Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

Palo Alto Networks and Zscaler are both solutions in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0, while Zscaler is ranked #6 with an average rating of 8.5. Palo Alto Networks holds a 2.1% mindshare in DLP, compared to Zscaler’s 4.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Read 7 Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention reviews

2,019 Views
2,019 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 66 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

13,353 Views
3,338 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform are competing products in the cybersecurity domain. Zscaler holds an advantage with its broad feature set and cloud-native architecture, making it a compelling choice.

Features: Palo Alto Networks offers automated data classification, advanced analytics, and data protection mechanisms designed for enterprises. Zscaler impresses with its cloud-native architecture, seamless integration of zero-trust principles, and comprehensive security across distributed environments. Its ability to enhance overall security posture sets it apart.

Room for Improvement: Palo Alto Networks could benefit from enhancing its scalability in cloud environments, offering more extensive cloud integration, and broadening its feature set to cover wider strategic security improvements. Zscaler might improve with more competitive pricing, reducing initial setup costs, and streamlining feature customization for diverse enterprise needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Palo Alto Networks provides a straightforward deployment process with responsive support, ideal for enterprises with specific data protection needs. Zscaler supports agile and scalable deployment, reducing setup complexities and ensuring rapid integration into cloud environments. Its ability to scale effortlessly highlights its strength compared to Palo Alto’s focused deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Palo Alto Networks offers a competitive pricing structure with significant ROI for data protection priorities. Though Zscaler might have higher initial costs, it justifies this with comprehensive security capabilities and strategic protection, leading to enhanced long-term ROI through its extensive features.

To learn more, read our detailed Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks Enterpri...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Ranking in Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

6th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (9th), Application Control (6th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (4th), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Data Loss Prevention (DLP) category, the mindshare of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is 4.4%, down from 6.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	4.4%
Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention	2.1%
Other	93.5%

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

Featured Reviews

Jamie A Larkin

Senior Solutions Specials at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Comprehensive security solution enhances data classification and protection

The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox. Compared to competitors, these are often additional add-ons, whereas Palo Alto Networks provides a complete solution. The artificial intelligence integration in the product also helps immensely by classifying data, identifying data, and monitoring user access and behavior, thus improving data security strategies.

Read full review

Zaheer_Khan

Cybersecurity Senior Program Manager at Dayforce

Secure access has improved remote work and has reduced vulnerabilities across our workforce

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform probably needs to be more efficient because scanning takes a lot of time. Some vulnerabilities create issues, and when we wanted to identify the source of the vulnerabilities, specifically focusing on mobile ID and related areas, it was unable to provide assistance. However, according to discussions with Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, they said that by the end of mid-2026, they are exploring these features, and probably those features can be incorporated or embedded into this particular system. That is the only major negative point.In terms of responses, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform is good. In terms of controlling vulnerability, it is good. The only cons I have noticed is that it is a bit slower, and sometimes it is unable to identify the source. These are the key areas for improvement.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature of Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is its comprehensive end-to-end solution in Cloud Delivery Security Services, which includes URL, data loss prevention, and advanced threat prevention as features that can be enabled just by clicking a checkbox."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"Our clients primarily deploy Palo Alto Networks Enterprise DLP to control the flow of information in and out of their networks. The main use cases include monitoring and managing sensitive data such as credit card information and personally identifiable information."

"It is a stable solution with good support."

"Another important feature is that the solution doesn't require any additional infrastructure to implement. It's a software license that is compatible with our existing hardware. We were able to install and configure the product seamlessly and effortlessly."

"The setup is very easy as we just need to switch on and switch off."

"The primary feature is managing firewalls through Panorama, especially when handling multiple firewalls across different sites like headquarters and remote sites."

"The security aspect in finance is crucial for controlling from a DLP perspective and ensuring protection."

"The product’s most valuable features are data discovery, activity control, and zero trust exchange."

"The product’s most valuable features are inbound and outbound scanning and API control."

"The agent's versatility is notable, used for digital experience monitoring to collect valuable endpoint metrics for troubleshooting."

"The most valuable features are the File Type Control and SSL bypass policies. We"

"It has some good data security and WIP features, providing secure Internet access."

"Sandboxing, DLP, and SSL inspection engine are the most valuable features of Zscaler SASE."

"What I find most valuable in Zscaler Private Access is that it's a VPN. Its connectivity as a VPN is its most valuable feature."

"The scalability of the solution is great."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"There are mostly performance issues."

"Pricing is expensive."

"Its scalability is not on par with the features of others."

"The configuration for Palo Alto Networks firewalls requires specifying many details, such as protocols and services."

"The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved."

"The solution needs improvement in stability. There has been feedback regarding the accuracy of file categorization."

