NinjaOne vs Windows Autopilot comparison

NinjaOne and Microsoft are both solutions in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) category. NinjaOne is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.4, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. NinjaOne holds a 7.2% mindshare in MDM, compared to Microsoft’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of NinjaOne users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

NinjaOne

Read 21 NinjaOne reviews

7,114 Views
285 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Windows Autopilot

Read 7 Windows Autopilot reviews

681 Views
681 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

NinjaOne

Windows Autopilot

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Aug 13, 2024

NinjaOne and Windows Autopilot compete in the IT management tools category. Windows Autopilot has the upper hand in advanced setup capabilities and integration with Microsoft services.

Features: NinjaOne offers comprehensive remote monitoring and management, integration with various IT tools, and ease of deployment. Windows Autopilot stands out with sophisticated device provisioning, seamless Microsoft ecosystem integration, and advanced setup capabilities.

Room for Improvement: NinjaOne needs better reporting customization, third-party integration, and increased integration flexibility. Windows Autopilot requires improved documentation, more intuitive initial setup, and simplified setup processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: NinjaOne has a straightforward deployment process and prompt, helpful customer service. Windows Autopilot, though powerful, can be complex initially but provides extensive resources and support once set up.

Pricing and ROI: NinjaOne is cost-effective with good ROI through its comprehensive features and affordable setup. Windows Autopilot, while more expensive, justifies its cost with feature depth and Microsoft service integration, providing strong ROI for enterprises heavily invested in Microsoft.

To learn more, read our detailed NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

NinjaOne

Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (24th), Server Monitoring (6th), IT Service Management (ITSM) (8th), Remote Access (14th), Vulnerability Management (26th), IT Alerting and Incident Management (9th), Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) (1st), Patch Management (7th), MSP Backup (2nd), Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) (6th)

Windows Autopilot

Ranking in Mobile Device Management (MDM)

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Mobile Device Management (MDM) category, the mindshare of NinjaOne is 7.2%, up from 3.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Windows Autopilot is 5.7%, up from 5.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile Device Management (MDM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Windows Autopilot	5.7%
NinjaOne	7.2%
Other	87.1%

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

Featured Reviews

Not Joseph Pearson

Assistant Vice President, Tech Solutions at LPL Financials

Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support

NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.

Read full review

ShubhamAgarwal

Senior CyberSecurity Specialist at LTIMindtree

Streamlined endpoint deployment has improved configuration and security workflows

It's a great tool that provides a lot of assistance from the Windows perspective with configuration and many other things. The newest feature that came up with AI is particularly valuable. I haven't used much of Windows Autopilot as it's very new to me. It's a cloud-based technology from Microsoft for performing the setup and pre-configuration of Windows devices. The way it assists in automated setup and streamlined deployment is great. I don't see any cons as of now.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"A significant feature of NinjaOne is its remote access capability, which is essential for my clients’ home office usage."

"The best feature of NinjaOne is the SLA system. Every IT person can check their performance, how long it takes to resolve an issue, and how many SLAs are breached."

"The software's automation tools have solved critical deployment problems for small businesses."

"The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands."

"The policies are probably the most valuable features. They're similar in function to Microsoft group policies where we can have it monitor certain things or push out software on a schedule. I would rate the policies eight out of 10. They're robust, I could monitor most of the things that Windows Performance Monitoring keeps tabs on."

"NinjaOne helps us view the status of software patching, whether the PC is locked or unlocked."

"It just works as advertised and serves the purpose for which we got it."

"The most valuable feature we have found currently is probably patch management."

More NinjaOne pros

"The way Windows Autopilot assists in automated setup and streamlined deployment is great."

"Windows Autopilot's most valuable features are its automatic enrollment functionality and ability to detect and configure new devices seamlessly."

"Its most valuable feature is imaging, it takes very less time for processing."

"Windows Autopilot automates much of the setup process when delivering computers with a specific image to multiple employees simultaneously. It streamlines the configuration loading process, making it more unattended and yielding consistent results. This eliminates the need for an engineer to input data on each machine manually."

"The most effective feature of Windows Autopilot for managing deployments is the automation."

"Windows Autopilot is very stable."

"The most valuable aspect of Windows Autopilot is its automation features, which allow preset regulations and configurations."

"The solution is very stable."

More Windows Autopilot pros

Cons

"The inclusion of XENServer and Proxmox as virtual platforms in NinjaOne is currently missing."

"The NinjaOne distribution server is highly dependent on an active directory."

"Maximizing the screen during an SSH connection is not possible, which hampers usability on Linux servers."

"The inclusion of XENServer and Proxmox as virtual platforms in NinjaOne is currently missing."

"I wish that they integrated it with more antivirus solutions. Currently, they only push Defender, but it doesn't really have integration with SentinelOne. It also didn't integrate with Trend Micro, which we were using previously. I would also like to have more control from the mobile app. As of now, I am able to see some performance values, but I can't see, for example, disk activity or disk performance values. If they can improve their app a little bit, it would help greatly. They can also improve the tech interface. If I assign certain techs to a bunch of specific machines, they only get those alerts that they're assigned to."

"NinjaOne's reporting module is cumbersome."

"I would like to see more scripts for PowerShell commands."

