No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Nexthink vs TeamViewer ONE comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nexthink
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TeamViewer ONE
Ranking in Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
12th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.4
Number of Reviews
34
Ranking in other categories
Remote Access (21st), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (9th), Patch Management (18th), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) category, the mindshare of Nexthink is 13.1%, down from 23.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TeamViewer ONE is 0.6%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Nexthink13.1%
TeamViewer ONE0.6%
Other86.3%
Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM)
 

Featured Reviews

PS
Assistant consultant at TCS
Proactive analytics have improved device performance and optimized disk space and support workflows
Nexthink offers many features, with the best being Flow, which encompasses almost everything. We have Nexthink Workspace and Spark, allowing integration with Teams so users can find solutions without going to the service desk, rectifying issues in chat. Nexthink Infinity has brought a lot of benefits to us. There has been a very good change from integration. Integrating ServiceNow with Nexthink automates problem ticket and incident generation, enabling the team to proactively know the kinds of problem statements we are receiving. For the integration with Teams, we have not completed it yet, but we are in the planning phase, and once done, we will observe the results. Nexthink has the capability of integrating with most third-party applications, which is a great feature. With the remediation actions we have in Nexthink, it has provided great self-heal capabilities along with proactiveness. By looking at the dashboards and identifying problem statements, we can share this information with the end-user computing teams to fix issues. Nexthink has significantly helped us enhance our DEX score from 74 to 80. When I talk about features that led to the improvement of our score from 74 to 80, there were earlier issues with device performance and reliability not being addressed. Noting these, we identified devices lacking free disk space and low RAM capacity contributing to high memory usage or excessive CPU usage. Disabling unnecessary startup applications brought us to a new DEX score of almost 80.
Nitesh Ranjan - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Software Engineer at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees
Remote sessions have become smoother and now resolve end user issues more comfortably
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to continue with the voice or not would be helpful when accessing a remote session. The audio system could be improved because sometimes we are not aware that we need to unmute the team while taking a remote session. The end user can hear us talking with colleagues, and we sometimes forget that we have unmuted while taking a remote session. If a pop-up appears when we take a remote session with the end user asking us to unmute ourselves, that would be better for us to proceed. When the pop-up appears, we can directly mute ourselves, and the end user will not be able to hear the background noise from the office. Since many colleagues are taking remote sessions and talking to end users simultaneously, there is often significant background noise. Having this pop-up appear when accessing a remote session with the end user would be a helpful update.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Although limited to 100,000,000 events per engine, it is suffice to do investigations for more than 30 days."
"I have seen a return on investment with Nexthink with 10,000 tickets avoided in six months, and it has proven to be time-saving and money-saving while reducing employee hassle since we invested in Nexthink."
"The solution's most valuable features are its cloud capabilities, particularly the dashboards and metrics."
"Nexthink has helped out organizations by reducing the number of level one incidents, which has been the most beneficial outcome because we have been more proactive, contacting users and solving issues before they reach the help desk and identifying major issues before they happen."
"With this solution we are able to link issues to automatic actions that will solve the problem."
"Nexthink is a complete package where you can dive deep into how applications and IT infrastructure are working."
"Number of service incidents dropped by more than 20%."
"I like everything about this product."
"It is a scalable solution...The initial setup of TeamViewer Remote Management was very simple."
"The most valuable feature is the remote management capabilities."
"The product is very stable."
"The user interface is fine."
"All the features of TeamViewer Remote Management are very good from my perspective."
"There are some great features."
"The stability seems to be pretty good so far."
"It's easy to use and maintain."
 

Cons

"I would rate Nexthink an eight out of ten because it is truly helpful, and not higher because it needs some improvement in the integration with our products that would benefit me in my work."
"I find the reporting and analytics capabilities in Nexthink not really detailed, but they provide what is actually required."
"There are many limitations. If I'm using a Windows 10 system and Windows has certain restrictions, Nexthink won't be able to penetrate into the Windows OS due to those restrictions."
"Nexthink can improve by incorporating multiple tools."
"Customer support is okay; it is fine and I do not face many challenges with the support, as it is good."
"Customer support for Nexthink is a pain point due to unclear SLAs and requests for logs that are not needed. We have checked things from our end, but sometimes simple solutions are made overly complex."
"Nexthink still has more capabilities, and we are still struggling with new use cases because sometimes out-of-box solutions are not optimized according to our needs."
"The solution could use better automation and less coding."
"The price for the license could be improved, as well as the setup could be easier."
"There could be stable connectivity for the product’s current technology."
"The licensing model is restrictive. Even if you have a license, it's hard to use it."
"It could be more secure."
"The price point would probably be an area of improvement with the number of competitors out there offering similar features. TeamViewer usually comes in a little high as compared to other solutions."
"There are some challenges with compatibility."
"Maybe TeamViewer could be improved with more scalability."
"VPN connection is an area with shortcomings that need improvement in the solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the tool's pricing a nine out of ten. The tool's pricing model is pay-as-you-use."
"Nexthink can pay for itself quickly if you identify and complete the most valuable use cases. The tool can do so much that to purely compare the price in a static way to other tools in your arsenal would be a mistake. If you do a more dynamic comparison that’s based on the overall functionality and use cases possible then it comes out cheaper. You need to consider it a relative measurement against potential use cases, size of the organization, maturity of organization, etc."
"With this implementation of the Act and Engage module, I believe that there is a one-time fee for a two-month period, which is for the support team to make additional customizations."
"I have seen it help improve the user experience scores. This helped clients to save costs on another tool that they were trying to deploy in order to improve the user experience by just deploying some scripts. We were able to identify the issues and help them remediate those using our help. The process does not take much time and it provided background on end user performance. Therefore, they were able to save a lot, e.g., for approximately 50,000 endpoints at two dollars per machine per year, that is about $100,000 in savings."
"There are certain layers when it comes to pricing. The product has three layers and these layers are associated with certain sources. For example, the top layer have the premium services and the bottom layer has the basic services."
"Addition services could be lower priced."
"My company needs to pay towards the solution's annual licensing subscription costs. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard license fees of the product."
"Its price is a little high as compared to other solutions."
"The solution's license is expensive."
"It is a licensed product."
"The solution relies on cloud-based infrastructure so the price is tailored to each individual model used"
"There are no charges to be paid for the solution since I use it for personal use."
"We pay a yearly licensing fee."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) solutions are best for your needs.
913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
14%
Healthcare Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Outsourcing Company
16%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business5
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise47
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business19
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nexthink?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that it was very easy. It was the best option when it comes to costing.
What needs improvement with Nexthink?
Nexthink is a perfect application for now. It appears to be working very well. No improvements are needed for now. I am also learning how to use more features and what I can do with them, as there ...
What is your primary use case for Nexthink?
My main use case for Nexthink is reinstalling SCCM when Software Center is not working. I can obtain insights into network-related issues or crashes that occur when applications are not functioning...
What advice do you have for others considering TeamViewer Remote Management?
Regarding pricing, since the licenses are purchased by the organization, I am not aware of the pricing details. However, the setup is easy and friendly to use. My overall rating for this product is...
What needs improvement with TeamViewer Remote Management?
One feedback I have is regarding the voice feature. Whenever we take a remote session, the voice gets enabled automatically, and we have to mute it from our side. A pop-up asking whether we want to...
What is your primary use case for TeamViewer Remote Management?
I use TeamViewer Remote Management primarily for remote session purposes in my previous and current organization.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
TeamViewer IoT
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

https://www.nexthink.com/custo...
Carey Paul Honda
Find out what your peers are saying about Nexthink vs. TeamViewer ONE and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.