS is a perfect backup solution for AWS EC2 instances and VPC backups, and it has made our backup process and monitoring simple and effective."

"We had a ransomware event in 2023, and we were able to recover every machine with minimal effort."

"The ability to recover instances or volumes within minutes has improved our RTOs dramatically."

More N2W pros

"The most valuable feature is the capability to back up our SQL server."

"It's a good product that's pretty easy to use."

"The solution is easy to use."

"This solution is quite stable because we have only three users."

"I like that Micro Focus keeps a separate catalog of our data."

"OpenText Data Protector is good for physical backup, specifically for physical servers."

"Backup of SAP/Oracle -- they are more robust than the competition."

"In one of the projects involving a database and UCMDB integration, we needed to manage a large database. We used the scheduling feature in Data Protector to automate backups."

More OpenText Data Protector pros

Cons

"The reporting engine could be easier to use, but it does a good enough job for what is needed."

"The process for version upgrades, which sometimes requires deploying a new instance, could be streamlined to allow for a more seamless in-place update."

"I would like to see native support for more AWS services beyond EC2 and EBS, such as full coverage of RDS, DynamoDB, and Redshift."

"They could expand their offering to include Lambda function backups and other native AWS services, as these can be recreated through CloudFormation or Terraform."

"More documentation would be helpful, especially some step-by-step documents for recovery scenarios."

"It could be improved to include disaster recovery in cross accounts for Azure in upcoming releases."

"The UI is a little dated and hard to use. Some of the buttons are a bit small. You have to go into the menu to get the settings you want."

"One area where we would appreciate improvement is support for additional AWS native services, such as Lambda function backups and S3 beyond archive."

More N2W cons

"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."

"The technical support was very slow."

"This solution is not scalable."

"OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup."

"The challenge is that we can't restore a single file from the VM in the data process when we do VM backups. But with Commvault, you can restore a single file even if you have a VM snapshot package. That's one drawback of this tool. When we do VM backups, it should help us browse the VMs to restore a single file instead of doing the complete VM restore."

"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."

"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."

"The new backup systems are using new mechanisms for the recovery phases; for example, VM, recovery and testing the backup before recovering it. These features are not available in Data Protector."

More OpenText Data Protector cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The purchasing process through the AWS Marketplace is easy. Just click the button."

"AWS adds more features and offer things for free, or cheaply. Therefore, we will be evaluating AWS Data Lifecycle Manager, because it will probably do backups. Thus, make sure the product that you are using is competitive or adds more value than AWS."

"It's very economical and worth the cost."

"The pricing and licensing on AWS is fine, because you can do it for smaller tiers depending on your number of instances, so it's not that scary."

"It has very good pricing per instance and comes with three options, for both small and large environments, to fit your needs."

"The price is not cheap, nor is it costly."

"The solution requires paying for a license."

"The pricing is acceptable for enterprise level companies, but it's not acceptable for small- and medium-sized businesses. Micro Focus Data Protector is not an enterprise level solution, and it should cover small- and medium-sized businesses with acceptable prices."

"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."

"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."

"Our licensing is on a capacity basis."

"It is fast, reliable, and its licensing policy is great."

"The pricing is neither too expensive nor very cheap."

"The pricing is around $3,000 to $5,000. The charge additionally for support and to scale."

More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

University

Comms Service Provider

Government

Marketing Services Firm

13%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	28
Midsize Enterprise	22
Large Enterprise	61

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is smooth, as I have not faced any issues while spinning up the instance from the marketplace, and the documentation is very comprehensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with N2WS Backup & Recovery?

The EKS environment solution could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for N2WS Backup & Recovery?

Backup and snapshots. Before implementing a dedicated cloud-native solution, our primary pain point was the fragmented and manual nature of our data protection strategy. We were relying on a patchw...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?

The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?

OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Data Protector?

We use OpenText Data Protector ( /products/opentext-data-protector-reviews ) for Oracle database backup and some applications that run for database security.

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Backup vs N2W

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Backup vs N2W

Compared 9% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs N2W

Compared 8% of the time

Clumio vs N2W

Compared 7% of the time

Rocket Servergraph vs N2W

Compared 3% of the time

More N2W Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 15% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 6% of the time

Symantec Data Loss Prevention vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 5% of the time

Dell Avamar vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 4% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs OpenText Data Protector

Compared 3% of the time

More OpenText Data Protector Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

N2W

January 2026

Download N2W product report

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Data Protector

January 2026

Download OpenText Data Protector product report

Also Known As

N2WS Backup & Recovery, N2WS Cloud Protection Manager, N2W Backup & Recovery for AWS Free Trial/BYOL

Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector

Interactive Demo

N2WS

Demo not available

OpenText

Overview

N2W offers a cloud-native backup and recovery platform tailored for AWS and Azure environments, delivering secure and rapid data protection.

N2W enables IT teams to effortlessly manage backup and restore processes within AWS and Azure environments. By leveraging policy-based management, users gain full control over rapid, secure recovery across regions and accounts. Designed to scale with workloads of any size, N2W ensures business continuity through features like immutable ransomware-protected backups and smart data lifecycle management. Hosted directly in the cloud account, it simplifies the protection and recovery of mission-critical applications.

What are N2W's key features?

Immutable Backups: Protects against ransomware with unchangeable data versions
Fast Recovery: Ensures rapid data restoration within seconds
Policy-Based Management: Automates backup processes for efficiency
Cost Savings: Optimizes storage with smart data lifecycle management
Granular Reporting: Offers detailed compliance-ready audit trails
Seamless Archival: Supports low-cost storage integration including Wasabi

What benefits should users consider?

Ease of Use: Simple management for quick data recovery
Automation: Reduces manual intervention with automated policies
Cost Optimization: Manages storage efficiently to save costs
Business Continuity: Ensures resilience with flexible scheduling

Organizations across sectors use N2W for automated backup and disaster recovery of AWS resources like EC2 instances and RDS databases. It's employed to manage schedules, streamline backups in production settings, and rely on S3 for storage, providing a robust data protection approach.

N2WS

OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.

OpenText

Sample Customers

Deloitte, NASA, Johnson & Johnson, Dyson, Deuthsche Bahn, Skechers, Allan Gray, Hewlett Packard, St. John's University, City of Oakland

GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company

Buyer's Guide

N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

February 2026

Free Report: N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector

Find out what your peers are saying about N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our N2W vs. OpenText Data Protector report.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.