"The solution could improve by optimizing the internet connection being used."

More NinjaOne cons

"They could provide an executable and user-friendly wizard for installation and automatic removal, making it easier for users."

"We encounter issues with re-registering devices in the Azure domain."

"The Azure and Intune platform is not always available and quite often, there are service outages."

"Windows Autopilot could improve its user interface. While it is a good tool, there are other options available that are more user-friendly."

"The Azure and Intune platform is not always available and quite often, there are service outages."

"If Microsoft can automatically add the license serial numbers, or have a method for us to get those serial numbers added to Windows Autopilot, apart from having to go through the device manufacturer that would greatly improve the solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We got a pretty good deal. It was fairly affordable."

"NinjaRMM uses a subscription model."

"The product's pricing depends on the number of PCs or devices."

"We currently pay $1.20 per device on a monthly basis."

"Its pricing is great."

"NinjaOne is a little expensive but is still cheaper than competitors like Acronis or Veeam."

"I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive."

"The pricing is reasonable and cheaper than ConnectWise."

More NinjaOne pricing and cost advice

"We are required to have a license for either EMS, E5, or E2."

"As far as I know, there isn't an additional cost specifically for Windows Autopilot itself. You'll need to consider the licensing fees for the software you install on the machines, such as Windows and Office. Overall, it is a valuable tool that simplifies the deployment process, making life easier for those involved."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile Device Management (MDM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Performing Arts

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	17
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NinjaOne?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for NinjaOne is fairly cheap and easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with NinjaOne?

One challenge I face with NinjaOne is that when remoting in, sometimes the end user has a resolution with very tiny text, making it necessary to zoom in to see what the other computer is displaying...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for NinjaOne?

My main use case for NinjaOne is ticketing. I use NinjaOne for ticketing in my daily work to keep track of all the computers and their uptime, and to generate tickets if there are any alerts.

See all answers

What do you like most about Windows Autopilot?

Windows Autopilot's most valuable features are its automatic enrollment functionality and ability to detect and configure new devices seamlessly.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Windows Autopilot?

For smaller organizations, they can get it, though it would be a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Windows Autopilot?

I think they can improve the time it takes to provide the exact solution which will assist in rectifying a particular issue. Maybe they could support other devices other than Windows, such as Mac a...

See all answers

Comparisons

Kaseya VSA vs NinjaOne

Compared 7% of the time

Datto Remote Monitoring and Management vs NinjaOne

Compared 6% of the time

Tanium vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

N-able N-central vs NinjaOne

Compared 5% of the time

Microsoft Intune vs NinjaOne

Compared 4% of the time

More NinjaOne Competitors

Jamf Pro vs Windows Autopilot

Compared 31% of the time

KACE Cloud vs Windows Autopilot

Compared 23% of the time

Microsoft 365 Business vs Windows Autopilot

Compared 17% of the time

Jamf School vs Windows Autopilot

Compared 13% of the time

More Windows Autopilot Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne

January 2026

Download NinjaOne product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile Device Management (MDM)

December 2025

Download Windows Autopilot product report

Overview

NinjaOne provides comprehensive remote monitoring, troubleshooting, and automation via a user-friendly web interface. With a robust mobile app and integration capabilities, it appeals to small businesses seeking cost-effective management solutions.

NinjaOne is designed to streamline IT operations through its remote monitoring, patch management, and automation capabilities. Its integration with Bitdefender and ongoing feature enhancements are valuable, although users express a desire for more third-party compatibility and smoother deployment processes. The platform's SLA system enhances performance tracking, while its continual development is a key attraction. Despite some calls for a more intuitive graphical interface and advanced reporting features, it remains an asset for managed service providers and businesses adapting to cloud-based environments.

What are the most important features?

Remote Monitoring: Essential for real-time insights into network and device performance.
Automation: Reduces manual tasks, increasing efficiency in IT management.
Patch Management: Timely updates for software and system security.
Mobile App: Ensures alerts and management capabilities on the go.
Third-Party Integrations: Enhances functionality by working with tools like Bitdefender.

What benefits can users expect?

Cost-Effectiveness: Appeals to small companies seeking budget-friendly IT solutions.
Performance Tracking: Improved SLA system aids in efficient performance monitoring.
Enhanced Management: Effective use of scripts and policies streamline operations.
Client Interaction: Better remote session management and asset control.

NinjaOne is widely employed across different sectors for server and workstation management, network infrastructure oversight, and client computer support. With its cloud-based framework, it supports managed service providers and businesses shifting to the cloud, ensuring seamless software deployment and improved asset management, making it integral to modern IT environments.

NinjaOne

Windows Autopilot is a collection of technologies used to set up and pre-configure new devices, getting them ready for productive use. You can also use Windows Autopilot to reset, repurpose and recover devices. This solution enables an IT department to achieve the above with little to no infrastructure to manage, with a process that's easy and simple.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Status Pros, Mitchell and Company

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot

December 2025

Free Report: NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot

Find out what your peers are saying about NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our NinjaOne vs. Windows Autopilot report.

See our list of best Mobile Device Management (MDM) vendors.

We monitor all Mobile Device Management (MDM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.