"You need to have an external solution to backup everything. For example, you need to have Syslog installed on your server as well so that you can back it up to another place."

"There is room for improvement in the documentation around the maintenance of the product, how the automatic updates work, and pushing out new policies. A little more detail and context in that area would be helpful."

"SCMP support would be one of the biggest improvements in my opinion. More speed improvements are also required."

"There could be a feature to view the VPN tunnel activities in terms of configuration."

"Zscaler Private Access needs to improve its collaboration with applications without compromising security."

"We would like to extend the SASE applications for Zscaler."

"Having a Zscaler-specific device could streamline this process and provide a more consistent user experience across diverse branches."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP needs to improve its compatibility with other security tools."

"We faced certain migration and implementation challenges in executing the tasks, so I would suggest improvement related to the stability of the solution."

"Another area of improvement is implementation through non-client connectors. The solution can be implemented in two ways. One uses the back file; the other one uses client connectors. So the client connector is pretty fast, but when it comes to non-client connectors and procedures, it's kind of delayed and slow."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention is expensive, and licensing costs are monthly."

"It's expensive."

"The pricing of the solution depends on the buyers. But, from my point of view, it is in line with the rest of the products and the price list of Palo Alto."

"The licensing model is very fair-minded and it's a good value. It scales well... Its licensing model is more streamlined when compared to other DLP solutions."

"Zscaler SASE software is quite expensive compared to other solutions"

"In terms of market positioning, I would describe Zscaler Private Access as offering optimal pricing. Based on our experience, Cato Networks tends to be slightly more expensive."

"It's an affordable solution"

"As per industry leads, Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"The product is a little more expensive than other tools."

"The solution is expensive."

"Zscaler CASB is an expensive solution."

"It is an auto-renewal subscription service."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

13%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	12
Large Enterprise	42

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

Palo Alto Networks' pricing can be complex. Their catalog is extensive. They have a licensing model based on credits for virtual machine firewalls or containers, which simplifies the process, while...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The product is still overly complicated compared to other vendors such as Check Point, which could be improved. Simplifying the initial setup procedure could also be beneficial as it currently requ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention?

The primary use case is a part of a complete package for Government of Canada. It helps in comparing data loss prevention against Fortinet, making it a cost-effective solution. It is used in the co...

See all answers

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler SASE?

The solution needs to improve a lot of aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

Cyera vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 32% of the time

Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 14% of the time

Check Point CloudGuard Code Security vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 11% of the time

Cyberhaven vs Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention

Compared 5% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Loss Prevention (DLP)

January 2026

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention report

Download Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

January 2026

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

Cloud-Delivered Data Protection: The industry’s first cloud-delivered Enterprise DLP that consistently protects sensitive data across all networks, clouds and users.

Palo Alto Networks

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange enhances security with seamless cloud-based connectivity and VPN-less operation, offering integration with multiple identity providers and advanced security features, suitable for remote work environments.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange provides secure, adaptive connectivity without traditional VPNs, allowing organizations to replace legacy systems and bolster remote work security. The platform offers cloud-based protection, single sign-on, dynamic URL categorization, and scalable solutions. While advanced security features like DLP and threat protection enhance data protection, users may face issues with speed, connectivity, and some customization options. Integration challenges, latency due to multi-tenant hosting, reporting delays, and licensing costs require consideration. It supports secure internet access and private application security, ensuring traffic control and data compliance.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

VPN-less Connectivity: Enables secure remote access without traditional VPNs.
Cloud-based Security: Offers scalable protection utilizing cloud infrastructure.
Single Sign-On: Integrates with multiple identity providers for streamlined access.
Dynamic URL Categorization: Provides real-time URL filtering to enhance security.
Advanced Threat Protection: Detects and mitigates sophisticated threats effectively.
Customizable Policies: Allows tailored security protocols to fit unique requirements.
Comprehensive DLP: Protects sensitive data through robust data loss prevention.
Integration Capabilities: Connects seamlessly with cloud services and applications.

What are the benefits of using Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange?

Enhanced Security: Delivers consistent protection regardless of user location.
Improved Compliance: Ensures adherence to data protection regulations.
Streamlined Access: Simplifies connectivity to private and cloud applications.
Scalability: Supports expanding organizational demands with cloud scalability.
Real-time Visibility: Provides instant insights into security incidents and network traffic.

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange is deployed across industries to secure remote access and enforce zero trust principles. Organizations in finance, healthcare, and technology sectors utilize it for secure internet access and visibility into cloud applications, enhancing performance and compliance in dynamic environments.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

February 2026

Free Report: Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention vs. Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report.

See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.

We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.