OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs SmartBear TestComplete comparison

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. SmartBear TestComplete

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Functional Testing...

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

18th

Average Rating

7.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Mobile App Testing Tools (6th)

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (5th), Test Automation Tools (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is 2.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 5.0%, up from 4.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SmartBear TestComplete	5.0%
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web	2.0%
Other	93.0%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2356440

Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Experienced ease in automation with strong support while seeking improvements in low-code options

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers flexibility of deployment, from on-premises to UFT One which is on the cloud. They provide capability for immediate deployment, and assets can be migrated easily. They include enablers specifically for quick migration of test assets. While I have not personally been involved in these migrations, I have observed some clients using it directly while others make a complete shift from OpenText to Tricentis platforms. There have not been many clients moving from OpenText platforms from on-premises to cloud because most shifts have been toward different product categories such as Tricentis altogether.

Read full review

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"This helped my prior organization immensely due to the ability to remotely manipulate devices, even by offshore vendors."

"ROI is definitely present with OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web; these are very capable tools, and there is no reason ROI should be a challenge."

"The main benefit is that you can get a very quick idea regarding the performance of your application, and it also helps you discover hidden pain points that you would not have found without using this tool."

"They've all been really satisfied with the scalability of the HPE products."

"The pricing is great."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"The product is easy to use."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web pros

"The solution is great as a record and playback tool, and it also has valuable regression testing."

"TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good."

"Using TestComplete, the application tests are executed at night unmanned, so that test engineers can focus on developing new tests instead of executing existing tests."

"This tool is very easy to use and very powerful."

"Test automation with TestComplete significantly (estimated 80%) reduced the regression timeline for a complex AUT with a large number of test cases."

"The reporting is ready to use and doesn't require any setup."

"In TestComplete, I saw a conformed package of a tool that kept everybody in consistency. The team was able to regenerate further tests without having to manipulate more code because the record feature is great."

"Complete works perfectly with CUTE."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

Cons

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"However, it is still a young product that is improving leaps and bounds each release."

"I think the interface is not very good and I have used other solutions that are easier to learn."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"It's very new to HP. They need to go beyond the HP world."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"With versions prior to 2.0 I found that configuration was trickier than it should be, particularly with aspects such as NV."

"It's complex, and you need more skills than in most implementations."

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web cons

"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."

"One notable drawback is the absence of native integration with Git."

"I can sense there's still a little bit more room for improvement in terms of making the whole testing process easier."

"The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing."

"Occasionally, image comparison results in failures, possibly due to issues with resolution or font size on the server side, which can be challenging to identify."

"The code editor, though following eclipse-style, is still a work in progress and gives a very poorly formatted code once viewed via other editing tools."

"We did not maximize our ROI until we put somebody full-time on our TestComplete endeavours. The tool does have a learning curve, and it wasn't until we had an in-house expert on it that we began to see the benefits of automated testing over traditional QA roles."

"The solution doesn't have a very flexible pricing model."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"The solution's pricing is too high."

"The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP."

"My advice so far, is that while it’s not quite as powerful and easy to use as UFT, its price tag more than makes up for it."

"TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module."

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

"The solution is around $1500. Some are perpetual licenses, and some get a yearly report card."

"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	13

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	32

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Digital Lab is a pretty solid product with areas that could be continuously improved on.

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I deal with OpenText Analysis Database and Core Performance Engineering, which are categories of software rather than individual pieces. We focus on the ADM area, which includes ALM, UFT One, UFT D...

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

I do have experience with OpenText products and OpenText ALM. I have been using ALM Quality Center, which has had a few names for it over time, but it is the old Quality Center that was then rename...

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I am not involved in pricing or licensing; our management team handles these aspects.

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

While using SmartBear TestComplete, we are fine with the current capabilities, however, it would be beneficial to improve some performance aspects, especially the image comparison feature. Occasion...

Perfecto vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 6% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 18% of the time

Eggplant Test vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 9% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 7% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Product Reports

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web

Download OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web product report

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web report

SmartBear TestComplete

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.

What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?

Ease of Use: Intuitive interface facilitating user engagement.
Integration: Compatible with HPE and non-HPE tools for improved workflow.
Real Device Testing: Ensures testing on actual devices for accurate results.
Automation: Advanced capabilities streamline repetitive testing.
Device Management: Flexible management of decentralized devices.
Multi-Platform Support: Simultaneous testing across various platforms.
Traceability: Strong application delivery traceability for robust tracking.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Scalability: Ability to handle multiple devices and scale as needed.
Flexibility: Deployment options include both on-premises and cloud-based solutions.
Real-Time Analytics: Provides actionable insights for data-driven decisions.
Enhanced Performance: Optimizes the software development lifecycle.
Comprehensive Testing: Facilitates thorough functional and performance testing.

Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.

OpenText

SmartBear TestComplete offers automation testing across desktop, web, and mobile platforms with robust object identification and cross-browser compatibility. It features seamless integration with CI tools and supports diverse tech stacks, enhancing efficiency through modular testing and data-driven capabilities.

SmartBear TestComplete is known for its Object Browser and Object Spy, providing deep inspection and interaction within applications. It supports third-party tool integration, particularly CI platforms, enhancing testing consistency through name mapping and modular testing. Despite its high pricing and need for enhancement in COM and ActiveX support and mobile testing, it offers record-and-playback features, self-healing capabilities, and cross-browser compatibility, making it a choice for regression and automation. Users leverage it for testing in environments including Windows, with exploration into a Flutter-based mobile context. Improvements are desired in object mapping, headless testing, and programming language support, while challenges exist in UI usability and virtual machine licensing.

What are the key features of SmartBear TestComplete?

Object Browser and Object Spy: Provides deep inspection and interaction capabilities within applications.
Integration Support: Seamlessly works with third-party tools and CI platforms.
Record-and-Playback: Simplifies test creation and execution.
Data-Driven Testing: Enhances testing processes by using varied data inputs.
Self-Healing: Offers resilience in automated tests upon changes.
Cross-Browser Compatibility: Supports testing across different browsers effectively.

What benefits do users highlight in reviews?

Efficiency: Streamlines testing processes and reduces manual effort.
Consistency: Promotes uniform testing practices through modular approaches.
Diverse Tech Stack Support: Accommodates a wide range of programming languages.
CI/CD Pipeline Compatibility: Enhances integration and testing in CI/CD workflows.

SmartBear TestComplete is implemented in industries requiring comprehensive testing solutions, including those performing regression and functionality testing across platforms. Its integration and behavior automation support CI/CD pipelines, while desktop, web, and mobile applications are tested for UI automation and backend database functionality, showing its adaptability to industry-specific needs.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs. SmartBear TestComplete